Solana Begins Phased 90% Reduction in Token Account Storage Costs

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-28Last updated on 2026-08-28

Abstract

The main development team of Solana, Anza, has launched the first of five planned functions that will ultimately reduce the cost of storing data on the blockchain by 90%. This initiative, driven by proposal SIMD-0437, will significantly lower the capital expenses for developers and projects that create a large number of token accounts, particularly benefiting fintech and payment companies using the network. The reduction in storage costs is achieved by lowering the `lamports_per_byte` constant, which sets the minimum account balance, from 6,960 to 696. This change will be implemented in five independent, risk-assessed phases to prevent a sudden surge in blockchain state data. Currently, the deposit for a standard SPL token account is $0.159, which will fall to $0.0159 upon full implementation. For a company creating one million accounts, the required capital drops from $159,000 to $15,900. This deposit is a fully refundable security, not a transaction fee. The move supports Solana's goal of becoming a leading payment network by reducing a major barrier to mass account creation. The rollout is part of the Agave 4.2 validator release, with the first mainnet activation beginning in mid-August 2026. A sixth contingency feature can revert the constant to its original value if issues arise.

Anza, Solana's core developer team, announced the activation of the first of five planned features. This development will reduce data storage costs on the blockchain by 90%. The changes will primarily benefit companies working with stablecoins and payment systems, which have become one of the fastest-growing use cases for the network.

For developers creating a large number of token accounts and for the users they onboard, this change now results in lower fixed capital costs, which had remained unchanged for many years.

Timing is of great significance. Over the past year, Solana has been working to establish itself as a payments network, not just a platform for speculation. However, rent remains one of the obstacles to achieving the goal—mass account creation. Cheaper accounts allow fintech companies and payment systems to more efficiently cover deposits for their users.

Solana Begins Phased Reduction of Token Account Costs

The reform is being implemented by SIMD-0437, a proposal written by Igor Duović of Anza. It reduces the constant `lamports_per_byte`, which sets the minimum account balance, from 6960 to 696.

As indicated on the Solana Foundation's update page, this factor was set many years ago and has remained unchanged since. Instead of reflecting the actual storage costs incurred by validators, the storage price has been tied to the price of SOL.

The reduction will be phased in over five stages: first from 6960 to 6333, then to 5080, followed by 2575, 1322, and finally 696. Testnet activation is occurring at the first stage, representing an approximately 9% reduction.

Subsequent stages will need to be activated separately based on system development information provided by the core developer teams.

Why Deposit Calculations Are Important for Payments

Solana's rent is not a fee. The Foundation describes it as a fully refundable deposit, which is returned when an account is closed. The change in SIMD-0437 concerns the size of this initial deposit.

Previously, the rent-exempt amount required for a standard SPL token account was $0.159, but after all five stages are activated, it will be just $0.0159—ten times less.

At larger scales, the savings become significant. According to Foundation estimates, if a payment company needed to create one million token accounts, it would cost them $159,000 today, and $15,900 after all reductions. This amount can mean the difference between a business's success and failure, determining whether it can afford to pay for account creation for a large number of users.

Cryptopolitan reported that payment volume on Solana grew by 755.3% in 2025, allowing the network to become a settlement layer for stablecoins issued by brands like Western Union, PayPal, and Fiserv. The reduction in rent directly contributes to this growth by lowering the cost of connecting each new payment system user to the network.

Safeguards Built-In to Prevent State Bloat

The phased approach aims to limit the risk that cheaper storage will lead to a sharp increase in blockchain data that each validator must store and index.

A sixth feature gate could restore the constant value to 6960 if issues arise. An accompanying proposal, SIMD-0392, also allows for rent to be increased again later without disrupting existing accounts.

The reduction is backed by published analysis from Solana Foundation's Umberto Natale. His simulation showed that even after a tenfold reduction, an attack aimed at exhausting the current storage capacity would still require approximately $17.2 million in locked capital. He concluded that the 90% reduction does not pose a systemic risk to the cluster.

How Will the Project Develop Further?

The rent reduction is included in Agave 4.2, Anza's validator release, recommended for mainnet deployment in August 2026. The release also features larger 4096-byte transactions and a halving of slot time to 200 milliseconds.

According to information from the Foundation, mainnet feature activation for the release began the week of August 17th. Existing accounts continue to operate unchanged and can simply reduce their balance to the new minimum level.

The next step is straightforward: each of the remaining four gates must undergo risk assessment before the full 90% reduction in Solana rent becomes available on mainnet.

The 90% figure refers to the fully completed deployment, not an immediate 90% cut. Each stage of feature implementation is independent, allowing Solana to monitor state growth before proceeding to the next reduction stage. The Foundation also describes a sixth fallback gate that can restore the original value of 6960 if problems arise.

Step lamports_per_byte Cumulative Reduction Percentage
Current 6,960 0%
Step 1 6,333 9.0%
Step 2 5,080 27.0%
Step 3 2,575 63.0%
Step 4 1,322 81.0%
Step 5 696 90.0%
SIMD-0437 reduces the lamports_per_byte value from 6960 to 696 via five independent steps.

The Solana Foundation uses a price of $0.159 for a standard SPL token account, which decreases to $0.0159 after the full 10x reduction. For 1 million accounts, this equates to $159,000 → $15,900.

Account Scale Before Reduction After 90% Reduction Capital Saved
1 account $0.159 $0.0159 $0.1431
1 million accounts $159,000 $15,900 $143,100
Cost of Solana rent deposit before and after the full 90% reduction under SIMD-0437. Calculations are based on a standard SPL token account and the Solana Foundation's stated economics.

This is a refundable, rent-exempt deposit, not a transaction fee. The deposit remains locked while the account exists and can be recovered upon its closure.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary goal of the Solana team's new proposal SIMD-0437, as described in the article?

AThe primary goal of proposal SIMD-0437 is to reduce the cost of storing token-account data on the Solana blockchain by 90%. This is achieved by gradually lowering the `lamports_per_byte` constant that sets the minimum account balance deposit.

QHow will the reduction in account storage costs benefit companies, specifically in the payment sector, according to the article?

AThe reduction in account storage costs will primarily benefit fintech companies and payment systems by making it significantly cheaper for them to fund deposit accounts for their users. This lowers a major barrier to mass account creation, supporting Solana's goal of becoming a payment network.

QWhat is the significance of the five-phase, gradual implementation approach for the cost reduction?

AThe five-phase, gradual implementation approach allows Solana to monitor the growth of the blockchain's state (stored data) after each reduction step. This helps prevent a sudden, risky inflation of data that validators must store and index. It also includes a sixth, contingency step to revert the change if problems arise.

QAccording to the article, what is the estimated financial impact for a company needing to create one million token accounts before and after the full 90% cost reduction?

AAccording to the Solana Foundation's estimates, creating one million token accounts currently costs approximately $159,000. After the full 90% reduction is implemented, the cost would drop to approximately $15,900, resulting in capital savings of $143,100.

QWhat is the nature of the 'rent' payment on Solana that is being reduced, and how does it differ from a transaction fee?

AThe 'rent' on Solana is a fully refundable deposit, not a transaction fee. It is a capital deposit that remains locked for as long as the account exists. The entire deposit is returned to the account owner when the account is closed.

Related Reads

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

In his first Jackson Hole speech, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled a significant shift in monetary policy communication. He declared that "forward guidance," a tool heavily used since the financial crisis, has outlived its usefulness in normal times and should be retired. He cautioned that over-reliance on it can distort market signals and constrain the Fed's flexibility. Instead, Warsh emphasized a return to data-dependence and decision-making discipline. Warsh outlined seven key principles to guide policy: anchoring the 2% inflation target, pursuing the employment mandate, using short-term rates as the primary tool, acknowledging the importance of money, and maintaining purposeful, restrained communication. He stressed that policy should focus on trends, not single data points. On the current economic outlook, Warsh noted that the labor market is consistent with full employment but inflation remains "far above" the Fed's target. He highlighted that over half of the PCE basket's components are still rising above 3% annually. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential for productivity and capital allocation, he admitted its full economic impact remains uncertain and is not a factor in current policy decisions. His core message was a commitment to policy discipline rather than pre-set decisions. Warsh stated the Fed's primary focus must be on restoring price stability, vowing, "We still have work to do," until there is clear evidence inflation is moving decisively toward 2%. He concluded by framing effective monetary policy as crucial for economic prosperity and U.S. global leadership.

Odaily星球日报22m ago

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

Odaily星球日报22m ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

Blockstream, a major Bitcoin solutions developer, has introduced a draft proposal for a new quantum-resistant digital signature scheme called SHRINCS. The scheme aims to protect Bitcoin transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers while aiming to maintain network throughput. This marks the second technical proposal for Bitcoin quantum defense in recent days, following a similar initiative from StarkWare. A quantum attack on blockchain typically involves deriving a private key from a public one. Currently considered computationally infeasible, quantum algorithms could potentially solve this problem far more efficiently. This threat presents two primary scenarios: an attacker could target addresses where the public key is already exposed, or intercept a transaction before it is confirmed, extract the public key, derive the private key, and replace the transaction. Blockstream's SHRINCS is designed to counter the latter, "in-flight" attack scenario. The SHRINCS signature is built upon the SHA-256 hash function, the same one already used in Bitcoin mining, allowing developers to leverage well-tested, familiar mechanisms. A key design goal was to preserve network capacity. Blockstream estimates Bitcoin could process about three transactions per second using SHRINCS, compared to the current rate of roughly seven, noting that some alternative quantum-resistant schemes could reduce throughput to as low as 0.36 transactions per second. Currently, the security proof for SHRINCS is pending, and the software has not been audited or deemed ready for production. However, Blockstream conducted tests with such transactions on its Liquid sidechain in March. Over the past year, Bitcoin developers have been actively exploring paths to migrate to post-quantum cryptography, a priority across the broader crypto market, underscored by significant investments into securing the leading cryptocurrency.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

When autonomous AI agents behave unpredictably and cause harm, determining legal liability is complex. Currently, there is no specific federal AI agent liability law, so existing legal frameworks are applied. The AI agent itself cannot be held liable, as it is not a legal entity. Liability typically falls on the "developer" (the maker of the AI) or the "deployer" (the user), depending on the facts and circumstances. A negligence analysis under standard tort law may apply. For instance, if a deployer gives a reckless instruction, such as demanding quick money without safety parameters, they could face significant liability, including potential criminal charges under statutes like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The situation is complicated by open-source models, where licenses often disclaim liability, and by the unclear division of responsibility between developers and deployers. An analogy is drawn to self-driving car accidents, where both the manufacturer and the human operator can share fault. In cases of severe harm, such as using AI to create bioweapons, liability for developers depends on jurisdiction; the EU's AI Act imposes responsibilities, while U.S. law offers less clear grounds, similar to platforms being shielded for user-generated content under Section 230. Even if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is achieved, the expert argues against making AGI itself a legally liable entity, as it lacks personhood, assets, or a meaningful way to provide remedy for harm. Instead, accountability should rest with the responsible human or corporate entities behind the technology.

cointelegraph1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

cointelegraph1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片