Ethereum Foundation Publishes Article: Restructuring the Division of Labor Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

Abstract

The Ethereum Foundation outlines a new vision for the relationship between Ethereum L1 and L2 networks, emphasizing a symbiotic evolution where each layer plays a complementary role. The goal is to scale Ethereum as a unified ecosystem while preserving its core properties (CROPS: censorship resistance, openness, privacy, security). L1 will serve as the global settlement layer, maximizing decentralization, security, and liquidity for DeFi, while scaling significantly without compromising its foundational values. L2s, meanwhile, will focus on differentiation, customization, and innovation—offering specialized features, privacy, compliance, non-EVM functionality, and faster iteration—which L1 cannot provide. L2s benefit from Ethereum ecosystem security, low-cost infrastructure, access to users, developers, and interoperability. In return, L2s strengthen Ethereum’s network effects, drive ETH demand, and expand its reach. The Foundation is committed to scaling L1 (e.g., via blobs), enhancing L1-L2 interoperability, developing native rollups, and promoting transparency in L2 security claims. The future involves a collaborative multi-chain ecosystem where L2s compete and cooperate, anchored by a robust L1.

Authors: Josh Rudolf, Julian Ma, and Josh Stark

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

The ultimate goal of the Ethereum Foundation's Platform team is to promote the scaling of Ethereum as a unified and synergistic system, allowing all users to use it with peace of mind. This article aims to share our perspective on the relationship between L1 and L2, explain the role of each layer, and how we (as an ecosystem) can leverage the strengths of L1 and L2 to create the most attractive platform for all users. Some of this is already clear, while other aspects require ongoing experimentation and iteration with the community and users to validate.

TL;DR

Goal: All individual and institutional users should have a clear path to utilize, extend, and benefit from the core properties provided by Ethereum. The best way to achieve this is to fully leverage the unique functions of each layer, strengthen Ethereum's core properties, and use these properties to deliver meaningful value to end-users.

As the Ethereum ecosystem evolves, the role of each layer also evolves:

  • Past: The primary mission of L2 was to help Ethereum scale, with providing differentiation and customization space being secondary. Scalability was the key.
  • Present: The primary mission of L2 is to provide differentiated functions, services, customized solutions, marketing strategies, and control zones while achieving scaling capabilities. Currently, the biggest drivers are differentiation, control, and innovation.
  • L1 serves as the truly permissionless and maximally resilient global settlement, shared state, liquidity, and DeFi hub. A strong, scalable L1 that does not compromise CROPS (Censorship Resistance, Openness, Privacy, and Security) provides a better foundation for the L2 layer.
  • L2 provides valuable new features, customization, and control to develop their own on-chain economies, while extending Ethereum's core properties to more users. Strong L2 networks strengthen the Ethereum ecosystem and its focus.

L2 covers all aspects, establishing differentiated binding relationships with L1 according to their own needs:

  • Those L2s seeking the closest integration with L1 should strive for synchronous composability, full interoperability, shared liquidity, and mechanisms like native Rollups.
  • L2s with various business models or technical expertise will continue to play important roles in the ecosystem, all providing exclusive capabilities that L1 cannot cover.

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) will continue to develop underlying technologies to help L2s seamlessly extend L1's native features and securely enable cross-layer and cross-chain liquidity and asset interoperability; it also requires L2s to be transparent and clearly publicize their security attributes and verification standards. In short, both sides play important roles, and actions must match words.

Introduction

Over the past five years, a vast L2 ecosystem has emerged around Ethereum L1. Various L2s inherit different native properties of Ethereum: some fully replicate the decentralized architecture (e.g., Stage 2 Rollup), some inherit partial security features (e.g., Validium, Prividium), and some are only compatible with the general EVM standard (not L2). Many chains are still under development, often starting as independent chains and gradually integrating deeply into the Ethereum L1 ecosystem.

It is time for the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and the broader Ethereum ecosystem to update our understanding of the relationship between L1 and L2 networks. The last update was arguably five years ago when the rollup-centric roadmap was first proposed as a path to scale Ethereum.

Since then, much has changed. The technology enabling L2s to share Ethereum's security and liquidity and interoperate with it has matured; the differentiated competitiveness and user value of L2s have become increasingly prominent; L2s themselves have grown and nurtured independent community ecosystems; the scaling roadmap for the L1 layer has also evolved and become clearer. The Ethereum ecosystem needs to face these changes and learn from past successes and failures.

Over the past few months, the future direction of the relationship between Ethereum L1 and L2 has gradually become clear:

  • A thriving Ethereum ecosystem must be built on a strong L1 foundation.
  • Ethereum L1 will achieve orders-of-magnitude scaling while maintaining the highest levels of security and decentralization, continuing to serve as the core of the on-chain economy and the center of DeFi.
  • In the future, an ecosystem of independent and interoperable L2 chains will emerge, offering higher levels of customization, control, and functionality that L1 cannot provide. These L2 chains choose to root themselves in the Ethereum ecosystem because it is the best choice for their users, communities, or businesses.
  • L2 chains will both compete and cooperate to provide a wide variety of specialized block space, services, and assets.

This article aims to explain the symbiotic vision of L1 and L2 in more detail and chart a path for a mutually reinforcing relationship between Ethereum L1 and any chain that wants to root itself and become part of the ecosystem.

What roles do L1 and L2 play, and how do they work together?

Ethereum L1 is the world's top programmable blockchain, unmatched in user adoption, developer ecosystem, decentralization, resilience to risks, and underlying stability. Ethereum L1 is the core of the DeFi ecosystem, aggregating the deepest liquidity in the entire network.

Ethereum L1 now has a clear scaling path while maintaining decentralization and security. Thanks to the joint efforts of numerous teams in the Ethereum ecosystem, zero-knowledge (ZK) technology has developed much faster than expected. In the coming years, we will be able to increase Ethereum L1's capacity by several orders of magnitude while adhering to its core value vision.

At the same time, no single public chain can bear the demands of the global, diverse on-chain economy. Even if Ethereum firmly occupies the leading position in the future and its scaling capability increases 1000-fold, there will still be many different chains because they provide specialized and customized services that even L1 cannot offer:

  • Specialization for specific applications or use cases
  • Non-EVM functionality
  • Additional privacy guarantees
  • Pricing mechanisms or transaction inclusion logic
  • Ultra-low latency or other sequencing characteristics
  • Extreme scaling characteristics that L1 cannot match
  • Specialized economies, market entry strategies, and growth methods
  • Modular design to meet compliance or other business needs
  • Other improvements or innovations that can iterate and deliver faster than L1
  • ......

This provides an opportunity for L1 and L2 to establish a mutually beneficial relationship, with each focusing on complementary roles.

Why would other independent public chains want to become Ethereum's L2?

  • Low cost. Compared to independent underlying public chains, L2s can replicate Ethereum's top-tier security and decentralization at an extremely low threshold; building a global decentralized validator network is costly, time-consuming, and extremely difficult. L2s can transfer this responsibility to Ethereum L1, paying on-demand without bearing high fixed setup costs.
  • Users and developers. Interoperability with the largest L1 and L2 cluster in the entire network provides access to more users and developers; interoperability and cross-chain user experience will accelerate due to the maturity of zero-knowledge proof technology, real-time proofs, faster L1 finality and L2 settlement, and proxy infrastructure.
  • Interoperability. If designed properly, L2s can securely access L1 assets and DeFi liquidity, user accounts on L1, and any services on L1, such as oracles, ENS.
  • Marketing: Being part of the Ethereum ecosystem offers advantages in terms of brand and reputation. The Ethereum ecosystem has the best reputation, security record, and regulatory recognition among all L1s.

What does Ethereum L1 gain from this? Based on our experience and discussions with various stakeholders in the ecosystem, we believe that positioning Ethereum L1 at the core of a growing network of L2s strengthens Ethereum and ETH's unique position in the on-chain economy:

  • Creates demand for ETH and provides trust-minimized, secure bridging services between ETH and other assets. ETH functions as both a store of value and currency within the Ethereum network.
  • Extends Ethereum's network effects (e.g., EVM, developer education, developer tools, user onboarding, and interoperability between L2 layers)
  • Consolidates Ethereum's important position as the core of the multi-chain ecosystem and the primary settlement and liquidity layer for the on-chain economy
  • Provides broader business development, growth, and marketing support for Ethereum.
  • L2s help realize the core vision of the Ethereum ecosystem. They act as distributed engines for Ethereum's core properties (security, resilience, and stability), maximizing the number of users who derive sustainable value from Ethereum.

The Ethereum ecosystem should not take these advantages for granted. Some of these advantages are still controversial within the community, or are long-term theories that require experimentation, measurement, and analysis to validate. Ultimately, the relationship between L1 and L2 must be mutually beneficial to succeed. Over the past five years, this relationship has achieved much and laid a critical foundation for the future.

What does this mean for the future development of L2?

What does this new vision mean for L2 users, their teams, and their communities?

Here are our suggestions:

  • L2s should focus on strategies that complement L1 and achieve platform differentiation. Many L2s have already successfully moved towards this vision. They achieve this through innovative features, targeting specific use cases (e.g., appchains), providing new distribution methods, or adopting novel marketing strategies. This has helped them create their own unique communities and extend Ethereum's properties to millions of new users.
  • L2s should have the right to differentiate themselves in various ways according to their vision. We have already seen differentiation in scalability, trustlessness, privacy protection, enterprise compliance, industry sectors, communities, and a range of technological innovations.
  • L2s can choose to extend all or part of Ethereum's properties based on their goals. But they should ensure users can easily understand the security properties they do and do not provide. L2s committed to minimizing trust should at least reach Stage 1 and pass the "exit" test, meaning users can safely exit to L1 even in the presence of malicious operators or a failure of the security council. L2s choosing to be closest to L1 and fully inherit its properties should develop towards: 1) reaching Stage 2; 2) synchronous composability; 3) becoming native Rollups.
  • L2s should continue to commit to building broader interoperability and shared liquidity mechanisms, thereby enhancing the entire Ethereum ecosystem.
  • L2s should continue to operate transparently, clearly explaining their respective security attributes and their relationship with the L1 security layer to the ecosystem.

What is the Ethereum Foundation contributing to build such a world?

To realize this vision for the L1<>L2 relationship, the Ethereum Foundation is fully advancing the following work:

  • We are committed to scaling both the L1 layer and blobs without sacrificing decentralization. The current fill rate for blobs is only around 30%, leaving significant room for expansion. We can confidently further scale blobs if needed.
  • Specifically supporting those L2s that have or wish to deepen expertise in areas like privacy, security, and trustlessness.
  • The Platform team, led by Josh Rudolf, aims to improve the overall performance of the Ethereum platform and serve as the interface between L2s and the core protocol roadmap.
  • Improving L1 liquidity to make it easier for L2s to obtain liquidity (faster finality, withdrawals, and deposits).
  • Working closely with L2 teams to understand their needs and reflect them in protocol priorities, while clarifying the relationship between L1 and L2. To ensure this relationship works effectively, we need to understand what works, what needs improvement, and collaborate. Our goal is always to clarify and strengthen the value proposition of being part of the Ethereum ecosystem.
  • Investing in R&D to achieve "native Rollup" technology, i.e., L2 chains that can be fully and trustlessly verified by L1, enabling synchronous composability and secure interoperability.
  • We work with L2Beat and other organizations to closely monitor and verify the security characteristics of L2s. We must rigorously and honestly assess the characteristics of L2s and their degree of connection to L1 security so that users and developers can make informed choices.
  • Addressing the main drawback of the multi-chain ecosystem: fragmentation. We will collaborate with the ecosystem (including various chains, wallets, and infrastructure providers) to build better interoperability solutions to address the fragmentation of user experience and developer platforms. Now, with a clear understanding of the relationship between L1 and L2, we can begin to address the fragmentation of the Ethereum narrative.

Together, we will build a global, permissionless on-chain economic system and provide the best platform for all users.

Related Questions

QWhat is the ultimate goal of the Ethereum Foundation's Platform team regarding Ethereum's scalability?

AThe ultimate goal is to drive Ethereum's scaling as a unified and coordinated system, allowing all users to use it with confidence by leveraging the unique functions of each layer (L1 and L2) to strengthen Ethereum's core properties and deliver meaningful value to end users.

QHow has the primary mission of L2 networks evolved according to the article?

AInitially, L2's primary mission was to help Ethereum scale, with differentiation and customization as secondary goals. Now, L2's primary mission is to provide differentiated functions, services, customization, marketing strategies, and control regions while achieving scalability, with differentiation, control, and innovation being the biggest drivers.

QWhat role does Ethereum L1 play in the ecosystem as described in the article?

AEthereum L1 serves as the truly permissionless and maximally resilient global settlement layer, shared state, liquidity hub, and DeFi center. A strong, scalable L1 that does not compromise on CROPS (Censorship Resistance, Openness, Privacy, Security) provides a better foundation for L2 networks.

QWhy would independent chains choose to become L2s within the Ethereum ecosystem?

AIndependent chains may choose to become L2s to benefit from low costs by leveraging Ethereum's security and decentralization, access to Ethereum's large user and developer base, achieve interoperability with L1 assets and DeFi liquidity, and gain branding and reputation advantages from being part of the Ethereum ecosystem.

QWhat is the Ethereum Foundation doing to support the vision of L1 and L2 collaboration?

AThe Ethereum Foundation is working on scaling L1 and blobs without sacrificing decentralization, supporting L2s in privacy and security, improving L1 liquidity for L2s, collaborating with L2 teams on protocol priorities, researching 'native Rollup' technology for trustless L2 validation, monitoring L2 security with partners like L2Beat, and addressing fragmentation through better interoperability solutions.

Related Reads

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit30m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit30m ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit35m ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit35m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit41m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit41m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit41m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit41m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit56m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit56m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片