Matrixport Research: Bitcoin Falls into Bear Market Territory, Could a Weakening Dollar Become the Next Support?

MatrixportPublished on 2026-02-03Last updated on 2026-02-03

Abstract

Bitcoin has entered a bearish phase, trading below its 21-week moving average, amid policy uncertainty from the U.S. midterm elections and its typical four-year cycle pressures. While structural weakness persists, a weakening U.S. dollar and ongoing reflation narrative could provide medium-term support for risk assets, including Bitcoin. The October 10 flash crash exacerbated market fragility, widening arbitrage gaps and reducing liquidity. Notably, realized losses were largely absorbed by speculative retail investors—particularly on platforms like Hyperliquid—rather than institutional players. Macro conditions show tolerance for a weaker dollar, which historically benefits Bitcoin. However, risk appetite is cooling: stablecoin growth has slowed, retail interest remains low, and quantum computing concerns continue to dampen Bitcoin’s safe-haven narrative. Although the dollar’s 14-year bullish trend has broken—a positive long-term signal—Bitcoin’s price action remains weak, with rallies being met with selling. A more bullish outlook requires clearer technical and capital flow confirmations.

"The structurally weak bias remains unchanged, but the shift in the dollar trend is becoming a key variable."

After the latest round of pullbacks, Bitcoin's price structure has further weakened. The most direct signal is that it continues to trade below the 21-week moving average, aligning with the technical characteristics of a bear market. At the same time, the policy uncertainty of the U.S. midterm election year, combined with the typical four-year cycle of Bitcoin, makes this historical time window more prone to price pressure. However, against the backdrop of a weakening dollar and the ongoing reflation narrative, we maintain a relatively positive view on overall risk assets, but our assessment of Bitcoin still requires careful evaluation in conjunction with structural signals.

Price Structure Under Pressure: Selling Pressure Not from Institutions, but from Dispersed Speculative Losses

Over the past six months, Bitcoin has failed to strengthen in sync with gold and other risk assets. Since June 2025, sustained selling by early holders was seen as the main suppressing factor. However, since October, as gold accelerated its upward trend and Bitcoin entered a correction, it has become clear that a single factor can no longer explain the current divergence.

The flash crash on October 10, 2025, became a significant watershed. This event led to a significant widening of cross-asset relative pricing and inter-exchange spreads, squeezing the risk budgets of market makers and market-neutral funds, thereby weakening short-term liquidity. Notably, there are almost no signs of concentrated losses among major trading institutions. Instead, realized losses are occurring more dispersed among a broader range of market participants. Data shows that traders on the Hyperliquid platform contributed over 50% of the realized losses, indicating that this round of shock was primarily borne by speculative retail investors, not led by institutions.

Capital and Narrative Shifts: Weakening Dollar is a Supporting Variable, but Risk Appetite is Still Cooling

On a macro level, the reflation narrative persists, and the dollar remains in a weak trading range. Historically, Bitcoin has often found medium-term support during periods of sustained dollar weakness. Recently, Trump has neither sent a clear signal of support for a weaker dollar nor made strong statements against it. The market tends to interpret this as increased tolerance for a weaker dollar, suggesting the reflation trade may still find support in the short term.

However, from a capital flow perspective, risk appetite is showing marginal cautiousness. The one-year rolling growth rates of the stablecoin supplies for both USDT and USDC peaked around October 2025 and have since slowed significantly, with USDC seeing a more pronounced decline. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's overall search popularity has remained low since its peak in 2021, reflecting more a cooling of retail attention rather than a wave of panic. Although discussions around quantum computing have subsided, they continue to somewhat suppress Bitcoin's "safe asset" narrative, making it difficult for its safety premium to recover.

Overall, although the dollar's 14-year-long uptrend has been broken—a change that historically tends to favor Bitcoin in establishing medium to long-term support—the current price structure remains weak, with rebounds often being met with selling. The overall trend remains within a consolidation range under a bear market framework. Our view on Bitcoin has become marginally more constructive compared to before, but before shifting to a clearer bullish stance, we still need to wait for further improvement and confirmation from technical and capital flow signals.

Some of the above views are from Matrix on Target. Contact us to obtain the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Related Questions

QAccording to the Matrixport research, what are the key technical characteristics indicating Bitcoin has entered a bear market territory?

AThe key technical characteristic is that Bitcoin's price continues to trade below its 21-week moving average, which aligns with the technical features of a bear market.

QWhat event on October 10, 2025, served as a significant watershed moment for Bitcoin's price action, and what was its primary impact?

AThe flash crash on October 10, 2025, was a significant watershed. It led to a significant widening of cross-asset relative pricing and inter-exchange spreads, which squeezed risk budgets for market makers and market-neutral funds, resulting in weaker short-term liquidity.

QThe report suggests the recent selling pressure did not primarily come from institutions. Which group of market participants was responsible for over 50% of the realized losses?

AOver 50% of the realized losses were contributed by traders on the Hyperliquid platform, indicating that the recent selling pressure was primarily shouldered by speculative retail traders, not institutions.

QHow does a weakening US Dollar historically tend to affect Bitcoin, and what is the current market interpretation of former President Trump's stance on the dollar?

AHistorically, Bitcoin tends to find more medium-term support during periods of sustained US Dollar weakness. The current interpretation of former President Trump's stance is that he has shown increased tolerance for a weaker dollar, as he has neither sent a clear signal of support nor made strong statements against its decline.

QWhat two signals from the stablecoin market and web search trends indicate a cooling in risk appetite among market participants?

AThe one-year rolling growth rate of the supply of stablecoins USDT and USDC peaked around October 2025 and has since slowed significantly, with USDC seeing a more pronounced decline. Additionally, Bitcoin's overall search popularity has remained low since its peak in 2021, reflecting cooling retail interest rather than a wave of panic.

Related Reads

Trade.xyz's Rebase Refusal Sparks Controversy, On-Chain Pre-IPO Market Faces Major Pricing Test

The debate surrounding Trade.xyz's refusal to adjust its SPCX (SpaceX pre-IPO) perpetual contract pricing amid updated share count revelations highlights a key challenge for on-chain pre-IPO markets. While several centralized exchanges (CEXs) paused and repriced their contracts after SpaceX's filing showed a ~10% increase in total shares, Trade.xyz maintained its market-driven pricing logic, which tracks expected per-share price sentiment rather than fundamental valuation metrics like market cap. This discrepancy triggered cross-platform arbitrage and caused leveraged long positions on Trade.xyz to suffer significant losses, as the platform's HIP-3 architecture lacks a native "Rebase" mechanism to neutrally adjust all user positions following such corporate actions. The incident underscores the difficulty for decentralized perpetual exchanges (Perp DEXs) to implement Rebase—a process CEXs handle by centrally pausing markets and adjusting ledger data. On-chain, this requires complex smart contract modifications, increasing gas costs, complexity, and potential attack surfaces. While some DEXs have managed similar adjustments, Trade.xyz's current design does not natively support it, though the team is reportedly exploring solutions for future events like stock splits. Ultimately, the controversy serves as a critical case study for the nascent on-chain pre-IPO sector, raising questions about price discovery reliability, transparent rule disclosure, and the readiness of DeFi infrastructures to handle traditional corporate actions as real-world assets (RWAs) gain traction.

marsbit9m ago

Trade.xyz's Rebase Refusal Sparks Controversy, On-Chain Pre-IPO Market Faces Major Pricing Test

marsbit9m ago

The 'Middle Eastern Prince' Swindles a Wealthy Woman: Renting Planes and Rolls-Royces, Scamming 120 Million Over Three Years

Two brothers who posed as "Middle Eastern princes" have been sentenced in the United States to 24 and 23 years in prison, respectively, and ordered to pay over $21.2 million in restitution and back taxes. Over three years, they fraudulently obtained approximately $21 million, primarily by promoting fictitious investment projects, including a non-existent cryptocurrency mining operation in a former General Electric industrial park in East Cleveland. The brothers, aged 42 and 33, created elaborate personas: one claimed to be a wealthy royal family heir and the city's "International Economic Advisor," while the other posed as a hedge fund manager with expertise from watching the TV show *Billions*. They bolstered their image by renting luxury cars and private jets and cultivating a relationship with a local mayor's chief of staff, who provided official-looking documents and government event access. A significant portion of the victims' funds, about $18 million, came from a single Chinese investor, a woman from Sichuan with experience in Bitcoin mining. The brothers also defrauded several women, including one former girlfriend. Their scheme unraveled when the primary investor discovered her $6 million worth of mining equipment had been sold off. The case highlights a trend of impostors using fabricated "Middle Eastern royal" identities to target wealthy individuals. Similar incidents include a "Dubai prince" who recently promoted a $500 million family office in Hong Kong and a Colombian man who impersonated a Saudi prince for decades in the US before being caught and sentenced in 2019.

marsbit24m ago

The 'Middle Eastern Prince' Swindles a Wealthy Woman: Renting Planes and Rolls-Royces, Scamming 120 Million Over Three Years

marsbit24m ago

a16z Partner: Being in the Flow of Capital Is the True Moat

A16z Partner: Standing in the Cash Flow is the True Moat Historically, many of the strongest companies built their moats by positioning themselves within "cash flows"—facilitating value creation and transfer in a network and taking a cut. The more value flows, the larger they grow. Crypto is the first modern technology natively built for this. With open ledgers, programmable settlement, and stablecoins enabling internet-speed global value transfer, it allows startups to inherit network effects from day one. Well-designed tokens align users, developers, and the protocol towards network growth, distributing value to contributors. This model isn't new (e.g., railroads, Visa, Google, AWS) but Crypto democratizes it. It lets entrepreneurs target areas with high inefficiency and profit extraction—like traditional finance's payments, custody, FX, and settlement—to compress costs, increase speed, and redistribute value by standing in the new flow. The opportunity extends beyond finance to emerging markets like GPU/compute, AI training data, energy, and space, where new, programmable infrastructure can be built without legacy constraints. Key questions for founders: Are you already in the cash flow? Does your revenue scale 10x with network activity? Where is profit extraction highest relative to value created in your market? The strategy is clear: compress the old cost structure, position yourself in the new value stream, and let the network compound.

marsbit51m ago

a16z Partner: Being in the Flow of Capital Is the True Moat

marsbit51m ago

Capturing 15 Top-Tier Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: A Consensus Protocol Debug Agent Framework Built by 0G Lab in Collaboration with Teams from NUS, PKU, and BUPT

"Agents Capture 15 Critical Zero-Day Bugs: 0G Lab's Multi-Agent Framework Automates Debugging in Consensus Protocols" Distributed consensus protocols are notoriously difficult to debug due to complex, intertwined states. A novel framework, Agora, developed by 0G Labs with researchers from NUS, Peking University, and Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, tackles this by fusing deep domain expertise with a collaborative multi-agent LLM architecture. Agora moves beyond the limitations of single LLMs and traditional testing like fuzzing. It employs three specialized agents: an Orchestrator for global state, a Strategy agent for generating attack scenarios using distributed systems knowledge, and a TestGen agent that creates executable tests. A core innovation is its efficient "Succinct Memory & Communication" mechanism and a dynamic test harness. This allows the system to translate abstract hypotheses into concrete tests across languages like Go and Rust, run them, capture failures, and refine the approach in a closed loop—all with minimal token overhead. In rigorous evaluations on production-level protocols including Raft, EPaxos, and components from etcd and Sui, Agora discovered 15 previously unknown deep logic bugs (e.g., execution divergence, liveness violations). In stark contrast, powerful standalone LLMs like GPT-5.2 and Claude 4.5 found zero such bugs. Agora achieved this with a high precision of 73.9% and at an average cost of only about $40 per bug found. The framework demonstrates high generalizability. Its decoupled design allows the "Multi-Agent + Hypothesis-Driven Testing" paradigm to be applied to other complex domains like database concurrency control, OS kernels, and Web3 smart contract auditing. By enabling efficient, automated detection of deep logic flaws, Agora points the way for AI-powered security in critical infrastructure, aligning with the growing trends of agentic systems and automated quality control.

marsbit55m ago

Capturing 15 Top-Tier Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: A Consensus Protocol Debug Agent Framework Built by 0G Lab in Collaboration with Teams from NUS, PKU, and BUPT

marsbit55m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片