Polygon Surpasses Ethereum in Daily Transaction Fees

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-17Last updated on 2026-02-17

Abstract

According to data from Token Terminal, Polygon, a scaling solution for Ethereum, surpassed Ethereum in daily transaction fee revenue for the first time. On a recent Friday, Polygon generated $407,121 in fees compared to Ethereum's $211,790. This surge is largely attributed to heavy usage of the prediction market platform Polymarket, which has driven significant on-chain activity. For instance, an Oscars-related market on Polymarket saw over $15 million in wagers. Additionally, increased stablecoin activity, particularly USDC, on the Polygon network has contributed to this growth. While the trend continued over the weekend, fees have since normalized, with Ethereum regaining its lead. This event highlights a momentary shift in network activity, prompting discussions on long-term competition.

Polygon, a blockchain network built to scale Ethereum, has recorded higher daily transaction fee revenue than Ethereum for the first time ever, according to data from Token Terminal. The figures show that on Friday, Polygon earned $407.121K in transaction fees, while Ethereum generated $211.790K in the same 24‐hour period, marking a notable shift in network activity.

Over the following day, the trend continued until Sunday with a record of $303.9923K volume. On the latest close, Polygon’s daily transaction fees slightly slipped to $186.508k compared with about $262.710k on Ethereum.

Analysts and blockchain data observers attribute the surge in Polygon’s fee revenue mainly to heavy usage of Polymarket, a prediction market platform operating on the network. According to Matthias Seidl, co-founder of the analytics platform growthepie, recent increases in activity “have been fully driven by Polymarket,” with the platform generating more than $1 million in fees for Polygon over the past seven days.

Impact of Polymarket and Stablecoin Activity on Polygon’s Fees

Polymarket’s user engagement appears to have contributed considerably to the shift in on‐chain activity, as users place real‐world event wagers that require frequent transactions. Polymarket is a major prediction market platform in the blockchain space, which began operating in 2020 supported by Polygon. Polygon itself noted that, in one instance related to an Oscars market, more than $15 million in wagers were placed, further driving fee generation.

In addition to prediction market growth, Polygon has seen increased use of stablecoins on its network, particularly USDC, which has reached new weekly highs in transaction counts. This uptick in stablecoin activity suggests broader adoption across decentralized finance use cases.

While Ethereum remains the largest smart contract platform by market value and overall activity, these fee metrics reflect a momentary shift in daily revenue generation. Discussions in the blockchain community now focus on whether such patterns will persist and how they might influence long‐term network competition.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Bundesbank President Urges Development of Euro-Pegged Stablecoins and Retail CBDC

TagsETHEREUMPolygontransaction fee

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the data from Token Terminal, which blockchain network recorded higher daily transaction fee revenue than Ethereum for the first time ever?

APolygon

QWhat was the amount of transaction fees earned by Polygon on Friday, as mentioned in the article?

A$407.121K

QWhich specific prediction market platform is identified as the main driver behind the surge in Polygon's fee revenue?

APolymarket

QBesides prediction markets, what other type of asset's increased activity on Polygon has contributed to its fee generation, reaching new weekly highs?

AStablecoins, particularly USDC

QWhat significant event-related wager amount was placed on Polymarket, hosted on Polygon, that was highlighted as driving fee generation?

AMore than $15 million in wagers were placed on an Oscars market

Related Reads

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News17m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News17m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit45m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit45m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit1h ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片