Can the Solana Foundation and Google's Collaboration on Pay.sh Bridge the Payment Link Between Web2 and Web3 in the Agent Economy?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-12Last updated on 2026-05-12

Abstract

Solana Foundation, in collaboration with Google Cloud, has launched Pay.sh, a payment gateway designed to bridge the gap between AI agents and enterprise-grade service infrastructure. The initiative aims to solve a key bottleneck in the "agent economy": existing payment systems are ill-suited for autonomous AI agents. Traditional methods like credit cards require human verification, while newer on-chain protocols like x402 and MPP create a separate, Web3-native system that raises barriers for service providers. Pay.sh functions as a universal payment layer. It allows users to fund a Solana wallet via credit card or stablecoin, which then acts as an identity and payment proxy for AI agents. When an agent needs to access a paid API service (e.g., Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud), Pay.sh handles the transaction seamlessly. It leverages the HTTP 402 status code ("Payment Required") to initiate payments, intelligently choosing between one-time transfers (x402-style) or session-based authorizations (MPC-style) based on the service's billing model. This spares agents from manual account registration and API key management. A key feature for service providers is low integration effort. They can adopt Pay.sh by providing a declarative configuration file, enabling features like tiered pricing, free tiers, and automatic revenue splitting to multiple addresses (e.g., for royalties, cloud costs). Providers can also list their APIs in a central Pay Skill Registry for agent discovery. The co...

Original Author: Hendrix, Researcher, Web3Caff Research

How to easily grasp the market hotspots, technological trends, ecological progress, and governance dynamics happening in the Web3 industry...? The "Market Pulse Analysis" column launched by Web3Caff Research will delve into the front lines to explore and filter current hot events, providing value interpretation, commentary, and principle analysis. See the essence through the phenomenon. Follow us now to quickly capture the front-line market trends in Web3.

As AI agents' capabilities continue to strengthen and cover an increasing number of end-to-end tasks, building payment systems for agents has become a necessary change for traditional merchants and service providers. However, existing solutions have their own limitations: traditional payment systems, such as credit cards and third-party payment platforms, were originally designed for real human users, requiring complex identity verification, risk assessment, etc., which are not suitable for agents. Emerging agent payment protocols, such as x402 (promoted by Coinbase) and MPP (the Machine Payment Protocol developed by Tempo and Stripe), are like building separate portals, entirely constructed for on-chain payments, processed on-chain and secured by on-chain verification. Service providers need to build a different payment system besides traditional payment channels, increasing the barrier to entry. Traditional payment solutions and emerging agent payment protocols are like two parallel lanes that are not well integrated. This limits the services agents can autonomously purchase, typically to Web3-friendly ranges, hindering the large-scale connection of workflows. To address this, the Solana Foundation and Google Cloud jointly launched Pay.sh, positioned as a "payment gateway between agents and enterprise-grade service infrastructure" to complete the final step in enabling agents to call more services.

Compliance Note: The following content is merely an objective analysis of Pay.sh, its technical principles, and design rules. It does not constitute any proposal or offer. Please do not make related decisions based on this information and strictly adhere to the laws and regulations of your country or region (readers from Mainland China are strongly advised to read Mainland China's Relevant Laws and Regulations on Blockchain and Virtual Currency Arrangement and Key Points), and do not participate in any financial behaviors prohibited by the laws and regulations of your country or region.

Pay.sh allows users to quickly top up a Solana wallet via credit card or stablecoin. Subsequently, the Solana wallet can act as the identity and payment account proxy for agents in the Web2 resource world. When an agent needs to call a service, there is no need to register an account or enter an API key. The Pay.sh gateway will declare the agent's legitimate identity, similar to Google's identity system, allowing the agent to use a unified account identity to purchase development resources like Google Cloud and Alibaba Cloud that were previously difficult to access.

Currently supported API services by Pay.sh Source: Project official website

The payment flow of Pay.sh is similar to the recently popular x402 protocol, both built on the HTTP 402 status code: when an agent discovers an external service that needs to be called, it makes a request for the paid resource. The server returns status code 402 (Payment Required), along with payment details, including payment amount, pricing plan, recipient address, payment validity period, etc. Pay.sh parses this content and initiates an authorization request to the wallet. After the wallet completes the payment and generates a payment proof, Pay.sh carries the proof and initiates the service request again to obtain a normal response. However, to cover various API usage scenarios, Pay.sh is compatible with both x402 and MPP payment logics: when the server returns status code 402, Pay.sh further determines the target service's payment method. For one-time data access (payment grants one-time access) or usage-based access (payment grants a fixed amount of access), Pay.sh constructs a one-time fixed-amount transfer and broadcasts it on-chain. For continuous billing or session-based billing (unified bill for usage paid at once), Pay.sh supports the session authorization token introduced by the MPP (Machine Payment Protocol), writing the budget cap into the authorization and sending it back to the server. The agent can then repeatedly call a certain service within a short time, avoiding frequent similar authorization requests. Pay.sh updates the remaining balance with each call and automatically re-initiates session authorization when the balance is depleted or the service expires. Pay.sh automatically selects the more appropriate payment rail based on the target service's requirements, potentially reducing usage and management costs. Pay.sh also ensures the wallet remains securely stored locally, requesting user confirmation only when payment is needed. When information is returned, Pay.sh distinguishes between data and instructions. All external content returned by the service provider (including titles, body text, and API descriptions) is treated by Pay.sh as untrusted input. The agent must not directly execute instructions returned by the service provider to prevent malicious prompt injection or other attacks.

The biggest advantage of Pay.sh is that it provides a gateway for service providers to easily deploy. Service providers can integrate the payment gateway into their service network without significant modifications to their payment pathways or APIs. By simply providing a declarative file specifying payment-related parameters, service providers can adapt to various complex usage scenarios. For example, by defining routing rules, agents can use a service for free up to a certain limit, with charges applied beyond that quota, or even implement tiered pricing (different prices for different usage levels). Additionally, Pay.sh offers payment splitting functionality. The fees received by the service provider can be automatically sent to multiple addresses, e.g., 2% for data royalty fees, 5% for cloud costs, and the remainder for their own operations. Service providers only need to define different percentages or amounts when setting up the receiving addresses to achieve multi-account settlement at once. After registration, service providers can publish their API service data to the Pay Skill Registry, where agents can discover and select suitable API services by querying the registry.

Pay.sh itself is not a competitor to x402 and MPP. While the x402 and MPP protocols strive to make on-chain agent payments more reliable, Pay.sh aims to bridge the Web2 and Web3 payment ecosystems, providing agents with corresponding identities for resource acquisition. An agent's wallet serves as both identity and payment method. It no longer needs to register accounts on service provider websites to obtain services (currently, some providers might treat agents imitating human registration as a violation). Furthermore, Pay.sh's collaboration with Google enables API proxy and traffic scheduling for agents to be completed on Google Cloud, ensuring access control and log compliance, keeping agent behavior within reasonable bounds. Pay.sh can provide a curated service directory and pricing discovery. Agents do not need to randomly discover services in an unprotected network environment. It can leverage both x402 and MPP payment methods. The service process can meet enterprise compliance requirements on Google Cloud. These aspects complement the agent payment capabilities that the singular payment channels of x402 and MPP cannot cover, while also opening an entry point for agent commerce to flow into Web3. Additionally, Pay.sh can complete the final payment step for multiple agent commerce protocols launched by Google, such as A2A (Agent2Agent Protocol) for agent communication and task delegation, AP2 (Agent Payments Protocol) for compliance verification, and UCP (Universal Commerce Protocol) for service discovery and execution. Pay.sh is responsible for the final, seamless settlement of service value. The emergence of Pay.sh also simultaneously perfects the Web2 agent commerce cycle, becoming the convergence point for value flow between the two worlds. This step also represents an upgrade opportunity for the Solana public chain ecosystem itself. In the x402 protocol environment, there are numerous shell APIs, where service providers might violate the original service provider's terms and resell their services, such as maliciously scraping and reselling data from database websites or encapsulating and reselling large model APIs to others. Agents in such an environment have no way to distinguish between authorized services and malicious, spam services. Through the Pay.sh payment gateway and Google's collaboration, agents using services via Pay.sh are expected to have reduced potential risks. The launch of Pay.sh marks the Solana public chain stepping in to provide endorsement and infrastructure support for agent payments. This can not only attract more Web2 payment traffic to Solana itself but also further enhance the capabilities and accelerate the adoption of Solana wallets.

However, Pay.sh is currently far from being a perfect payment gateway solution. Pay.sh's service provider registry currently lacks admission mechanisms and decentralized verification mechanisms, making it still difficult to effectively distinguish between unauthorized third-party shell services and malicious services. Agents run a significant risk of connecting to counterfeit services, potentially causing losses for users. Moreover, since Pay.sh itself does not design the underlying payment protocols, the security of the payment process relies more on the design of those underlying protocols. This introduces uncontrollable external risks to Pay.sh and could also lead to potential payment failures due to insufficient adaptation to different protocols. From the service provider's perspective, despite Google's platform endorsement, API suppliers in different countries and regions might still hesitate to adopt the services provided by Pay.sh due to compliance requirements related to data privacy management inherent to their services and payment compliance requirements. This could not only limit the number of service providers using Pay.sh but might also require Pay.sh to make more compliance efforts in the future. Nonetheless, the launch of Pay.sh marks a step forward in the fusion and practical implementation of Web2 and Web3 for agent payment infrastructure. On-chain wallets will have the opportunity to become the endorsement for agents participating in diverse tasks. Therefore, we can continue to observe the subsequent development of Pay.sh.

Key Points Structure Diagram:

Disclaimer: This report is compiled by Web3Caff Research. The information contained herein is for reference only and does not constitute any prediction, investment advice, proposal, or offer. Investors should not rely on such information to purchase, sell any securities, cryptocurrencies, or adopt any investment strategy. The terminology used and views expressed in this report are intended to help understand industry trends and promote the responsible development of the Web3, including the blockchain industry, and should not be interpreted as definitive legal opinions or the views of Web3Caff Research. The opinions in this report reflect only the personal views of the author as of the stated date, are independent of the position of Web3Caff Research, and may change following subsequent circumstances. The information and opinions contained in this report come from proprietary and non-proprietary sources that Web3Caff Research considers reliable, do not necessarily cover all data, and do not guarantee their accuracy. Therefore, Web3Caff Research makes no guarantee of their accuracy or reliability in any form and assumes no responsibility for errors and omissions arising in any other way (including liability to any person arising from negligence). This report may contain "forward-looking" information, which may include predictions and forecasts. This article does not constitute a guarantee of any prediction. Whether to rely on the information contained in this report is entirely up to the reader's discretion. This report is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice, a proposal, or an offer to buy or sell any securities, cryptocurrencies, or adopt any investment strategy. Please strictly comply with the relevant laws and regulations of your country or region.

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary purpose of Pay.sh as introduced by the Solana Foundation and Google Cloud?

AThe primary purpose of Pay.sh is to act as a 'payment gateway between intelligent agents and enterprise-grade service infrastructure,' aiming to bridge the payment gap between Web2 and Web3 for intelligent agents. It allows agents to pay for services (like Google Cloud or Alibaba Cloud resources) using a Solana wallet funded by credit cards or stablecoins, without needing separate accounts or API keys for each service.

QHow does the Pay.sh payment process fundamentally work when an intelligent agent requests a paid service?

AWhen an intelligent agent requests a paid service, the server responds with an HTTP 402 status code (Payment Required), which includes payment details. Pay.sh parses this information, requests authorization from the user's wallet, and processes the payment. Once payment is confirmed, Pay.sh resends the request with a payment proof to access the service. It adapts its payment logic, supporting both one-time payments (akin to x402 protocol) and session-based billing with budget limits (akin to MPP protocol).

QWhat key advantage does Pay.sh offer to service providers who want to accept payments from intelligent agents?

APay.sh offers service providers an easily deployable gateway that requires minimal changes to their existing payment systems or APIs. By providing a declarative file defining payment parameters, providers can support complex billing scenarios (e.g., free tiers, usage-based or tiered pricing) and automatic payment splitting to multiple addresses. They can also list their APIs in the Pay Skill Registry for agents to discover.

QWhat role does the collaboration with Google Cloud play in the Pay.sh system, according to the article?

AThe collaboration with Google Cloud allows Pay.sh to handle API proxying and traffic routing on Google's infrastructure. This ensures compliance with access control, logging, and enterprise regulations, keeping agent behavior within legitimate bounds. It also helps integrate Pay.sh as the final payment settlement layer within Google's broader suite of agent commerce protocols (like A2A, AP2, UCP).

QWhat are some of the current limitations or challenges facing Pay.sh mentioned in the article?

ACurrent limitations include: 1) Its service registry lacks rigorous vetting and decentralized verification, making it hard to distinguish authorized services from unauthorized or malicious ones. 2) Payment security relies on underlying protocols (x402, MPP), introducing external risks and potential payment failures due to integration issues. 3) Service providers in different regions may hesitate to adopt Pay.sh due to data privacy regulations and payment compliance concerns, potentially limiting its growth and requiring further compliance efforts.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit51m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit51m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit2h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy LINK

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ChainLink (LINK) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ChainLink (LINK) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ChainLink (LINK)After purchasing your ChainLink (LINK), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ChainLink (LINK)Easily trade ChainLink (LINK) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

9.0k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy LINK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of LINK (LINK) are presented below.

活动图片