Did BlackRock’s IBIT ETF really crash Bitcoin? Here’s everything you need to know!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-08Last updated on 2026-02-08

Abstract

Theories suggest BlackRock's IBIT ETF significantly contributed to Bitcoin's 35% price crash, with BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes explaining that institutions like Morgan Stanley had to hedge structured notes linked to the ETF, forcing massive sell-offs. On February 5th, a record $10.7 billion in trading volume occurred as leveraged positions unwound. However, recent signs indicate a potential reversal, with IBIT seeing over $200 million in inflows—its first in nearly a month—and Bitcoin’s Coinbase Premium Index surging 65% in under a week. This suggests institutional investors may be re-entering the market, possibly signaling a bottom and the start of stabilization.

Theories are swirling about what caused the market to crash. From a technical standpoint, it’s clear that the massive breakdown over the last few weeks was more than just a short-term reaction to macro volatility.

Sure, the first half of January saw significant capital inflows as major high-caps reclaimed key levels. In this context, it makes sense that the crash occurred as the crypto market swept liquidity and deleveraged.

However, analysts are now pointing to factors beyond just leveraged positions. Instead, Bitcoin’s [BTC] 35% drop might be tied to BlackRock’s IBIT ETF – Evidence that institutional moves amplified the downturn.

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMex, puts it simply – BTC sold off because banks were hedging positions tied to IBIT ETF. He cited Morgan Stanley’s “structured note” linked to IBIT, basically a bank-made bet on Bitcoin.

When BTC moved, these banks had to quickly sell to protect themselves. And, it wasn’t just Morgan Stanley. Other large non-crypto players have reportedly been doing similar trades too, adding fuel to the volatility.

The result? On 05 February, heavily leveraged IBIT ETF positions were forced to unwind. Trading that day hit record levels – $10.7 billion in volume and $900 million in options premiums, both all-time highs.

Fast forward to now, and IBIT Bitcoin ETF has recorded its first $200+ million inflow in nearly a month. It’s still early, but could this be a sign that BTC is stabilizing and that some investors are starting to step back in?

BlackRock sparks questions about Bitcoin’s recovery

Rarely are market moves purely “coincidental.”

Take the October crash – Bitcoin’s price dropped by 30%, driven in part by theories around Strategy’s potential exclusion from the MSCI index. That sparked full-blown panic, leading to widespread capitulation across risk assets.

Fast forward to now, and the crash is being viewed through a similar lens. In that context, the $200 million inflows into IBIT and Bitcoin’s Coinbase Premium Index (CPI) jumping 65% in under a week is anything but a fluke.

Put simply, institutional investors may be stepping back in. A few days ago, the forced unwind triggered a major risk-off move. The CPI hit a monthly low, IBIT saw massive outflows, and Bitcoin broke below the $80k support level.

Now, the reversal in these metrics could allude to a potential bullish shift.

According to AMBCrypto, the market may be stabilizing, with institutions possibly setting the stage for a BTC bottom. In light of this, monitoring these indicators closely is key to seeing whether the crash is truly behind us or not.


Final Thoughts

  • BlackRock’s IBIT ETF and other large players amplified volatility, with 05 February seeing record trading due to forced unwinds.
  • Recent inflows into IBIT and a 65% jump in Bitcoin’s Coinbase Premium Index suggested institutions may be stepping back in.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat role did BlackRock's IBIT ETF play in Bitcoin's recent price crash according to the article?

AThe article suggests that BlackRock's IBIT ETF amplified Bitcoin's downturn, as banks like Morgan Stanley had to quickly sell Bitcoin to hedge their positions tied to IBIT-structured notes, leading to forced unwinds and record trading volume on February 5th.

QWho is Arthur Hayes and what explanation did he provide for Bitcoin's sell-off?

AArthur Hayes is the co-founder of BitMex. He explained that Bitcoin sold off because banks were hedging positions tied to the IBIT ETF, specifically citing Morgan Stanley's 'structured note' linked to IBIT, which forced these institutions to sell Bitcoin rapidly to protect themselves.

QWhat significant market activity occurred on February 5th related to the IBIT ETF?

AOn February 5th, heavily leveraged IBIT ETF positions were forced to unwind, resulting in record trading levels: $10.7 billion in volume and $900 million in options premiums, both of which were all-time highs.

QWhat recent indicators suggest that Bitcoin might be stabilizing and institutions are returning?

ARecent indicators include the IBIT Bitcoin ETF recording its first $200+ million inflow in nearly a month and Bitcoin's Coinbase Premium Index (CPI) jumping 65% in under a week, suggesting institutional investors may be stepping back in and potentially setting the stage for a BTC bottom.

QHow does the article compare the current crash to the October crash in terms of causes and effects?

AThe article compares the current crash to the October crash, noting that both were driven by theories involving institutional moves (e.g., Strategy's potential exclusion from the MSCI index in October and IBIT-related hedging now). Both events triggered panic and capitulation across risk assets, but recent inflows and CPI jumps hint at a potential bullish shift similar to past recoveries.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit3m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit3m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

972 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片