Chainlink adds 99K LINK to reserves, yet prices stall: Why?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-30Last updated on 2026-01-30

Abstract

Chainlink has significantly increased its reserves, adding 99,103 LINK in a single accumulation, bringing the total to 1.77 million—a 377% rise since before Q4 2025. This supply squeeze, funded by strong on-chain and off-chain revenue from high network usage, has not translated into price gains. LINK remains one of the worst-performing assets, down 39% in Q4 2025 and 11.7% in 2026, largely due to broader market sentiment. Despite this underperformance, strong fundamentals, record-high fees, and strategic accumulation suggest LINK is undervalued and poised for a potential scarcity-driven rally once demand recovers.

Supply squeezes remain one of the key drivers of long-term growth.

From a technical standpoint, locking up a portion of the total supply naturally pushes the per-coin valuation higher. When this supply reduction meets rising demand, it sets the stage for a strong scarcity-driven rally.

But it’s not just about the charts. These supply shocks also help reinforce holding conviction. That said, does Chainlink’s [LINK] recent accumulation really support this thesis, given LINK’s recent underperformance?

For context, Chainlink recently revealed that its reserve has added 99,103 LINK, its largest single accumulation so far. This pushes the total amount of LINK locked in reserves to 1.77 million, further tightening supply.

As the chart above shows, that’s a 377% increase from the 371K LINK held before Q4 2025, meaning 1.4 million LINK has been added since. And yet, that supply squeeze hasn’t really shown up in price action so far.

Notably, Chainlink funds its accumulation through both on- and off-chain revenue, pointing to solid adoption and network usage. This divergence raises a key question: Is LINK simply being undervalued by the market?

Chainlink’s activity signals scarcity-driven potential

In the current market setup, being undervalued is actually a bullish signal.

Looking at LINK, it fits this setup perfectly. Acting as a bridge, Chainlink generates revenue through fees whenever smart contracts on other chains rely on its oracles, such as a DeFi lending protocol using its price feeds.

Recently, fees across 13 chains hit an all-time high, with Ethereum [ETH] alone bringing in $6.8 million, showing strong demand for Chainlink’s services and growing network usage that’s capturing real value.

Put simply, solid on-chain revenue is flowing straight into LINK’s reserve.

And yet, that hasn’t shown up in the price, with LINK standing out as one of the worst-performing assets, down 39% in Q4 2025, and still dipping 11.7% so far in 2026. However, this pullback mostly reflects broader market FUD.

In this context, Chainlink looks undervalued.

Strong on-chain usage and fee generation, combined with strategic accumulation, point to solid fundamentals. Once demand kicks in, LINK could spark a scarcity-driven rally, making this “dip” a great entry point.


Final Thoughts

  • Chainlink has locked 1.77 million LINK in reserves, driven by both on- and off-chain revenue, yet this hasn’t shown in price.
  • Growing fees across, strong network usage, and strategic accumulation suggest LINK could trigger a scarcity-driven rally once demand returns.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the amount of LINK recently added to Chainlink's reserves, and what is the new total?

AChainlink recently added 99,103 LINK to its reserves, bringing the new total to 1.77 million LINK locked.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason LINK's price has not increased despite the supply squeeze?

AThe article suggests that LINK's price underperformance is mostly due to broader market FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt), despite strong fundamentals.

QHow does Chainlink fund its accumulation of LINK tokens for its reserves?

AChainlink funds its accumulation of LINK through both on-chain and off-chain revenue generated from its oracle services.

QWhat evidence does the article provide for strong demand and usage of the Chainlink network?

AThe article cites that fees across 13 chains reached an all-time high, with Ethereum alone generating $6.8 million in revenue for Chainlink's services.

QWhy does the article argue that the current market situation for LINK is actually a bullish signal?

AThe article argues that strong on-chain usage, fee generation, and strategic accumulation make LINK undervalued, positioning it for a potential scarcity-driven rally once demand returns, making the current price a good entry point.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit11m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit11m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit30m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit30m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit39m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy LINK

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ChainLink (LINK) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ChainLink (LINK) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ChainLink (LINK)After purchasing your ChainLink (LINK), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ChainLink (LINK)Easily trade ChainLink (LINK) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

9.7k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy LINK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of LINK (LINK) are presented below.

活动图片