Longs Recede, Volatility Weakens, Bitcoin Locks in $60K-$70K Range

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-02Last updated on 2026-04-02

Abstract

Bitcoin remains range-bound between $60,000 and $70,000, with early signs of accumulation in spot markets and a reset in derivatives positioning. Overhead supply remains a key structural issue, with approximately 8.4 million BTC held at a loss, concentrated between $80,000 and $126,000. Long-term holder realized losses have risen to around $200 million per day, indicating ongoing distribution. While Coinbase spot flows have turned slightly positive, demand remains tentative. Corporate treasury buying has narrowed significantly, with only one major player continuing consistent accumulation. Perpetual funding rates have reset to neutral, and implied volatility has softened across the term structure. Options skew shows renewed defensive positioning, and negative gamma below the spot price suggests vulnerability to amplified downside moves. The market lacks a clear catalyst and appears to be in a redistribution phase rather than a trending environment, requiring stronger demand or further supply absorption to break out.

Authored by: Glassnode

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Bitcoin remains confined within the $60,000 to $70,000 range. The spot market shows early signs of absorption, while the derivatives market has completed a reset. Volatility has cooled, and positioning has become more balanced. However, the lack of a clear catalyst means the market lacks the confidence needed for a sustained breakout.

Summary

  • Bitcoin remains stuck in a wide range between $60,000 and $70,000. URPD data shows a dense cluster of supply overhead between $80,000 and $126,000. Digesting this supply overhang may require a deeper price discount or a longer period of redistribution.
  • The total supply in loss is approaching 8.4 million BTC, resembling the market structure seen in Q2 2022. Back then, the market needed to redistribute approximately 3 million BTC to regain the cycle midline.
  • Long-Term Holder Realized Loss has been climbing since November 2025, now reaching levels around $200 million per day, confirming active capitulation. A cooling of this metric below $25 million per day would be a key threshold for market bottom formation.
  • The Coinbase Spot Cumulative Volume Delta has turned to a slight positive, indicating spot buyers are beginning to absorb selling pressure. However, the current level of demand remains far below what is typically seen during the formation of durable lows.
  • Treasury flows have become more concentrated: Marathon has distributed ~15,000 BTC, while Strategy remains the only institution conducting large-scale, consistent buying.
  • Directional premium in the perpetual swap market has compressed to near-neutral levels, slightly below zero, reflecting a reset of long-biased leverage and cooling speculative enthusiasm.
  • Current perpetual positioning is far from momentum-driven; long exposure is being unwound, and short interest is re-emerging. This leaves the futures market more balanced overall, but also more cautious.
  • Implied Volatility continues to soften across the term structure, indicating the options market is pricing in a calmer near-term environment and reduced demand for volatility exposure.
  • Skew metrics are beginning to tilt downward again, signaling a return of protective positioning, though their levels remain well below those typically associated with strong hedging demand.
  • Gamma positioning has flipped back to being supportive of the market, reducing convexity effect on the downside and indicating stabilizing short-term dealer positioning following the recent negative gamma regime.

On-Chain Insights

The Scale of Unrealized Loss Supply

As price consolidates in the $60k-$70k range, this report will look beyond short-term price action to assess the structural forces shaping the current market. As noted in recent reports, one of the most persistent headwinds to momentum is the significant volume of supply acquired above $80k, which is now held at an unrealized loss.

This cohort has endured a bearish environment for over six months, facing a binary behavioral choice: either sell into any rally to minimize further losses, or capitulate psychologically as drawdowns deepen.

The URPD chart illustrates this clearly, showing a dense cluster of supply firmly overhead between $80k and $126k. Resolving this supply overhang will likely require either a significant price discount to attract new buyers, or a prolonged period where these coins are redistributed from loss-realizing holders to more conviction-driven new owners.

Supply in Loss

To quantify the overhead supply, we can use the 'Total Supply in Loss' metric. It counts the number of circulating bitcoins whose last move price was above the current spot price. Smoothed with a 30-day SMA to remove short-term noise, this metric currently sits around 8.4M BTC, meaning roughly 8M to 9M coins have been in loss persistently over the past month.

The scale of this value, coupled with spot trading near the current cycle's midline, suggests parallels to the market structure observed in Q2 2022. Historically, resolving supply overhangs of this magnitude has required a significant redistribution of coins from loss-holding sellers to new buyers entering at lower prices. The precedent of the 2022 bear market is instructive. Typically, the Total Supply in Loss compressed from above 8M BTC to around 5M BTC before the market decisively reclaimed the cycle midline. This implies roughly 3M coins changed hands before conditions normalized.

Tracking the Redistribution in Progress

After establishing the scale of loss supply needing redistribution, the next step is monitoring the pace of this process. The 'Long-Term Holder Realized Loss' metric measures the total value of losses realized by investors holding coins for over six months who are now selling below their cost basis. This metric directly captures the active redistribution of the aforementioned overhead supply.

Its 30-day moving average has been steadily rising since November 2025 and is now elevated at ~$200M per day. This confirms that Long-Term Holders are increasingly capitulating to the current market. While this wave of loss realization is a necessary and constructive part of the bear market clearing process, it alone is not a sufficient condition for a reversal. A significant cooling of this metric below $25M per day would represent a more convincing signal of seller exhaustion and has been a prerequisite for market basing historically, before sustainable bull markets commence.

Off-Chain Insights

Coinbase Spot Demand Returns

The spot market is showing tentative signs of stabilization. The 30-day moving average of the Coinbase Spot Volume Delta has turned to a slight positive in the latest readings. This follows an extended period of negative values throughout January and early February, reflecting sustained distribution pressure.

The recent shift suggests that as price stabilizes, buyers are beginning to absorb available supply and provide support. However, the magnitude of the positive delta remains modest, indicating current demand is tentative rather than conviction-driven.

Historically, more robust market recoveries require sustained positive spot flows, whereas fleeting bouts of buying often fail to produce follow-through. For now, the recent uptick is constructive, but a more durable recovery would likely require an expansion in buying pressure.

Treasury Flows Grow More Complex

The broad base of treasury flows has weakened significantly in recent months. The latest data reveals a more uneven and selective pattern of activity. Earlier in the cycle, corporate accumulation was supported by a wider array of allocators. Recent flows, however, suggest buying support is becoming increasingly concentrated.

Most notably, Marathon has sold approximately 15,000 BTC, standing as one of the clearest examples of recent corporate treasuries reducing, not increasing, exposure. In contrast, Strategy appears to remain the only consistent structural buyer; the firm continues to make regular purchases even as participation from others becomes more sporadic.

This shift points to a significant change in market structure. Corporate demand is no longer a broad-based corporate accumulation trend and now appears narrower and more reliant on a single dominant player. The net result is that corporate buying, while still present, is on a less broad foundation and therefore a less reliable source of structural support compared to earlier cycle phases.

Perp Premium Reset

Directional premium in the perpetual swap market continues to compress, with the 30-day sum now near neutral and slightly negative. This marks a clear cooling from the long-biased conditions that previously supported the rally.

This shift suggests bullish speculative positions are being unwound, and short interest is beginning to re-emerge. The current structure does not reflect strong market conviction but points towards a more cautious and balanced perpetual market landscape.

Historically, resets in directional premium often accompany consolidation or trend exhaustion. This is because leverage is repriced following an extended move. In this sense, the recent decline in premium indicates speculative appetite has waned, leaving the perp market thoroughly reset with reduced leverage.

Volatility Expectations Are Lowering

Following the reset in options market positioning, Implied Volatility is among the first places showing changes. Bitcoin's volatility term structure has shifted lower overall compared to last week, led by the front end. 1-week ATM Implied Volatility is now 51%, with the 3-month at 49%. Other tenors are packed tightly in between, with the 6-month at 49.8%, pointing to a significantly compressed term structure.

This reflects a market dialing down expectations for near-term large moves, despite ongoing macro uncertainty. Longer-dated vol is relatively better supported, suggesting uncertainty hasn't disappeared but is being pushed further out in time. In the near term, pricing is shifting towards a more convergent volatility regime as the market lacks immediate catalysts and demand for optionality has faded.

Downside Protection Begins Rebuilding

As volatility expectations soften, skew metrics reveal a shift in positioning towards more caution. The 25delta skew (calculated as put IV minus call IV) is higher, indicating the market prices more for downside protection. Last week, 1-week skew hit a monthly high of 22.7% before pulling back, reflecting its sensitivity to immediate price action. In contrast, longer-dated skew continues to trend higher and hold elevated: 1-month at 17.4%, 6-month at 13.2%.

This divergence across tenors is telling. While near-term price stabilization has slightly eased short-dated hedging demand, there remains strong buying of protective options in the medium term. The market isn't pricing aggressive moves, but the entire term structure consistently assigns more weight to downside risks. This points to a sustained defensive bias, not merely a transient reaction to short-term market gyrations.

Short-Term Gamma Below Market

This more defensive positioning becomes more relevant when mapped to dealer gamma exposure. Negative gamma is now stacking up below current price levels, stretching from $68k down into the $50k's. This implies the market is buying puts below the spot price and does not expect the recent bounce to last much longer, forcing dealers to be the counterparty to these trades.

In this setup, dealers will be forced to sell into weakness, amplifying downward moves. With overall market structure appearing fragile post the March 27th expiry thinning liquidity, a move into this zone could exacerbate downside momentum through hedging flows. This could trigger accelerated selling, turning what might be a gradual move into a more violent repricing, potentially retesting the $60k level – the low of the February 5th sell-off.

Calm Realized Volatility Masks Fragility

Compounding the fragility of the current setup is that Implied Volatility remains elevated above Realized Volatility. On the front end, 1-week Realized Vol is 38%, while 1-week Implied is 49%, a gap of 11 percentage points. This gap has persisted for over three weeks, indicating options are consistently priced for more movement than the market is actually experiencing.

At first glance, this reflects a seemingly stable market, as realized vol remains contained. However, the persistent premium suggests market participants are pricing risk despite a lack of actual price follow-through, pointing to an environment of low market confidence.

Combined with negative gamma, a market where vol is priced above realized is susceptible to having moves amplified by relatively modest selling pressure. This is because the market adjusts rapidly from a compressed pricing base, with limited positioning capacity to absorb flows.

Conclusion

Bitcoin remains locked in a wide $60k-$70k range. The market shows tentative signs of stabilization but lacks sufficient momentum for a decisive breakout in either direction. On-chain conditions still reflect a market in repair: supply in loss is elevated, and Long-Term Holder capitulation has not yet fully cooled. Meanwhile, spot demand is beginning to show improvement, suggesting sellers no longer have complete control.

Off-chain, the picture is similarly balanced. Corporate treasury demand has narrowed significantly, perpetual leverage has reset, implied volatility has softened, and dealer positioning stability has improved. Together, these signals point to an environment no longer under obvious stress but still searching for stronger conviction.

For now, Bitcoin appears to be in a phase of redistribution rather than trending clearly. Until spot demand expands more significantly and the overhead supply overhang begins to clear, range-bound trading is likely to remain the dominant characteristic.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trading range for Bitcoin as described in the article?

ABitcoin is currently locked in a wide range between $60,000 and $70,000.

QWhat does the URPD data reveal about the supply overhead above the current price?

AThe URPD data shows a dense cluster of supply stacked in the range of $80,000 to $126,000, which represents a significant overhead resistance.

QWhat key on-chain metric indicates active capitulation by long-term holders, and what is its current level?

AThe Long-Term Holder Realized Loss metric indicates active capitulation, and its 30-day moving average has reached a high of approximately $200 million per day.

QHow has the Coinbase Spot Cumulative Volume Delta changed, and what does it signify?

AThe Coinbase Spot Cumulative Volume Delta 30-day moving average has turned to a slight positive value, indicating that spot buyers are beginning to absorb selling pressure, though the level of demand remains tentative.

QWhat is the current state of the perpetual futures market's directional bias according to the funding rate?

AThe directional premium in the perpetual futures market has compressed to near-neutral levels and is slightly negative, reflecting a reset of bullish leverage and cooling speculative enthusiasm, leading to a more balanced but cautious market.

Related Reads

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbit42m ago

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbit42m ago

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbit1h ago

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbit1h ago

Conversation with Investor Zheng Di: MicroStrategy's Coin Sale Experiment, AI Economy, and Opportunities in US Stocks

Frontier tech investor Zheng "Didier" Di discusses the recent Bitcoin price drop, the financial strategy shift at MicroStrategy, the AI-driven surge in U.S. stocks, and the evolving role of crypto exchanges. Didier posits that the recent BTC decline stems less from macro factors or ETF outflows, and more from market repricing due to MicroStrategy's new financial structure. Following a wave of preferred stock and debt issuance (STRC, STRZ, etc.), MicroStrategy must now manage cash flow to pay dividends, potentially leading to a market expectation of sustained, small-scale BTC sales to maintain its "per-share bitcoin neutral" principle. Didier views this as a financial "experiment" testing market capacity for such recurring sell pressure, which, while creating near-term structural headwinds, likely avoids a true "death spiral" absent major new external shocks. Shifting to AI, Didier argues that tokens are becoming the new form of labor, with AI models and compute (tokenized inputs) increasingly replacing human roles in execution and middle-management. This drives enterprise efficiency and higher margins, fueling the sustained rally in U.S. semiconductor, data center, and infrastructure stocks. He foresees an emerging "machine economy" where automated agents transact and collaborate on-chain. Regarding crypto exchanges offering U.S. equities, Didier sees this as a natural evolution. With few crypto-native assets generating lasting value, exchanges are pivoting towards real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and bonds. This doesn't necessarily cannibalize crypto but reflects a maturing industry focusing on blockchain's core utilities: decentralized choice and efficient settlement. He notes that trading logic for crypto natives doesn't need to drastically change, as meme-driven and fundamentalist strategies find analogs in U.S. markets. The "1011 event" (likely referring to a major market crash) severely damaged crypto market liquidity, marking a probable end to the altcoin speculative cycle, with capital flowing towards the deeper liquidity of U.S. markets. For the macro outlook, Didier is cautious about near-term market pressure from potential mega-IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and the U.S. midterm elections, which could bring more regulatory scrutiny. Long-term, he remains bullish on AI's productivity gains and its convergence with blockchain/Web3, predicting a shift from speculative frenzy to a more institutionalized, industrial phase for the crypto sector.

marsbit1h ago

Conversation with Investor Zheng Di: MicroStrategy's Coin Sale Experiment, AI Economy, and Opportunities in US Stocks

marsbit1h ago

Playnance’s $GCOIN Lists on KoinBX Amid Rapid Growth in India

Playnance's native token, $GCOIN, has been listed on the cryptocurrency exchange KoinBX as of June 18. This move aims to enhance accessibility for its rapidly growing community, particularly in India, where the blockchain-powered Web3 iGaming ecosystem has gained significant traction. Over 130 partners in Playnance's "Be the Boss" program have built communities engaging thousands of active players in the region. The "Be the Boss" model allows participants to create and manage their own gaming communities, earning rewards tied to community activity. CEO Pini Peter noted India's high engagement, with community leaders successfully building player networks. One partner, Dr. Nicolas, reported earning over $57,000 through the program in recent months, highlighting both the financial rewards and the opportunity to grow an engaged community. $GCOIN serves as the ecosystem's core utility token, incentivizing participation and aligning the interests of players and community leaders ("Bosses"). The listing on KoinBX is part of Playnance's strategy to expand globally, increasing the token's utility and accessibility by combining community ownership, gamified engagement, and blockchain-based incentives. Founded in 2020, Playnance is a Web3 iGaming infrastructure company focused on creating live, non-custodial, on-chain products to onboard mainstream users. It currently processes approximately one million transactions daily, aiming to simplify the user experience while maintaining full on-chain transparency.

TheNewsCrypto2h ago

Playnance’s $GCOIN Lists on KoinBX Amid Rapid Growth in India

TheNewsCrypto2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

396 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片