Ethereum hits 1.29M active addresses, but security risks loom – Why?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-24Last updated on 2026-01-24

Abstract

Ethereum recently reached a record 1.297 million daily active addresses, largely driven by a surge in stablecoin transactions. However, a significant portion of this activity is attributed to malicious "address poisoning" attacks, where scammers send small amounts of tokens ("dust") to wallets from spoofed addresses. This tactic has already resulted in $740k stolen from 116 addresses. Despite these security risks, the network's fundamentals remain strong following the successful Fusaka upgrade, which drastically reduced transaction fees. Institutional demand and accumulation are high, with Ethereum dominating the real-world asset (RWA) sector and on-chain metrics showing strong market absorption.

Activity on the Ethereum [ETH] network has never been higher. In a post on X, Token Terminal revealed that the daily active addresses surpassed those of the Layer 2 solutions.

On the 16th of January, the number of Active Addresses was 1.297 million, according to Etherscan data.

At the time of writing, this figure has dropped to 945k. Yet, the trend was unmistakable. The Fusaka upgrade was completed in early December, which cut network transfer fees by nearly 6x.

This has likely had other consequences, as blockchain security specialist Andrey Sergeenkov wrote.

Dusting and poisoning on Ethereum

The specialist found that the massive increase in the number of active addresses and on-chain transactions was due to stablecoin transactions. 67% of the new addresses received less than 1 dollar as their first stablecoin transaction.

Sergeenkov identified this as “dust” and also found smart contracts that automate the mass distribution of poisoning dust.

This is address poisoning. Attackers send small amounts of tokens, or dust, to wallets using addresses that closely match their own. Later, when these users copy an address from their transaction history without closely checking it, they end up sending funds to the attacker.

Even with a low conversion rate of 0.01%, $740k has been stolen from 116 addresses in this way. It should be said that $509k came from a single victim.

Assessing the fundamentals

The Fusaka upgrade was a success. Cheap transactions should be the goal for any network. This would be a key step toward “institutionalization“. AMBCrypto pointed out that Ethereum was the leader in the real-world asset (RWA) sector, controlling roughly 60% of the market.

Aggressive ETH accumulation from entities such as Bitmine was a positive sign. In Q4 2025, Ethereum treasuries acquired 1.2 million ETH. On-chain metrics also highlight buyer dominance in the spot markets, reflecting absorption instead of distribution.

The kind of divergence between price and fundamentals right now, argued Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan, is what marks the bottom of bear markets.


Final Thoughts

  • The record-high daily active addresses were not as hopeful a sign as it appears on first glance.
  • Despite the threat from address poisoning, fundamentals, including on-chain metrics and institutional demand, remained strong.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the peak number of daily active addresses on the Ethereum network in January, and what was the figure at the time of writing?

AThe peak number of daily active addresses was 1.297 million on the 16th of January. At the time of writing, this figure had dropped to 945k.

QAccording to the article, what was the primary reason for the massive increase in active addresses and on-chain transactions?

AThe massive increase was primarily due to stablecoin transactions, with 67% of new addresses receiving less than 1 dollar as their first stablecoin transaction.

QWhat is 'address poisoning' as described in the article, and how does the attack work?

AAddress poisoning is an attack where attackers send small amounts of tokens, or 'dust', to wallets using addresses that closely resemble the victim's. The victim may later mistakenly copy this fake address from their transaction history and send funds to the attacker.

QWhat positive impact did the Fusaka upgrade have on the Ethereum network?

AThe Fusaka upgrade, completed in early December, successfully cut network transfer fees by nearly six times.

QDespite the security risks, what positive fundamental factors for Ethereum does the article highlight?

AThe article highlights strong fundamentals including Ethereum's dominance in the real-world asset (RWA) sector, aggressive ETH accumulation by entities like Bitmine, on-chain metrics showing buyer dominance, and institutional demand.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit17m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit17m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit36m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit36m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit45m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit45m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片