Justin Sun Sues World Liberty Financial Over Token Freeze Dispute

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-04-22Last updated on 2026-04-22

Abstract

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in a California federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a project backed by the Trump family. Sun alleges the project threatened to burn his tokens and froze them without providing a reason. He stated he resorted to litigation after failed attempts to resolve the matter directly with the team. The dispute centers around a new WLFI governance proposal that would lock tokens for founders and advisors for two years, release them gradually over three years, and burn 10% of the tokens. Sun criticized the plan as non-transparent and harmful, arguing it would permanently freeze tokens of holders who do not explicitly accept its terms. He had previously raised concerns that 76% of the voting power came from just 10 wallets. WLFI has denied Sun's claims as "baseless allegations," stating they have evidence and are prepared for a legal battle. Despite the lawsuit, Sun reaffirmed his support for former President Trump and his administration's crypto-friendly policies.

According to Tron founder Justin Sun, he sued World Liberty Financial, which is backed by the Trump family, for reportedly threatening to burn his tokens and freezing them without providing any reason. Sun said in a Wednesday social media post that he was attempting to defend his token holder rights by filing the lawsuit in a federal court in California.

Sun added:

“I have tried in good faith to resolve this situation with the World Liberty project team without resorting to litigation. But the project team has refused my requests to unfreeze my tokens and restore my rights as a token holder. They have left me with no choice but to turn to the courts.”

Ongoing Tussle

In a prior statement, Sun implied that WLFI’s new governance plan was not transparent due to the fact that 76% of the voting tokens originated from 10 wallets, and he threatened legal action earlier this month over the extended lockup periods for the governance token.

The WLFI project team called the assertions “baseless allegations” and made the statement on X at the time. “We have the contracts. We have the evidence. We have the truth. See you in court pal.”

Meanwhile, Sun attacked a WLFI governance plan on April 15 that would lock the tokens of founders, team members, and advisers for two years, release them progressively over the following three years, and finally burn 10% of the tokens when the proposal expires.

According to WLFI, holders who reject the revised timetable remain locked under the current conditions indefinitely. According to Sun, the proposal will be detrimental to the community if it is approved since token holders who do not explicitly agree to its conditions would have their tokens frozen eternally. These requirements include a mandate to permanently burn 10% of all advisor tokens. Sun said on X that his opinions on Trump and his government remain unchanged despite the litigation.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Umbra Shuts Front-End After Hackers Funnel Stolen Crypto Through Protocol

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy did Justin Sun sue World Liberty Financial?

AJustin Sun sued World Liberty Financial for reportedly threatening to burn his tokens and freezing them without providing any reason, in an attempt to defend his token holder rights.

QWhere did Justin Sun file the lawsuit against World Liberty Financial?

AHe filed the lawsuit in a federal court in California.

QWhat was Justin Sun's main criticism of WLFI's governance plan?

ASun criticized the plan for its lack of transparency, noting that 76% of the voting tokens came from just 10 wallets, and opposed the extended lockup periods and the clause to burn 10% of tokens.

QHow did the WLFI project team respond to Justin Sun's allegations?

AThe WLFI project team called Sun's assertions 'baseless allegations' and stated they have contracts and evidence to support their case, saying 'See you in court pal.'

QWhat are the consequences for token holders who reject WLFI's revised timetable according to the article?

AHolders who reject the revised timetable remain locked under the current conditions indefinitely, and those who do not explicitly agree to the new conditions risk having their tokens frozen eternally.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit7m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit7m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit27m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit27m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit35m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit35m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy SUN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SUN (SUN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SUN (SUN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SUN (SUN)After purchasing your SUN (SUN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SUN (SUN)Easily trade SUN (SUN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.5k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy SUN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SUN (SUN) are presented below.

活动图片