The Ethereum Foundation Has Perished, Long Live a Plurality of Ethereum Organizations

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-07-10Last updated on 2026-07-10

Abstract

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has entered a period of significant upheaval, marked by major organizational restructuring and a shift towards a more decentralized leadership model. The EF's Protocol Support Team has officially disbanded, part of what is described as its largest-ever round of layoffs, cutting 20% of its staff. This follows the high-profile resignation of Executive Director Aya Wang and the departure of at least eight senior figures this year. This internal transformation coincides with the rise of new, independent non-profit organizations like Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional, founded by former EF researchers. These entities aim to take on roles in research, development, and institutional adoption that were previously associated with the EF, signaling a fragmentation of the ecosystem's central guiding body. Simultaneously, the EF's security team is evolving its approach by deploying specialized AI agents to perform red-team testing on the Ethereum network, a process that has already identified real vulnerabilities. While the EF states AI complements rather than replaces human researchers, this technological shift presents further questions about the foundation's future structure and staffing. Criticism of the EF's centralized decision-making and market influence has been growing within the community. Faced with these internal reforms, external competition, and technological changes, the article suggests the Ethereum Foundation may be transitioning from a ce...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

Last evening, the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team officially announced that the team has been formally dissolved. Previously, Wang Xiaowei, the co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, who was seen as "one of the representative figures of EF organizational reform," has also formally resigned. So far this year, at least 8 senior personnel have left the Ethereum Foundation.

On the other side of organizational and personnel changes are the encroachment and functional replacement of the Ethereum Foundation organization by non-profit independent institutions such as EthLabs and Ethereum Institutional; it is also technological progress like the recent adoption of AI agents for red-team testing of the ETH network by the Ethereum Foundation security team, which discovered real vulnerabilities.

As the ETH price faces wave after wave of industry scrutiny, what lies before the Ethereum Foundation are the more complex and diverse contradictions and tests following internal reforms. Related to this is the divisive transformation that Ethereum's leading body is now directly confronting.

The Era of Decline for the Ethereum Foundation: Rise of Contenders, Brain Drain, and the AI Shift

The Ethereum Foundation (hereinafter referred to as EF) has long been criticized for its rigid system, decision-making by a minority, organizational value, and market-influencing sell-offs. Criticisms within the Ethereum community are particularly fierce. Not long ago, Bankless founder David Hoffman even went so far as to "sell his last ETH holdings" to express his dissatisfaction with EF, calling on the Ethereum community to build the ecosystem in their own way.

Now, the formal dissolution of EF's Protocol Support Team has exposed the organization's internal conflicts and crisis of division like a thunderclap to all. It is noteworthy that this round of organizational changes is particularly different from the organizational changes initiated by Ethereum founder Vitalik last year—this is a thorough personnel purge, also seen as 'the largest round of layoffs since EF's founding,' rather than previous partial leadership changes.

When the Ethereum Ecosystem Leader Chooses to Sever Its Tail to Survive: The Whole Story of EF's Major Layoffs

Everything begins with the official announcement "New EF Structure" formally released by EF on June 23.

In this lengthy article spanning thousands of words, EF differentiated the new organizational structure into protocol layer, access layer, user layer, community layer, and institutional layer. It subsequently stated that "this organizational restructuring involves laying off 54 people, accounting for 20% of EF's members." What's even more disheartening is the beginning of the announcement: "Through this process, we have gained the structure, activities, and personnel needed to execute the critical tasks we will soon face." In other words, the laid-off personnel and departments were eliminated, unnecessary, and without value.

It must be said that EF, which has always presented itself as a research organization and ecosystem leader with a scholarly demeanor, has for the first time revealed the cold side of its organizational management.

Schematic diagram of the new EF structure

The Dissolution of EF's Protocol Support Department Marks a Key Sign of EF's Organizational Split

It's worth mentioning that the work of EF's Protocol Support department leaned towards infrastructure construction, mainly responsible for coordinating the Ethereum protocol development process, including organizing and coordinating core developer meetings, tracking Ethereum network upgrades, supporting EIP advancement, and running the Ethereum protocol. Now, its main functions have been allocated to the protocol layer part of EF.

Coincidentally, on the same day EF announced its new structure, Ethlabs, a non-profit R&D lab co-founded by five former EF researchers, was officially announced. This organization aims to advance Ethereum as a settlement layer for the global economy and has received support from a series of investment institutions, Ethereum ecosystem projects, independent individuals, and EF foundation members, including Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin (Chairman of Sharplink, founder of Consensys), ETH treasury company BitMine (Tom Lee's Ethereum treasury company), Sharplink, and crypto investment firm SNZ.

ETHLabs Community Participant List (Source: Official Account)

On July 1st, Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members David Walsh, Marius Smith, and Matthew Dawson, was officially unveiled.

This organization's main concept is "the institutional finance application plan for Ethereum," dedicated to promoting the institutionalization and institutional-grade application of Ethereum, its secondary nodes, applications, and the entire ecosystem. The organization also emphasizes collaboration with Ethlabs, Etherealize, and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, taking charge of institutional demand connection and explaining Ethereum's value proposition to banks; Ethlabs focuses on translating related demands into technical products. As a non-profit independent institution, Ethereum Institutional will provide free Ethereum application-related consulting to banks and asset management companies.

A week later, Ethereum Institutional announced the start of core team recruitment. In the coming weeks, the focus will be on hiring roles such as Institutional Business Development (Institutional GTM), Marketing & Community Operations, as well as technical positions like Solution Architect and Technical Project Lead.

Thus, the EF layoff storm officially concluded with the emergence of two major non-profit independent organizations and the dissolution of the Protocol Support department, drawing an imperfect full stop to the "internal organizational transformation" personally promoted by Vitalik last year. Beyond organizational-level fragmentation and the loss of high-level talent like Executive Director Wang Xiaowei, EF also faces the impact of AI technology.

The Era of AI Offense and Defense Begins, EF Security Team Upgrades Testing

Yesterday, researchers from the EF Protocol Security Team stated in a blog post that they have deployed a series of AI agents to test software relied upon by the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems, protocol code, and smart contracts.

The vulnerabilities discovered by the AI agents include a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub peer-to-peer layer used by Ethereum consensus clients. This issue has been fixed and disclosed on GitHub as CVE-2026-34219.

The researchers stated that the AI agents were organized into specialized roles such as reconnaissance, search, patching, and verification, used to find potential attack paths, reproduce failures, and verify their applicability to production code. EF stated that AI has not replaced security researchers but has changed the way they work, enabling the team to cover a far greater scope than manual review. However, it requires researchers to make more cautious judgments on a large number of seemingly credible conclusions.

Considering today's news of the official launch of the GPT-5.6 model, subsequent maintenance of Ethereum protocol security may be jointly handled by AI models and EF security researchers. Moreover, although EF now mentions "AI has not replaced researchers," with the continuous development and evolution of AI models, personnel within the EF security team and perhaps the entire organization may be further reduced in the future. In other words, EF will also face the test of AI models on its organizational structure and the execution of its own functions.

Summary: EF Organizational Transformation Reaches a Staged Conclusion, May Become an Ecosystem Mascot in the Future?

In January of last year, we provided a systematic analysis of EF's organizational transformation in the article "Vitalik Fires the First Shot of 'Reform,' Where is the Ethereum Foundation Headed?" Back then, Vitalik was ambitiously and forcefully pushing for EF organizational change. In May this year, after more than a year of organizational innovation, Vitalik's tune changed, stating that "the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and will shift towards a smaller, long-termism route."

It must be said that after ETH has grown into an asset with a market cap in the hundreds of billions, EF, the official ecosystem organization founded nearly a decade ago, has also entered the awkward situation of being "a large ship hard to turn." No wonder Vitalik previously even remarked—"I will no longer write regular blog posts, I have decided to try writing some science fiction on the topic of decentralized governance."

As former EF researcher and Ethlabs member Ansgar Dietrichs said on a podcast earlier this month, "After five years of failing to break through $5,000, ETH still lacks a clear value narrative."

Currently, it seems that EF is already struggling to shoulder the banner of "revitalizing the Ethereum ecosystem and driving ETH price breakthroughs." Future large-scale adoption and institutional investment may have to rely on organizations like Ethlabs, Ethereum Institutional, and Etherealize.

Perhaps, in the near future, playing the role of an "ecosystem mascot" would be more suitable for EF.

Recommended Reading

Ethereum Enters a "Mid-Life Crisis," Analyzing Development Performance from a Data Perspective

Given: ETH = Nokia, Find: Ethereum = iOS?

Ethereum Is "Sick," Are These Three Remedies Appropriate?

Where Lies the Path? A Brief Analysis of the Three Major Abstract Problems Facing the Ethereum Ecosystem Today

Enumerating the Seven Deadly Sins of Ethereum, Who Can Play Its "Salvation Oratorio"?

Where Lies the Orthodoxy of Ethereum? A Detailed Explanation of the "Cryptocurrency Masterpiece" in Vitalik's Heart

Ethereum's Tenth Anniversary: Revisiting ETH's Change of Ownership Journey, The Resurgence of Token Centralization

Are L2s a Detour for Ethereum?

Bankless Founder Liquidates ETH Holdings, Collective Disillusionment with Ethereum Faith

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the major announcement regarding the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team, and why is it significant?

AThe Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team has officially disbanded. This is significant as it represents the largest round of layoffs in the EF's history, affecting 20% of its staff, and is seen as a major indicator of the organization's internal restructuring and fragmentation.

QWhat are two new non-profit independent organizations that emerged following the Ethereum Foundation's restructuring?

ATwo new non-profit independent organizations that emerged are Ethlabs, founded by five former EF researchers, and Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members. These organizations aim to take over functions related to R&D and institutional adoption of Ethereum, respectively.

QHow is the Ethereum Foundation's security team incorporating AI technology into its work?

AThe EF's security team has deployed a series of AI agents to test Ethereum's ecosystem software. These AI agents are organized into specialized roles to find potential attack paths, identify vulnerabilities (such as the CVE-2026-34219 issue), and verify fixes. The team states AI augments rather than replaces researchers, allowing them to cover much more ground.

QAccording to the article, what is one of the major criticisms faced by the Ethereum Foundation from within the community?

AOne major criticism from within the community is directed at the EF's perceived rigid structure, decision-making by a small group, questions about its organizational value, and its market-influencing ETH sell-offs. Bankless founder David Hoffman's public criticism and divestment from ETH is cited as an example of this discontent.

QWhat future role does the article suggest might be most suitable for the Ethereum Foundation?

AThe article suggests that, given its challenges in driving large-scale adoption and ETH price growth, the Ethereum Foundation's most suitable future role might be that of an 'ecological mascot' or a symbolic figurehead, while newer organizations lead practical development and institutional outreach.

Related Reads

Bernstein Analysis: Can the $142 Billion Long-Term Order Hold Up the Memory Cycle?

Bernstein revisits long-term agreements (LTAs) in the memory industry, highlighting new contracts with purchase commitments, minimum prices, and financial guarantees signed by Micron and SanDisk. These aim to provide an earnings floor for the coming years. Micron has 16 strategic customer agreements, with 14 representing approximately $100 billion in minimum revenue and about $22 billion in cash deposits/commitments. SanDisk has contracts for around $42 billion in minimum revenue and over $11 billion in guarantees. Combined, these ~$33 billion in guarantees make it more costly for major clients to walk away. However, Bernstein models that the potential revenue needing protection over 3-5 years is around $5.2 trillion. The existing guarantees thus cover only about 0.6% of that scale. While LTAs provide a cushion, they cannot fully shield profits in a severe downturn, as clients may still find it cheaper to breach contracts if spot prices fall deeply below floor prices. LTAs are most suitable for large, credit-worthy customers like U.S. cloud service providers with stable, high-volume AI infrastructure needs. Consumer segments (phones, PCs) and some Chinese clients are less likely to adopt them, leaving an estimated 30-50% of the DRAM/NAND market exposed to spot price volatility. AI demand (e.g., HBM for training, storage for inference) supports higher valuations and makes LTAs more attractive for locking in high-demand customers. Yet, Bernstein stresses that LTAs soften, but do not eliminate, the memory cycle. Their true test will come in the next downturn, revealing whether clients honor contracts and whether guarantees provide sufficient pain to maintain supplier discipline.

marsbit4m ago

Bernstein Analysis: Can the $142 Billion Long-Term Order Hold Up the Memory Cycle?

marsbit4m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit28m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit28m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit28m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit28m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片