Ethereum enters FTX-era stress: Is this structural deleveraging?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-01Last updated on 2026-02-01

Abstract

Ethereum experienced severe market stress reminiscent of the FTX era, driven by geopolitical tensions and forced deleveraging. Funding rates collapsed to extreme negative levels as ETH's price fell sharply toward $2,300, resulting in over $1.1 billion in ETH liquidations. Large holders, such as BitMine, faced near 40% unrealized losses with ETH trading far below its $3,800 acquisition cost. Both ETH and BTC reflected a synchronized market unwind, with price failing to hold above key resistance levels. Momentum indicators turned bearish, with support now tested near $2,400–$2,600. A break below could lead to further declines, while recovery depends on improved macro conditions and renewed institutional inflows.

Ethereum’s Funding Rates collapsed to FTX-era extremes as derivatives absorbed a violent macro shock.

Rising U.S.–Iran tensions reignited risk aversion, pushing Ethereum [ETH] sharply lower while leverage amplified the move.

As price slid toward the $2300 level, forced selling accelerated, liquidating roughly $1.1 billion in ETH positions within a broader $2.5 billion market-wide wipeout.

That pressure drove perpetual prices below their spot, forcing funding on Binance down to -0.028%.

Similar stress hit Bitcoin [BTC] over the weekend, sharing the same catalyst: geopolitical risk tightening liquidity.

Together, ETH and BTC reflected a deleveraging phase, where panic-driven flows dominated and market depth briefly vanished.

BitMine’s ETH position slips into structural drawdown

BitMine’s portfolio reflects acute stress as ETH trades near $2,415 against an estimated $3,800 weighted acquisition price.

The catalyst came from a sharp risk-off shock, driven by geopolitical tensions and forced deleveraging, which accelerated ETH’s 7-day decline of roughly 17.7%.

That move pushed unrealized losses to about $5.9 billion on a $15.6 billion position. This drawdown nears 40%, signaling structural pressure rather than noise.

The cost basis now acts as gravity, not guaranteed support. The timing below it reflects liquidity withdrawal and sentiment compression.

A shift would require easing macro risk, renewed inflows, and sustained spot demand. The distance from the cost basis defines the current drawdown distribution.

At press time, Ethereum traded near $2,430–$2,450, extending an 8–9% daily drop as capital rotated out of risk assets and into safe havens like gold and silver.

That shift tightened crypto liquidity, and ETH absorbed the pressure quickly.

Failed breakout hints at bearish structure

Price failed to sustain a breakout above $3,400, then slipped back through the $2,780–$2,800 zone as momentum faded.

This rejection reflects more than tired bulls. Macro stress and deleveraging amplified the move, accelerating liquidations and reinforcing a lower-high, lower-low structure.

Momentum indicators confirmed the tone. Weekly RSI trended below neutral, signaling weakening demand rather than oversold relief.

Meanwhile, MACD remained negative and compressing, showing bearish momentum persists but may be slowing.

Support now clusters around $2,400–$2,600, where buyers test conviction.

A clean break risks a deeper slide toward $2,000–$2,200, while stabilization would require easing macro pressure and renewed spot inflows.


Final Thoughts

  • Geopolitical risk drained liquidity, triggered $2.5 billion in liquidations, and dragged both ETH and BTC into a synchronized unwind.
  • ETH’s slide below the ~$3,800 institutional cost basis left large holders facing a near 40% drawdown, turning that level into gravitational resistance while price probes fragile support near $2,400–$2,600.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat caused the sharp decline in Ethereum's price and the collapse of its funding rates to levels similar to the FTX era?

ARising U.S.-Iran geopolitical tensions reignited risk aversion, leading to a violent macro shock. This triggered forced selling and massive liquidations, with roughly $1.1 billion in ETH positions being wiped out as part of a broader $2.5 billion market-wide deleveraging event.

QWhat was the significance of Ethereum's funding rate on Binance dropping to -0.028%?

AThe negative funding rate indicates that perpetual swap prices were trading below the spot price. This is a sign of extreme market stress and intense selling pressure, as traders holding short positions were paying those holding long positions to keep the market in a state of contango.

QHow does BitMine's ETH portfolio illustrate the concept of 'structural deleveraging' and what is its current drawdown?

ABitMine's portfolio shows acute stress with ETH trading near $2,415 against a weighted acquisition price of ~$3,800. This represents an unrealized loss of roughly $5.9 billion on a $15.6 billion position, signaling a near 40% drawdown. This is described as a 'structural pressure' rather than market noise, indicating a deep, fundamental deleveraging is underway.

QWhat technical factors, beyond geopolitical risk, contributed to Ethereum's bearish price structure according to the article?

ATechnically, ETH failed to sustain a breakout above $3,400 and then fell back through the $2,780–$2,800 support zone. This rejection established a lower-high, lower-low structure. Momentum indicators like the weekly RSI trending below neutral and a negative MACD confirmed weakening demand and persistent bearish momentum.

QWhat does the article identify as key requirements for the market to stabilize and for Ethereum's price to see a shift in trend?

AA shift would require an easing of macro geopolitical risk, renewed capital inflows into the crypto market, and sustained spot demand for Ethereum. The article states that stabilization is contingent on these factors, otherwise, a break below the $2,400–$2,600 support cluster risks a deeper slide toward $2,000–$2,200.

Related Reads

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbit1h ago

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbit1h ago

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

Stock Markets Plunge Deeper Than Cryptocurrencies: Where Did the Money Go? In late July, Seoul's Kospi index triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive days, plummeting over 40% from its June high. The collapse was led by heavyweight stocks like SK Hynix, whose record profits still disappointed investors, and devastating leveraged ETFs, with one major product losing over 83% of its value. This signaled a global, forced deleveraging targeting the most crowded trades. Interestingly, while stocks exhibited extreme volatility akin to crypto markets, Bitcoin rose nearly 15% in July after a prior steep drop. Analysis shows the money fleeing equities did not flow into Bitcoin. Instead, Bitcoin had already absorbed its sell-off in May-June, when U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw historic outflows. The true safe-haven beneficiary was gold, whose price rose over 20% year-on-year, highlighting a decoupling between Bitcoin and gold as "digital gold." The sell-off was a targeted unwinding of leveraged positions in tech and semiconductors, accelerated by broker-dealer risk management and shifts in the AI narrative, including new competition from Chinese memory chipmakers. The retreat path was clear: from high-valuation tech stocks to cash and U.S. Treasuries, then to gold. For Bitcoin to attract sustained institutional inflows, conditions like eased global liquidity pressure, a "soft-landing" Fed rate cut, and U.S. regulatory clarity via legislation like the stalled CLARITY Act are needed. Currently, Bitcoin is not a safe haven but an already-cleared asset. Its low correlation with tech stocks, however, makes it a potential diversification play for institutional portfolios once the storm passes. The money isn't here yet, but the positioning is underway.

marsbit1h ago

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

marsbit1h ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit5h ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片