Solana: Why SOL risks a 30% drop after losing KEY support

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-30Last updated on 2026-01-30

Abstract

The crypto market faced a slump, intensifying selling pressure on Solana (SOL) as sentiment turned bearish. SOL lost a key support level at $118, which it had held since March 2024. A whale deposited 2M USDC on Hyperliquid DEX and opened a $6.15M SOL short position. U.S. Solana spot ETFs also saw outflows of $2.22M. SOL dropped 6.65% to $115, with trading volume surging 105%. Technical analysis suggests a potential 30% decline to $78 if SOL remains below $118. The 50-day EMA and ADX support the bearish outlook. Derivatives data shows significant leveraged short positions, reflecting trader expectations of further downside.

The crypto market faced a slump, intensifying selling pressure on Solana [SOL] as trader and investor sentiment turned increasingly bearish.

Within this broader sell‐off, SOL was hit the hardest. It lost a key support level at $118, which it had successfully defended since March 2024.

Adding to the bearish outlook, a newly created wallet deposited 2 million USDC on the Hyperliquid DEX and opened multiple short positions. This reflects the current market outlook, according to the crypto tracker Onchain Lens.

Further analysis of the whale’s activity shows that it has opened a massive SOL short position worth $6.15 million at the $122.91 level.

This sell-off is not limited to the crypto market alone; it has also been observed on Wall Street.

According to on-chain analytics platform SoSoValue, U.S.–based Solana spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded a significant outflow of $2.22 million. This suggests that investors and institutions are withdrawing capital from the underlying asset.

Both developments highlight market sentiment toward Solana, and their impact is reflected in the asset’s price.

Solana price action and key levels

At press time, SOL plunged 6.65% over the past 24 hours and was trading near $115.

Despite the price decline, market participation surged significantly, with SOL’s trading volume jumping 105% to $7.60 billion during the same period. This indicates strong interest from traders and investors, leading to heavy market participation.

Looking at the price charts, it appears that SOL has lost one of its strongest key support levels at $118, which it had been holding since March 2024.

On the weekly chart, the asset had previously rebounded from this support more than ten times, but SOL has now failed to hold it.

On the daily chart, price action suggests that SOL could see a strong downside move, potentially declining by 30% and reaching the $78 level in the coming days.

However, this outlook would only be validated if the asset remains below or closes a daily candle under the $118 level.

Technical indicators, including the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) and the Average Directional Index (ADX), support SOL’s bearish outlook.

Notably, SOL was trading below the 50 EMA, indicating that the asset is bearish in the short term.

Meanwhile, the ADX, which measures the strength of the current trend, had risen to 33, above the key threshold of 25, suggesting that SOL is experiencing a strong directional trend.

Traders eye short-leveraged positions

From a derivatives perspective, traders appear to be strongly positioned on the bearish side.

According to CoinGlass data, intraday traders are closely monitoring two critical price levels. On the downside, the focus is on $112.8, while on the upside, attention centers around $120.2.

At these levels, traders have established significant leveraged positions. Short‐leveraged positions total $55.15 million, while long‐leveraged positions are far larger, amounting to $241 million.

This positioning highlights the market’s current tension, with traders preparing for sharp moves in either direction.

This positioning clearly reflects how intraday traders are viewing SOL at the moment.


Final Thoughts

  • Bearish activity from market participants has strengthened Solana’s negative outlook.
  • Price action suggests that another 30% drop in SOL could be on the cards if the asset remains below the $118 level.

Related Questions

QWhat key support level did Solana (SOL) lose, and why is it significant?

ASolana lost the key support level at $118, which it had successfully defended since March 2024. This level is significant because the price had rebounded from it more than ten times on the weekly chart, making it a historically strong support. Losing it suggests a potential shift in market structure and opens the door for further downside.

QWhat on-chain and institutional activities are contributing to SOL's bearish pressure?

AA newly created wallet deposited 2 million USDC on Hyperliquid DEX and opened a massive $6.15 million SOL short position. Additionally, U.S.-based Solana spot ETFs recorded a significant outflow of $2.22 million, indicating that both large traders and institutional investors are withdrawing capital or betting against the asset.

QAccording to the price chart analysis, what is the potential downside target for SOL?

AThe price action on the daily chart suggests that SOL could see a strong downside move, potentially declining by 30% from its current level to reach the $78 level in the coming days, provided it remains below the $118 support.

QWhat do the technical indicators (50-day EMA and ADX) reveal about SOL's current trend?

ASOL was trading below the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), indicating a bearish short-term trend. The Average Directional Index (ADX) had risen to 33, which is above the key threshold of 25, suggesting that the current downtrend is strong and has significant momentum.

QHow are derivatives traders positioned regarding SOL, and what does it indicate?

ADerivatives data shows that intraday traders are focused on the $112.8 (downside) and $120.2 (upside) price levels. There are $55.15 million in short-leveraged positions and a much larger $241 million in long-leveraged positions. This creates significant market tension and indicates that traders are preparing for a sharp price move in either direction, with a large number of long positions at risk if the price falls further.

Related Reads

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit7m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit7m ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1h ago

BIT Research: ETF Purchases Have Slowed, Strategy (MicroStrategy) Has Slowed, What Else Can Drive Bitcoin's Rise?

Market Refocus on Inflation and Rate Expectations Weighs on Bitcoin Currently, the market is in a phase of macro-repricing dominated by inflation and interest rate expectations. Bitcoin, which previously benefited from easy liquidity and low inflation, is seeing its core bullish drivers weaken. These drivers were market expectations for interest rate cuts and strong inflows from Bitcoin ETFs and institutions like MicroStrategy (referred to as "Strategy" in the text). The logic has shifted. Recent high inflation data (e.g., CPI hitting 3.8% in a May 2026 report) has caused the market to sharply reduce its rate cut expectations for 2025 and even price in potential hikes. This is a key constraint for Bitcoin, as it lacks cash flows and is highly sensitive to rate expectations. Concurrently, institutional capital flows have slowed significantly. Following the hot CPI data, Bitcoin ETFs saw accelerated outflows, with around $4.3 billion leaving over a period. MicroStrategy's ability to keep adding substantial Bitcoin to its balance sheet is also diminishing. Together, ETF and MicroStrategy holdings total roughly $110 billion, but their momentum as growth engines is cooling. In summary, Bitcoin's current pressure stems not from its own fundamentals but from a changing macro environment. As long as inflation stays elevated, Bitcoin is likely to remain in a consolidating phase. However, historically, inflation eventually peaks. Once it recedes and rate cut expectations rebuild, institutional capital could return, potentially fueling a new and more robust recovery phase for Bitcoin.

marsbit1h ago

BIT Research: ETF Purchases Have Slowed, Strategy (MicroStrategy) Has Slowed, What Else Can Drive Bitcoin's Rise?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片