Ethereum vs Solana – No chain has defensible ‘moat’ yet, warns Wintermute CEO

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-21Last updated on 2026-03-21

Abstract

Wintermute CEO Evgeny Gaevoy argues that neither Ethereum nor Solana has established a defensible market position, despite Ethereum's dominance in DeFi TVL ($56 billion vs. Solana's $6.8 billion). He claims Ethereum's value is largely "stuck money" and corporate experiments with limited real-world impact, while Solana, though technologically capable, remains overly reliant on memecoin activity without major new dApps. Gaevoy believes the space remains open for new blockchains to emerge and attract users. Hyperliquid's success supports this view, as it now generates 45% of blockchain fee revenue—surpassing Ethereum (7%) and Solana (13%)—by expanding into commodity trading. Additionally, new corporate chains like Tempo and Circle’s Arc threaten public chains' stablecoin and tokenization advantages by offering lower fees and enhanced security. The competition remains fluid, with no clear winner yet.

From the outside, one might think public blockchains are a two-horse race, pitting DeFi pioneer Ethereum against its closest and fastest challenger, Solana. In fact, DeFi activity and liquidity (total locked value) may somewhat reinforce the above picture.

Check this out – Out of the total DeFi TVL of $95.3 billion, Ethereum dominates with $56 billion, while Solana comes in second at $6.8 billion – About 10% of Ethereum’s size.

Source: The Block/DeFiLlama

However, Evgeny Gaevoy, CEO of crypto market maker Wintermute, believes neither of the two leading chains has a sticky moat.

ETH vs SOL – No clear winner just yet

For Ethereum’s massive TVL, Gaevoy claimed that most of the capital on the chain is “stuck money” and “corporate experiments” on blockchain rails.

People quite overestimate those corporate pilots to put some cash markets and bonds on the block. It’s a tiny TradFi economic activity.

On the contrary, for Solana, the memecoin mania has revealed that its technology works and it can handle massive transaction volumes with faster transfers.

According to the exec though, Solana is still stuck with memecoins. Additionally, there are no major new dApps or exchanges to catalyze it.

He concluded,

I don’t feel anyone has won yet. It’s feasible that a new blockchain could attract a new cohort of believers and take the world by storm. It’s possible because nobody has this moat yet.

In the stablecoin and tokenization boom, Ethereum and Solana are still ranked first and second, respectively.

Hyperliquid validates his theory

Gaevoy’s arguments are plausible too, especially after Hyperliquid’s success despite being operational for about three years.

The chain and DEX were purpose-built for high-frequency crypto trading and DeFi activity. However, now it has become the best place to trade oil and other commodities amid geopolitical tensions.

Interestingly, the massive trading activity across crypto and non-crypto assets has driven Hyperliquid to generate more fees and revenue.

The results? Hyperliquid now dominates 45% of the generated fee revenue market. TRON controls 20% of the revenue, while Solana ranks third with a 13% market share. Finally, Ethereum comes fifth at 7% after BNB Chain’s 10%.

Source: The Block/DeFiLlama

And yet, the current perceived ‘moats’ for Ethereum and Solana, such as stablecoins and tokenized markets, are under threat from rival private corporate chains.

Stripe-backed stablecoin payment-focused Tempo chain went live recently. A similar chain, Circle’s Arc, debuted too. The full roll-out of Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL) is expected this year, with all of them eyeing payments and tokenized capital markets.

All these new chains seek to scrap the volatile, unpredictable transfer fees charged by current public chains and minimize scams. So, it’s feasible they could eat into public chains’ market share and their perceived moat.


Final Summary

  • Wintermute CEO has downplayed the perceived moats of Ethereum and Solana, warning that they could still be easily disrupted.
  • Hyperliquid’s 45% market dominance in total blockchain revenue validated exec’s argument

Related Questions

QAccording to Wintermute CEO Evgeny Gaevoy, why does Ethereum's massive TVL not necessarily represent a strong moat?

AGaevoy claims that most of the capital on Ethereum is 'stuck money' and 'corporate experiments' on blockchain rails, referring to small-scale TradFi economic activity like putting cash markets and bonds on-chain.

QWhat technological advantage of Solana was revealed during the memecoin mania, according to the article?

AThe memecoin mania revealed that Solana's technology works and it can handle massive transaction volumes with faster transfers.

QWhich blockchain currently dominates the market in generated fee revenue, and what is its market share?

AHyperliquid currently dominates the generated fee revenue market with a 45% share.

QWhat are some of the new rival chains mentioned that threaten the stablecoin and tokenization moat of public chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AThe article mentions the Stripe-backed Tempo chain, Circle's Arc chain, and the upcoming Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL), all of which are focused on payments and tokenized capital markets.

QWhat is the core argument made by Wintermute's CEO about the current state of competition between blockchain networks?

AThe core argument is that no chain has a defensible moat yet, and it's still feasible for a new blockchain to attract believers and take the world by storm, as the current leaders are vulnerable to disruption.

Related Reads

WeChat Agent Issues a 'Heroic Summons,' Half of the Internet Responds

WeChat AI Agent is on the horizon. The WeChat Open Platform has issued a guide for developers, offering them ways to integrate into the WeChat AI ecosystem. This will enable mini-programs to be discovered and invoked by the AI. Meituan has already announced its integration, allowing users to access services like food delivery through WeChat AI. Other platforms like Ctrip and Tongcheng have followed suit. Furthermore, WeChat is collaborating with major smartphone manufacturers to enable their native AI assistants to perform actions within WeChat, such as initiating calls or sending messages, through a controlled protocol called Agent-to-Agent (A2A). Reports indicate the WeChat AI Agent will be accessible by swiping right on the main interface. It aims to understand user intent within the rich context of chats, groups, and past interactions, then automatically call upon relevant mini-programs to complete tasks like ordering coffee or booking restaurants. This positions it as a potential "super app" with direct access to WeChat's vast ecosystem of services, social connections, and payment systems. Technically, this is a complex endeavor. It requires advanced natural language understanding, a "world model" to predict interactions within mini-programs (UI-Oceanus), multi-model orchestration for cost efficiency, and careful coordination with millions of third-party service providers. Tencent's development follows a "Co-Design" approach, where product teams and the Hunyuan model team collaborate closely, allowing capabilities honed in other AI products (like Yuanbao for chat, ima for search, WorkBuddy for office tasks) to be transferred to the WeChat Agent. Tencent is strategically opting for the A2A protocol over GUI-based automation (which it has blocked in the past), maintaining control over its ecosystem. To manage the immense scale and cost of serving 1.4 billion monthly active users, Tencent is deepening its ties with DeepSeek, known for its cost-effective training, to secure a low-cost inference backbone. The ultimate goal is to solve practical, everyday problems for users within the WeChat ecosystem, moving beyond technical benchmarks to deliver real utility, which Tencent sees as the key to winning in the long-term AI game.

marsbit6m ago

WeChat Agent Issues a 'Heroic Summons,' Half of the Internet Responds

marsbit6m ago

Humanity Loses $31 Million in Attack, Token Price Plummets 90% Due to a Single Private Key

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million in losses. According to on-chain analyst Specter, hundreds of wallets holding the project's H token were drained. The attack was confirmed by founder Terence Kwok to be caused by the compromise of a foundation member's private key. As a precaution, users are advised to avoid interacting with Humanity's cross-chain bridge or liquidity pools. The incident caused the H token price to crash over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping its market cap from $2 billion to approximately $35.7 million. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and is selling them for BNB. This breach adds to existing controversies surrounding Humanity Protocol. Founded in 2024, it aimed to verify human users via palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs. However, a leaked conversation in 2025 revealed that only about 1 million of its 9 million claimed Human IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, the project has faced allegations of being a repackaged product from a Chinese access control vendor, raising privacy and authenticity concerns. Founder Terence Kwok's previous venture, Tink Labs, a hotel smartphone startup that raised $170 million, failed and entered bankruptcy in 2020 after burning through its funding. The current attack highlights the persistent critical issue of private key management in crypto. Unlike smart contract exploits, a private key compromise bypasses all on-chain security mechanisms. With no user compensation plan announced yet, this $31 million breach may be a final blow to the project's credibility, already weakened by previous controversies and a heavily depreciated token.

marsbit41m ago

Humanity Loses $31 Million in Attack, Token Price Plummets 90% Due to a Single Private Key

marsbit41m ago

MicroStrategy Will Not Die in This Downturn: Reflexivity, STRC Anchoring Back to Par, and the Self-Rescue Logic of "Sell Stock, Not Bitcoin"

This article analyzes the recent sharp decline in Bitcoin and MicroStrategy (MSTR), framing it as a targeted "reflexivity" attack. The trigger was MSTR using its cash reserves to buy back convertible notes, raising market concerns about a liquidity crisis. The playbook follows George Soros's principle: market expectations can shape reality. Fears that MSTR might be forced to sell BTC caused panic selling, lowering BTC's price and worsening MSTR's financial ratios, thus reinforcing the negative narrative. The author argues that MSTR's Structured Convertible (STRC), while falling in price, is a floating-rate security that will eventually return to par value (100). The price drop reflects the market demanding a higher yield due to perceived risk, but as a floating-rate instrument, its coupon can adjust, naturally pulling the price back to par over time. This is crucial for MSTR's continued ability to raise funds. The core thesis is that MSTR's best move to counter the attack is to **issue new equity (sell shares)**, not sell its Bitcoin holdings. While selling BTC would solve the immediate cash crunch, it would destroy the company's core investment thesis and premium. It would dilute the BTC per share, likely erase the market premium over its net asset value (mNAV > 1), and worsen its debt-to-asset ratio. Issuing shares while mNAV is high (e.g., 1.25x) allows MSTR to raise cash for reserves without harming shareholder value or the "perpetual accumulation" narrative. It improves the debt ratio and reassures STRC holders, breaking the negative reflexivity cycle. In conclusion, while MSTR could survive this episode even by selling BTC, doing so would fundamentally alter its investment proposition and weaken it for future cycles. The optimal, value-preserving strategy is to sell equity to rebuild reserves and maintain the long-term growth flywheel.

marsbit41m ago

MicroStrategy Will Not Die in This Downturn: Reflexivity, STRC Anchoring Back to Par, and the Self-Rescue Logic of "Sell Stock, Not Bitcoin"

marsbit41m ago

Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million stolen from hundreds of wallets holding its H token. The attack was caused by the compromise of a private key belonging to a foundation member, leading the team to advise users against interacting with its bridge or liquidity pools. Following the incident, the price of the H token plummeted by over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping out a significant portion of its market capitalization. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and began selling them for BNB. Humanity Protocol, founded in 2024, aimed to verify human users through palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs on Polygon CDK. Despite raising $50 million across two funding rounds and achieving a unicorn valuation, the project faced prior controversies. Shortly after its June 2025 token launch, reports emerged that only about 1 million of its 9 million registered IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, allegations surfaced that the project might be a rebranded "shell" of a Chinese access control company, raising concerns about data privacy and authenticity. The project's founder, Terence Kwok, has a controversial business history. His previous venture, Tink Labs, burned through $170 million in funding before collapsing in 2020. The breach highlights the persistent critical risk of private key management in crypto. With no user compensation plan detailed in the initial response, the incident deals a severe blow to trust in a project already struggling with credibility issues.

Foresight News1h ago

Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片