Solana 2025 Report Card: Annual Revenue of $1.5 Billion, Surpassing the Combined Total of 'Hyperliquid + Ethereum'

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-01-04Last updated on 2026-01-04

Abstract

Solana's 2025 Performance: A Record-Breaking Year with $1.5B in Revenue In 2025, Solana emerged as the top-performing blockchain network, generating a total revenue of $1.5 billion, surpassing the combined revenue of Hyperliquid and Ethereum. According to Nansen, its on-chain fee income alone reached $603 million, exceeding that of Tron and Ethereum and securing its position as the leader in public blockchain earnings. Key metrics underscored Solana's dominance: it recorded over 10.5 billion active addresses and approximately 23.01 billion transactions, both figures leading all major blockchains. Its on-chain spot trading volume hit $1.6 trillion, surpassing all centralized exchanges except Binance, indicating a significant shift of crypto activity to on-chain platforms. Solana's revenue structure is composed of four main components: base fees (burned for deflation), priority fees (paid to validators), MEV-related income, and minor sources like storage fees. This efficient model supports high transaction volumes while maintaining a median fee below $0.01. The report highlights that public chains, Perp DEXs (like Hyperliquid with $908M revenue), and launchpads (like Pump.fun with $549M revenue) remain the most profitable crypto sectors, second only to stablecoins. Solana's growth is attributed to its scalability, low costs, and vibrant ecosystem, including meme coin trends and DeFi innovations.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

The year 2025, which belonged to cryptocurrency, has passed. This year, in addition to a series of favorable policies, the regulatory layer development was even more rapid.

From the Meme coin issuance wave sparked by Pump.fun, to the on-chain Perp DEX trend led by Hyperliquid, and then to the stablecoin and PayFi financial wave driven by Circle (CRCL) going public, the on-chain ecosystems of numerous public chains have also entered a period of explosion. Among them, Solana, with its ecological vitality, underlying infrastructure construction, and its "application-first" internet-style capital network positioning, surpassed Ethereum to become the "New King of Annual On-Chain Networks".

Odaily Planet Daily will梳理 (sort out) the Solana on-chain ecosystem in this article, attempting to explore the "best business model" in the current crypto market (Odaily Note: Data sources vary, statistical calibers differ, for reference only).

Solana On-Chain Revenue Exceeds $600 Million, Outperforms Ethereum and TRON to Become the "Strongest Public Chain"

Solana's "year-end report card" starts with public chain revenue. Although the price of SOL has been falling since it rose to a new high of nearly $300 last year, and the highest rebound did not reach $270, from the perspective of public chain operation, its ability to generate revenue is already "fragmented and first".

2025 Solana On-Chain Fee Revenue Breaks Through $600 Million

On January 2nd, Nansen data showed that Solana's on-chain fee revenue in 2025 broke through $600 million, surpassing TRON and Ethereum to rank first. The top five blockchains by on-chain fees last year were:

  • Solana ($603 million);
  • TRON ($581 million);
  • Ethereum ($514 million);
  • BNB Chain ($259 million);
  • Bitcoin ($172 million).

In addition, the number of active addresses on the Solana chain exceeded 1.05 billion, and the number of on-chain transactions was about 23.01 billion, both higher than public chains such as Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Tron.

Latest data shows that,as of the time of writing, Solana has maintained its first position in terms of number of active addresses, number of transactions, and revenue fees within the past year.

2025 Solana Annual Revenue Exceeds $1.5 Billion, Surpassing the Combined Revenue of "Hyperliquid + Ethereum"

According to Blockworks Research data, Solana's full-year revenue in 2025 exceeded $1.5 billion, leading all public chain networks. Hyperliquid followed closely with revenue of $780 million; Ethereum generated $690 million in the same period, both lagging behind Solana. At the same time, and even more commendable, Solana achieved this revenue achievement while its median transaction fee remained below 1 cent.

In this regard, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko affirmed this achievement and pointed out that capacity growth and cost-effectiveness are the core driving forces. He believes that network scale, not high fees, supports sustainable revenue expansion.

2025 Solana On-Chain Spot Trading Volume Reaches $1.6 Trillion, Surpassing All CEXs Except Binance

Recently, The Kobeissi Letter stated that the on-chain spot trading volume on Solana in 2025 officially reached $1.6 trillion, surpassing all centralized exchanges except Binance.

According to data from JupiterExchange, the proportion of Solana's on-chain trading volume to total trading volume has grown from 1% to 12% since 2022. In 2025, Solana's total trading volume officially exceeded that of Bybit, Coinbase Global, and Bitget, second only to Binance.

At the same time, Binance's market share has dropped from 80% to 55% since 2022. This also means that industry activity in cryptocurrency is rapidly shifting on-chain.

Revealing the Composition of Solana Ecosystem On-Chain Revenue: 4 Components Support Over $600 Million

Based on available information, Solana's network revenue mainly comes from on-chain transaction fees. Unlike Ethereum and others, its fee mechanism design focuses more on deflation and validator incentives. The composition of the total fee revenue of $603 million in 2025 is as follows:

First Revenue: Base Fee

  • A very low fixed base fee is charged per transaction (about 5000 lamports).
  • This portion of the fee is entirely burned, not distributed to validators, directly reducing the total supply of SOL, creating deflationary pressure.
  • Accounts for a large proportion of total fee revenue, especially in 2025 with explosive transaction growth, the burning mechanism significantly enhanced SOL's scarcity.

Second Revenue: Priority Fee

  • An additional fee that users can optionally pay to speed up transaction confirmation.
  • During periods of high congestion (e.g., meme coin craze, large DEX trades), priority fees increase significantly, becoming a major source of revenue increment.
  • This portion of the fee is distributed to block producers (Leaders) and stakers, and is the main reward source for validators.

Third Revenue: MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) Related Revenue

  • Tips paid by searchers through MEV clients like Jito further supplement income.
  • The proportion of MEV revenue increased in 2025, closely related to complex arbitrage opportunities in DEX and meme coin trading.

Fourth Revenue: Other Minor Sources

Such as account rent (storage fees), voting fees, etc., accounting for a small proportion.

In the overall distribution mechanism, about 50% of the fees indirectly benefit all SOL holders through the burning mechanism (deflation); about 50% is directly distributed to validators and stakers, incentivizing network security. Unlike Ethereum, where protocol revenue fees mainly go to validators, Solana's burning mechanism gives its network revenue greater long-term value capture capability, which is also the key to maintaining low fees under high transaction volume.

Overview of Crypto Money-Making Machine Business Models: Public Chains, Perp DEXs, Launchpads Remain the Most Profitable Tracks, Second Only to Stablecoins

Finally, synthesizing existing market information, public chains (Solana, Ethereum, TRON), on-chain perp DEXs (like Hyperliquid, Aster, etc.), and on-chain Launchpads (like Pump.fun) are still the most profitable tracks in the crypto industry, second only to stablecoin projects that collect interest and have stable issuance.

Although we previously analyzed the awkward survival state of current public chain projects in the article "Only 10 Public Chains Have Weekly Revenue Over $100,000: Swimming Naked After the Tide Recedes", the existence of public chains like Solana, Ethereum, TRON, and Base tells us: public chains are still the most profitable crypto track today, perhaps even without exception.

According to DefiLlama data, Hyperliquid's revenue in 2025 was $908 million; its cost of revenue was approximately $67.77 million, and its annual net profit was approximately $843 million. Excluding incentive-based expenses, the net profit attributed to the platform in 2025 was as high as approximately $420 million.

According to DefiLlama data, Pump.fun's annual revenue in 2025 was approximately $550 million. Unlike on-chain perp DEX platforms like Hyperliquid, as a "one-click coin issuance platform", Pump.fun does not need to incur incentive expenses, so its platform's annual net profit is approximately equal to its annual revenue, i.e., $549 million.

Based on the above information, the industry's mainstream revenue-generating machines are still top applications like public chains, on-chain Perp DEXs, and Launchpad coin issuance platforms, second only to stablecoins (e.g., Tether's net profit related to the stablecoin sector alone reached $7.43 billion in 2025).

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was Solana's on-chain fee revenue in 2025, and how did it rank compared to other major blockchains?

ASolana's on-chain fee revenue in 2025 was $603 million, ranking it number one among all major blockchains, surpassing Tron ($581 million) and Ethereum ($514 million).

QWhat was Solana's total annual revenue for 2025, and how does it compare to the combined revenue of Hyperliquid and Ethereum?

ASolana's total annual revenue for 2025 was over $1.5 billion, which is more than the combined revenue of Hyperliquid ($780 million) and Ethereum ($690 million).

QWhat were the four main components that made up Solana's $603 million in on-chain fee revenue?

AThe four main components were: 1. Base fees (burned, creating deflationary pressure), 2. Priority fees (paid to validators and stakers), 3. MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) related income, and 4. Other minor sources like account rent and voting fees.

QHow much on-chain spot trading volume did Solana process in 2025, and what does this volume surpass?

ASolana processed $1.6 trillion in on-chain spot trading volume in 2025, surpassing the volume of all centralized exchanges except for Binance.

QAccording to the article, what are the most profitable business models in the crypto industry,仅次于稳定币?

AThe most profitable business models,仅次于稳定币, are public chains (like Solana, Ethereum, Tron), on-chain Perp DEXs (like Hyperliquid), and on-chain Launchpads (like Pump.fun).

Related Reads

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit2h ago

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit2h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片