Sharplink stakes 511 Ethereum in a week – Breaking down its ‘ETH earns more ETH’ approach

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-08Last updated on 2026-04-08

Abstract

Sharplink, the second-largest Ethereum treasury company, staked 511 ETH this week, bringing its total staked ETH to 16,947. This is part of its strategy to earn passive yield by staking its Ethereum holdings, which it describes as "Ethereum with an edge." The company's total ETH holdings are valued at $1.95 billion. This approach differs from the largest Ethereum treasury firm, BitMine, which hoards ETH for long-term bullish gains and flexibility. Sharplink's staking strategy, while generating rewards, carries risks like reduced liquidity, potential slashing, and exposure to price volatility. The trend of earning yield on crypto assets is growing, exemplified by Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy, which recently entered the yield-earning space with a new financial instrument. At the time of reporting, ETH's price was $2,245.04, and on-chain data suggested the asset was in an accumulation phase.

Sharplink, the second-largest Ethereum [ETH] treasury company, has reportedly staked over 511 ETH this week in staking rewards, bringing its total to 16,947 ETH.

Source: Sharplink

By staking ETH, Sharplink is locking up its Ethereum tokens in the network to validate transactions and, in return, earn rewards in ETH. Remarking on the same, Sharplink said,

Every week, our ETH earns more ETH. This is Ethereum with an edge.

AD

Sharplink vs. BitMine – ETH holdings and strategy

This happens at a time when Sharplink’s ETH stash has reached 868,699 ETH holdings worth $1.95 billion. However, when compared to the largest Ethereum treasury company, BitMine, it’s too little. As per CoinGecko’s data, BitMine holds 4,803,334 ETH worth $10.81 billion.

Source: CoinGecko

In fact, the motives of the two firms are also widely different, as BitMine strongly believes in hoarding ETH, which is similar to Michael Saylor’s firm, Strategy. However, Sharplink is taking a different approach to earning interest by staking its Ethereum.

The approach that BitMine is following is good if the firm is looking for bullish results and is more inclined towards flexibility at times of selling.

However, in Sharplink’s case, the firm is more interested in long-term conviction and wants passive yield. But this also comes with a set of risks, like reduced liquidity, potential slashing risks, and exposure to price drops while the ETH is locked.

Why is staking becoming important now?

Additionally, with the ongoing discussions around the CLARITY ACT and investors adjusting to the yield-earning policy shift, Ethereum staking is gradually growing.

Needless to say, there are many firms that opt for both. The recent addition to the list was Saylor’s Strategy. The firm, with the help of STRC, a Variable Rate Series A Perpetual “Stretch” Preferred Stock, recently entered the yield-earning cycle besides hoarding Bitcoin [BTC].

This comes as ETH’s price was trading at $2,245.04 after a hike of 6.8% in the past 24 hours.

Additionally, the on-chain metrics are also in support. For instance, the Ethereum Exchange Fow Balance showed more ETH being withdrawn from exchanges, and the Network Realized Profit/Loss suggested a neutral phase.

All this combined suggests that ETH was in an accumulation phase at the time of reporting.

Source: Santiment

Final Summary

  • Sharplink reaches 16,947 ETH thanks to its Ethereum staking strategy, but risk remains.
  • If in the Ethereum ecosystem it’s Sharplink, in the Bitcoin space, it’s Michael Saylor’s Strategy, which recently started STRC for the same reason.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow much Ethereum did Sharplink stake this week, and what is its total staked amount now?

ASharplink staked over 511 ETH this week, bringing its total staked amount to 16,947 ETH.

QWhat is the key difference in Ethereum strategy between Sharplink and the largest treasury company, BitMine?

ASharplink focuses on earning passive yield through staking its Ethereum, while BitMine believes in hoarding ETH, similar to Michael Saylor's Strategy, prioritizing bullish results and flexibility for selling.

QWhat are some of the risks associated with Sharplink's staking strategy?

AThe risks include reduced liquidity, potential slashing risks, and exposure to price drops while the ETH is locked in the staking contract.

QWhat recent development suggests that Ethereum is in an accumulation phase according to the article?

AOn-chain metrics support this, specifically the Ethereum Exchange Flow Balance showing more ETH being withdrawn from exchanges and the Network Realized Profit/Loss indicating a neutral phase.

QWhich other major company, mentioned in the article, recently entered the yield-earning cycle for its crypto holdings?

AMichael Saylor's company, Strategy, recently entered the yield-earning cycle by utilizing STRC, a Variable Rate Series A Perpetual 'Stretch' Preferred Stock, in addition to its Bitcoin hoarding strategy.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报26m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报26m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News43m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News43m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片