Here’s how Solana is outshining Ethereum, from staking to market momentum

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-21Last updated on 2026-01-21

Abstract

Amidst market volatility, Solana (SOL) and Ethereum (ETH) are both demonstrating fundamental strength with their staking ratios reaching all-time highs. However, a key divergence exists: Solana's staking ratio is 70%, locking nearly 400 million tokens, while Ethereum's is 30%. This means Solana's staked supply is over 10 times larger, creating significantly tighter supply dynamics that can amplify long-term price moves. This economic strength is reflected in SOL's market performance, as it continues to outperform ETH. Furthermore, Solana is attracting substantial capital, pulling in over 50% of bridged funds from Ethereum with $50 million in inflows in just seven days, signaling strong on-chain demand and growing network momentum.

Markets are shaky, and conviction is being tested.

With macro FUD building, capital continues to rotate out, pushing risk assets broadly into the red. In this environment, holding key support levels is critical. Lose them, and downside capitulation becomes far more likely.

Notably, for Solana [SOL] and Ethereum [ETH], fundamentals are starting to show up. According to Token Terminal, Solana’s staking ratio has reached an all-time high of 70%, locking up roughly $60 billion in SOL.

Meanwhile, Ethereum isn’t far behind. BitMine (BMNR) continues to add to its staking position, with another 86k ETH staked, pushing Ethereum’s staking ratio to an all-time high of 30%, or about $120 billion locked up.

Together, these trends reinforce AMBCrypto’s thesis: Even amid volatility, L1s fundamentals are quietly strengthening, with staking acting as a solid signal of long-term conviction. But there’s a key divergence worth noting.

Around 70% of all SOL is staked, versus “only” 30% of ETH. While both L1s hit major staking milestones, the economic impact is very different. Could this mean that SOL is becoming “economically” stronger than ETH?

Solana’s staking edge: A sign of long-term conviction?

Solana’s staking edge shows why its supply dynamics are tighter.

In economic terms, a breakout needs a supply-demand imbalance, where demand gradually outweighs supply. With 567 million SOL in circulation, 70% staked means nearly 400 million tokens are effectively locked.

By comparison, Ethereum only has about 37 million ETH staked. That means Solana’s staked supply is more than 10x larger than Ethereum’s, highlighting its much stronger supply squeeze.

From a long-term perspective, this divergence matters.

A larger proportion of locked tokens reduces circulating supply, which can amplify price moves in the long-term. For instance, despite the ongoing volatility, SOL continues to outperform ETH, with the ratio up 2.13%.

Adding to this, Solana has pulled in over 50% of bridged capital from Ethereum, totaling $50 million in the past seven days alone, a clear signal that its on-chain demand and network activity are gaining momentum.

In short, Solana’s strong staking economics aren’t just theoretical. Instead, they’re now showing up as real technical strength and on-chain growth, highlighting SOL’s resilience and its relatively stronger long-term potential.


Final Thoughts

  • 70% of SOL is staked, over 10x Ethereum’s staked supply, creating tighter supply dynamics and long-term economic strength.
  • Strong staking, continued capital inflows, and a rising SOL/ETH ratio show Solana’s technical strength and growing network momentum.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Solana's current staking ratio and how does it compare to Ethereum's?

ASolana's staking ratio has reached an all-time high of 70%, while Ethereum's staking ratio is at an all-time high of 30%.

QWhat is the total value of SOL in staking and how does it compare to the value of staked ETH?

AApproximately $60 billion worth of SOL is locked in staking, while about $120 billion worth of ETH is staked.

QHow does the amount of staked SOL tokens compare numerically to the amount of staked ETH tokens?

AWith 567 million SOL in circulation, 70% staked equals nearly 400 million tokens. This is more than 10 times larger than Ethereum's staked supply of about 37 million ETH.

QWhat recent on-chain activity indicates growing demand for the Solana network?

ASolana has pulled in over 50% of bridged capital from Ethereum, totaling $50 million in the past seven days alone, signaling strong on-chain demand and network activity.

QAccording to the article, what are the key factors showing Solana's technical strength and long-term potential?

AThe key factors are its strong staking economics (70% staking ratio), continued capital inflows, and a rising SOL/ETH ratio, which highlight its resilience and growing network momentum.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit12m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit12m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit27m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片