Solana 2025 Report Card: Annual Revenue of $1.5 Billion, Surpassing the Combined Total of 'Hyperliquid + Ethereum'

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-04Last updated on 2026-01-04

Abstract

Solana's 2025 Performance: $1.5B in Annual Revenue, Outpacing Ethereum and Hyperliquid Combined In 2025, Solana emerged as the top-performing blockchain by key financial and usage metrics. According to Nansen, Solana's on-chain fee revenue reached $603 million, surpassing Tron ($581M) and Ethereum ($514M). The network also recorded over 10.5 billion active addresses and 230.1 billion transactions. Blockworks Research data shows Solana's total annual revenue exceeded $1.5 billion, outperforming Hyperliquid ($780M) and Ethereum ($690M) combined, while maintaining a median transaction cost below $0.01. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko attributed this success to capacity growth and cost efficiency. Additionally, Solana's spot trading volume hit $1.6 trillion, exceeding all centralized exchanges except Binance. JupiterExchange data indicates Solana's share of total crypto trading volume grew from 1% in 2022 to 12% in 2025. Solana's revenue structure includes base fees (burned for deflation), priority fees (for validators), MEV income, and minor sources like storage fees. Approximately 50% of fees are burned, benefiting all SOL holders through deflation, while the rest rewards validators. The report highlights that public blockchains, perpetual DEXs (like Hyperliquid with $908M revenue), and launchpads (like Pump.fun with $549M revenue) remain among crypto's most profitable sectors, second only to stablecoins.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

The year 2025, which was significant for cryptocurrency, has passed. This year, in addition to a series of favorable policies, the regulatory layer, the development of on-chain ecosystems was even more rapid.

From the Meme coin issuance wave sparked by Pump.fun, to the on-chain Perp DEX trend led by Hyperliquid, and then to the stablecoin and PayFi financial wave driven by Circle (CRCL)'s listing, the on-chain ecosystems of numerous public chains have also entered a period of explosion. Among them, Solana, with its ecological vitality, underlying infrastructure construction, and its "application-first" internet-style capital network positioning, surpassed Ethereum to become the "New King of Annual On-Chain Networks".

Odaily Planet Daily will梳理 (sort out) the Solana on-chain ecosystem in this article, attempting to explore the "best business model" in the current crypto market (Odaily Note: Data sources vary, statistical calibers differ, for reference only).

Solana On-Chain Revenue Exceeds $600 Million, Outperforms Ethereum and TRON to Become the "Strongest Public Chain"

Solana's "year-end report card" starts with public chain revenue. Although the price of SOL fell all the way after rising to a new high of nearly $300 last year, and the highest rebound did not reach $270, from the perspective of public chain operation, its ability to generate revenue is already "fractured first".

Solana's On-Chain Fee Revenue Surpassed $600 Million in 2025

On January 2nd, Nansen data showed that Solana's on-chain fee revenue exceeded $600 million in 2025, surpassing TRON and Ethereum to rank first. The top five blockchains by on-chain fees last year were:

  • Solana ($603 million);
  • TRON ($581 million);
  • Ethereum ($514 million);
  • BNB Chain ($259 million);
  • Bitcoin ($172 million).

In addition, the number of active addresses on the Solana chain exceeded 1.05 billion, and the number of on-chain transactions was about 23.01 billion, both higher than public chains such as Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Tron.

Latest data shows that,as of the time of writing, Solana has maintained its first position in terms of the number of active addresses, number of transactions, and fee revenue over the past year.

Solana's Annual Revenue in 2025 Exceeded $1.5 Billion, Surpassing the Combined Revenue of "Hyperliquid + Ethereum"

According to data from Blockworks Research, Solana's full-year revenue in 2025 exceeded $1.5 billion, leading all public chain networks. Hyperliquid followed closely with revenue of $780 million; Ethereum generated $690 million in the same period, both lagging behind Solana. At the same time, and even more commendable, Solana achieved this revenue while its median transaction fee remained below 1 cent.

In this regard, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko affirmed this achievement and pointed out that capacity growth and cost-effectiveness are the core driving forces. He believes that network scale, not high fees, supports sustainable revenue expansion.

Solana's On-Chain Spot Trading Volume Reached $1.6 Trillion in 2025, Surpassing All CEXs Except Binance

Recently, The Kobeissi Letter stated that Solana's on-chain spot trading volume officially reached $1.6 trillion in 2025, surpassing all centralized exchanges except Binance.

According to data from JupiterExchange, the proportion of Solana's on-chain trading volume to the total trading volume has grown from 1% to 12% since 2022. In 2025, Solana's total trading volume officially exceeded that of Bybit, Coinbase Global, and Bitget, second only to Binance.

At the same time, Binance's market share has dropped from 80% to 55% since 2022. This also means that industry activity in cryptocurrency is rapidly shifting on-chain.

Revealing the Composition of Solana's Ecological On-Chain Revenue: 4 Components Support Over $600 Million

Based on available information, Solana's network revenue mainly comes from on-chain transaction fees. Unlike Ethereum and others, its fee mechanism design focuses more on deflation and validator incentives. The composition of the total fee revenue of $603 million in 2025 is as follows:

First Revenue: Base Fee

  • A very low fixed base fee is charged per transaction (about 5000 lamports).
  • This portion of the fee is entirely burned, not distributed to validators, directly reducing the total supply of SOL, creating deflationary pressure.
  • Accounts for a large proportion of total fee revenue, especially in 2025 with explosive transaction growth, the burning mechanism significantly enhanced SOL's scarcity.

Second Revenue: Priority Fee

  • An additional fee that users can choose to pay to speed up transaction confirmation.
  • During periods of high congestion (such as meme coin booms, large DEX trades), priority fees increase significantly, becoming the main source of revenue increment.
  • This portion of the fee is distributed to block producers (Leaders) and stakers, and is the main reward source for validators.

Third Revenue: MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) Related Revenue

  • Tips paid by searchers through MEV clients like Jito further supplement income.
  • The proportion of MEV revenue increased in 2025, closely related to complex arbitrage opportunities in DEX and meme coin trading.

Fourth Revenue: Other Minor Sources

Such as account rent (storage fees), voting fees, etc., accounting for a small proportion.

In the overall distribution mechanism, about 50% of the fees indirectly benefit all SOL holders through the burning mechanism (deflation); about 50% is directly distributed to validators and stakers, incentivizing network security. Unlike Ethereum, where ecological protocol fee revenue mainly goes to validators, Solana's burning mechanism gives its network revenue greater long-term value capture capability, which is also the key to maintaining low fees under high transaction volume.

Overview of Crypto Money-Making Machine Business Models: Public Chains, Perp DEXs, Launchpads Remain the Most Profitable Tracks, Second Only to Stablecoins

Finally, based on existing market information, public chains (Solana, Ethereum, TRON), on-chain perp DEXs (such as Hyperliquid, Aster, etc.), and on-chain Launchpads (such as Pump.fun) are still the most profitable tracks in the crypto industry, second only to stablecoin projects that collect interest and have stable issuance.

Although we previously analyzed the awkward survival state of current public chain projects in the article "Only 10 Public Chains Have Weekly Revenue Over $100,000: Naked After the Tide Recedes", the existence of public chains like Solana, Ethereum, TRON, and Base tells us: public chains are still the most profitable crypto track, perhaps even without one.

According to DefiLlama data, Hyperliquid's revenue in 2025 was $908 million; its cost of revenue was approximately $67.77 million, and its annual net profit was approximately $843 million. Excluding incentive-based expenses, the net profit attributed to the platform in 2025 was as high as approximately $420 million.

According to DefiLlama data, Pump.fun's annual revenue in 2025 was approximately $550 million. Unlike on-chain perp DEX platforms like Hyperliquid, as a "one-click coin issuance platform", Pump.fun does not need to incur incentive expenses, so its platform's annual net profit is approximately equal to its annual revenue, i.e., $549 million.

Based on the above information, the industry's mainstream revenue generators are still top applications like public chains, on-chain Perp DEXs, and Launchpad coin issuance platforms, second only to stablecoins (e.g., Tether's net profit related to the stablecoin sector alone was as high as $7.43 billion in 2025).

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, which blockchain had the highest on-chain fee revenue in 2025?

ASolana had the highest on-chain fee revenue in 2025, reaching $603 million.

QWhat was Solana's total annual revenue for 2025, and how did it compare to the combined revenue of Hyperliquid and Ethereum?

ASolana's total annual revenue for 2025 was over $1.5 billion, which was more than the combined revenue of Hyperliquid ($780 million) and Ethereum ($690 million).

QWhat were the four main components that made up Solana's on-chain fee revenue?

AThe four main components were: 1. Base fees (burned), 2. Priority fees (paid to validators and stakers), 3. MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) related income, and 4. Other minor sources like account rent and voting fees.

QHow much on-chain spot trading volume did Solana achieve in 2025, and what did it surpass?

ASolana achieved $1.6 trillion in on-chain spot trading volume in 2025, surpassing all centralized exchanges except for Binance.

QBesides public chains, what other types of crypto projects are mentioned as the most profitable business models, second only to stablecoins?

AThe other most profitable business models mentioned are on-chain Perpetual DEXs (like Hyperliquid) and on-chain Launchpads (like Pump.fun).

Related Reads

Hardcore First Look | Ocean Embodied Intelligence Company 'Shihang Intelligence' Secures Record-Breaking 1 Billion in Funding, Zhu Xiaohu, Temasek Place Bets

Breaking News | Ocean Embodied Intelligence company "Shihang Intelligent" secures a record-breaking 1 billion RMB (approximately 10 billion yuan) in Series A financing, with investment from Zhu Xiaohu and Temasek. Author: Qiu Xiaofen | Editor: Yuan Silai Ocean Embodied Intelligence company "Shihang Intelligent" has completed its Series A funding round, raising over 1 billion RMB. This marks the largest single funding round in the global marine robotics field to date. Investors include upstream momentum funds from chip companies "Moore Thread" and "Kunlunxin," Singapore's state-owned investment platform Vertex Growth, and listed company Dyneo, among others. Existing investors like GSR Ventures (whose founder Zhu Xiaohu has invested for the fifth time), Vertex Ventures China, Hua Ying Capital, and Long Capital also significantly increased their investments. Founder and CEO Chen Xiaobo, a 1989-born alumnus of Harbin Engineering University, is a long-time expert in underwater robotics. He received the National Defense Science and Technology Progress Award at age 28 (the youngest recipient) and led the development of China's first commercial underwater cleaning robot. The funds will be used for core technology R&D, global market expansion, and building the industry chain ecosystem to scale the application of marine robots in complex underwater scenarios. The ocean is considered one of the most challenging environments for robotics due to low light, high turbidity, complex currents, limited communication, high pressure, and corrosion. "Shihang Intelligent" focuses on developing core underlying technologies for marine robots, covering six key systems: power, control, sensing, navigation, sealing, and deployment. Its robots are capable of operating at depths from 0 to 10,000 meters with full degrees of freedom, performing complex maneuvers, autonomous navigation, and multi-robot collaboration. Applications include ship cleaning, underwater security, offshore wind power, marine ranching, and seabed inspection. The company's order value for the first half of 2026 alone has exceeded 1 billion RMB. Its "Orca Robot" is used by major shipping companies and has performed maintenance on over a thousand large vessels. In April of this year, the company launched its ocean embodied large model "Cangqiong CEORION." Unlike traditional remote-controlled or pre-programmed robots, this model integrates environmental perception, task understanding, and action generation into a single end-to-end architecture. Trained on millions of hours of commercial operation data and simulation data, it covers 12 major underwater operation scenarios. In simulations, it achieved over 90% task success rate and over 70% zero-shot adaptation capability to unseen environments. A built-in physics reasoning module reduces collision risk by 80%, enabling autonomous operation even with weak or no communication. Recently, "Shihang Intelligent" was selected as a core technology partner for Singapore's Maritime and Port Authority national hull inspection and cleaning program. These advancements indicate marine robotics is moving from pilot projects to scaled applications, with real-world operations generating valuable data to continuously improve robot capabilities. CEO Chen Xiaobo stated the company will continue investing in core marine robotics technology, the embodied intelligence model, and global application scenarios to expand into more high-risk, high-difficulty, and high-value underwater operations.

marsbit8m ago

Hardcore First Look | Ocean Embodied Intelligence Company 'Shihang Intelligence' Secures Record-Breaking 1 Billion in Funding, Zhu Xiaohu, Temasek Place Bets

marsbit8m ago

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

Investors flock to a physical AI startup as the race for the "OpenAI of the physical world" heats up. Ji Jia Shi Jie (GigaWorld), a company dedicated to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for the physical world, has raised 3.5 billion RMB (approximately $490 million) in just three months, according to a report from investment media outlet Touzijie. The latest B2 funding round of 1 billion RMB attracted a wide range of top-tier investors, including sovereign wealth funds, industrial capital, and financial institutions. This brings the total funding for the young company, now valued over 10 billion RMB, to 3.5 billion RMB across three recent rounds. The company is led by Huang Guan, a post-90s Tsinghua University PhD with extensive experience in AI, autonomous driving, and entrepreneurship. Its core innovation is a "dual-pyramid" system comprising a five-layer data pyramid (from internet videos to real-world robot data) and a three-layer algorithm pyramid focused on world simulation, action alignment, and reinforcement learning. This system underpins its key models: the "World Action Model" (e.g., GigaBrain series for robot control) and the "World Generation Model" (e.g., GigaWorld series for simulating and understanding the physical world). Its models have reportedly achieved top rankings in global robotics benchmarks. Ji Jia Shi Jie argues that while current digital AGI excels in information processing, the next frontier is physical AGI—systems that can understand and interact with the real world. The company believes the field is approaching its "GPT-3 moment," a key inflection point in capability scaling. To achieve this, the company is pursuing a dual-market strategy. For the consumer (C) market, it launched the "SeeLight" brand and its S1 general-purpose humanoid robot, which has secured initial orders for deployment in real homes. For the business (B) market, it focuses on industrial automation with its Maker series robots, having signed agreements for large-scale deployment in factories, and its DriveDreamer world model for autonomous driving, which is already in use with over 30 automakers and tech companies. The report concludes that by bridging the gap between digital intelligence and physical action, Ji Jia Shi Jie aims to unlock a new wave of productivity, ultimately bringing physical AGI into everyday life.

marsbit36m ago

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

marsbit36m ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1h ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1h ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit2h ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片