GameStop Exits, Saylor Still Buying

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

GameStop, led by CEO Ryan Cohen, has reportedly moved its entire Bitcoin holdings of approximately 4,710 BTC (worth around $450 million) to Coinbase Prime, signaling an intent to sell. This decision comes less than a year after the company initially invested $513 million in Bitcoin, averaging a cost of about $108,917 per coin. Cohen publicly stated that he now sees a more attractive strategy than Bitcoin, focusing on transforming GameStop into an investment holding platform akin to Berkshire Hathaway. This move contrasts sharply with the approach of Michael Saylor and MicroStrategy, who have continued to aggressively accumulate Bitcoin despite market downturns. While GameStop’s investment represented only about 10.4% of its cash reserves, MicroStrategy has heavily leveraged its balance sheet to buy Bitcoin, reflecting a deeper conviction in the asset. The divergence highlights a broader trend: corporate Bitcoin treasury strategies, which thrived during bull markets, are now under pressure as prices fall. Some companies may exit entirely, while others, like MicroStrategy, double down. The market is likely to see consolidation, evolution in financial strategies around Bitcoin, and a potential downgrade in Bitcoin’s narrative from a revolutionary asset to a high-volatility alternative. GameStop’s exit may become a footnote in the larger story of corporate Bitcoin adoption, underscoring the difference between short-term speculation and long-term belief.

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

"This strategy is more attractive than Bitcoin."

GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen sat in front of CNBC's cameras and uttered these words in an almost casual tone. As if he had just decided not to abandon a $500 million investment, but to change the lunch menu.

But in the crypto market, this statement was as devastating as a bomb.

According to data from on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant, GameStop transferred all of its Bitcoin holdings to Coinbase Prime around January 23. The total transferred was approximately 4,710 BTC, with a market value of about $450 million.

This move, in the eyes of crypto veterans, means only one thing: preparing to sell.

Subsequently, Cohen gave consecutive interviews to The Wall Street Journal and CNBC. During these interviews, he extensively discussed acquisition plans, vowing to transform GameStop into an investment holding platform "similar to Berkshire Hathaway." When reporters pressed him on the Bitcoin strategy, he dropped that line.

Ironic?

From entry to preparing to exit, less than a year.

The End of an Imitation Show

On February 8, 2025, Cohen met with Michael Saylor, co-founder of MicroStrategy.

Saylor was at the peak of his life at that time. He had changed his Twitter bio to "Bitcoin Maximalist," posting long sermons about Bitcoin daily.

He said on a podcast that Bitcoin was a "technological phoenix" that would be reborn from the ashes of traditional finance.

According to a Cryptopolitan report, MicroStrategy held Bitcoin worth over $47 billion at the time.

This meeting sparked market speculation that GameStop might follow MicroStrategy's lead and add Bitcoin to its balance sheet. GameStop's stock price rose 4% that day.

What did Cohen learn? At least he learned how to create hype.

Three months later, GameStop announced its entry. According to a Reuters report, GameStop spent $513 million to buy 4,710 BTC, with an average cost of approximately $108,917 per coin.

The news caused a brief spike in the stock price.

But a closer look at this transaction revealed problems.

According to the company's financial report as of February 1, 2025, GameStop had approximately $4.8 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. $500 million in Bitcoin? That's only 10.4% of its cash reserves.

This wasn't "All In." This was a test.

And Saylor? During the same period, he leveraged almost MicroStrategy's entire balance sheet, continuously issuing debt to buy more. That's conviction. What Cohen did was speculation.

"Judging from the capital ratio, subsequent actions, and communication style, Bitcoin seemed more like an option rather than a core identity anchor," said an analyst who wished to remain anonymous. "Saylor bet the entire company. Cohen? He bought a little and then did nothing."

In Q3 2025, Bitcoin prices were still high.

GameStop did not increase its holdings.

MicroStrategy was buying almost every week.

The gap was set here.

The Two Sides of the Flywheel

To understand why GameStop is running, one must first understand the rules of this game.

The core logic of the corporate Bitcoin treasury strategy can be summarized in one word: flywheel.

Issue stock to raise money, buy Bitcoin, the rising price pushes up the market cap, a higher market cap allows issuing more stock, buy more Bitcoin, repeat the cycle.

In a bull market, this is a money-printing machine.

From MicroStrategy's first purchase in August 2020 to the end of 2025, its stock price increased 12.29 times. Bitcoin rose about 6.37 times in the same period, while the S&P 500 only rose 115%.

The effect was astonishing. In 2025, nearly 200 publicly listed companies rushed in, stuffing Bitcoin onto their balance sheets. According to K33's H1 report, in the first half of 2025 alone, Bitcoin treasury companies purchased 244,991 BTC, bringing in tens of billions of dollars in inflows.

But the flywheel has a fatal characteristic: it can spin in reverse.

In October 2025, Bitcoin hit an all-time high of approximately $126,000. Then it started to fall.

By the end of December, it was at $87,500. A drop of over 30%.

The flywheel began to work in reverse: coin price falls, market cap falls, stock price falls below net asset value, unable to issue new shares at a premium, no money to buy more coins, investor confidence collapses, market cap continues to fall.

MicroStrategy's market cap plummeted from a premium of about 3 times its Bitcoin holding's net value. By December 2025, analysis on Reddit claimed it was at an 11% discount.

Not a premium. A discount.

The market no longer believed the flywheel would keep spinning.

What did Saylor do at this time?

From December 29, 2025, to January 4, 2026, while Bitcoin was still in a downward trend and the company's stock price had halved from its peak, he announced the purchase of an additional 1,286 BTC.

He stated: "The drop in Bitcoin's price is a gift. Every decline is a buying opportunity."

And Cohen?

He transferred the coins to an exchange.

Faced with paper losses:

MicroStrategy added to its position. GameStop prepared to run.

The difference lies not in financial condition, but in belief.

Three Paths

"The era of premium is over," said John Fakhoury, a senior analyst at Stacking Sats, in a market report. Surviving in this field requires two things: discipline and actual business capabilities.

Those who leave lack the former; those who stay need to prove the latter.

GameStop? At least on the path of Bitcoin treasury, it neither chose to bind its identity long-term nor established a sustainable execution mechanism.

So, what does the future hold?

Based on feasibility speculation, this field may evolve along three paths.

First, consolidation and concentration. The weak exit, the strong harvest. According to Galaxy Digital's 2026 crypto market outlook report, at least 5 Bitcoin treasury companies will sell their Bitcoin holdings or shut down completely this year. Where will these Bitcoins go? Some will be absorbed by ETFs and retail investors, some will be acquired at a discount by giants like MicroStrategy. Eventually, only a few companies may dominate the entire field.

Second, model evolution. The simple "buy and hold" has become ineffective. Some companies are beginning to explore how to generate cash flow without selling, subsequently trying options trading, Bitcoin lending, structured products, etc. But this requires professional capability, which most bandwagoners lack.

Third, narrative downgrade. Bitcoin is downgraded from a "revolutionary corporate asset allocation choice" to "a highly volatile alternative asset." It can be allocated, but not worth All In; it can be tried, but should not be a core strategy.

However, Ryan Cohen is taking a fourth path: a complete pivot.

His goal is to transform GameStop into an enterprise worth over $100 billion, with businesses far beyond selling video games and collectibles. Based on the current market cap of about $11.5 billion, the stock price needs to increase 8.7 times.

Cohen is ambitious about this. To achieve this goal, he is considering acquiring a listed company.

When the Tide Goes Out

Let's zoom out the lens a bit.

Saylor believes Bitcoin is the most important asset innovation in human history, the decline is just noise, and he will buy until his last breath.

Cohen says, thank you, but I see something more attractive.

If Bitcoin rises to $500,000 in five years, Saylor becomes a legend, Cohen becomes "the one who sold at the bottom."

If Bitcoin falls into a long-term bear market, Cohen's timely exit is seen as wise, while Saylor needs to pay about $700 million annually in preferred stock dividends and bond interest.

Who is right? Who is wrong?

Time will tell.

But one thing is certain: GameStop's Bitcoin experiment will most likely become a footnote. Years from now, when people look back on this history, they will remember Saylor, they will remember those true believers who kept buying in the darkest hours.

As for those bandwagoners who come and go in a flash?

The market never lacks such characters. When the tide goes out, they are always the fastest to run.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason for GameStop's decision to sell its Bitcoin holdings according to the article?

AGameStop's decision was driven by a lack of conviction in Bitcoin as a core strategic asset, viewing it more as a speculative option rather than a long-term belief, unlike Michael Saylor's maximalist approach.

QHow did Michael Saylor's strategy differ from Ryan Cohen's regarding Bitcoin investment?

AMichael Saylor adopted a 'Bitcoin Maximalist' approach, heavily leveraging his company's balance sheet to continuously buy Bitcoin regardless of price drops, while Ryan Cohen treated it as a minor, experimental investment without further commitment during market highs.

QWhat is the 'flywheel effect' in corporate treasury Bitcoin strategy, and how does it reverse?

AThe 'flywheel effect' describes a cycle where companies issue stock to raise funds, buy Bitcoin, whose price rise boosts market capitalization, enabling more stock issuance and further Bitcoin purchases. It reverses when Bitcoin's price falls, leading to declining market value, inability to issue premium stock, and loss of investor confidence.

QWhat are the three possible future paths for corporate Bitcoin treasury strategies mentioned in the article?

AThe three paths are: 1) Consolidation and concentration, with weaker companies exiting and stronger ones acquiring assets; 2) Evolution of models, incorporating strategies like options trading or lending; 3) Narrative downgrade, where Bitcoin is seen as a high-volatility alternative asset rather than a revolutionary choice.

QWhat does Ryan Cohen plan to do after moving away from Bitcoin investment?

ARyan Cohen aims to transform GameStop into a $100 billion enterprise by pursuing acquisitions and expanding beyond video games and collectibles, effectively shifting the company's strategic focus away from Bitcoin.

Related Reads

The Semiconductor Industry's Most Obscure Chokepoint Material: It Has Multiplied in Price Unnoticed, and China Just Banned Its Export

"Helium: The Silent Choke Point in Semiconductors" Helium, despite being the universe's second most abundant element, is critically scarce on Earth. It cannot be synthesized artificially and escapes Earth's gravity once released, making it a non-renewable resource. Yet, it is indispensable for advanced semiconductor manufacturing, requiring ultra-high purity (99.9999%) for processes like wafer etching, leak detection, and thermal management in lithography tools, with no viable substitutes. This low-profile resource, whose price has doubled unnoticed, suddenly gained attention when China imposed an export ban on July 10th. The ban is a response to a severe global shortage triggered months earlier. In March, missile attacks damaged the world's largest helium production hub in Qatar's Ras Laffan, halting a third of global supply with repairs expected to take 3-5 years. Concurrently, Russia tightened export controls, and the US sold off its federal helium reserve. Approximately 200 specialized transport containers, each worth ~$1 million, were stranded with perishable cargo. Global spot prices skyrocketed, and chipmakers like TSMC warned of potential impacts. China, which imports over 84% of its helium (primarily from Qatar and Russia), faces a severe squeeze. Despite being helium-poor, China has developed domestic extraction technology over five years, processing byproduct gases from LNG plants to produce ultra-pure helium. Domestic output, while still only covering less than 20% of demand, enabled the recent export ban aimed at securing domestic supply for its own expanding chip industry. The industry now faces "Helium Shortage 5.0." With key global sources constrained for years, this invisible gas—once wasted on party balloons—has become a critical, geopolitically charged bottleneck for chips, healthcare (MRI machines), and beyond, forcing the world to finally treat it as the finite strategic resource it is.

marsbit15m ago

The Semiconductor Industry's Most Obscure Chokepoint Material: It Has Multiplied in Price Unnoticed, and China Just Banned Its Export

marsbit15m ago

Early Investor of Unitree Bets on a Brain-Computer Interface Company

"Wabo Technologies, a brain-computer interface (BCI) startup, has secured new funding from Vertex Ventures (under Temasek), Hongtai Fund, Chengdu Future Industry Fund, and Huifengda Capital. Vertex Ventures is known for its early bet on Unitree Robotics. Inspired by the sci-fi film "Avatar," founder Zhang Xingzhi has pursued human-machine interaction for over a decade. He established Wabo in late 2025, coinciding with China's push for BCI as a future industry. Unlike companies focused solely on medical hardware, Wabo positions itself as a model company. Its core mission is to develop a "Human Neural Intent Model" that decodes EEG, EMG, and behavioral signals to understand a user's goals, confirmations, corrections, and stop intentions before physical action, translating them into standardized control signals for machines, robots, or smart devices. The young, full-stack team, backed by academic collaborators from Tianjin University and Fudan University, quickly attracted investors. The company had previously raised a seed round from Ceyuan Capital. Investors were impressed by Wabo's systematic capabilities in data collection, signal processing, and engineering, seeing potential beyond a single hardware product toward a reusable layer of human intent interpretation. Applications span medical rehabilitation, smart homes, embodied AI, and even space exploration, with Wabo partnering with Tianjin University on pioneering "space BCI" research. Wabo plans a dual-headquarters strategy, with Shanghai focusing on high-end R&D and model development, and Chengdu handling hardware, product development, and supply chain. The BCI sector in China is heating up, with over 30 financing deals in early 2026. Zhang believes future competition will center on who can build a sustainable data-model-scenario loop. He predicts industry consolidation within three years, with only companies that master this闭环 surviving. The vision from "Avatar" is inching closer to reality."

marsbit30m ago

Early Investor of Unitree Bets on a Brain-Computer Interface Company

marsbit30m ago

ChangXin Technology: A Cyclical Stock Standing Atop the Cycle Peak

Changxin Technology: A Cyclical Stock at the Peak On July 27, 2026, Changxin Technology topped the A-share market with a market capitalization of 3.28 trillion yuan, surging 465% on its first trading day. The company, which lost 16.3 billion yuan in 2023, reported an estimated net profit of 50-57 billion yuan for the first half of 2026. Its dramatic reversal mirrors the volatile DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) cycle. The DRAM industry is inherently cyclical, with booms and busts every 3-4 years. This is due to product standardization and a significant time lag in supply adjustment. When prices rise, manufacturers expand capacity, but new production takes 2-3 years to come online, often leading to oversupply and price crashes when demand cools. Changxin's performance perfectly tracks this cycle. It recorded deep losses in 2023-2024 during the industry downturn, turned its first annual profit in 2025, and saw profits skyrocket in Q1 2026. This surge is primarily price-driven. The AI boom has led major players like Samsung and SK Hynix to shift 70-80% of new capacity to high-margin HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), creating a severe shortage and price explosion in general-purpose DRAM markets where Changxin competes. However, a massive global capacity expansion is underway. The top three manufacturers have announced nearly $70 billion in capital expenditure for 2026. Changxin itself plans to expand from three to seven 12-inch wafer fabs. This investment will translate into significant new supply in 2-3 years. While DRAM prices are expected to remain high through 2026-2027, price growth is already slowing, and a potential downturn is forecast for around 2028 as new capacity ramps up. A key challenge for Changxin is catching up in the critical HBM segment. While it has delivered HBM3 samples, leaders are already mass-producing more advanced HBM3E. Success in HBM is crucial for gaining true cyclical resilience. In conclusion, Changxin is a commendable company that has broken foreign monopolies in DRAM. Its long-term growth narrative—driven by import substitution and AI—is valid. Yet, its current valuation of 5-6x forward P/E, typical for a cyclical stock at its peak, suggests much future growth is already priced in. AI may extend the current cycle but cannot eliminate the industry's inherent volatility. For investors, the critical question is preparedness for the inevitable downturn when the cycle turns.

marsbit35m ago

ChangXin Technology: A Cyclical Stock Standing Atop the Cycle Peak

marsbit35m ago

What If the CLARITY Act Ultimately Fails to Pass?

This article examines the potential consequences if the CLARITY Act, a major US crypto market structure bill, fails to pass in the Senate. Having cleared the House in July 2025 and a key committee in May 2026, the bill's passage into law this year is now considered uncertain, with prediction markets showing its probability dropping from 82% in February to 35%. The article analyzes three main areas of impact should the bill fail. First, for the crypto market, analysts believe a negative reaction is limited and partially priced in already, with Bitcoin's recent weakness attributed more to macro factors. The specific details of the failed bill would matter more than its failure alone. Second, for US stocks, Coinbase (COIN) could see short-term pressure, with analysts citing a potential drop to the $140-$160 range, though its long-term thesis is not solely tied to the bill. For Circle, failure might be neutral or even positive long-term, as a passed bill could invite more stablecoin competition. Bitcoin-treasury firms like Strategy (MSTR) are seen as more directly tied to Bitcoin's price than the legislation. Third, in Washington, the failure is framed within a broader political struggle. Democratic resistance is partly linked to concerns over former President Trump's crypto holdings, making the bill a political tool. If it fails in 2026, the industry would likely rely on existing frameworks like the GENIUS Act and agency-level rules. Missing the August window likely pushes any significant progress to 2027, a period of political reshuffling after midterm elections, making consensus harder to achieve.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

What If the CLARITY Act Ultimately Fails to Pass?

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片