ETHZilla crashes 97%, Thiel exits the ‘Ethereum Treasury’ model

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-19Last updated on 2026-02-19

Abstract

ETHZilla, once a prominent corporate crypto firm known for holding large amounts of Ethereum as its core strategy, has collapsed by 97% from its peak. Billionaire investor Peter Thiel and his Founders Fund sold their entire 7.5% stake, marking a dramatic shift. The company has abandoned its Ethereum treasury model, selling $74.5 million worth of ETH to reduce debt and pivot into aerospace investments. This move came amid severe Ethereum price volatility, where ETH fell from around $3,400 to $1,900 between January and February 2026, causing financial instability for ETHZilla. Despite this, other institutions like Bitmine Immersion Technologies and Harvard Management Company continue to hold or increase Ethereum exposure, indicating ongoing institutional interest despite market weakness.

In the summer of 2025, ETHZilla was one of the biggest names in the corporate crypto trend. The company became popular for holding large amounts of Ethereum [ETH] as its main business strategy.

With a 7.5% stake from billionaire investor Peter Thiel, the stock attracted considerable attention. But that story has now changed.

Recent SEC filings show that by the end of 2025, Thiel and his Founders Fund had quietly sold their entire stake, cutting their 11.59 million shares down to zero.

This marks a dramatic shift. At one point, the stock had surged nearly 200% just on news of Thiel’s involvement. Since then, it has fallen about 97% from its peak.

ETHZilla stock price action

The bigger issue is that ETHZilla itself is changing direction. As of the 18th of February, with the stock trading around $3.51, the company has moved away from its Ethereum Treasury model.

Instead of focusing on holding ETH, it is now selling its crypto reserves to reduce debt and invest in commercial aerospace engines.

That said, Peter Thiel’s exit came at a time when the crypto-treasury strategy was facing serious pressure.

While companies like Michael Saylor’s Strategy found success holding Bitcoin, ETHZilla’s attempt to copy that model with Ethereum did not go as planned.

Market conditions and price volatility made the strategy much harder to sustain.

How is ETH reacting?

The Ethereum OI-weighted funding rate chart from mid-January to mid-February 2026 shows heavy volatility followed by a period of weakness. In late January, as ETH fell from around $3,400, funding stayed mostly positive.

Between mid-January and mid-February 2026, Ethereum fell sharply from around $3,400 to near $1,900.

During this drop, many traders kept buying the dip using borrowed money, which increased risk and helped push prices lower.

The large red spikes in early February show major liquidations, when too many traders were forced out near $1,900. These moments often mark short-term bottoms, as weak positions are cleared.

By mid-February, trading activity slowed. ETH moved sideways near $2,100, and funding dropped, showing low confidence and weak demand. With neither buyers nor sellers taking strong positions, prices remain fragile.

Since funding mainly reflects Futures trading, it does not fully show spot market selling, making it an incomplete signal.

For ETHZilla, which once held over 82,000 ETH, this volatility was not just market noise, it threatened the company’s financial stability.

With its stock down 30% in a month and Ethereum struggling, ETHZilla decided to change direction. The company sold about $74.5 million worth of ETH, not to buy more crypto, but to launch ETHZilla Aerospace.

Not everyone is quitting

This comes at a time when Bitmine Immersion Technologies now holds about 4.37 million ETH, equal to nearly 3.6% of all circulating supply.

Additionally, the Harvard Management Company recently reduced some of its Bitcoin ETF exposure and added about $86.8 million in Ethereum through a fund by BlackRock.

This shows that major institutions do not see current market weakness as a reason to leave. Instead, they see it as a chance to rotate into Ethereum while prices are still low.


Final Summary

  • ETHZilla’s collapse shows that not every crypto treasury model can survive long-term market stress.
  • Peter Thiel’s exit reflects the failure of one strategy, not the end of institutional interest in Ethereum.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason for ETHZilla's dramatic stock price decline of 97% from its peak?

AETHZilla's stock collapsed due to the failure of its Ethereum Treasury business model, extreme market volatility that threatened the company's financial stability, and the subsequent exit of major investor Peter Thiel, which led to a loss of market confidence.

QWhat significant action did Peter Thiel and his Founders Fund take regarding their ETHZilla investment by the end of 2025?

ASEC filings show that Peter Thiel and his Founders Fund sold their entire stake in ETHZilla, reducing their holding from 11.59 million shares to zero.

QHow did Ethereum's price and market activity perform between mid-January and mid-February 2026, according to the article?

AEthereum's price fell sharply from around $3,400 to near $1,900. This drop was accompanied by heavy volatility, major liquidations in early February, and by mid-February, it was moving sideways near $2,100 with low trading activity and weak demand.

QWhat new business direction did ETHZilla pursue after moving away from its crypto-treasury model?

AETHZilla sold approximately $74.5 million worth of its Ethereum reserves to reduce debt and invest in a new venture called ETHZilla Aerospace, focusing on commercial aerospace engines.

QDespite ETHZilla's failure, what does the article suggest about broader institutional interest in Ethereum?

AThe article suggests that institutional interest in Ethereum remains, citing examples like Bitmine Immersion Technologies holding a large amount of ETH and the Harvard Management Company rotating some of its assets into Ethereum through a BlackRock fund, seeing the market weakness as a buying opportunity.

Related Reads

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit1h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit1h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit3h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit3h ago

Deconstructing Notion's Growth: From a Note-taking Tool to 100 Million Users—How Notion Built a Triple Growth Flywheel Through Product, Templates, and Community

Notion's growth from a niche note-taking tool to a platform with 100 million users is powered by three interconnected flywheels: Product-Led Growth (PLG), a Template Economy, and Community-Driven Growth. First, Notion's PLG strategy relies on a highly flexible, "plastic" product that users can adapt to countless personal and team workflows. Its freemium model lowers the barrier to entry, while features like page sharing and collaboration drive organic, usage-based viral growth as users naturally invite others. Second, the Template Economy solves the "blank page" problem. Templates, created by both Notion and its community, transform abstract product capabilities into concrete, copyable solutions for specific scenarios (e.g., project management, content calendars). This dramatically lowers activation costs for new users and fuels SEO-driven discovery. Third, a vibrant Community acts as a distributed growth engine. Users and official Ambassadors create tutorials, share use cases, and host local events. This community not only educates users but also fosters a sense of identity around pursuing "better ways of working," strengthening loyalty and enabling global, low-cost expansion. Together, these flywheels create a self-reinforcing ecosystem: a great product attracts users who create templates and community content, which in turn attracts more users and deepens engagement. This system allowed Notion to scale from individuals to teams and enterprises through a bottom-up adoption path. Looking ahead, AI integration promises to accelerate these flywheels further by making templates smarter and the platform a potential AI-native work operating system. Ultimately, Notion's defensible advantage is not just its features, but this deeply entrenched network of user assets, creators, and community trust.

marsbit3h ago

Deconstructing Notion's Growth: From a Note-taking Tool to 100 Million Users—How Notion Built a Triple Growth Flywheel Through Product, Templates, and Community

marsbit3h ago

$10 Billion, Qualcomm to Acquire Chip Legend Jim Keller's Company

Global mobile chip giant Qualcomm is in advanced talks to acquire AI chip startup Tenstorrent in a deal valued between $8-10 billion, according to media reports. This potential acquisition would be one of the largest in the AI chip sector in recent years. Tenstorrent, led by legendary chip architect Jim Keller, has gained prominence for its RISC-V architecture and AI accelerator designs. The move highlights Qualcomm's strategic push to diversify beyond its core smartphone chip business. As the smartphone market matures, Qualcomm is aggressively targeting growth in automotive, data center, and cloud AI. Acquiring Tenstorrent would allow Qualcomm to rapidly enter the high-end AI computing market, bypassing lengthy in-house development cycles. Tenstorrent's cost-effective system architecture, which avoids expensive HBM memory and relies on standard Ethernet for clustering, offers a potential alternative to Nvidia's costly solutions. Furthermore, Tenstorrent's high-performance RISC-V CPU technology and its focus on the automotive and edge computing segments align with Qualcomm's strategic goals, including its "Snapdragon Digital Chassis" platform. Despite the strategic rationale, the high valuation has sparked some investor caution. The successful integration of Tenstorrent's open-source culture and independent team into Qualcomm's organization, along with the commercialization of its technology, remains a key challenge.

marsbit4h ago

$10 Billion, Qualcomm to Acquire Chip Legend Jim Keller's Company

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片