India’s Crypto Policy Under Scrutiny as Chadha Pushes for VDA Legal Recognition

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-10Last updated on 2026-02-10

Abstract

Indian AAP MP Raghav Chadha urged the Indian government to legally recognize Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) as a formal asset class during a Rajya Sabha address. He highlighted the inconsistency in the current approach where crypto profits are taxed—1% TDS and 30% flat tax—yet lack legal status. This ambiguity has eroded investor confidence, driven an estimated 12 crore Indian investors to offshore platforms, and caused 180 VDA startups to relocate abroad. Chadha noted that 73% of crypto trading volume has moved offshore in FY25, resulting in significant tax revenue loss. He proposed a new licensing law to enhance consumer protection, enforce AML measures, and potentially recover ₹15,000–20,000 crores in annual tax revenue through clear regulation.

AAP MP Raghav Chadha addressed the Rajya Sabha, urging the Indian government to legalise Virtual Digital Assets as a formal asset class. He noted that the government has already started taxing digital assets but has failed to accord them the requisite legal classification. Chadha noted that the tax structure requires investors to pay 1% as TDS and a 30% flat tax on their crypto profits without legal status. Chadha noted that the government needs to move beyond the half-baked system of asset classification.

The MP argued that such an inconsistency erodes investor confidence in digital assets. Chadha said 12 crore Indian investors are forced to use offshore platforms due to unclear laws. He added that 180 VDA startups have relocated operations to crypto-friendly jurisdictions abroad. The MP emphasised that India loses significant tax revenues under the current regulatory trend.

Offshore Trading and Regulatory Challenges

Chadha pointed out that 73% of the trading volume of crypto assets had left the country and gone offshore in the Financial Year 2025. This trend will continue and likely worsen unless authorities implement clear regulations. According to the MP, the current regulatory space is risky and does not encourage investors. The MP noted that other countries, such as Dubai, Singapore, and Malaysia, have attracted Indian investors due to clear regulatory mechanisms. These countries have clear legal frameworks that classify the services of crypto assets.

Chadha pointed out that the lack of a licensing law for India holds the key to comprehensive consumer protection and AML. He said that the ring-fencing approach could lower the risks of money laundering and enhance compliance. Chadha added that the digital trading assets, if brought onboard, could strengthen the domestic market.

Proposed Legislative Framework

Mr Chadha also proposed drafting a new law to enable licensing for digital asset exchanges and related service providers. The law should place investor protection at the center of its mandates and enforce stringent AML measures to bring the grey market into compliance. It will also help India to garner tax revenues of Rs.15,000 to Rs.20,000 crores annually as clarity is created.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Vitalik Buterin Outlines Ethereum’s AI Framework, Pushes Back Against Solana’s Acceleration Thesis

Tags#Indiacrypto tax indiaIndiaIndia CryptocurrencyIndian_Government

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument made by AAP MP Raghav Chadha regarding India's crypto policy?

ARaghav Chadha argues that India should legalize Virtual Digital Assets as a formal asset class, as the current system taxes crypto (1% TDS and 30% flat tax on profits) without providing legal status, which he calls a 'half-baked system'.

QAccording to the article, what are two major consequences of India's unclear crypto regulations?

ATwo major consequences are: 1) 12 crore Indian investors are forced to use offshore platforms, and 2) 180 VDA startups have relocated their operations to crypto-friendly jurisdictions abroad.

QWhat percentage of crypto trading volume has left India for offshore platforms in FY25, as cited by Chadha?

A73% of the trading volume of crypto assets had left the country and gone offshore in the Financial Year 2025.

QWhat key legislative measure did Chadha propose to address the regulatory challenges?

AChadha proposed drafting a new law to enable licensing for digital asset exchanges and related service providers, which would place investor protection at its center and enforce stringent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures.

QWhich countries were mentioned as having attracted Indian crypto investors due to their clear regulatory frameworks?

ADubai, Singapore, and Malaysia were mentioned as countries that have attracted Indian investors due to their clear regulatory mechanisms and legal frameworks for crypto assets.

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit21m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit21m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit34m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片