Solana tops 2025 usage charts – So why didn’t SOL outperform ETH?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-15Last updated on 2025-12-15

Abstract

Looking back at 2025, Solana (SOL) significantly underperformed Ethereum (ETH) in terms of price, with SOL declining over 30% while ETH fell only 6%, resulting in a 25% drop in the SOL/ETH ratio. Despite this, Solana emerged as the most-used blockchain of the year, leading in key on-chain metrics such as monthly active users (98 million), total transactions (34 billion), and trading volume ($1.6 trillion). However, Ethereum maintained stronger foundational strengths, ranking higher in total value locked (TVL), developer activity, total transfer volume, and stablecoin supply. This contrast highlights that while Solana excelled in pure network usage and adoption, Ethereum retained structural advantages critical for DeFi and long-term ecosystem growth, making a SOL outperformance over ETH in 2026 appear unlikely.

As we head into 2026, it’s worth taking a look back at 2025.

On the technical front, 2025 is ending with major top-caps losing capital, closing the year with negative ROI. Among the top five assets, Solana [SOL] stood out as the weakest, down over 30%+ on an annual basis.

To put this into perspective, Ethereum [ETH] was down 6% over the same period.

This meant SOL’s decline is 5x greater than ETH’s, translating into a 25% drop in the SOL/ETH ratio. In short, 2025 has been a year in which ETH outperformed.

But the story isn’t just about price.

Solana and Ethereum are similar L1s. Both are seeing growing adoption, strong RWA rankings, expanding ETF presence, and hosting a variety of protocols.

You’d expect that ETH’s dominance would show on-chain, too.

Surprisingly, according to Artemis CEO Jon Ma, Solana ended up being the most-used chain in 2025. Ultimately, that kicked off a heated debate across the community.

The question remains: Which side carries the most weight?

Solana’s activity lead meets Ethereum’s structural edge

No doubt, Solana’s network dominance is backed by hard data.

In 2025, it led all chains in multiple key metrics: Monthly Active Users (MAU) reached 98 million, Total Transactions hit 34 billion, and Trading Volume topped $1.6 trillion.

On the revenue side, SOL also came out on top.

Looking at this performance, the case for SOL as the most-used chain can’t be ignored. When it comes to “pure usage,” Solana clearly outpaced other L1s, showing that adoption does not always move in line with market price.

Ethereum’s structural edge

That said, Ethereum retained strength across foundational metrics.

Based on Jon Ma’s post, Solana ranked third in Total Transfer Volume, second in TVL, second in Developer Activity, and third in Stablecoin Supply.

In this context, the whole SOL dominance debate is totally reasonable.

Simply put, while Solana crushes it on network usage, Ethereum still flexes in the core on-chain fundamentals. In fact, most of the metrics SOL lags in are critical for DeFi rails, market depth, and long-term ecosystem play.

Against this backdrop, SOL outperforming ETH in 2026 seems unlikely.

Final Thoughts

  • Solana is the weakest among top 5 assets, down 30%+, while Ethereum [ETH] only fell 6%, making the SOL/ETH ratio drop 25%.
  • Despite the price gap, Solana emerged as the most-used chain in 2025, sparking debates over on-chain dominance versus market performance.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
CapricornAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
dos
DAPPOSDOS
jst
JUSTJST

Related Reads

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit4m ago

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit4m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit19m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit19m ago

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

Tsinghua and Wharton researchers have used GPT-5.6 Sol Pro to solve a 40-year-old open problem in optimization theory, proving a fundamental limit for gradient descent. They demonstrated that by adjusting only the step size sequence—without adding momentum or changing the algorithm's structure—the convergence rate of gradient descent cannot exceed Ω(T^{-1.9319}). This establishes a mathematical ceiling, showing that structural modifications are necessary to achieve the fastest possible convergence rates like O(1/T²). The core proof, involving a geometric construction based on "resisting oracles," was entirely generated through iterative interaction with the AI. The proof was then formally verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover, achieving zero "sorry" or "admit" statements, confirming its logical correctness without human intervention in the non-trivial mathematical steps. This result bridges the gap between the known O(T^{-1.2716}) rate achieved by the "silver stepsize" sequence and the newly proven impossibility bound. The work suggests a new paradigm where researchers can leverage general-purpose AI to explore and formally verify complex theoretical proofs.

marsbit28m ago

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

marsbit28m ago

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

Anthropic publicly apologized after users discovered a hidden A/B test in Claude Code (versions 2.1.237+) that seemingly "dumbed down" the model. Developer argofowl found that selecting the "high" reasoning effort was being mapped internally to a value of "10," which previously corresponded to the "low" setting. While Anthropic engineers clarified this was only a change to the numerical mapping scale and assured it did not affect performance based on internal evaluations, the lack of communication about the test sparked widespread user backlash and self-tests on social media. Separately, significant complaints emerged about the flagship Opus 5 model, with users reporting it became "unstable," prone to lazy outputs, factual errors, and repetitive corrections. An Anthropic engineer acknowledged Opus 5's performance instability, calling its resolution a top priority. The incident highlights a growing industry-wide rift between improving benchmark scores and declining user-perceived quality and reliability. It underscores the lack of transparency in continuous model updates, where server-side changes, A/B tests, and configuration adjustments occur without clear user notification, eroding trust as AI models become critical infrastructure.

marsbit29m ago

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

marsbit29m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit43m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit43m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions