Conflux jumps 9% on AI gaming deal – $0.093 next ONLY IF…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-26Last updated on 2025-12-26

Abstract

Conflux (CFX) surged 8.7% to $0.072 following a partnership announcement with PlaysOut to explore AI-driven gaming and cross-chain interoperability. The news triggered a spike in trading volume and short-term speculative interest, with Binance data showing strong buyer dominance. However, signs of profit-taking emerged as exchange net inflows reached a multi-month high, indicating potential selling pressure. Technical indicators remain mixed, with the RSI retreating from bullish territory and the Trend Strength Index still negative. The next price movement hinges on whether buyers sustain momentum to push toward $0.093 or if sellers regain control, potentially driving CFX down to $0.068.

Since facing rejection at $0.146 nearly a month ago, Conflux has traded inside a descending channel, sliding to a local low near $0.06.

After weeks of sustained weakness, the token attempted a rebound, briefly rallying to $0.078 before pulling back.

At press time, Conflux [CFX] traded at $0.072, up 8.7% on the daily chart. Trading activity also picked up sharply, with volume rising 358% to $58 million, while market capitalization climbed toward $400 million.

The spike pointed to renewed short-term participation, though price structure remained fragile.

Conflux’s partnership with PlaysOut lifts sentiment

In a significant boost to a struggling CFX, PlaysOut and Conflux announced a partnership to explore AI-driven gaming and cross-chain interoperability.

According to the announcement, both teams plan to collaborate on scalable blockchain infrastructure, AI-supported engagement tools, and next-generation gaming use cases.

The partnership also outlined potential deployment of mini-game experiences within Conflux’s Layer 1 environment, alongside initiatives focused on Web2-to-Web3 onboarding and regional market expansion.

The announcement acted as a short-term sentiment catalyst, triggering a rush of speculative buying across spot markets.

Binance buyers dominate spot activity

After Conflux and Playsout announced their partnership, demand for CFX accelerated. On Binance, for example, buyers rushed into the market, fearing they would miss out on potential gains arising from the relationship.

Coinalyze data showed that Buy Volume surged to 74.83 million, compared to 67 million in Sell Volume, between the 24th and the 25th of December.

For that reason, the market recorded a positive Buy Sell Delta of 7.8 million, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.

Even more importantly, Spot demand was not limited to Binance, as more buy orders were executed across the spot market.

In fact, Spot Taker CVD data from CryptoQuant showed Buyer Dominance jumped to a weekly high on the 24th, reflecting fresh demand.

Profit-taking resurfaces as price stalls

Despite the rebound, signs of distribution quickly followed. Data from CoinGlass showed Spot Netflow turning positive for the first time in nearly three weeks.

At press time, net inflows stood at $1.73 million, levels last seen in August.

Positive netflows typically reflect increased exchange deposits, often associated with profit realization after sharp rallies.

Historically, such spikes in profit-taking have coincided with renewed downside pressure for CFX, especially when broader trend momentum remains weak.

Just a short-term bubble?

Technical indicators echoed the mixed setup.

Conflux’s Relative Strength Index briefly pushed into bullish territory, touching 54, before sliding back to 47 at press time. The pullback suggested that sellers absorbed recent buying interest.

In fact, the Trend Strength Index (TSI) remained negative, at -11 at press time, indicating intense bearish pressure.

These market conditions pointed towards a fierce battle between sellers and buyers seeking market control. Thus, the next move depends on who overwhelms the other.

If buyers hold onto the momentum they recently showed, Conflux could target $0.093. Conversely, if sellers manage to overpower them, CFX could drop to $0.068.


Final Thoughts

  • Conflux and PlaysOut announced a partnership to explore AI-driven gaming and cross-chain interoperability.
  • CFX bounced back from a month-long downtrend and briefly touched a high of $0.078, then retraced to $0.072.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason for Conflux's (CFX) 8.7% price increase mentioned in the article?

AThe main reason was the announcement of a partnership between Conflux and PlaysOut to explore AI-driven gaming and cross-chain interoperability, which acted as a short-term sentiment catalyst.

QAccording to the data from Binance, what was the Buy Sell Delta for CFX between December 24th and 25th, and what does it indicate?

AThe Buy Sell Delta was a positive 7.8 million. This is a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation, meaning buyers were significantly more active than sellers during that period.

QWhat does a positive Spot Netflow value, as reported by CoinGlass, typically signify for an asset like CFX?

AA positive Spot Netflow typically reflects increased exchange deposits, which is associated with investors realizing profits after a sharp price rally.

QBased on the technical indicators mentioned, what are the two potential price targets for CFX and what determines which one is reached?

AThe potential price targets are $0.093 if buyers maintain their momentum, or a drop to $0.068 if sellers overpower the buyers. The next move depends on which group wins the battle for market control.

QBesides the price increase, what other two metrics showed significant activity for CFX according to the press time data?

ATrading volume rose 358% to $58 million, and the market capitalization climbed toward $400 million.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片