Solana volume is fragile, but traders haven’t given up – Here’s why!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-11Last updated on 2026-04-11

Abstract

Solana (SOL) is experiencing a prolonged cooling phase with significantly weakened trading volumes in both spot and futures markets since November 2025. Despite a notable price decline from around $160 to the $80-$90 range, and a sharp drop to below $80 in late January, trading activity has not recovered. However, derivatives data reveals some underlying optimism: aggregated open interest has remained stable around $2.0B-$2.1B, indicating traders haven't fully exited, and funding rates have turned positive. Currently trading near $85, SOL is range-bound with neutral RSI and weak trend strength. A breakout above the $90-$92 resistance zone requires stronger volume; otherwise, sideways movement is likely to continue.

Solana’s [SOL] markets are in a prolonged “cooling” phase. Even so, traders look like they’re holding onto hope.

Will SOL deliver?

Solana volumes weak across the board

At the time of writing, both Solana’s Spot and Futures volume charts revealed that trading activity has stayed weak for months.

Source: Cryptoquant

Since November 2025, most of the bubbles have remained in the green “cooling” zone. In fact, there’s been lower participation from both spot buyers and derivatives traders.

Source: Cryptoquant

During this period, SOL’s price fell from around $160 to the $80-$90 range. The biggest drop came in late January to early February, when the token fell from about $125 to below $80 on the charts.

There were small recoveries towards $90-$95 in March, but volumes did not pick up.

Derivatives numbers look positive

Volumes might be weak, but there’s more! Solana’s Aggregated Open Interest has held relatively stable around the $2.0B-$2.1B range. Traders haven’t fully exited the market just yet.

Source: Coinalyze

At the same time, funding rates were also back in positive territory, at around 0.006 at press time. Long positions seemed to be regaining strength, even if there wasn’t enough belief.

Earlier this month, there was high short pressure. That phase has eased since, with mild optimism being the mood for now.

SOL holds near $85

On the price charts, SOL was stable, but not quite strong enough. At the time of writing, the altcoin was trading at around $85, being range-bound after weeks of decline.

The RSI was near neutral; no clear bias from buyers or sellers. The DMI indicator also highlighted weak trend strength. So, it confirmed that neither bulls nor bears were in firm control.

Source: TradingView

The price structure was capped below the $90-$92 resistance zone – A level that has rejected recent upside attempts.

Unless SOL breaks above this range with greater volume activity, it will continue to move sideways rather than break out on the charts.


Final Summary

  • Solana might be stuck thanks to Spot and Futures volumes staying weak.
  • Derivatives numbers suggested traders might still be expecting a rebound.

Related Questions

QWhat has been the trend in Solana's trading volumes according to the article?

ASolana's trading volumes have been weak for months, with both spot and futures activity staying low since November 2025, indicating a prolonged cooling phase.

QHow has SOL's price changed during the period of weak volumes mentioned?

ASOL's price fell from around $160 to the $80-$90 range, with the most significant drop occurring from about $125 to below $80 in late January to early February.

QWhat does the stability in Solana's Aggregated Open Interest around $2.0B-$2.1B suggest?

AIt suggests that traders haven't fully exited the market yet, indicating that some are still holding positions and possibly expecting a rebound.

QWhat is the current market sentiment based on funding rates and recent pressure?

AFunding rates are positive at around 0.006, showing mild optimism with long positions regaining strength, and the earlier high short pressure has eased.

QWhat key resistance level must SOL break for a potential breakout, according to the article?

ASOL needs to break above the $90-$92 resistance zone with greater volume activity to avoid continuing sideways movement and potentially initiate a breakout.

Related Reads

I Built Myself an Investment Workbench Using AI

For the past two weeks, I've been immersed in Vibe Coding—using AI to write code from natural language descriptions. This process has enabled me to quickly build functional tools that address long-standing personal ideas. Previously, I had many concepts but found execution too cumbersome. Key ideas included a unified dashboard for assets across US stocks, Crypto, HK stocks, and A-shares; a real-time alert system for price movements; an investment map visualizing sector relationships; and a tool to correlate prediction market bets with news and market data. Traditional development hurdles meant these often remained unrealized. Using AI (Codex, Claude Code, and DeepSeek API), I built four initial tools: 1. A **Cross-Market Asset Dashboard** showing total assets, daily P&L, and holdings by market, with added features for alerts and sector mapping. It's deployed locally for privacy. 2. A **Prediction Market (PM) Monitor** tracking bets on events (e.g., company valuations) and correlating probability shifts with news and market movements. I categorize bets by conviction to filter noise. 3. A **Simple Operations Backend** for managing my writing workflow (topics, progress, publishing). It's cloud-deployed for mobile access. 4. A **One-Click Formatting Tool** that automates converting drafts into various platform-specific formats, saving manual effort. While these tools are basic, they represent a significant shift: AI lowers the barrier to creating personalized systems. I believe individual investors can now feasibly build core systems for: * **Asset Observation** (tracking holdings and changes) * **Signal Monitoring** (watching for key market shifts) * **Sector Mapping** (understanding network relationships within a sector) * **Performance Review** (documenting rationale and outcomes) The power of Vibe Coding is its fast feedback loop. Ideas can be implemented, tested, and iterated on rapidly, turning "want-to-do" into "done." This marks the start of my new phase, where I'll share investment thoughts, tool tests, on-chain operations, and educational Web3 content.

marsbit2m ago

I Built Myself an Investment Workbench Using AI

marsbit2m ago

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

Title: How to Exit After Asset Tokenization? Author: Symbiotic Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher Summary: Tokenization addresses how assets go on-chain but largely leaves the redemption question unresolved. While tokenized assets can settle instantly, the underlying redemption for assets like treasuries, private credit, or real estate can take from T+1 to 180 days. This gap hinders DeFi adoption of Real World Assets (RWAs). Three emerging models aim to provide instant exit liquidity, differing primarily in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its balance sheet, acting as a bridge during the settlement period. It offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by a single entity's capacity and risk appetite. 2. **Asset-Specific Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers fund dedicated vaults for each supported asset, earning fees. It decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital per asset, leading to potential fragmentation. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (e.g., Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** A shared capital pool supports multiple RWA types simultaneously. Funds remain productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in lending markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market. This model aims for higher capital efficiency, scalability across assets, and serves longer-duration assets like private credit. Key differentiators are: 1) Source of capital and risk bearer, 2) Redemption pricing mechanism, 3) Capital efficiency, 4) Scalability to new asset types, and 5) Composability. The shared liquidity layer model represents a move from piecemeal solutions toward scalable infrastructure, enabling T+0 exits by pooling capital, maintaining yield, and using competitive pricing, thus enhancing RWA utility in DeFi.

marsbit16m ago

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

marsbit16m ago

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

After tokenization, a key unresolved issue is providing holders with a reliable exit mechanism, as underlying asset settlement (taking days to months) lags far behind on-chain token settlement. Three primary models for instant liquidity have emerged, differing in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single, well-capitalized entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its own reserves. This offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by that single balance sheet's capacity and risk appetite, limiting scalability. 2. **Dedicated Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers (LPs) fund separate vaults for each supported asset. This decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital, which becomes inefficient as the number of tokenized assets grows. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** Independent capital providers fund shared vaults that can support multiple tokenized assets simultaneously. Capital remains productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in DeFi markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market where market makers bid. The article argues that the shared layer model offers superior capital efficiency and scalability. It transforms exit liquidity from an asset-specific patch into shared market infrastructure, allowing liquidity capacity to grow with overall market participation rather than being fragmented per asset. This is particularly valuable for longer-duration assets like private credit, where reliable T+0 exits can significantly enhance their utility in DeFi.

链捕手29m ago

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

链捕手29m ago

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

This article analyzes Anthropic's recent conflicts and strategic moves following the U.S. government's emergency halt of its new Fable model, citing national security concerns over potential "jailbreaks." The author argues this incident reveals deeper tensions between AI labs, governments, and the software industry. While critics view Anthropic's safety-focused rhetoric as marketing fear, the author suggests it serves as a commercial moat masking the company's core economic imperative: moving closer to end-users and their valuable data to avoid being commoditized. The piece outlines a coming clash between frontier AI labs like Anthropic and established software companies. Labs need real-world usage data for model improvement via reinforcement learning, creating a cycle where better products attract more users and more data. This threatens software firms who, as Microsoft's Satya Nadella warns, risk having their value captured by a few dominant models. Anthropic's controversial policy changes—initially secretly degrading Fable's performance for LLM development and expanding data retention—are framed as assertions of control, justified by its safety narrative. The company's foundational belief that it alone is sufficiently concerned about superintelligent AI dangers legitimizes its actions, from resisting government demands to shaping usage policies. The author concludes that this alignment of mission, talent, and business strategy is powerful but concerning, as it concentrates immense potential power in the hands of those convinced of their own righteous understanding.

marsbit39m ago

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy T

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Threshold Network Token (T) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Threshold Network Token (T) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Threshold Network Token (T)After purchasing your Threshold Network Token (T), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Threshold Network Token (T)Easily trade Threshold Network Token (T) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

12.0k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy T

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of T (T) are presented below.

活动图片