BitMEX Founder Arthur Hayes Sets the Date: 'If the AI Bubble Bursts, Bitcoin Could Reach $1 Million!' Here Are the Details

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-05Last updated on 2026-08-05

Abstract

Arthur Hayes, founder of BitMEX, predicts that bitcoin could surpass $1 million if a financial bubble in the artificial intelligence sector bursts. Hayes warns that the real risk lies not in AI technology companies themselves, but in potential bubbles forming in the real estate and lending markets associated with the rapid construction of AI data centers and their energy infrastructure. He suggests that if large loans for these projects are not repaid in the coming years, it could trigger a credit crisis similar to 2008, potentially between 2026 and 2028. In such a scenario, Hayes believes governments, particularly the U.S., would respond with massive monetary stimulus programs to bail out banks and AI companies. This would severely devalue fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar and drive investors toward alternative assets. Bitcoin, having established a strong base between $60,000 and $70,000 (with a potential worst-case drop to around $50,000), would serve as a key hedge, capturing both currency devaluation and capital misallocation, ultimately propelling its price to historic highs.

BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes asserts that Bitcoin could experience a historic surge if the financial bubble he believes is forming in the artificial intelligence sector bursts. According to Hayes, a potential AI bubble crash around 2028 could trigger economic conditions that would push Bitcoin's price above $1 million.

Hayes stated in his assessment that the real risk in the AI sector lies not with the technology companies themselves, but with the bubbles forming in real estate and lending markets. He said the data centers for AI being rapidly built today largely represent a form of real estate development and financing.

Hayes claimed that if the large loans for constructing data centers and their necessary energy infrastructure are not repaid in the coming years, it could put serious pressure on the financial system, suggesting this process could escalate into a credit crisis similar to the 2008 global financial crisis.

Hayes stated that in this scenario, which he forecasts to occur between 2026 and 2028, banks and financial institutions could face credit risks related to their AI investments. He argued that in such a situation, governments might once again resort to large-scale monetary policies to support the economy.

Hayes noted that one reason for Bitcoin's recent price pressure is the flow of investor capital into the artificial intelligence sector, but added that despite this, BTC has begun forming a solid base in the $60,000 to $70,000 range. The well-known investor predicted that even in the worst case, Bitcoin might drop to around $50,000 before resuming an upward trend.

According to Hayes, during a potential AI sector crisis, the U.S. government could launch money printing programs on a scale even surpassing that of the 2008 financial crisis to rescue banks and AI companies. Arguing that this would weaken the dollar's purchasing power and push investors towards alternative assets, Hayes stated that Bitcoin would serve as an indicator that accounts for currency devaluation and the disruption of capital allocation during this process.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat does BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes predict could happen to Bitcoin's price if the AI bubble bursts around 2028?

AArthur Hayes predicts that if the AI financial bubble bursts around 2028, it could create economic conditions that push the price of Bitcoin above $1 million.

QAccording to Hayes, what is the real risk in the AI sector that could lead to a broader financial crisis?

AHayes states that the real risk in the AI sector is not the technology companies themselves, but the bubbles forming in real estate and lending markets, particularly due to the rapid construction of data centers and their energy infrastructure.

QWhat does Hayes compare the potential AI-related credit crisis to?

AHayes suggests the process of potential loan defaults on AI data center construction could escalate into a credit crisis similar to the 2008 global financial crisis.

QWhat range does Hayes identify as a solid base that Bitcoin has started to form, despite recent price pressure?

ADespite recent pressure, Hayes notes that Bitcoin has begun forming a solid base in the range of $60,000 to $70,000.

QHow does Hayes believe the US government might respond to a potential AI crisis, and what would be the effect on Bitcoin?

AHayes believes the US government might launch money printing programs on an even larger scale than during the 2008 crisis to bail out banks and AI companies. He argues this would weaken the US dollar's purchasing power, drive investors to alternative assets, and position Bitcoin as an indicator that accounts for currency devaluation.

Related Reads

Avalanche Price Forecast for August 2026: Can AVAX Break Above $7 When Kenya Launches on the Network?

Avalanche (AVAX) Price Forecast for August 2026: Key Factors and Levels Avalanche (AVAX) is trading at $6.782 on August 4, showing signs of a potential breakout after consolidating between $5.50 and $7 since June. The price has recently moved above its 20-day and 50-day EMAs, with the Parabolic SAR turning bullish for the first time in months. Key resistance levels are $7 (range top), $7.483 (100-day EMA), and $9.368 (200-day EMA). Support lies at $6.775 (50-day EMA), $6.532 (20-day EMA), $6.040 (Parabolic SAR), and $5.50 (range bottom). Historically, August is AVAX's strongest month with an average return of +25.1%, though median returns are more modest. The token enters August from a low base after a significant June sell-off. Fundamentally, the network is seeing increased institutional adoption. Kenya's National Examinations Council (KNEC) has placed over 15 million academic records on Avalanche. Other developments include Securitize tokenizing ~$300M, Progmat migrating $2.7B+ in securities, Aave V4 expanding to Avalanche, and Hyundai launching a stablecoin payment pilot. The Avalanche Payments Collective has also launched with 29 members. The weekly forecast suggests a range between $6.60-$8.50 for the month, with a close above the 100-day EMA at $7.483 being a key bullish target. The bearish risk involves a rejection at $7 and a fall back towards the $5.50 range low. The progress of the U.S. CLARITY Act by August 7 is noted as a potential macro catalyst.

cryptonews.ru5m ago

Avalanche Price Forecast for August 2026: Can AVAX Break Above $7 When Kenya Launches on the Network?

cryptonews.ru5m ago

The Ethereum Community Is in an Uproar! Who Stands to Lose with EIP-8363?

The Ethereum community is deeply divided over the controversial EIP-8363 proposal, which aims to introduce a "tapered issuance burn" to curb the growth of ETH staking. Authored by researchers including Jérôme de Tychey and Justin Drake, the proposal would gradually reduce and eventually eliminate the consensus-layer issuance rewards for validators when the total staked ETH approaches 50% of the total supply (approximately 60.25 million ETH). This is intended to discourage excessive staking concentration among large institutional providers and reduce the dilution pressure on non-staking ETH holders, potentially strengthening native ETH as a neutral asset. Currently, even at 100% staking, validators have a theoretical minimum reward of about 1.5%. EIP-8363 would implement a burn mechanism based on the staking ratio, making net consensus rewards approach zero at the 50% threshold, though execution-layer rewards (priority fees, MEV) remain unaffected. At the current ~33% staking ratio, annual consensus yield would drop from ~2.6% to ~1.2%. An 18-month transition period is proposed to soften the impact. The community reaction has been largely negative. Critics, including Aave founder Stani Kulechov and ether.fi CEO Mike Silagadze, argue it undermines predictable cash flows for institutional investors, hurts solo stakers by making their operations less viable against fixed costs, and could destabilize the DeFi ecosystem built around Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs). They also fear it could lead to further centralization, as low rewards might push out small validators while large, cost-insensitive entities remain. Supporters counter that it addresses long-term security and dilution concerns. The proposal is currently an early-stage Core EIP draft under review and has not yet been officially included in the upcoming Hegotá upgrade. The debate highlights a fundamental tension within Ethereum: balancing ETH's roles as a yield-generating "internet bond" versus a neutral store of value.

marsbit7m ago

The Ethereum Community Is in an Uproar! Who Stands to Lose with EIP-8363?

marsbit7m ago

US Senators Target Wildfire Betting in New Push Against CFTC Rules

A group of nine U.S. senators has urged the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to restrict wildfire prediction contracts, arguing they allow traders to profit from disasters. In an August 3rd letter led by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the lawmakers requested answers from CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam by August 14th. The senators, representing states impacted by recent wildfires, expressed concern that betting on fires' duration, spread, or property damage trivializes community suffering and creates a perverse incentive for arson. They cited over $1.2 million in trading volume on contracts related to California's Palisades and Eaton fires on the Polymarket platform as a catalyst for their inquiry. While acknowledging no confirmed cases of arson linked to such markets, the letter draws a parallel to insider trading risks. Polymarket defended its markets as sources of timely information for understanding evolving events, not causes of tragedy. The senators questioned if the CFTC, currently developing new rules, plans to ban wildfire contracts as contrary to the public interest, given its authority to prohibit contracts on terrorism, assassination, or gambling. Although wildfires aren't explicitly mentioned in law, the lawmakers seek a preemptive move, warning it's only a matter of time before U.S.-based markets offer similar contracts. This follows a prior, broader request from Merkley in April to ban election and war-related contracts, which the CFTC did not adopt, instead proposing a case-by-case review process in June.

cryptonews.ru8m ago

US Senators Target Wildfire Betting in New Push Against CFTC Rules

cryptonews.ru8m ago

Reflections After the Coldcard Incident: Why Did Korean Users Escape Unscathed While the English-Speaking Community Suffered Heavily?

An incident involving a security flaw in Coldcard hardware wallets revealed a stark contrast in outcomes between the Korean and English-speaking Bitcoin communities. While many experienced users in the English-speaking world suffered significant losses, the Korean Bitcoin community reportedly avoided any direct financial impact. This divergence is attributed not to a gap in technical skill, but to deeper structural issues within the communities. Korean influencers and leaders strongly advocated for secure self-custody practices, specifically urging users to generate their seed phrases manually (e.g., by rolling physical dice) rather than relying on any wallet manufacturer's random number generator. This "don't trust, verify" approach was widely adopted, protecting users. In contrast, the English-speaking community saw its discourse and trust influenced by prominent influencers and podcasters who often had sponsorship ties or personal relationships with Coldcard's parent company, Coinkite. This created a "reverberation chamber" effect, where overconfidence in the product's security was amplified, leading followers to overlook potential risks. The incident underscores a critical need to extend Bitcoin's core principle of "Don't Trust, Verify" beyond code to the consumption of information itself. It highlights the dangers of over-reliance on influencers and the importance of maintaining neutrality by critically assessing the financial and relational biases of information sources. The Korean community's success serves as a lesson for the broader ecosystem to reflect on these dynamics to prevent future losses.

marsbit12m ago

Reflections After the Coldcard Incident: Why Did Korean Users Escape Unscathed While the English-Speaking Community Suffered Heavily?

marsbit12m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.5k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片