Solana Introduces Flexible Privacy Framework to Drive Institutional Crypto Adoption

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

Abstract

The Solana Foundation has introduced a new flexible privacy framework designed to attract institutional adoption of cryptocurrency. The initiative addresses the need for businesses, such as banks and financial firms, to control data privacy while maintaining compliance, as public blockchains are often unsuitable for handling sensitive information. Solana's framework proposes a spectrum of four privacy levels, including pseudonymity, confidentiality, anonymity, and full privacy, supported by advanced technologies like zero-knowledge proofs. The network's high speed ensures these features operate efficiently without compromising performance. This approach aims to enable private trading, secure inter-bank data sharing, and regulatory compliance without exposing confidential details, making blockchain more practical for enterprise use.

The Solana Foundation has introduced a new privacy framework aimed at attracting large institutions into the crypto space. The report explains that future crypto adoption will depend not just on transparency, but also on giving businesses control over their data and privacy.

Why this is important

In most blockchains, all transactions are public. This works well for transparency, but it is not always suitable for companies. Businesses like banks and firms need to keep some information private, such as transaction details or customer data. Solana says that companies want systems where they can choose what to share and what to hide. This is why the foundation is focusing more on flexible privacy.

Instead of one system,Solana introduces a private spectrum with four levels, such as pseudonymity, confidentiality, anonymity, and a fully private system. Solana claims that its fast blockchain can support cutting-edge privacy technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs. These tools assist users in demonstrating the validity of something without providing all the details. Because Solana is fast, these features can work smoothly without slowing down the network.

The goal is to make crypto more useful for institutions by allowing private trading, secure data sharing between banks, and compliance without revealing sensitive information. This flexibility makes blockchain more practical for real-world business use. This helps companies follow regulations while still protecting their data. The Solana Foundation is trying to make blockchain more suitable for institutions by offering flexible privacy options.

Highlighted Crypto News:

TRON DAO Expands AI Fund to $1B for Agentic Economy

TagsCryptoSOLSolana

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main goal of Solana's new privacy framework?

AThe main goal is to attract large institutions into the crypto space by providing flexible privacy options that allow businesses to control their data and privacy, enabling private trading, secure data sharing, and regulatory compliance without revealing sensitive information.

QWhy is public blockchain transparency sometimes unsuitable for companies?

APublic blockchain transparency is unsuitable for companies because businesses like banks and firms need to keep certain information private, such as transaction details or customer data, to protect confidentiality and comply with regulations.

QWhat are the four levels of privacy in Solana's private spectrum?

AThe four levels are pseudonymity, confidentiality, anonymity, and a fully private system.

QHow does Solana's fast performance benefit privacy technologies like zero-knowledge proofs?

ASolana's fast blockchain allows privacy technologies like zero-knowledge proofs to work smoothly without slowing down the network, enabling efficient and seamless operation.

QWhat specific technologies does Solana mention to support its privacy features?

ASolana mentions zero-knowledge proofs as a cutting-edge privacy technology that helps users demonstrate the validity of something without revealing all the details.

Related Reads

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit2m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit2m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手14m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手14m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit29m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit29m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手32m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手32m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片