It's Bankless That Needs Ethereum, Not Ethereum That Needs Bankless

链捕手Published on 2026-05-21Last updated on 2026-05-21

Abstract

Titled "Bankless Needs Ethereum, Not the Other Way Around," this article analyzes the significant recent news involving Bankless, a prominent crypto media outlet. Bankless co-founder David Hoffman announced the sale of all his ETH holdings, while the company also reportedly underwent major layoffs, with its founders parting ways. The news, likened to a high-profile defection, initially sent shockwaves through the Ethereum community, given Bankless's historical role as a key evangelist and "semi-official" narrative builder for Ethereum. For years, through its podcasts and writings, Bankless championed core Ethereum ideas like "ultrasound money" and the blockchain's role as a new financial settlement layer, acting as a crucial community hub and belief system during its growth phase. However, the article argues this development is not necessarily negative for Ethereum. It suggests Bankless's "first mission"—serving as Ethereum's passionate, inward-facing "propaganda department"—has largely been completed. As Ethereum matures and moves towards mainstream, institutional adoption, the narrative baton has shifted. Today, the value propositions of ETH are increasingly communicated to traditional finance by asset managers like BlackRock and VanEck, public companies adding ETH to their treasuries, and established financial figures. This represents a natural evolution towards a more decentralized, professional, and institutionally-focused narrative network. Therefore, while Bankless's ...

Author: Yu Gu, ChainCatcher

Under the shadow of a series of negative news such as the continuous resignation of high-level foundation executives and multiple institutions selling off ETH, the Ethereum ecosystem has once again been hit by sensational news.

Today, David Hoffman, co-founder of Bankless, confirmed on the X platform that he has liquidated all his ETH holdings. Simultaneously, news emerged that Bankless is undergoing massive layoffs and the two founders are parting ways.

In response, prominent KOL Chen Jian gave a rather vivid analogy—"Bankless co-founder David selling all his ETH is similar in nature to Huang Chang-yeop's defection from North Korea back in the day." The impact of this statement is enough to send a chill down the spine of anyone familiar with Bankless's status in the Ethereum ecosystem.

However, in the current context of the crypto industry's increasing mainstream and institutional adoption, and with the basic transfer of Ethereum's narrative authority, Bankless's retreat is actually understandable and may not necessarily be negative news for Ethereum.

I. Bankless: The Former "Propaganda Department" of Ethereum

Before delving into this earthquake, one must first understand what Bankless truly represents in the Ethereum ecosystem.

Bankless is far more than just a crypto media platform. It began as a podcast and a Substack subscription channel, with a core idea simple: to replace traditional banking using self-custody, DeFi, and Ethereum as the settlement layer for a new financial system.

David Hoffman and Ryan Sean Adams vigorously advocated that Ethereum is "ultra sound money." They built a media brand around Ethereum, maximizing its exposure and becoming two of the loudest Ethereum supporters in the industry. Today, Bankless is widely recognized as one of the most influential media brands in the crypto world, especially within the Ethereum ecosystem.

David Hoffman is particularly known for his firm personal beliefs. During the 2018 bear market, when Ethereum's price fell to $300, he actively bought ETH. Consequently, he became a symbol of Ethereum maximalism on Crypto Twitter.

Bankless's unique position lies in the fact that it is not merely a "reporter" on the Ethereum ecosystem but a co-builder of the Ethereum narrative itself.

"Ethereum is ultrasound money," "Ethereum will usher in the industrial revolution of the internet," "Ethereum is digital oil"... A series of his viewpoints have been widely disseminated in the crypto industry, injecting a continuous stream of belief and fuel into the Ethereum ecosystem.

From conversations with Vitalik Buterin to in-depth analyses of the Ethereum roadmap, and continuously providing theoretical packaging for new narratives like L2, DeFi, and restaking, Bankless has long played the dual role of the Ethereum community's "information hub" and "spiritual lighthouse." The two co-founders have also long acted as core evangelists for Ethereum—Hoffman himself publicly stated that 99% of his personal wealth was held in Ethereum.

Chen Jian compared Bankless to the "Ethereum party newspaper"—the accuracy of this metaphor lies in revealing that Bankless's role had long transcended that of a regular commercial media outlet; it was a value-output machine with a "quasi-official" or "semi-official" status within the ecosystem.

However, in the last year or two, Bankless's narrative authority within the Ethereum ecosystem has noticeably weakened, rarely putting forward distinctive viewpoints with high virality and unique perspectives.

II. What Exactly Happened

Earlier today, Bankless co-founder David Hoffman announced that he had sold all his ETH holdings. The other co-founder, Ryan Sean Adams, subsequently retweeted, stating that the first phase of Bankless has ended, and his six-year collaboration with David exploring crypto, DeFi, and Ethereum has come to a close. They have now entered the second phase, transitioning to a supporting role to continue providing support for Bankless.

Soon, Lucas Campbell, co-founder of FireEyes DAO and former Bankless research analyst, further disclosed on X that Bankless apparently fired most of its team members yesterday, and its founders did not offer a single word of thanks or a public statement to help the team members find new positions.

Jean-Paul Faraj, Head of Business Development at Bankless, posted on X recounting his experience working at Bankless, stating that today is his last day at the company, which also indirectly confirms the accuracy of the mass layoff news.

This series of messages conveys at least two clear signals: first, Bankless co-founder David Hoffman is no longer a staunch ETH bull, and second, after massive layoffs, Bankless will struggle to maintain its current content output frequency and intensity, and its status as Ethereum's "propaganda department" is over.

There have been signs of all this. Just a day ago, Ryan Sean Adams criticized the Ethereum Foundation, stating, "The future of Ethereum can no longer rely on the Ethereum Foundation (EF). EF is important, but Ethereum needs new institutions to step in and fill the gaps. We need an organization that genuinely wants Ethereum's asset (ETH) to win—to grow in quantity—and is willing to speak out and execute. EF is not that, and never will be."

And earlier this month, David Hoffman publicly stated on a podcast that he had sold his CryptoPunk, which he had held for years and carried significant symbolic meaning, and converted the proceeds mainly into Zcash (ZEC).



III. The End of a Phased Mission

In Ryan Sean Adams's response, there is a noteworthy statement: Bankless's first-phase mission is over, and it is now moving towards the second phase. So, what exactly was Bankless's first-phase mission? And what is its upcoming mission?

As mentioned earlier, Bankless largely served as a semi-official "propaganda department" for Ethereum, continuously transmitting the specific roles and concepts of new technologies like Layer2 to the crypto community and "recharging faith" in the market.

In the early stages of Ethereum's evolution from a "geek toy" to a "world computer of crypto," such high-density, high-belief content output was essential—it helped Ethereum consolidate its most loyal community amidst the siege of countless public chains and supported ETH's initial narrative premium.

But the problem is, this phased mission is largely complete.

In the past year or two, purely narrative-driven momentum within the crypto industry has noticeably weakened. The growth of adoption increasingly relies on the integration of the traditional financial system, especially in the realms of payments and RWA (Real World Assets). Ethereum no longer needs a few impassioned articles to convince people "not to trust banks," but rather needs to truly get banks, asset management companies, and publicly listed companies to treat Ethereum as infrastructure.

As the type of target audience switches, the baton of narrative has quietly been passed on.

Asset management companies represented by Bitwise, VanEck, and BlackRock are now conveying ETH's value proposition to the traditional financial world through ETF products, research reports, and public statements. While MicroStrategy focuses primarily on Bitcoin, its model of "public companies buying crypto assets" has been emulated by others, and some listed companies have begun incorporating ETH into their balance sheets. Figures with traditional finance backgrounds, such as Tom Lee and Larry Fink, have become the new faces explaining Ethereum's concepts to the mainstream world. Their language is more compliant, professional, and more acceptable to traditional capital.

Bankless's role is being replaced by a more decentralized, professional, and diverse "narrative network."

For a long time, Ethereum's "moat" was not technical superiority or user scale, but a complete system of value narratives jointly woven by Vitalik, the Ethereum Foundation, core developers, and evangelist media like Bankless. Technology can be imitated, ecosystems can be copied, but this community of faith accumulated since 2015 is almost irreplaceable.

Now, although Bankless is fading out, its role is not left in a vacuum. A host of new forces more aligned with Ethereum's current stage of development are naturally taking over, including various institutional research departments, mainstream entrepreneurs, on-chain data platforms, and so on.

From this perspective, Bankless's retreat is not a crisis but an inevitable outcome of the maturation and decentralization of Ethereum's narrative system. A healthy ecosystem should not rely long-term on a single "semi-official" media outlet to sustain its faith. When Ethereum has entered the sightline of mainstream finance, and when ETF fund flows influence market sentiment more than any podcast, the historical mission of the "propaganda department" has already been accomplished.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the two key signals conveyed by the recent series of announcements from Bankless founders?

AThe key signals are: 1) Bankless co-founder David Hoffman is no longer a staunch ETH bull, as evidenced by him selling his entire ETH holdings. 2) Following large-scale layoffs, Bankless will struggle to maintain its previous content output, signaling the end of its role as Ethereum's dominant "propaganda department".

QAccording to the article, what was Bankless's primary role and mission in the Ethereum ecosystem during its "Phase One"?

ABankless served as Ethereum's semi-official "propaganda department" or "spiritual lighthouse." Its mission was to co-build the Ethereum narrative, vigorously promote concepts like "ultrasound money," act as an information hub, and provide ideological fuel and unwavering belief to the community, especially during its early growth against competing blockchains.

QWhy does the article argue that Bankless's 'retreat' might not be negative for Ethereum?

AThe article argues it's not negative because Bankless's phase-one mission of community building and narrative evangelism is largely complete. Ethereum's narrative is now being driven and legitimized for mainstream adoption by a more diversified network including asset managers (e.g., BlackRock), traditional finance figures, and institutional research, marking a maturation and decentralization of its advocacy ecosystem.

QWhat specific actions by David Hoffman and Ryan Sean Adams prior to the announcement hinted at their shifting stance?

ADavid Hoffman sold his symbolically significant CryptoPunk NFT, converting most proceeds to Zcash (ZEC). Ryan Sean Adams publicly criticized the Ethereum Foundation, stating it is not and never will be an organization truly focused on ETH's price growth, and called for new institutions to fill the gap.

QHow does the KOL '陈剑' metaphorically describe Bankless's significance, and what does the article say this reveals about its role?

AChen Jian metaphorically described Bankless as the "Ethereum Party Newspaper." The article states this reveals Bankless's role transcended that of a typical commercial media outlet. It occupied a quasi-official or semi-official position within the ecosystem, functioning as a core value-output machine for Ethereum.

Related Reads

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

When users complained that Claude was "getting dumber," the root cause wasn't the AI model itself. In an official blog post, Anthropic clarified the critical difference between two key settings in Claude Code: Model and Effort. Model refers to the core "brain"—the fixed, trained weights of a specific AI (like Sonnet, Opus, or Fable). Changing the Model addresses *capability* ("can it do this?"), but its knowledge is static post-training. Effort, however, controls the AI's *approach and thoroughness* for a specific task. A higher Effort level instructs Claude to read more files, run tests, perform verification, and complete multi-step reasoning before responding, significantly increasing its "work output" for that job. Conversely, low Effort leads to quicker, less thorough replies. This distinction explains the March 2024 uproar where users experienced a sudden drop in Claude's performance. The cause was not a model change but Anthropic quietly lowering the *default* Effort setting from "high" to "medium" to reduce latency, which was later reverted. The key insight is that a smaller, capable model (like Sonnet) on high Effort can often outperform a larger, more powerful model (like Opus) on low Effort for many tasks. The article provides a practical troubleshooting framework: if Claude makes an error, first check the context and instructions. If it seems to skip necessary steps or validations, increase Effort. If it diligently attempts the task but fails conceptually or makes consistent factual errors despite good context, then consider switching to a more capable Model. The takeaway is a shift in focus: effective AI programming is less about always choosing the "strongest" model and more about intelligently *orchestrating* models and effort levels—acting like a project manager to assign the right "brain" with the right level of diligence for each job, optimizing both results and cost.

marsbit13m ago

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

marsbit13m ago

Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is undergoing significant internal turmoil and functional erosion. Following its largest-ever layoff of 54 staff (20% of its workforce) and a major organizational restructuring announced in June, its Protocol Support Team has been officially dissolved. This comes alongside the high-profile resignation of key figures like co-executive director Xiaowei Wang, bringing senior departures this year to at least eight. Criticism of EF's rigid structure, opaque decision-making, and perceived lack of a clear value narrative for ETH has intensified within the community. The layoffs have catalyzed the emergence of independent, non-profit organizations like Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional, founded by former EF researchers and members. These entities are now taking on core functions such as protocol research/development and institutional adoption, effectively fragmenting the EF's traditional leadership role. Concurrently, EF's security team is adapting to technological change, deploying specialized AI agents to audit Ethereum's codebase, which successfully discovered a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-34219). While EF states AI complements rather than replaces researchers, it signals a potential future shift in its operational model. Faced with these challenges—internal restructuring, talent drain, the rise of competing organizations, and AI integration—the Ethereum Foundation appears to be stepping back from a central commanding role. Analysts and community observers speculate it may increasingly transition towards a symbolic "ecosystem mascot" function, while decentralized initiatives drive Ethereum's future growth and institutional adoption.

marsbit39m ago

Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

marsbit39m ago

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

The domestic embodied AI data industry has attracted nearly 100 players, with 70 focused on data collection and 27 on data infrastructure. In the past year, 15 independent embodied data service providers raised approximately 4.47 billion yuan. Despite this growth, the sector remains early-stage, fragmented, and faces significant challenges. Data collection methods are diverse, categorized into four main routes: teleoperation of real robots, human demonstration without a robot (using motion capture, exoskeletons, etc.), simulation synthesis, and distillation from internet videos. Most companies (43%) adopt hybrid approaches, combining multiple routes, as no single method can meet all training needs. Teleoperation alone is pursued by 31% of players, often by state-owned platforms and robot companies, while newer firms favor asset-light, no-hardware human demonstration. Independent data service providers now form the largest player group (40%), indicating the emergence of a distinct industry segment rather than just a subsidiary function for robot makers. Two-thirds of all players are "embodied-native" startups, while one-third are companies that pivoted from fields like AI data annotation, which are more prevalent in the data infrastructure layer. Current annual industry capacity is estimated at 1.6-1.8 million hours plus 70-80 million data points, with a short-term goal to increase this 15-20 fold within 1-3 years. Data collection factories are spread across 20 provinces in China, concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and Pearl River Delta regions. Financially, the 4.47 billion yuan raised in the past year pales compared to the 43.8 billion yuan raised by the broader embodied intelligence sector in just the first half of 2026, highlighting that data remains a less "sexy" bet for investors. The 15 funded independent providers show clear stratification: a top tier led by a unicorn (Lightwheel Intelligence, 3.1 billion yuan), a middle tier of 11 firms raising tens to hundreds of millions, and an early-stage tier of 3 companies. Sixty-nine investment institutions have participated, but none have made concentrated bets, reflecting uncertainty about viable business models. Over half of these funded companies are less than a year old, most are at pre-A or A rounds, and profitability remains largely unproven. In summary, the embodied data industry has become an independent track creating jobs and local economic activity. However, it is still nascent, with unformed consensus, unsolved problems, and unproven business models. The coming 1-2 years will be a critical validation window to see if companies can build sustainable, profitable businesses purely by "selling data."

marsbit3h ago

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片