Ethereum Slides Below $2,000 for First Time Since May 2025

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-13Last updated on 2026-02-13

Abstract

Ethereum's native token, Ether (ETH), fell below the critical $2,000 support level for the first time since May 2025, hitting a year-to-date low near $1,927. This sharp decline was part of a broader sell-off in cryptocurrency markets, driven by intensified selling pressure and fear-driven liquidations. Technical analysis indicates a confirmed breakdown of a long-term support zone between $2,200 and $2,000, with further downside targets identified between $1,665 and $1,725. Momentum indicators show sellers are in control, with ETH trading below key moving averages. On-chain data reveals increased exchange inflows and reduced holdings from mid-sized investors, signaling heightened selling willingness. The short-term outlook remains cautious, with key psychological support levels now at $2,000 and $1,800. Resistance for any potential bounce is expected around $2,200–$2,300, with more significant hurdles near $2,500–$2,700. Until these levels are reclaimed, technical sentiment favors continued downside risk and elevated volatility.

Ethereum’s native token, Ether (ETH), fell sharply below the $2,000 zone, a level not seen since May 2025 as broader cryptocurrency markets came under intensified selling pressure Thursday. ETH dropped to around $1,927, marking a year-to-date low and drawing increased concern as Bitcoin and other major assets also weakened. The move extends declines from the multi-cycle peaks and has placed key psychological and technical support zones in focus.

Market sentiment turned bearish as traders reacted to accelerating sell orders that pushed ETH through long-held support levels. The breach of $2,000 originally seen as a significant floor since mid-2025 triggered additional stop-losses and fear-driven liquidations. Analysts noted that selling intensified as traders saw breaks of technical support as confirmation of a deeper corrective phase in the broader digital asset market.

Ethereum Breaks Long-Term Support as Bearish Structure Takes Hold

On the technical side, Ethereum’s chart structure reveals sustained weakness. The ETH price has recently broken below a long-term support zone between $2,200 and $2,000. This region had historically acted as a key demand area and trend reference. With the breakdown now confirmed, classic bearish patterns point to further downside risk. If the weakness persists, ETH sets downside targets between $1,665 and $1,725. These levels are derived from pattern projections and MVRV band analysis, which reflect market cycles where price can move toward lower bounds before stabilizing.

Zooming in, momentum indicators continue to signal that sellers are in control. ETH has been trading below key exponential moving averages — notably the 20-day and 50-day EMAs — which have flipped into resistance following failed attempts to reclaim higher levels. Additionally, open interest and funding rates in the derivatives market remain subdued and negative. This indicates reduced bullish participation and dominance of short positions across futures markets. This lack of speculative conviction compounds the price pressure, as fewer buyers step in at current levels to counteract the selling.

On-chain behavior also reflects a stress test. Exchange inflows have spiked as ETH balance on centralized platforms rose. That suggests increased selling willingness from holders rather than long-term accumulation. Mid-sized investors have reduced holdings, while some larger holders have absorbed part of the pressure.

Short-term outlook remains cautious until meaningful support is established. The former psychological floors near $2,000 and $1,800 are now key zones to watch. With breakdown below them likely to expose deeper levels around $1,600–$1,500 should broad market conditions stay bearish.

Resistance during any corrective bounce is expected around the $2,200–$2,300 range. More substantive hurdles lie higher, near $2,500–$2,700, should buyers regain footing. Until these levels are reclaimed on a sustained basis, technical sentiment continues to favor downside risk. Volatility is also likely to remain elevated amid ongoing risk-off trading behavior.

TagsETHETHEREUMEthereum (ETH)

Related Questions

QWhat price level did Ethereum (ETH) fall below for the first time since May 2025?

AEthereum fell below the $2,000 zone, reaching around $1,927.

QWhat technical support zone did Ethereum break, and what are the new downside targets?

AEthereum broke below the long-term support zone between $2,200 and $2,000. The new downside targets are between $1,665 and $1,725.

QHow are momentum indicators and derivatives market data reflecting the current market sentiment for ETH?

AMomentum indicators show ETH trading below key exponential moving averages, with open interest and funding rates remaining subdued and negative, indicating reduced bullish participation and dominance of short positions.

QWhat on-chain behavior suggests increased selling pressure for Ethereum?

AExchange inflows have spiked, with ETH balances on centralized platforms rising, indicating increased selling willingness from holders rather than long-term accumulation.

QWhat are the key resistance levels that need to be reclaimed for a potential bullish reversal in Ethereum's price?

AResistance during any corrective bounce is expected around $2,200–$2,300, with more substantive hurdles near $2,500–$2,700 if buyers regain footing.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片