ETHZilla crashes 97%, Thiel exits the ‘Ethereum Treasury’ model

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-19Last updated on 2026-02-19

Abstract

ETHZilla, once a prominent corporate crypto firm known for holding large amounts of Ethereum as its core strategy, has collapsed by 97% from its peak. Billionaire investor Peter Thiel and his Founders Fund sold their entire 7.5% stake, marking a dramatic shift. The company has abandoned its Ethereum treasury model, selling $74.5 million worth of ETH to reduce debt and pivot into aerospace investments. This move came amid severe Ethereum price volatility, where ETH fell from around $3,400 to $1,900 between January and February 2026, causing financial instability for ETHZilla. Despite this, other institutions like Bitmine Immersion Technologies and Harvard Management Company continue to hold or increase Ethereum exposure, indicating ongoing institutional interest despite market weakness.

In the summer of 2025, ETHZilla was one of the biggest names in the corporate crypto trend. The company became popular for holding large amounts of Ethereum [ETH] as its main business strategy.

With a 7.5% stake from billionaire investor Peter Thiel, the stock attracted considerable attention. But that story has now changed.

Recent SEC filings show that by the end of 2025, Thiel and his Founders Fund had quietly sold their entire stake, cutting their 11.59 million shares down to zero.

This marks a dramatic shift. At one point, the stock had surged nearly 200% just on news of Thiel’s involvement. Since then, it has fallen about 97% from its peak.

ETHZilla stock price action

The bigger issue is that ETHZilla itself is changing direction. As of the 18th of February, with the stock trading around $3.51, the company has moved away from its Ethereum Treasury model.

Instead of focusing on holding ETH, it is now selling its crypto reserves to reduce debt and invest in commercial aerospace engines.

That said, Peter Thiel’s exit came at a time when the crypto-treasury strategy was facing serious pressure.

While companies like Michael Saylor’s Strategy found success holding Bitcoin, ETHZilla’s attempt to copy that model with Ethereum did not go as planned.

Market conditions and price volatility made the strategy much harder to sustain.

How is ETH reacting?

The Ethereum OI-weighted funding rate chart from mid-January to mid-February 2026 shows heavy volatility followed by a period of weakness. In late January, as ETH fell from around $3,400, funding stayed mostly positive.

Between mid-January and mid-February 2026, Ethereum fell sharply from around $3,400 to near $1,900.

During this drop, many traders kept buying the dip using borrowed money, which increased risk and helped push prices lower.

The large red spikes in early February show major liquidations, when too many traders were forced out near $1,900. These moments often mark short-term bottoms, as weak positions are cleared.

By mid-February, trading activity slowed. ETH moved sideways near $2,100, and funding dropped, showing low confidence and weak demand. With neither buyers nor sellers taking strong positions, prices remain fragile.

Since funding mainly reflects Futures trading, it does not fully show spot market selling, making it an incomplete signal.

For ETHZilla, which once held over 82,000 ETH, this volatility was not just market noise, it threatened the company’s financial stability.

With its stock down 30% in a month and Ethereum struggling, ETHZilla decided to change direction. The company sold about $74.5 million worth of ETH, not to buy more crypto, but to launch ETHZilla Aerospace.

Not everyone is quitting

This comes at a time when Bitmine Immersion Technologies now holds about 4.37 million ETH, equal to nearly 3.6% of all circulating supply.

Additionally, the Harvard Management Company recently reduced some of its Bitcoin ETF exposure and added about $86.8 million in Ethereum through a fund by BlackRock.

This shows that major institutions do not see current market weakness as a reason to leave. Instead, they see it as a chance to rotate into Ethereum while prices are still low.


Final Summary

  • ETHZilla’s collapse shows that not every crypto treasury model can survive long-term market stress.
  • Peter Thiel’s exit reflects the failure of one strategy, not the end of institutional interest in Ethereum.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason for ETHZilla's dramatic stock price decline of 97% from its peak?

AETHZilla's stock collapsed due to the failure of its Ethereum Treasury business model, extreme market volatility that threatened the company's financial stability, and the subsequent exit of major investor Peter Thiel, which led to a loss of market confidence.

QWhat significant action did Peter Thiel and his Founders Fund take regarding their ETHZilla investment by the end of 2025?

ASEC filings show that Peter Thiel and his Founders Fund sold their entire stake in ETHZilla, reducing their holding from 11.59 million shares to zero.

QHow did Ethereum's price and market activity perform between mid-January and mid-February 2026, according to the article?

AEthereum's price fell sharply from around $3,400 to near $1,900. This drop was accompanied by heavy volatility, major liquidations in early February, and by mid-February, it was moving sideways near $2,100 with low trading activity and weak demand.

QWhat new business direction did ETHZilla pursue after moving away from its crypto-treasury model?

AETHZilla sold approximately $74.5 million worth of its Ethereum reserves to reduce debt and invest in a new venture called ETHZilla Aerospace, focusing on commercial aerospace engines.

QDespite ETHZilla's failure, what does the article suggest about broader institutional interest in Ethereum?

AThe article suggests that institutional interest in Ethereum remains, citing examples like Bitmine Immersion Technologies holding a large amount of ETH and the Harvard Management Company rotating some of its assets into Ethereum through a BlackRock fund, seeing the market weakness as a buying opportunity.

Related Reads

AI Bulk Bombards Apple Bug Bounty Program, Review Team Has Gone Offline

Apple has temporarily suspended and limited submissions to its Bug Bounty Program due to a flood of AI-generated vulnerability reports. The program, launched in 2016 and offering rewards up to $5 million, has been overwhelmed by reports from amateur researchers using tools like ChatGPT, many containing false positives or "AI hallucinations." This AI-driven surge in bug reports is straining Apple's security review team, leading the company to impose a 30-day "cooling-off" period and submission caps. The trend highlights a broader industry challenge, with other major firms like Google and GitHub also adjusting their vulnerability disclosure programs. Paradoxically, while AI is creating a reporting bottleneck, it's also accelerating defense. Apple's recent macOS Tahoe 26.6 security update, which patched 194 vulnerabilities, included its first-ever acknowledgments to AI tools (Claude, Codex Security, etc.) for helping discover flaws. This forces Apple into faster, more frequent security updates, a departure from its traditionally controlled release cadence. A key example involves Apple's advanced "Memory Integrity Enforcement" (MIE) security feature, touted as a major breakthrough. However, researchers using an AI model bypassed its protections in just five days, demonstrating both the power and disruptive pace of AI in cybersecurity. The incident underscores a critical shift: as AI compresses the vulnerability discovery cycle to days, traditional monthly security update cycles may become dangerously long exposure windows.

marsbit31m ago

AI Bulk Bombards Apple Bug Bounty Program, Review Team Has Gone Offline

marsbit31m ago

Qualcomm Wants to Expand the Market with Dual Flagship Chips but Hits Memory Price Hikes

Qualcomm is reportedly planning to launch a dual-flagship chip strategy for its upcoming 2nm-based Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 platform in 2026, featuring both a standard and a Pro version. This move aims to expand the reach of its premium chipsets beyond just ultra-high-end phones into more mainstream flagship models, similar to Apple's approach with its A-series chips. However, this expansion plan coincides with a significant and likely prolonged surge in memory prices, driven by AI data centers consuming production capacity for HBM and server DRAM. This cost increase squeezes the entire smartphone market, particularly price-sensitive segments. While Pro-tier chips might still find a place in expensive Ultra models, the standard version—intended to make the new platform more accessible—may not result in meaningfully lower phone prices. The savings from using a less powerful chip could be offset by higher memory costs. Consequently, consumers might face a scenario where phones with the standard chip are still expensive but lack the "best" specs, creating a perception gap. With Qualcomm also hinting at potential price hikes for its chips, smartphone makers are caught in a difficult position: use the Pro version and risk prohibitively high prices, use the standard version and market a "lesser" flagship, or rely on previous-generation chips and struggle with marketing. Ultimately, Qualcomm's strategy to broaden its flagship lineup through product segmentation is being undermined by market forces that are shrinking consumer demand and raising overall device costs. This could lead to a more expensive and confusing premium Android market, potentially pushing consumers towards older, discounted models instead.

marsbit46m ago

Qualcomm Wants to Expand the Market with Dual Flagship Chips but Hits Memory Price Hikes

marsbit46m ago

Three Industry Signals from the Systematic Revision of the 'Regulations on the Protection of Integrated Circuit Layout Designs'

The revised "Regulations on the Protection of Integrated Circuit Layout Designs" were promulgated on July 23, 2026, marking the first comprehensive amendment since its 2001 implementation. The revision sends three key industry signals. First, the protection scope is expanded from "semiconductor" to include "semiconductor + photonics + quantum," formally covering next-generation technologies like silicon photonics and quantum chips in the post-Moore era. Second, it introduces a "statement of originality" system to address long-standing difficulties in defining protection scope and proving infringement. Applicants must now clearly indicate the original portions of their design. Procedures for rejection, revocation (including third-party initiated), and rights restoration are also refined. Third, infringement penalties are significantly strengthened, shifting from compensatory to punitive damages. For willful and serious infringement, punitive damages of 1 to 5 times the actual loss, illicit profits, or license fees can be applied. Beneficiaries include IC design firms in emerging fields and IP suppliers. Entities facing new pressure include those reliant on reverse engineering, applicants filing fraudulent registrations, and packaging/test houses with heightened compliance duties. The amendment provides clearer rules, but their practical impact will be tested in post-implementation judicial practice, where courts are expected to strictly scrutinize rights foundations, originality, and commercial use timelines.

marsbit1h ago

Three Industry Signals from the Systematic Revision of the 'Regulations on the Protection of Integrated Circuit Layout Designs'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片