Ethena struggles as revenue falls 32% – Can demand save ENA at $0.089?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-28Last updated on 2026-03-28

Abstract

Ethena's (ENA) financial performance weakened significantly in Q1 2026, with its price dropping to $0.089. Key metrics show a 32% decline in Gross Protocol Revenue to $65.06 million, attributed to reduced minting activity and staking rewards. Total Value Locked (TVL) also fell by approximately $130 million since March, indicating sustained capital outflows and declining user activity, which hit a low of around 1,200 daily active users. Despite a slight improvement in gross profit, it remains substantially lower than previous quarters. However, spot market data shows consistent accumulation, with $3.41 million in net inflows over three days, suggesting investor demand may provide some price support. Without a recovery in core fundamentals, significant upside potential remains limited.

Ethena’s [ENA] price now appears to be aligning with its weakening financial performance. Over the past 24 hours, the asset has recorded a double-digit decline, dropping to $0.089 at press time.

While the numbers reflect mounting pressure, a broader evaluation of market conditions is necessary to determine whether this decline marks the start of a deeper correction or a temporary adjustment.

Ethena’s momentum weakens across key metrics

On-chain data shows that ENA has underperformed across multiple fronts since the start of Q1 2026, particularly when compared to its performance in the previous two quarters.

A key area of concern is revenue efficiency. Gross Protocol Revenue fell to $65.06 million, down from $96.15 million in Q4 2025, representing a 32% decline. The drop becomes even more pronounced when compared to Q3 2025.

This contraction points to weaker minting activity and reduced staking rewards, both of which suggest declining on-chain participation.

Source: DeFiLlama

In a market that has remained relatively stable compared to the October–December 2025 cycle, this underperformance raises concerns about weakening user demand rather than external pressure.

Liquidity conditions reinforce this trend. Total Value Locked (TVL), a core indicator of protocol health and user commitment, has continued to decline steadily.

Since the start of March 2026, TVL has fallen by approximately $130 million, bringing it to around $6.66 billion at the time of writing. Within the last 24 hours alone, roughly $16 million has been unstaked, signaling sustained capital exit from the protocol.

Can profit alone sustain user interest?

Despite the broader slowdown, Ethena has recorded a slight improvement in gross profitability.

In Q1 2026, the protocol has generated $614,190 in gross profit, compared to $463,200 in Q4 2025. While this reflects a marginal increase, it does little to offset the sharp decline from earlier performance levels.

For context, Q3 2025 saw $10.18 million in gross profit, roughly 16.5 times higher than current figures. This gap highlights a structural decline in earning potential, even as short-term profitability shows minor improvement.

The implication is clear, as modest profit growth alone may not be sufficient to retain users, especially in a competitive DeFi environment where capital quickly rotates toward higher-yield opportunities.

User activity data supports this view. According to Artemis, Daily Active Users have dropped to around 1,200, the lowest level recorded since December.

Spot demand offers a counter-signal

Despite weakening fundamentals and declining liquidity, spot market activity presents a more resilient picture. Exchange netflow data indicates that buying pressure has increased recently. Over the past 24 hours, net inflows into spot positions reached approximately $303,000.

More notably, this is not an isolated event. Over the past three days, cumulative purchases have climbed to around $3.41 million, suggesting consistent accumulation.

Source: CoinGlass

Such a sustained demand indicates that investors continue to absorb sell-side pressure, even as capital exits the protocol layer.

If this accumulation trend holds, it could limit further downside and support price stabilization. However, without a recovery in core fundamentals, particularly user activity and revenue generation, any upside may remain constrained within a narrow range.


Final Summary

  • Ethena’s protocol performance deteriorated in Q1 2026, even as broader market conditions remained relatively stable.
  • Spot investors continue to accumulate, despite rising liquidity outflows and declining TVL.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price of ENA and how much has it declined in the last 24 hours?

AThe current price of ENA is $0.089, and it has recorded a double-digit decline over the past 24 hours.

QBy what percentage did Ethena's Gross Protocol Revenue fall in Q1 2026 compared to Q4 2025?

AEthena's Gross Protocol Revenue fell by 32%, dropping from $96.15 million in Q4 2025 to $65.06 million in Q1 2026.

QWhat does the decline in Total Value Locked (TVL) and the unstaking of funds indicate about the Ethena protocol?

AThe decline in TVL, including $16 million unstaked in 24 hours, signals sustained capital exit from the protocol, indicating weakening user commitment and health.

QDespite the broader slowdown, which financial metric showed a marginal improvement for Ethena in Q1 2026?

AGross profitability showed a marginal improvement, increasing to $614,190 in Q1 2026 from $463,200 in Q4 2025.

QWhat counter-signal does spot market activity provide against the weakening fundamentals?

ASpot market activity shows increased buying pressure, with net inflows of $303,000 in 24 hours and cumulative purchases of $3.41 million over three days, suggesting consistent accumulation by investors.

Related Reads

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbit24m ago

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbit24m ago

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight News38m ago

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight News38m ago

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit47m ago

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit47m ago

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbit48m ago

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbit48m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy ENA

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Ethena (ENA) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Ethena (ENA) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Ethena (ENA)After purchasing your Ethena (ENA), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Ethena (ENA)Easily trade Ethena (ENA) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.03Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ENA

Ethena: Building a New Era of Web3‑Native Digital Dollars

Ethena is an Ethereum‑based synthetic dollar protocol that delivers crypto‑native monetary solutions, including USDe, a synthetic dollar, and sUSDe, a globally accessible U.S. dollar savings asset.

53.2k Total ViewsPublished 2026.03.16Updated 2026.03.16

Ethena: Building a New Era of Web3‑Native Digital Dollars

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ENA (ENA) are presented below.

活动图片