Solana ETFs Attract $540 Million From Wall Street In Q4: Data

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-11Last updated on 2026-03-11

Abstract

US spot Solana ETFs attracted over $540 million from major Wall Street institutions in Q4 2024, with half of all assets owned by large investors, signaling strong institutional demand. The top buyers included Electric Capital, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley. Despite a more than 30% price drop in SOL from $124.95 to $86.50 during the period, net inflows remained steady, reaching over $950 million cumulatively. Analysts note the high institutional ownership suggests a focus on long-term positioning rather than short-term trading. Updated data on institutional response to the price decline will be available in mid-May.

Half of all assets sitting in US spot Solana exchange-traded funds are owned by large institutional investors — a sign that serious money, not just retail traders, has been driving demand since the products launched last fall.

Wall Street Names Top The List

Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart released data this week drawn from 13F filings submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission in mid-February.

Those filings, required of any institution managing more than $100 million in assets, show that the 30 biggest holders of US spot Solana ETFs accumulated more than $540 million worth of positions during the fourth quarter of 2024.

SOLUSD currently trading at $87.7. Chart: TradingView

Electric Capital, a Silicon Valley venture capital firm, held the largest stake at close to 138 million. Goldman Sachs came in second at $1074 million. Elequin Capital, SIG Holding, and Multicoin Capital rounded out the top five. Morgan Stanley and Citadel Advisors were also among the buyers.

Investment advisors made up the biggest slice of that total, accounting for more than $270 million in holdings. Hedge fund managers followed at $186.4 million. Holding companies and brokerage firms held nearly $60 million and $20 million, respectively. Banks trailed the group at $4.5 million.

A Rough Start On Price

The first US spot Solana ETF went live on October 28, when Bitwise received SEC approval and began trading. Other products followed. Since then, cumulative inflows across all US-listed spot Solana ETFs have reached more than $950 million, according to data from Farside Investors — a figure that covers retail and smaller institutions not captured in the 13F filings.

But the timing hasn’t been kind on price. Those Q4 institutional positions were backed by roughly 4.3 million SOL tokens, which were valued at around $124.95 each at year-end. By the time Seyffart shared his analysis, SOL had dropped to $86.50 — a decline of more than 30%.

Source: Farside Investors

Flows Hold Even As Token Drops

Despite the slide in price, money has kept moving in. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas noted last week that net flows into Solana ETFs have stayed relatively steady in recent months, even as the token itself fell.

He also flagged that the 50% institutional ownership figure points to a buyer base that skews toward deliberate, longer-term positioning rather than short-term trading.

The data covers only the fourth quarter. Updated filings for the first quarter of 2025 won’t be available until mid-May, so how institutions have responded to the price drop won’t be clear for several more weeks.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow much did the top 30 institutional holders invest in US spot Solana ETFs in Q4 2024?

AThe top 30 holders accumulated more than $540 million worth of positions.

QWhich firm held the largest stake in US spot Solana ETFs according to the 13F filings?

AElectric Capital, a Silicon Valley venture capital firm, held the largest stake at close to $138 million.

QWhat was the largest category of institutional investors by holdings in Solana ETFs, and how much did they hold?

AInvestment advisors were the largest category, accounting for more than $270 million in holdings.

QDespite the price drop of SOL, what was the trend in net flows into Solana ETFs according to Eric Balchunas?

ANet flows into Solana ETFs have stayed relatively steady in recent months, even as the token price fell.

QWhen will updated 13F filings for Q1 2025 be available to show how institutions responded to the SOL price drop?

AUpdated filings for the first quarter of 2025 won't be available until mid-May.

Related Reads

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

The article "The Foreign Guest: Genspark" investigates the identity and business practices of AI startup Genspark, which presents itself as a Palo Alto-based "AI Costco" offering a subscription bundle of over 70 models and numerous AI agent tools. Despite its official Silicon Valley narrative, Genspark's founding team has deep roots in Chinese tech giant Baidu, a history systematically downplayed in its branding. The company actively cultivates an image as an elite US firm, heavily publicizing partnerships and endorsements from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft, while distancing itself from the Chinese AI community and obscuring its connections to Chinese investors and open-weight models (like those from DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax) that power its services. Genspark's core strategy involves rapidly cloning and integrating successful AI product concepts (e.g., from Perplexity, Manus, Plaud) into its unified platform, supported by aggressive marketing, including Super Bowl ads and paid native content in publications like The Wall Street Journal. Critically, the article suggests a significant portion of its engineering and product development is conducted by a team in Beijing, operating outside its official US corporate structure. This duality allows Genspark to leverage Chinese talent and models for efficiency and cost reduction while constructing a public facade as a purely American success story. The piece concludes that Genspark's most effective agent is its own corporate identity, meticulously engineered to obscure its Chinese underpinnings and be perceived solely as a Silicon Valley company.

marsbit41m ago

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

marsbit41m ago

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

While South Korean auto workers fear job losses from robotics, Elon Musk envisions a future where AI and robots render most work optional. This article explores the growing tension between immediate anxieties over automation and long-term visions of a post-work society. The piece begins with recent strikes at Hyundai's Korean plants, where unions, amid standard wage negotiations, also sought job guarantees against advancing robotics—specifically mentioning Boston Dynamics' Atlas. This reflects how anxiety about technological displacement is emerging even before robots are fully capable of replacing skilled labor on assembly lines. The author argues that while current robotics still struggle with the nuanced, experiential knowledge of veteran workers, the *perception* of imminent replacement is fueling social conflict prematurely. This modern "Luddite" sentiment is compared to the 19th-century English textile workers who smashed machines. Historically, Luddites weren't simply anti-technology; they were protesting the rapid devaluation of their skills and the unequal distribution of productivity gains. Similarly, today's workers ask who will bear the cost of transition and share in the new wealth created by machines. In contrast, figures like Elon Musk propose an optimistic endpoint: with AI and robotics driving extreme abundance, the link between work and survival could break. He suggests concepts like "Universal High Income" could allow society to share the technological bounty, transforming work from a necessity into a choice. The core challenge, however, lies in the transition. The author notes that technology's benefits diffuse slowly, while its disruptive costs—job losses, skill obsolescence—can be concentrated and immediate. The risk is a painful interim period where productivity gains are captured by a few before new social contracts, safety nets, and retraining systems are established. The conclusion calls for proactive governance. Just as past industrial revolutions gave rise to labor standards and social safety nets, the robotics era needs its own frameworks. These should address job transition support, distribution of productivity gains, safety liability, and ethical deployment. Embracing such "constraints" is not opposition to progress but a necessary step to ensure technology benefits society broadly. The discussion sparked by Hyundai's workers, therefore, is not premature but essential.

marsbit54m ago

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

marsbit54m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片