Is Ethereum undervalued? These 2 on-chain signals say…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-21Last updated on 2025-12-21

Abstract

Ethereum has underperformed in 2025, declining roughly 12% YTD while assets like gold and equities climbed. However, two key on-chain signals suggest it may be undervalued. First, Ethereum's network remains the dominant settlement layer for global dollar liquidity, processing $90-100 billion in stablecoin transfers daily, as users prioritize security and finality over lower fees. Second, large holders are accumulating more ETH even as prices approach their average cost basis, showing patience and confidence despite squeezed profits. This indicates underlying strength that price action alone may not reflect.

Ethereum has been one of the worst-performing major assets of 2025 so far. But don’t let that fool you!

Every day, tens of billions of dollars in stablecoins move across Ethereum, making it THE settlement layer for global dollar liquidity. Large holders are accumulating ETH as well, even with prices down in the dumps.

Is the general market missing the bigger picture?

Putting Ethereum’s bad year in context

Ethereum has had a bruising start to 2025. While silver, gold, and U.S. equities have climbed steadily, ETH slid roughly 12% YTD, making it one of the weakest performers among major assets.

Bitcoin [BTC] has fared slightly better, while the altcoin market has fallen far further.

Capital is rotating into metals and traditional risk assets, all while Ethereum’s [ETH] price has gone nowhere. It looks like a market that has lost interest.

But price performance alone doesn’t tell you everything.

Where the money actually settles

On an average day, Ethereum Mainnet processes roughly $90-100 billion in Stablecoin Transfers, far more than any other network. According to Leon Waidmann, Head of Research, OnChainHQ, this is mostly USDT and USDC moving for payments, treasury operations, and real settlement.

Other chains are growing, and some are cheaper or faster. But stablecoin volume concentrates where trust, neutrality, and finality matter most.

Users willingly pay higher fees because a failed settlement is not an option at this scale.

While prices stall...

Large holders are behaving very differently.

ETH has repeatedly traded near the realized price of accumulation addresses; essentially, the average entry price of long-term whales. Instead of selling into weakness, these wallets have continued to add more ETH.

The timing is interesting.

Whale profits have been squeezed close to zero, a point where many would normally reduce exposure. Instead, inflows to accumulation addresses are increasing. That’s a lot of patience!

Related Questions

QHow has Ethereum performed compared to other major assets in 2025 so far?

AEthereum has been one of the worst-performing major assets of 2025, sliding roughly 12% year-to-date, while assets like silver, gold, and U.S. equities have climbed steadily.

QWhat is the daily volume of stablecoin transfers processed on the Ethereum Mainnet?

AOn an average day, Ethereum Mainnet processes roughly $90-100 billion in stablecoin transfers, which is far more than any other network.

QAccording to the article, why do users choose to settle large stablecoin transfers on Ethereum despite higher fees?

AUsers willingly pay higher fees on Ethereum because a failed settlement is not an option at this scale, and the network offers the trust, neutrality, and finality that matter most for large settlements.

QHow are large Ethereum holders (whales) behaving despite the price weakness?

AInstead of selling into weakness, large holders (whales) have continued to accumulate more ETH, even as their profits have been squeezed close to zero.

QWhat is the 'realized price of accumulation addresses' mentioned in the article?

AThe 'realized price of accumulation addresses' refers to the average entry price of long-term whale wallets. ETH has repeatedly traded near this price point recently.

Related Reads

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

MoneyGram, a global leader in cross-border remittances for over 80 years, has launched its own stablecoin, MGUSD. The initiative aims to evolve from single-transaction services to becoming a more integral part of users' financial lives. By allowing customers to hold a stable US dollar balance within the MoneyGram app, MGUSD enables not only remittances but also everyday spending, currency exchange, cash access, and future financial services. Targeting the billions globally who face challenges like currency volatility or lack of bank accounts, MGUSD leverages Stellar blockchain technology with a self-custody wallet architecture. This gives users control over their assets while providing a secure, compliant experience through a trusted brand. The approach focuses on solving existing customer pain points within MoneyGram's established network, rather than competing for broad crypto market liquidity. A key advantage is MoneyGram's hybrid model, combining digital services with the world's largest physical network for crypto-to-cash conversions. The stablecoin also modernizes the company's internal infrastructure, streamlining treasury management and partner settlements, with annual forex volume via stablecoins already reaching $2 billion. The project was delivered in about a year, driven by a reorganization into agile, cross-functional teams that operate with startup-like speed while leveraging decades of institutional expertise. Partners include Stablecoin (issuance), Crossmint (wallet APIs), Fireblocks (enterprise treasury), m0 (smart contracts), and the Stellar network. MoneyGram emphasizes that enhancing direct consumer offerings strengthens its partner ecosystem. The future direction is clear: to provide users worldwide with stable value storage, better financial tools, and greater control over their funds through a trusted, existing network.

Foresight News36m ago

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

Foresight News36m ago

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Bitcoin is approaching a critical block height of 961,632, which could activate the controversial BIP-110 proposal. This proposal aims to restrict the amount of non-financial data, such as inscriptions and other large data payloads, within Bitcoin transactions. Supporters, including some node operators and Bitcoin purists, argue that BIP-110 is necessary to preserve Bitcoin's core function as a monetary settlement layer by reducing network congestion and node operational burdens caused by non-essential data. They frame it as a correction to keep the network true to its original purpose. However, critics, including prominent figures like Blockstream's Adam Back and developer Jameson Lopp, warn that the proposal's implementation mechanism is dangerously flawed. They highlight that its low 55% miner signaling threshold, coupled with a contentious enforcement mechanism allowing nodes to unilaterally reject non-compliant blocks, significantly increases the risk of a chain split. Opponents argue this sets a dangerous precedent for transaction censorship, undermines Bitcoin's protocol neutrality, and creates excessive uncertainty for developers and businesses, especially since the rule is proposed as a temporary one-year measure. Market analysts, such as those from Bitfinex, suggest a full-scale network split is unlikely due to a lack of broad economic consensus. Major mining pools remain neutral, and adoption of the new rules is minimal. They view the situation more as a governance stress test. The primary risk is operational disruption: if a minority chain persists, major exchanges and custodians may need to temporarily suspend Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals to manage security and liquidity, potentially unsettling newer institutional investors. While BIP-110 is not expected to succeed in overtaking the main chain, its approach has ignited a significant debate about Bitcoin's governance, core values, and resilience.

Foresight News1h ago

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Foresight News1h ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit2h ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片