Blood Loss of $55 Million Selling 3,588 BTC, Strategy Becomes a Literal Scumbag

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-07-07Last updated on 2026-07-07

Abstract

On July 6th, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) disclosed in an SEC filing that it sold 3,588 Bitcoin (BTC) between June 29th and July 5th for approximately $216 million, at an average price of ~$60,200. This marked the company's largest net sale since initiating its Bitcoin strategy in 2020 and its first institutionalized reduction of its core holding. The sale resulted in a realized loss of about $54.8 million, as the selling price was below its average cost basis of ~$75,476 per BTC. The proceeds were used to pay preferred stock dividends and replenish USD reserves. This move follows a new "Digital Credit Capital Framework" approved on June 29th, authorizing the sale of up to $1.25 billion in Bitcoin. The sale consumes roughly 17% of this authorized amount in its first week. Strategy's foundational narrative, built by founder Michael Saylor, was a commitment to "never sell" Bitcoin. The recent institutionalized selling framework and these substantial sales represent a significant shift from that original promise. While the amount sold is only 0.4% of Strategy's total holdings of 843,775 BTC, the action challenges the premium at which its stock (MSTR) trades relative to its Bitcoin holdings. Investors had priced in the "never sell" narrative. The company now faces a contradiction: it sells Bitcoin at a loss to pay dividends on the preferred stock it issued to fund Bitcoin purchases. Saylor has framed selling as a tool for future strategic purchases, but each sale erodes th...


Written by: ChandlerZ, Foresight News


On July 6, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) disclosed in an SEC 8-K filing that the company sold 1,363 Bitcoin from June 29 to 30 at an average price of approximately $59,256, totaling about $80.8 million; and sold 2,225 Bitcoin from July 1 to 5 at an average price of approximately $60,773, totaling about $135.2 million. The proceeds were used to pay preferred stock dividends and supplement US dollar reserves.


This is the largest net sale by Strategy since initiating its Bitcoin strategy in 2020, and the company's first institutionalized reduction of core assets in six years. The average selling price was approximately $60,200, below the company's average cost basis of about $75,476 per Bitcoin, resulting in a loss of approximately $15,276 per coin, totaling $54.81 million.


As of July 5, Strategy cumulatively holds 843,775 Bitcoin, with a total acquisition cost of approximately $63.69 billion. It remains the publicly traded company with the largest Bitcoin holdings globally.



According to official statements, as of July 5, Strategy's US dollar reserve balance was $2.55 billion, unchanged from the previous week. In the second quarter of 2026, the company reported a digital asset loss of approximately $8.32 billion, including approximately $8.31 billion in unrealized losses and about $900,000 in realized losses. As of June 30, the book value of its Bitcoin holdings decreased to $49.67 billion, falling below the acquisition cost. Strategy will record a full valuation allowance for the related deferred tax assets.


After the disclosure, Bitcoin quickly dipped below $61,500, then reversed after the US stock market opened, with buying interest pushing it back up to around $64,500. MSTR's stock price corrected by about 2% following a 21% gain the previous week but is still down over 35% year-to-date.



From 32 to 3,588, a 100-Fold Increase in Six Weeks


Selling Bitcoin was once a taboo for Strategy. In September 2020, after completing his first $425 million Bitcoin purchase, founder Michael Saylor told CoinDesk in an interview, "I didn't buy it to sell it. Ever." For the next five years, Strategy only bought and never sold, positioning itself as a permanent holder of Bitcoin using its corporate balance sheet.


December 2022 was the only exception. Strategy announced the sale of 704 Bitcoin at an average price of about $16,776, but repurchased 810 Bitcoin two days later, resulting in a net increase in holdings. The SEC filing characterized this move as tax-loss harvesting, using capital losses to offset previous capital gains for tax benefits.


On May 5, 2026, during its Q1 earnings call, Strategy first signaled a potential sale. Michael Saylor stated, "We might sell some Bitcoin to pay dividends, to get the market accustomed to it."


He later told Fortune in an interview that the purpose of those remarks was "to create panic and squeeze shorts and haters." However, an SEC filing three weeks later revealed that Strategy sold 32 Bitcoin between May 26 and 31, raising approximately $2.5 million.


Six weeks later, that number grew from 32 to 3,588.


$1.25 Billion Sales Authorization, 17% Burned in a Week


The sale of 3,588 coins was not a temporary decision. On the same day as the first Bitcoin sale (June 29), Strategy released a new capital framework titled "Digital Credit Capital Framework," formally institutionalizing Bitcoin sales into company policy.



The framework's core provisions include a US Dollar Reserve Policy, adjustments to the STRC Dividend Policy, a Preferred Stock Repurchase Plan, a Common Stock Repurchase Plan, and a BTC Liquidation Plan. Key points authorize management to sell up to $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin (approximately 20,800 coins at current prices, representing 2.5% of total holdings) when necessary; establish a US dollar reserve system with a minimum level equal to the sum of preferred stock dividends and interest expenses for the next 12 months; increase the STRC preferred stock's annual dividend rate from 11.5% to 12%, effective July 1; and authorize up to $1 billion in preferred stock repurchases and $1 billion in common stock repurchases.


As of June 28, Strategy's US dollar reserves stood at $2.55 billion. When releasing the framework, Strategy aimed to signal that selling Bitcoin was merely one option in its overall capital management toolbox and that the company had sufficient cash reserves to meet dividend obligations. However, the speed of the sales clearly exceeded market expectations. 3,588 coins, $216 million, meant that 17% of the $1.25 billion sales authorization was consumed in its first week of effectiveness.


From 2020 to 2025, Strategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy was built on an aggressive financing engineering model—issuing convertible bonds, offering common stock, issuing preferred stock, and using all raised funds to purchase Bitcoin. This model worked perfectly during Bitcoin bull runs, as asset appreciation covered financing costs, creating a positive feedback loop between the company's stock price and Bitcoin.


Strategy currently has four series of preferred stock trading in the market: STRC (12% annual dividend), STRK (8%), STRF (10%), and STRD (10%), with combined annual dividend obligations of approximately $1 billion. Preferred stock dividends are rigid expenses that must be paid on time regardless of Bitcoin's price movement. The company's software business (formerly MicroStrategy's BI products) generates less than $500 million in annual revenue, far from enough to cover the dividends.


This creates a significant contradiction: Strategy raises funds by issuing preferred stock to buy Bitcoin, but the dividend obligations of those preferred stocks then force the company to sell Bitcoin to pay the dividends. This contradiction was masked when Bitcoin's price was above the acquisition cost.


Bitcoin has fallen significantly from its October 2025 all-time high. Strategy's comprehensive average cost is approximately $75,476, while this batch was sold at an average price of only about $60,200, incurring a loss of over $15,000 per coin. The Q1 financials recorded a $12.5 billion digital asset impairment loss, and Q2 recorded another $8.32 billion. The company is now selling Bitcoin below cost to pay dividends on securities issued to buy Bitcoin in the first place.


Premium Collateral


3,588 coins represent 0.4% of the total 840,000-coin holdings, having a limited direct impact on Bitcoin's market price. The $1.25 billion sales authorization ceiling represents 2.5% of total holdings; even if fully utilized, it's far from a liquidation. From a balance sheet perspective, Strategy faces no solvency crisis.


But MSTR's stock price has never been priced based solely on its balance sheet. This stock has long traded at a premium of 1.5 to 3 times its Bitcoin Net Asset Value (NAV). The premium investors pay is not for the 840,000 Bitcoin themselves (directly buying BTC or an ETF is cheaper). Instead, it's for a narrative product provided by Michael Saylor: a Bitcoin absorption machine that only buys and never sells, with holdings perpetually growing, never appearing on the sell side. This promise was the collateral for MSTR's entire premium.


As of June 28, Strategy had $2.55 billion in US dollar reserves and annual preferred stock dividend obligations of about $1 billion. The cash was sufficient to cover over two years of payments. Financially, Michael Saylor did not need to sell Bitcoin now. Yet, he still initiated the institutionalized sales framework, raised the STRC dividend rate, and executed $216 million in sales within a week. The four series of preferred stocks generate monthly cash outflow obligations, while the promise of "never selling" precluded using core assets for repayment.


When these two realities coexist on the same balance sheet, one must give way. Michael Saylor chose to give way on the latter.


Following the first coin sale this year, Michael Saylor's new narrative is that if the interest/dividends on issued bonds or preferred stocks can be serviced at a low financial cost, Strategy can use leverage to buy and lock in more Bitcoin at lower prices. Since overall asset appreciation during a bull market far outweighs interest costs, theoretically, through instruments like convertible notes, the company could buy 20 Bitcoin for every one it sells.


But each time Saylor sells Bitcoin, he must explain why it doesn't constitute breaking his promise, and the explanations themselves consume the credibility he has built over six years.


MSTR's premium over its BTC NAV has never been because this company holds Bitcoin more efficiently than an ETF. It was largely because Saylor turned "never selling" into a corporate governance-level religious ritual. Once the ritual is interrupted, MSTR becomes just a leveraged Bitcoin holding vehicle, and the market already has plenty of cheaper alternatives.


Strategy's balance sheet can withstand the paper volatility of 840,000 Bitcoin, but it may not withstand a story that is fading.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why did Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) sell 3,588 Bitcoin in late June and early July 2026?

AStrategy sold the Bitcoin to raise funds for paying dividends on its preferred shares and to supplement its dollar reserves.

QHow much was the realized loss on this specific sale of 3,588 BTC, and what was the approximate cost basis per Bitcoin for the company at that time?

AThe company realized a loss of approximately $54.81 million on the sale. The average selling price was around $60,200 per Bitcoin, which was below the company's approximate cost basis of $75,476 per Bitcoin, resulting in a loss of about $15,276 per coin.

QWhat major shift in company policy did Strategy announce alongside the Bitcoin sales, and what is the authorized limit for future sales under this new framework?

AStrategy announced a new 'Digital Credit Capital Framework' which institutionalized the sale of Bitcoin as a capital management tool. It authorized management to sell up to $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin (approximately 20,800 BTC at the time) if necessary.

QThe premium was based on Michael Saylor's narrative and commitment that Strategy would be a 'permanent holder' that only buys and never sells Bitcoin, making it a unique 'absorption machine.' This commitment was the 'collateral' for the stock's premium. The recent institutionalized selling breaks this core promise, risking the erosion of this narrative-based premium as the company becomes seen as just another leveraged Bitcoin holding tool with cheaper alternatives available.

AThe article suggests MSTR stock historically traded at a significant premium to its Bitcoin holdings. What was the implied reason for this premium, and why is it now considered at risk?

QWhat financial obligation is creating pressure for Strategy to sell Bitcoin, even at a loss, according to the analysis in the article?

AThe company has annual dividend obligations of approximately $1 billion from its four series of outstanding preferred shares. Its core software business generates less than $500 million in annual revenue, which is insufficient to cover these mandatory dividend payments, forcing the company to use other assets like Bitcoin.

Related Reads

With Mining Profits Depressed, What Kind of Mining Companies Can Survive a Bear Market?

Mining Profitability Slumps: Which Miners Can Survive the Bear Market? A comprehensive Bitcoin miner stress indicator has recently hit a historically low "extreme stress" zone, aligning with the typical market cycle pattern where industry bottoms coincide with severe miner pressure. The current situation presents a direct survival test: if hashprice (daily USD revenue per PH/s of computing power) remains weak, only the most robust mining firms will endure. Hashprice, which incorporates block rewards, transaction fees, network difficulty, and BTC price, is the core metric for mining profitability. Despite Bitcoin's price holding above previous lows, profitability is shrinking due to rising difficulty and low fees. Recent data shows hashprice around $32-33/PH/s/day, with a significant divide: newer, energy-efficient rigs (<19 J/TH) generate ~$81 per megawatt, while older, inefficient models (25-38 J/TH) make only ~$43/MW. This gap is forcing inefficient operators to shut down. The industry has a self-correcting mechanism. As high-cost miners power down, the network's total computing power (hashrate) drops. This eventually triggers a downward adjustment in mining difficulty, increasing the rewards for remaining miners. Data from Q2 2026 shows the hashrate has already fallen by 5.8%, with an estimated 252 EH/s of inefficient mining capacity idled. Firms at risk of淘汰 (elimination) are those reliant on old hardware, high electricity costs, and significant debt. Survivors will likely be miners with newer equipment, low-cost power contracts, strong cash reserves, and flexible operations. A key trend is diversification into AI and high-performance computing (HPC) hosting, though this path is only viable for miners with the necessary infrastructure, capital, and clients. The miner stress indicator serves as a warning, not a precise timing tool for a market bottom. Key signals to watch are whether hashprice stabilizes above ~$30, difficulty continues to adjust downward, hashrate finds a floor, and miner Bitcoin selling subsides. The duration of this low-profitability period will act as a solvency test, determining which miners are positioned to survive and eventually benefit from the next cycle.

Foresight News12m ago

With Mining Profits Depressed, What Kind of Mining Companies Can Survive a Bear Market?

Foresight News12m ago

Dialogue with Yihui Capital, SoundAI Technology, Ling Universe, and Zhongbo Jili: Opportunities and Challenges in the AI Smart Hardware Track

On June 28, 2026, an event titled "New Opportunities in AI Hardware: The Battle for Interactive Entry Points Begins" was held in Beijing. It featured a report from ITJuzi and discussions with experts from SoundAI, Ling Universe, One Reed Capital, and Zhongbo Juli on the opportunities and challenges in China's AI hardware sector. Key report findings highlight the sector's intense activity: 327 out of 431 startups founded post-2023 have secured funding, with 179 investments in H1 2026 alone. The landscape is dominated by embodied intelligent robots, while wearable tech like smart rings and AI glasses shows rapid growth. Geographically, Shenzhen leads, leveraging its superior hardware supply chain, followed by Beijing and Shanghai. The overarching trend is for companies to focus on micro-innovations within specific scenarios rather than reinventing foundational technology. Industry leaders shared several critical insights: 1. **Balancing Innovation & Market Readiness**: Entrepreneurs face the "hammer looking for a nail" dilemma. Success requires balancing technical capability with user acceptance, cost control, and incremental design improvements rather than chasing disruptive innovation. 2. **Competitive Landscape**: The future interactive entry point may not be a single super-device but a mix of universal terminals and specialized, scenario-specific hardware. While large companies have ecosystem advantages, startups can win by deeply targeting vertical markets and specific user groups. 3. **Core Challenges & Business Models**: Key hurdles include deep understanding of AI models and navigating non-transparent hardware supply chains. Viable business models may involve selling hardware at cost and generating revenue through software subscriptions, but this requires tight control over both hardware BOM and model inference costs. 4. **The Road to Commercialization**: The ultimate test is market validation—achieving sales growth and sustainable cash flow. Companies must find the right application scenario, use edge computing effectively, and close the loop from technology to commercial success. 5. **The Future of Interaction**: Proactive, context-aware interaction is the next frontier, though it's currently limited by issues like model hallucinations and environmental perception. The near-term focus should be on identifying target users and creating a coherent experience in specific domains, such as health wearables. In summary, to succeed in the competitive AI hardware arena, companies must strategically choose their niche, build a team with the right geographical advantages (e.g., leveraging Shenzhen's supply chain), and most importantly, execute a flawless commercialization strategy that translates technology into market-accepted products and sustainable business growth.

marsbit2h ago

Dialogue with Yihui Capital, SoundAI Technology, Ling Universe, and Zhongbo Jili: Opportunities and Challenges in the AI Smart Hardware Track

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

655 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片