Supporters of the Separatist Bitcoin BIP-110 Network Have Created Their Own Blocks: But There's a Problem

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-09Last updated on 2026-08-09

Abstract

Supporters of the Bitcoin BIP-110 separatist network created their own minority chain, but it has fallen significantly behind the main Bitcoin ($BTC) chain. Following a split after block 961,632, the BIP-110-supporting Roughnecks mining pool has only produced blocks 961,632 and 961,633. Meanwhile, the main Bitcoin chain advanced to block 961,651, leading by 18 blocks. The chain split coincided with a period where Bitcoin's mining difficulty was adjusted to 127.48T. Block creation on the BIP-110 chain slowed dramatically as it continues to operate at the same mining difficulty despite having far less computational power than the main network. BIP-110 advocate Matthew Krater acknowledged that a "very significant change" in hashpower would be needed for the minority chain to catch up and overtake Bitcoin's main chain again. Some supporters are now discussing a possible switch to an alternative Proof-of-Work algorithm to improve the current chain's resilience. The BIP-110 proposal itself is controversial, aiming to restrict certain transaction patterns and data usage on the Bitcoin network.

The minority chain created by BIP-110 supporters in the Bitcoin network is significantly lagging behind the main Bitcoin chain $BTC.

Following a divergence that occurred after Bitcoin block 961,632, the Roughnecks mining pool, which supports BIP-110, was only able to produce blocks 961,632 and 961,633. During the same period, the main Bitcoin chain progressed to block 961,651, outpacing the BIP-110 chain by 18 blocks.

The chain split coincided with a period when the Bitcoin mining difficulty was adjusted to 127.48 T. Block creation time slowed significantly, as the BIP-110 chain, despite having far less computational power compared to the main $BTC network, continued to operate at the same mining difficulty.

Matthew Crater, a BIP-110 supporter, acknowledged that a "very significant change" in computational power would be required for the minority chain to catch up and overtake the main Bitcoin chain again.

In light of these events, some BIP-110 supporters have begun discussing the possibility of switching to a different Proof-of-Work mining algorithm to enhance the resilience of their current chain.

The BIP-110 proposal stands out as controversial and aims to limit certain transaction patterns and data usage within the Bitcoin network.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main issue that the BIP-110 minority chain is currently facing?

AThe BIP-110 minority chain is significantly lagging behind the main Bitcoin chain. At the time of the article, it is 18 blocks behind, due to operating with the same high mining difficulty as the main network but with much less computational power.

QHow far behind is the BIP-110 chain compared to the main Bitcoin blockchain at the point described?

AThe BIP-110 chain is behind by 18 blocks. While it was at block 961,633, the main Bitcoin chain had already progressed to block 961,651.

QWhat potential solution are some BIP-110 supporters discussing to improve the chain's resilience?

ASome supporters are discussing a potential switch to a different proof-of-work mining algorithm to improve the current chain's resilience and sustainability.

QWhat is the stated goal of the controversial BIP-110 proposal?

AThe BIP-110 proposal aims to restrict certain transaction models and data usage within the Bitcoin network.

QAccording to Matthew Crater, what is needed for the minority chain to catch up to the main Bitcoin chain?

AAccording to BIP-110 supporter Matthew Crater, a 'very significant change' in computational power is needed for the minority chain to catch up to and surpass the main Bitcoin chain again.

Related Reads

Vance says US-Iran conflict remains in 'midgame', US military 'seeks exit', Iran sets 'six conditions for reopening the strait'

U.S. Vice President Vance described the U.S.-Iran conflict as being in the "mid-game," stating the U.S. is utilizing diplomatic, economic, and military tools, with a focus on increasing oil and gas shipments through the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine is reportedly seeking an "exit" privately, expressing concerns that airstrikes alone are insufficient to achieve objectives and that further escalation carries significant risks. He highlighted critical ammunition shortages for key missile defense systems. In response, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary, Zolgadr, presented six conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz: a U.S. pledge never to threaten Iran, an end to aggression against Iran and its allies, withdrawal of forces from the region, war reparations, lifting of all sanctions, and the unconditional unfreezing of Iranian assets. These demands, seen as a high bar set by hardliners, contrast with more pragmatic requests made in backchannel talks, which focus on lifting the blockade, restoring oil sanctions waivers, and accessing frozen funds. While Iran and Oman are close to a technical agreement on a temporary shipping lane, Iran clarified this does not equate to a full reopening of the strait, which remains contingent on U.S. meeting its conditions. Attacks on commercial vessels in the area continue, with recent incidents attributed to Iran. Despite pauses in military action and expressions of openness to talks from both sides, negotiations are currently stalled over Iran's economic demands and U.S. insistence on freedom of navigation.

marsbit9m ago

Vance says US-Iran conflict remains in 'midgame', US military 'seeks exit', Iran sets 'six conditions for reopening the strait'

marsbit9m ago

$20k Signing Fee + $30k Monthly Salary: The Story Behind Pump.fun Poaching FOMO's Corner

The meme market has become increasingly fragmented, with a significant divide between overseas and Chinese users in terms of ecosystem and trading tools. Recently, a piece of gossip spread within overseas meme communities: Pump.fun, the largest token launch platform, is allegedly offering lucrative incentives to poach users from its competitor FOMO. According to a leaked agreement, eligible users are reportedly offered a one-time $20,000 signing bonus plus a $30,000 monthly salary to migrate their funds and trading activity exclusively to Pump.fun, close their FOMO accounts, and meet specific trading volume requirements. This aggressive move highlights FOMO's rapid rise. Launched just over a year ago, FOMO has secured $94 million in funding and, crucially, its revenue over the past 30 days has surpassed that of Uniswap and Phantom. Its market share in trading bots has even overtaken GMGN to become the leader. FOMO's success is attributed to its "social-first" product design, featuring a profit leaderboard and a feed tracking top traders' activities—effectively creating "trading celebrities" that users follow. In response, Pump.fun has recently upgraded its app to replicate these social features, shifting its homepage focus to trader activity feeds. The platform's founder has actively welcomed prominent meme traders. This competition underscores a major shift in the overseas meme market: the battleground has moved from launch tools and liquidity to a fight for attention and influence. The market is now dominated by a "网红带货模式" (influencer-driven model), where platforms compete to sign the most influential trading Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs), who have become the new carriers of market consensus. While this mirrors early competition in livestreaming platforms, it signals a potential risk for the meme space: losing the organic, community-driven vitality that originally fueled its growth, as competition centers increasingly on a concentrated group of trading influencers.

marsbit1h ago

$20k Signing Fee + $30k Monthly Salary: The Story Behind Pump.fun Poaching FOMO's Corner

marsbit1h ago

The Inside Story of Pump.fun Poaching FOMO's Top Users: $20K Signing Bonus + $30K Monthly Salary

Pump.fun, a leading meme coin launchpad, is reportedly offering exclusive contracts to lure high-value users and traders away from its competitor FOMO. The alleged agreement includes a $20,000 signing bonus, a $30,000 monthly stipend, and requires users to migrate funds, use a dedicated wallet, and permanently close their FOMO accounts. This aggressive move highlights a significant shift in the competitive landscape of the meme market. FOMO, a multi-chain mobile-focused trading platform launched in 2025, has rapidly grown to challenge incumbents. Data shows its 30-day revenue recently surpassed Uniswap and Phantom, and it has overtaken GMGN to become the market leader in trading bot share. FOMO's success is largely attributed to its "social-first" design, featuring profit leaderboards and feeds that track top traders' moves. This effectively creates and promotes "meme trading influencers," turning successful traders into attention hubs that drive platform engagement and user growth. Recognizing this model's power, Pump.fun recently updated its app to replicate similar social features. The competition for influential traders signals the meme market's evolution into a "influencer-driven" phase. Platform growth now hinges less on technical features and more on securing key personalities who can attract followers and trading volume. While a standard competitive tactic, this trend risks centralizing attention around a few individuals and potentially stifling the organic, community-driven culture that originally fueled the meme coin ecosystem.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Inside Story of Pump.fun Poaching FOMO's Top Users: $20K Signing Bonus + $30K Monthly Salary

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Future Outlook of Bitcoin

Bitcoin: A Mid-2026 Perspective Bitcoin analyst Will Clemente assesses the asset's outlook, arguing that despite a challenging period, it now presents a compelling long-term value opportunity. The current bear market, while less severe in peak drawdown than 2022, has been difficult due to a lack of clear catalysts, underperformance versus assets like gold, and persistent ETF outflows. However, key negative pressures are showing signs of abating. Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs), a major source of sell pressure during the bull market, are slowing accumulation or shifting strategies. While quantum computing remains a long-term concern, its risk is likely significantly priced in at current levels. Fundamentally, the Bitcoin network remains decentralized and healthy, with a robust global node distribution. Although hash rate has declined as miners pivot to AI/HPC, the network's difficulty adjustment ensures security, and the resilience suggests a diverse, non-public mining base. Valuation metrics indicate Bitcoin is in deeply undervalued territory. It is consolidating near its 2021 highs, below the 200-week EMA, with weekly RSI showing a bullish divergence from oversold levels. The MVRV ratio is at historically low levels, signaling the market's aggregate cost basis is near the current price. Long-term holders have resumed accumulation, and trading volume across spot, ETF, and derivatives markets has dried up to multi-year lows. Implied volatility is cheap, and futures basis is compressed, reflecting a complete lack of speculative interest. The core bullish thesis hinges on seller exhaustion. After a year of selling from DATs and ETFs, and with quantum risks largely discounted, the pool of remaining motivated sellers appears limited. A potential catalyst could be steady, price-insensitive inflows from large institutions adding small strategic allocations to portfolios for diversification, given Bitcoin's recent low correlation with other assets. Conclusion: Bitcoin is considered "cheap" with most risks priced in. While a final leg down is possible, the network is healthy, and long-term holders are buying. Strategies include dollar-cost averaging, waiting for a definitive catalyst or price reversal, or entering a position now while using inexpensive options to hedge against further downside. The current setup suggests an interesting period ahead for the orange coin.

marsbit2h ago

The Future Outlook of Bitcoin

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.7k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片