ETH Staking Data Reversal: Exits Drop to Zero VS Entries Surge by 1.3 Million—When to Buy the Dip?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

Ethereum's staking dynamics have recently undergone a notable shift. As of January 7, the exit queue for ETH staking has been fully cleared, indicating that the prolonged period of withdrawal pressure has been absorbed. Concurrently, the entry queue has surged significantly, with approximately 1.3044 million ETH now waiting to be staked—a stark contrast to the situation in mid-September when over 2.66 million ETH were queued to exit amid higher prices. This reversal, while reflecting improved market structure, is largely driven by institutional reallocation rather than broad retail momentum. Notably, BitMine, a major digital asset treasury, staked around 771,000 ETH in recent weeks, accounting for a substantial portion of the new entries. This suggests the trend is influenced more by long-term yield strategies than immediate bullish sentiment. Beyond staking, Ethereum's fundamentals show signs of broader improvement: Q4 2024 saw a record 8.7 million smart contracts deployed, stablecoin transfer volume exceeded $8 trillion, and gas fees hit all-time lows. Exchange reserves of ETH remain near multi-year lows, reducing immediate sell-side pressure. Additionally, the significant disparity between Ethereum’s TVL dominance (59%) and its market cap share (~14%) may indicate undervaluation relative to its economic activity. In summary, while the staking shift alone may not signal a price turnaround, it aligns with other strengthening on-chain metrics, suggesting Ethereum is underg...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Ding Dang (@XiaMiPP)

On January 7, the exit queue for Ethereum's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism officially cleared. At least from on-chain data, the sustained exit pressure over the past months has finally been fully digested, with no new large-scale redemption requests currently observed.

At the same time, the size of the staking entry queue has significantly increased, now reaching approximately 1.3044 million ETH, with a waiting time of about 22 days and 15 hours. This situation is a complete reversal compared to mid-September last year.

At that time, ETH's price was at a阶段性高点 of around $4,700, and market sentiment was high, but the staking side showed a different attitude: 2.66 million ETH chose to exit staking, with exit queue wait times一度 exceeding 40 days. In the following three and a half months, ETH's price fell by about 34%, dropping from $4,700 to $3,100.

Now, after a deep price correction, the exit queue has finally been fully digested.

Staking Queue as a "Sentiment Indicator," But Not a Price Signal?

Typically, changes in the validator queue are seen as an important barometer for gauging market sentiment. The logic behind this is that Ethereum's PoS, to ensure consensus stability, does not allow nodes to enter or exit arbitrarily. Instead, it uses a flow control mechanism to regulate the pace of staking and exit behaviors.

Therefore, when ETH's price is at a high stage, exit demand tends to accumulate. Some stakers may choose to cash out profits, but the potential selling pressure is not released instantly; instead, it is "stretched out" on-chain through the exit queue. When exit demand gradually dries up and is fully digested, it may indicate that a structural selling pressure is coming to an end.

From this perspective, the clearing of the current exit queue, coupled with the simultaneous rise in the entry queue, does constitute a noteworthy change. However, I believe that while this change appears to form a positive resonance on the surface, its impact on market prices—note, "impact"—is not equivalent to the "high exits, low entries" phase in September. This is because ETH entering the staking queue does not equate to "new funds actively buying ETH at the moment." A significant portion of the筹码 entering staking likely completed accumulation at an earlier stage and is only choosing to reallocate at the current time. Therefore, the rise in the staking queue reflects more a change in preference for long-term returns, network security, and the stability of staking rewards, rather than a significant strengthening of immediate price demand. This also means that the current improvement in queue structure is more about expectation repair than an equally strong boost to short-term prices.

Nevertheless, the significant growth in the current staking entry queue is still worth attention. The main driving force behind this comes from BitMine, the largest DAT treasury company for Ethereum. CryptoQuant data shows that BitMine has staked approximately 771,000 ETH in the past two weeks, accounting for 18.6% of its holdings of about 4.14 million ETH.

This means that this shift in staking trends is driven by a single large institution's asset allocation behavior, rather than a synchronized回暖 in overall market risk appetite. Therefore, it cannot be simply interpreted as a "return of全面看多 sentiment." However, in an emerging market like crypto, where liquidity distribution is uneven, the actions of large institutions are often more likely to, and can more easily, provide a certain degree of emotional support and expectation repair in the short term.

Whether this trend can continue or spread to a broader range of participants remains to be seen over time. But from on-chain fundamental data, several core metrics of Ethereum are simultaneously showing signs of marginal improvement.

From "Staking Changes" to "Coordinated Fundamental Improvement"

First, in terms of developers, Ethereum's development activity is hitting all-time highs. Data shows that in Q4 2025, Ethereum deployed approximately 8.7 million smart contracts, setting a new historical record for a single quarter. This change is closer to sustained product and infrastructure development rather than short-term speculative behavior. More contract deployments mean more DApps, RWA, stablecoins, and infrastructure are being launched, continuously strengthening Ethereum's role as a core execution and settlement layer.

In the stablecoin sector, the on-chain transfer volume of stablecoins on Ethereum in Q4 exceeded $8 trillion, also setting a new historical record. In terms of issuance structure, Ethereum's advantage in the stablecoin ecosystem remains significant. Data shows that the share of stablecoin issuance on Ethereum is as high as 54.18%, far exceeding other mainstream blockchain networks like TRON (26.07%), Solana (5.03%), and BSC (4.74%).

At the same time, Ethereum Gas fees have hit the lowest records since the mainnet launch and are continuously breaking records. In some periods, Gas fees were even below 0.03 Gwei. Considering that Ethereum will continue to推进 block扩容 this year, this trend has room to continue in the medium term. Lower transaction costs directly reduce the barrier to on-chain activity and provide a practical foundation for the continued expansion of the application layer.

Looking at the exchange balance metric, Ethereum's potential selling pressure is also at a low level. In mid-December, Ethereum's exchange supply dropped to 12.7 million, the lowest level since 2016. Especially since August 2025, this metric has shown a significant decline of over 25%. Although exchange balances have slightly increased recently, the increment is only about 200,000 ETH, and the overall level remains in a historically low range, indicating weak selling意愿 among traders.

Additionally, crypto KOL rip.eth recently posted on X platform, pointing out that judging from the gap between Total Value Locked (TVL) and market capitalization, Ethereum might be the most undervalued blockchain network currently. Data shows that Ethereum carries 59% of the crypto market's TVL, but its token ETH's market share is only about 14%. In comparison, Solana's token market cap / TVL ratio is 3% / 7%, Tron's is 1% / 3.7%, and BNB Chain's is 4.5% / 5.5%. This, to some extent, reflects that there is still a significant misalignment between ETH's valuation and the scale of economic activity it supports.

Conclusion

Overall, changes in the staking queue may not be the "single variable" determining price trends. But when it improves simultaneously with metrics like developer activity, stablecoin usage volume, transaction costs, and exchange balances, it no longer presents an isolated signal but a more comprehensive fundamental picture.

For Ethereum, this might not be a sentiment-driven rapid reversal, but rather a process where the system is gradually restoring structural stability after undergoing a deep adjustment.

Related Questions

QWhat significant change occurred in Ethereum's staking queues on January 7th, and what does it indicate?

AOn January 7th, the exit queue for Ethereum staking was fully cleared, indicating that the prolonged period of exit pressure has been completely digested. Simultaneously, the entry queue saw a significant increase, with approximately 1.3044 million ETH waiting to enter staking, a reversal from the high exit and low entry trend observed in mid-September.

QHow does the change in staking queues relate to market sentiment, and is it a direct price signal?

AChanges in validator queues are seen as an important indicator of market sentiment. The clearing of the exit queue and the rise in the entry queue suggest a reduction in structural selling pressure and a shift in preference towards long-term yields and network security. However, it is not a direct price signal, as the increase in staking entries often represents earlier accumulated ETH being reallocated rather than new capital immediately buying ETH.

QWhat major institution drove the recent surge in Ethereum staking, and what was the scale of their activity?

AThe recent surge in Ethereum staking was primarily driven by BitMine, the largest DeFi Asset Token (DAT) treasury company. CryptoQuant data shows that BitMine staked approximately 771,000 ETH over the past two weeks, accounting for about 18.6% of its total holdings of 4.14 million ETH.

QWhat are some key Ethereum on-chain metrics showing marginal improvement alongside the staking changes?

AKey on-chain metrics showing improvement include: a record high in smart contract deployments with 8.7 million deployed in Q4 2025, Ethereum stablecoin transfer volume exceeding $8 trillion in Q4, record-low Gas fees (sometimes below 0.03 Gwei), and exchange balances hitting their lowest level since 2016, indicating reduced selling pressure.

QAccording to the article, how does Ethereum's valuation compare to its economic activity, and what does this suggest?

AAccording to analysis by rip.eth, Ethereum carries 59% of the total value locked (TVL) in the crypto market, but its token ETH only accounts for about 14% of the market capitalization. This significant disparity suggests that ETH may be undervalued relative to the scale of economic activity it supports, especially when compared to other chains like Solana, Tron, and BNB Chain.

Related Reads

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit43m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit43m ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit48m ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit48m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit54m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit54m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit54m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit54m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit1h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片