Pump.fun Launches Trader Cashbacks in Fee Model Shift

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-18Last updated on 2026-02-18

Abstract

Solana-based memecoin launchpad Pump.fun has introduced a new Trader Cashback system, shifting its fee model. Token creators must now choose between the traditional Creator Fees or the new cashback option before launch, a decision that is irreversible. Under the cashback model, traders earn automatic rewards on every trade made through Pump.fun's Terminal interface, aiming to better distribute incentives and reward active market participants rather than just deployers. This change comes as the platform experiences a significant revenue decline, with fees dropping 75.6% in January from its peak. On-chain data highlights a profitability disparity, as only a small fraction of the millions of interacting wallets have earned substantial profits. The community reaction is mixed; some welcome the trader-focused incentives, while others worry it may reduce developer promotion post-launch. This move reflects a broader industry trend of platforms testing new incentive models to boost participation and confidence in the volatile memecoin market.

Solana-based memecoin launchpad Pump.fun has introduced a new trader-focused rewards system that reshapes its fee model. The platform now allows token creators to choose between traditional Creator Fees or a new Trader Cashback structure before launching a coin. Once selected, creators cannot reverse the decision.

Pump.fun originally rewarded token deployers with 0.3% of all fees generated by their coins. That model fueled rapid growth and helped the platform generate more than $15 million in daily fees at its peak. However, critics argued that the system favored deployers while most retail traders absorbed losses.

Trader Cashback Model Takes Center Stage

Under the new framework, creators must decide whether their token qualifies for Creator Fees or should operate as a “Cashback Coin.” If creators select the Trader Cashback option, traders earn rewards on every trade executed through Terminal, Pump.fun’s built-in trading interface.

Terminal generates cashback rewards automatically and makes them accessible within the platform. According to Pump.fun, this change brings about a more balanced distribution of incentives, particularly for successful tokens that do not have organized teams or development plans.

The company noted that many viral memecoins gain traction organically. In this regard, the Creator Fees might end up favoring the deployers who do not contribute much to the process. The new system tries to shift the incentives to the people who are actively participating in the market.

Platform Revenue Faces Sharp Decline

The new system is being introduced at a time when the platform revenue is experiencing a drastic drop. Pump.fun has seen a 75.6% drop in its fees to $31.8 million in January, compared to the $148.1 million it saw in January 2025, which is its best month so far. February has brought in $15.6 million so far, putting the platform on track to underperform January’s total.

On-chain data reveals another challenge. Dune Analytics shows that out of 58.7 million wallets that interacted with Pump.fun, only 4.76 million wallets earned between $1,000 and $10,000. Fewer than 13,700 wallets reached millionaire status. The information points to the disparity between viral token launches and the profitability of traders.

Santiment analysts have recently indicated that memecoins could be close to a possible market bottom. You can follow memecoin market trends and on-chain data using tools such as CoinMarketCap and follow Solana ecosystem data using Solscan.

Community Reaction and Industry Context

The community responded positively to the news, although some users questioned the long-term implications of the change. Some critics believe that lowering Creator Fees could lead to a decrease in the number of developers who promote tokens following a launch. This is because developers currently use early trading volume as a reward, and this change could affect that.

However, other platforms have made different decisions. Coinbase’s Base has decided to end its Creator Rewards program in favor of tradable assets. The program rewarded about 17,000 creators with a total of $450,000 over a period of seven months.

The adjustment signal by Pump.fun indicates a larger trend in the economics of memecoins. The platforms are now testing different models of incentives as trading volumes become volatile and retail participation slows down. By putting traders front and center in the incentive scheme, Pump.fun aims to regain confidence and drive participation.

The memecoin market is driven by speculation and social momentum. For healthy growth, there has to be a balance in incentives. The cashback system of Pump.fun is testing the hypothesis of whether reward redistribution can help stabilize participation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) Posts 18% Surge: Are Buyers Taking the Driver’s Seat?

Tagscrypto tradingDeFimemecoinsPump.funSolana

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the key change Pump.fun has made to its fee model?

APump.fun has introduced a new Trader Cashback system, allowing token creators to choose between the traditional Creator Fees or the new cashback structure for traders before launching a coin.

QWhat was the primary criticism of the original Pump.fun fee model?

ACritics argued that the original model, which rewarded token deployers with 0.3% of all fees, favored deployers while most retail traders absorbed the losses.

QHow does the new Trader Cashback system work?

AIf a creator selects the Trader Cashback option, traders earn rewards on every trade executed through Pump.fun's built-in trading interface, Terminal, which generates and makes the cashback accessible within the platform.

QWhat significant challenge is Pump.fun facing alongside this model change?

AThe platform is experiencing a sharp decline in revenue, with a 75.6% drop in fees to $31.8 million in January compared to its peak of $148.1 million, and February is on track to underperform January.

QWhat is one potential negative consequence of lowering Creator Fees, as mentioned by some critics?

ASome critics believe that lowering Creator Fees could lead to a decrease in the number of developers who promote tokens after launch, as they currently use early trading volume as a reward.

Related Reads

Once-Popular Web3 Enters Wave of Layoffs

The once-hot Web3 industry is experiencing a severe wave of layoffs. While many companies attribute job cuts to AI-driven restructuring, the primary reason is often financial pressure. The Web3 sector, at the intersection of tech and finance, has been hit particularly hard. Employees at major cryptocurrency exchanges report sudden, impersonal layoffs—often with system access revoked overnight—and minimal or no severance. Common tactics include setting impossible performance targets or terminating employees for minor policy violations. The working atmosphere has become toxic, marked by intense monitoring, excessive meetings, and management obsessed with control and internal politics rather than product innovation. The industry's core business model is collapsing. Exchange revenue from trading fees and listing charges has plummeted due to a decline in quality projects and retail investor exodus. Events like the massive forced liquidation on October 10th further shattered confidence. Competition from on-chain derivatives platforms and prediction markets is intensifying the downturn. As layoffs continue, displaced workers struggle to find new opportunities. Many transition to the AI sector, but face significant bias from traditional finance and even some AI firms, which view crypto industry experience with suspicion. The current downturn appears more structural than cyclical, driven by unsustainable practices, internal strife, and a failure to innovate, raising questions about the industry's future trajectory.

marsbit10m ago

Once-Popular Web3 Enters Wave of Layoffs

marsbit10m ago

Sales Drop 26% But Prices Rise? Xiaomi's Dilemma

Xiaomi, facing a significant 26.3% year-on-year decline in global smartphone shipments in Q2 2026, has implemented its third price hike of the year. On August 2nd, prices were raised for nine models, including the flagship Mi 17 series (up 400-500 yuan) and Redmi K90/Turbo 5 series (up 300 yuan). This move completes a pattern where cost pressure, originating from surging memory chip prices, has climbed from entry-level to mid-range and now flagship products. The primary driver is a severe supply squeeze on consumer-grade DRAM and NAND flash memory, as major manufacturers like Samsung shift advanced capacity to more profitable HBM for AI applications. According to Xiaomi President Lu Weibing, memory prices for the same configuration have skyrocketed nearly fourfold since Q1 2025, adding roughly 1500 yuan to the cost of a mainstream 12GB+512GB phone. IDC estimates consumer memory costs have risen nearly 300% year-on-year. While the price increases hurt demand and contributed to the sales slump, Xiaomi's strategy of reducing entry-level models and upgrading its product mix also played a role. Domestically, its market share in China fell to 12% (5th place), while leaders Huawei and Apple saw shipments grow over 24%. To mitigate future risks, Xiaomi is accelerating its in-house "Surge" chip development and optimizing memory configurations across its lineup. Xiaomi is not alone; major brands like OPPO, vivo, and Apple have already raised prices in 2026, with industry insiders predicting another round of increases (200-800 yuan) in the second half. A full-scale industry-wide涨价 cycle is underway, forcing both manufacturers and consumers to recalibrate their strategies and purchasing decisions amid sustained cost pressures.

marsbit21m ago

Sales Drop 26% But Prices Rise? Xiaomi's Dilemma

marsbit21m ago

Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline: The Crypto Market is Experiencing Its Longest Ebb Since 2022

The cryptocurrency market experienced its third consecutive quarterly decline in Q2 2026, marking its longest downturn since 2022, according to a CoinGecko report. The total market capitalization fell 12.6% to $2.1 trillion, a retreat of roughly 52% from its October 2025 peak. Multiple indicators signal an orderly capital exit from the sector. For the first time since Q3 2023, the total stablecoin market cap shrank (-1.6% to $305.1B), indicating funds are leaving the ecosystem entirely, not just rotating to safer crypto assets. Trading volumes on centralized exchanges dropped 27.9%, while DeFi's Total Value Locked (TVL) plummeted 23.4%. Both Bitcoin (-14.2%) and Ethereum (-25.4%) underperformed traditional risk assets like equities in Q2, breaking from previous correlative narratives. Ethereum saw its first-ever three-quarter losing streak, with its market share falling to around 10%. A few areas saw growth. Prediction market volumes surged 48.7%, largely driven by sports betting. Hyperliquid's HYPE token entered the top 10 by market cap, and tokenized collectibles platforms grew, though primarily via gamified mechanics. Despite a ~9.8% Bitcoin rebound in July, historical trends suggest caution for August. The market, now ~49% below its 2025 high, is undergoing a measured retreat. Its recovery hinges on future Federal Reserve policy and the industry's ability to develop sustainable revenue streams beyond speculation.

marsbit35m ago

Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline: The Crypto Market is Experiencing Its Longest Ebb Since 2022

marsbit35m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片