BIS Latest Research: The Future of Stablecoins and the Global Monetary Landscape

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-01Last updated on 2026-06-01

Abstract

BIS Working Paper No. 170, released in May 2026, analyzes the impact of stablecoins on the global monetary system. The market has grown exponentially since 2014, with over 300 active stablecoins exceeding $300 billion in market capitalization. It is highly concentrated, dominated by USD-linked stablecoins (98% by market cap, mainly USDT and USDC), which function as new forms of private offshore dollar claims on blockchain. Currently, stablecoin use remains largely within crypto ecosystems for trading and DeFi collateral. Real-economy adoption, such as in cross-border payments, is nascent but growing in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) facing high inflation and volatile currencies, where they facilitate capital flight and "digital dollarization." The paper assesses impacts using the Cohen-Kennen framework. For private-sector functions, stablecoins most directly affect value storage (as a dollar-denominated safe haven in EMDEs) and the medium of exchange (enhancing cross-border payment efficiency, further entrenching dollar use). Impacts on the unit of account and official-sector functions are currently limited but could indirectly constrain monetary policy autonomy and capital controls. The report outlines three potential future scenarios: 1) **Niche adoption**, where stablecoins remain crypto-centric with minimal systemic impact; 2) **Digital dollarization**, a high-risk scenario where USD stablecoins become de facto standards in EMDEs, eroding monetary so...

Original Author丨 BIS

Source丨China Financial Case Center Compiled by丨Xie Binbin, Qi Zhiping

The rapid global development of digital finance has seen stablecoins evolve from niche tools within the cryptocurrency sphere into novel digital assets with cross-border payment and value storage functions, profoundly impacting the international monetary landscape. In May 2026, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) released Working Paper No. 170, systematically analyzing the development characteristics, operational mechanisms, and impact of stablecoins on the international monetary system, and proposing three future scenarios and regulatory approaches. The report concludes that stablecoins will reinforce the dominant position of the US dollar in the short term, posing risks to the monetary sovereignty of emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs). Their long-term trajectory will depend on adoption patterns, regulatory responses, and synergy within the digital finance ecosystem.

Stablecoin Market: Rapidly Expanding, USD Dominance

Stablecoins are privately issued blockchain tokens pegged to fiat currencies or assets to maintain stable value, combining payment and store-of-value functions. Since the first stablecoin emerged in 2014, the industry has experienced exponential growth; by 2026, there were over 300 active stablecoins globally, with a total market capitalization surpassing $300 billion.

In terms of market structure, stablecoins exhibit high concentration and US dollar dominance. In quantity, USD-pegged stablecoins account for approximately 64%; in market value, USD stablecoins represent as high as 98%, with USDT and USDC dominating the market, while stablecoins pegged to other currencies remain extremely small in scale. Regarding reserve assets, major fiat-backed stablecoins primarily hold US short-term Treasury bonds, reverse repurchase agreements, and cash equivalents as core reserves. However, some issuers lack transparency and insufficient auditing, posing potential redemption risks.

Current stablecoin applications remain predominantly within the crypto ecosystem, serving as trading and settlement media for crypto assets, and as collateral in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) lending and liquidity protocols. After excluding automated wash trading and high-frequency trading, the actual transaction volume is only 1% of the nominal volume. Retail scenarios (single transactions below $250) account for less than 0.9%. Real-economy applications like cross-border remittances and retail payments are still in early pilot stages. However, in emerging markets with high inflation and volatile exchange rates, cross-border stablecoin flows continue to rise, becoming a hidden channel to avoid currency depreciation and circumvent capital controls.

Operational Mechanisms: A New Form of Offshore Dollar Carrier

Stablecoins operate on a "on-chain circulation, off-chain reserves" model: the issuer collects fiat currency at a 1:1 ratio and mints tokens, users hold them via digital wallets, enabling 24/7 global transfers via public blockchains, with reserve assets used for redemptions to maintain the peg. This model combines features of 19th century private banknotes, the Eurodollar market, and Money Market Funds (MMF). Essentially, they are private on-chain claims on offshore dollars, extending dollar liquidity through financial innovation.

Unlike the traditional Eurodollar market, stablecoins lack bank credit elasticity and central bank liquidity support. Their stability relies entirely on the quality of reserve assets and market arbitrage mechanisms. The collapse of TerraUSD in 2022 and the temporary de-pegging of USDC in 2023 demonstrated that stablecoins without sufficient high-liquidity reserves are highly prone to losing their peg under stress. A global regulatory consensus has emerged: focus on regulating fiat-collateralized stablecoins and reject algorithmic stablecoins.

In terms of risk transmission, stablecoins' reserves are heavily concentrated in US short-term Treasuries, creating a transmission chain of "global demand → stablecoin issuance → increased US Treasury holdings," directly affecting US Treasury yields and the transmission efficiency of Federal Reserve monetary policy.

Global Impact: Intensifying Monetary Hierarchy, Challenging Emerging Markets' Monetary Autonomy

Using the Cohen-Kenen international monetary function framework, the report systematically assesses the impact of stablecoins on the international monetary system across three functions (unit of account, medium of exchange, store of value) and two sectors (private and official). The conclusion indicates that stablecoins have the most direct impact on the private sector's store-of-value and medium-of-exchange functions, with limited impact on the unit of account and official sector functions, but they implicitly constrain monetary policy autonomy.

  • 1. Store of Value: The Core Channel of Digital Dollarization In high-inflation emerging markets, USD stablecoins, requiring no foreign currency accounts and allowing anonymous cross-border holding, have become residents' preferred safe-haven asset, leading to "hidden dollarization". Stablecoin inflows are highly correlated with local currency depreciation and widening exchange rate gaps, squeezing local currency deposits and weakening central bank control capabilities.

  • 2. Medium of Exchange: Enhancing Cross-Border Payment Efficiency Stablecoins offer advantages like real-time settlement, no operational hour restrictions, and low fees, leading to rapid penetration in scenarios like cross-border remittances and e-commerce. Their development further reduces friction in using the US dollar, expanding its share in retail cross-border payments and e-commerce transactions.

  • 3. Unit of Account: Limited Impact, Hard to Break Commercial Inertia Trade invoicing and contract pricing exhibit strong path dependence. Stablecoins have not yet altered the global trade pattern dominated by the US dollar and euro. They are only sporadically used in some retail scenarios in high-inflation economies, not forming a systematic substitute.

  • 4. Official Sector: Indirect Constraints, No Direct Substitution Central banks have not yet included stablecoins in foreign exchange reserves or as exchange rate intervention tools; official unit-of-account and intervention functions have not been directly impacted. However, widespread private-sector use of stablecoins can render capital controls ineffective and hinder monetary policy transmission, exacerbating the "trilemma": financial openness is passively increased, intensifying conflicts between exchange rate stability and monetary policy autonomy.

Three Future Scenarios: From Limited Penetration to Systemic Change

Based on adoption scale, regulatory environment, and cross-border impact, the report constructs three mutually exclusive yet parallel future scenarios, covering possible paths from marginal influence to reshaping the system.

  • Scenario 1: Niche Adoption (Baseline Scenario) Stablecoins remain confined within the crypto ecosystem, with limited penetration into the real economy. Localized holdings emerge in high-inflation countries, but retail payments and trade settlements remain primarily in local currencies. Regulation focuses on anti-money laundering and consumer protection. Capital flow spillover is small, monetary sovereignty and financial stability in emerging markets remain largely controllable, and central banks retain full policy autonomy. This scenario aligns most closely with current market characteristics and is the most likely short-term trajectory.

  • Scenario 2: Digital Dollarization (High-Risk Scenario) USD stablecoins become the de facto standard for cross-border retail payments and domestic pricing in emerging markets, with banks offering related services, accelerating deposit dollarization. Local currency policies become ineffective, capital controls are rendered meaningless, domestic savings flow into US Treasuries via stablecoins, and local credit markets shrink. Exchange rate transmission effects intensify, stablecoin run risks directly impact emerging market financial stability, leading to irreversible digital dollar dependency. This scenario's impact on monetary sovereignty far exceeds traditional dollarization and is an extreme risk emerging markets must prioritize preventing.

  • Scenario 3: Integration of Local Currency Stablecoins (Ideal Scenario) Emerging markets, through regulatory authorization, allow licensed institutions to issue local currency stablecoins, interoperable with domestic fast payment systems and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Reserve assets are restricted to local currency government bonds and central bank deposits, balancing technological efficiency with policy autonomy. Stablecoins are used for government payments, e-commerce settlements, and securities clearing, enhancing payment efficiency and financial inclusion while avoiding foreign currency substitution risks. However, this scenario requires robust regulatory capacity, financial infrastructure, and macroeconomic stability, conditions currently lacking in most low-income emerging markets.

Regulatory Challenges and Policy Implications: Global Coordination is Key

The cross-border nature of stablecoins makes single-country regulation ineffective. The report proposes four core policy directions::

  • 1. Unify Global Regulatory Standards: Implement the Financial Stability Board's (FSB) recommendations on stablecoin regulation, clarifying reserve requirements, disclosure rules, and redemption mechanisms to avoid regulatory arbitrage.

  • 2. Strengthen Cross-Border Collaboration: Establish regulatory information sharing and risk management mechanisms between issuing and using countries to address cross-border runs and capital flow shocks.

  • 3. Upgrade Domestic Defenses: Emerging markets should improve macroeconomic stability, optimize domestic payment systems, and advance CBDC development to counter the appeal of foreign currency stablecoins.

  • 4. Prevent Illicit Activities: Leverage blockchain traceability technology to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and other abuses, balancing innovation and risk.

In summary, stablecoins are not simple financial innovations but structural forces reshaping the international monetary hierarchy. In the short term, they may reinforce dollar hegemony and exacerbate financial subordination in emerging markets; in the long term, the outcome depends on global regulatory coordination, innovation in local currency digital tools, and market adoption paths. For emerging markets, stablecoins are a double-edged sword offering both opportunities and risks: they can enhance payment efficiency and promote financial inclusion but may also trigger digital dollarization and erode monetary sovereignty.

The future global monetary system will enter a new stage of coexistence between public digital currencies (CBDCs) and private digital currencies (stablecoins), with competition between fiat currencies and digital dollars. Only through sound macroeconomic policies, robust regulatory frameworks, and international coordination can we embrace technological benefits while safeguarding financial security and monetary sovereignty, avoiding new forms of digital financial subordination.

Original Link

Related Questions

QAccording to the BIS report, what are the three potential future scenarios for stablecoins, and which one is considered the most likely in the short term?

AThe three potential future scenarios are: 1) Niche adoption (baseline scenario), where stablecoins remain confined to the crypto ecosystem with limited real-economy penetration. 2) Digital dollarization (high-risk scenario), where USD stablecoins become a de facto standard in emerging markets. 3) Local currency stablecoin integration (ideal scenario), where licensed entities issue local currency stablecoins linked to national payment systems. The report considers the niche adoption scenario as the most likely in the short term.

QHow does the BIS report describe the current market structure of stablecoins in terms of currency dominance and concentration?

AThe report describes the stablecoin market as highly concentrated and dominated by the US dollar. By quantity, USD-pegged stablecoins account for about 64% of all stablecoins. By market capitalization, USD stablecoins represent a staggering 98% share, with USDT and USDC dominating the market. Stablecoins pegged to other currencies remain negligible in size.

QWhat is the core mechanism of fiat-collateralized stablecoins, and how does the BIS report characterize their economic nature?

AThe core mechanism is an 'on-chain circulation, off-chain reserves' model. Issuers create tokens on a 1:1 basis with fiat currency received, which users hold in digital wallets. The reserves are used for redemption to maintain the peg. The BIS characterizes this as essentially a private, on-chain claim on offshore US dollars, combining features of 19th-century private banknotes, the Eurodollar market, and money market funds, extending dollar liquidity through financial innovation.

QWhich functions of an international currency are most directly impacted by stablecoins, according to the report's analysis based on the Cohen-Kenen framework?

AAccording to the analysis using the Cohen-Kennen international currency functions framework, stablecoins most directly impact the store of value and medium of exchange functions for the private sector. Their impact on the unit of account function and official sector functions (like foreign exchange reserves) is currently limited, but they can indirectly constrain monetary policy autonomy.

QWhat are the four core policy directions proposed by the BIS report to address the regulatory challenges posed by stablecoins?

AThe four core policy directions are: 1) Unify global regulatory standards (e.g., implement FSB recommendations on reserves, disclosure, and redemption). 2) Strengthen cross-border collaboration for information sharing and crisis management. 3) Upgrade domestic defenses in emerging markets by improving macroeconomic stability, payment systems, and CBDCs. 4) Prevent illicit activities by using blockchain analytics to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Related Reads

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit1h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit1h ago

Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

**"Spicy Commentary": Three Tales of Crypto's Wild Week** This week's "Spicy Commentary" column highlights three dramatic stories from the cryptocurrency world. First, **MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor** addressed the controversy over his company potentially selling Bitcoin. At the BTC Prague event, he clarified, "I never said the company can't sell Bitcoin. I told *you* never to sell *your* Bitcoin." This "do as I say, not as I do" stance was criticized by netizens as peak linguistic gymnastics, noting a history of him previously stating the company would "never" sell. Second, a **bizarre fraud case** emerged from Beijing. A 60-year-old woman, obsessed with getting rich from crypto but unwilling to risk her own savings, posed online as the 20-something "god-daughter" of a high-ranking official. She catfished a young man, convincing him to give her over 200,000 yuan for fabricated emergencies. She then invested all the stolen money into cryptocurrency with 10x leverage, only to lose everything in a market crash. The woman was sentenced to four years in prison for fraud. Finally, a **sobering trader's tale** surfaced on Reddit. A user posted "Tale of a crypto trader," confessing their net worth had plummeted from a peak of $45 million to roughly $17,200, primarily due to holding meme coins too long. The post, described as a crypto "book of confessions," sparked reactions ranging from sympathy to critique about greed, poor risk management, and the perils of treating meme coins as long-term investments instead of taking profits. The column concludes that this week featured masterful rhetoric, elaborate scams, and extreme financial volatility, stitching together another chapter in crypto's unpredictable theater.

Foresight News1h ago

Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

Foresight News1h ago

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

Trembling, Humans: AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint Yes, AI is still rapidly accelerating. While deep learning seemed to stall quickly in its early years, large models after years of development show no sign of hitting their ceiling. At the Zhiyuan Conference 2026, the focus is on enabling AI to move from the digital world into the physical world. Scaling Law remains effective, continuing to drive advancements in both large language models and multimodal models. The industry is now entering a phase of pursuing World Models, though unresolved technical paths and data issues mean this exploration may take 3-5 more years. Concurrently, breakthroughs in Agents are accelerating AI's real-world application in fields like healthcare and meetings. Making Agents truly useful requires key hardware-software co-design, evident from the strong presence of chip vendors at the conference. We stand at a new historical threshold where AI is becoming a foundational force reshaping the world. The first day of the conference highlighted AI's evolution from "knowing how to chat" to "knowing how to work." Scaling Law persists, World Models are the next key battleground, and Agents are transitioning from usable to好用 (user-friendly). Scaling Law is not ending but diversifying. New models like Anthropic's Fable 5 demonstrate scaling through parameter size, synthetic data, and reinforcement learning. Advancements in AI Coding and Agent deployment are enabling a trend of AI self-evolution, potentially allowing AI to take over digital world iterations. World Models represent the next frontier for large models extending into the physical realm, but no current model is truly impressive at solving real-world problems. Technical consensus is lacking, with debates on data sources (video, simulation, real-world). Different approaches are emerging: language-centric, pixel-centric, 3D-structure-centric, and visual-representation-centric models. Zhiyuan Institute is exploring a fifth path: unified latent space modeling fusing language and visual representations, and introduced its own under-development World Model, Physis-v0.1. On the product side, Agents are key to bringing AI into daily life. Since 2025, the "Year of the Agent," products have become more proactive and capable of complex tasks. Zhiyuan showcased four vertical Agents for cardiac diagnosis, autonomous research, meeting summarization, and protein risk discovery. However, technical challenges remain, particularly in context engineering like memory and orchestration. "Harness" – the engineering framework around an Agent – is crucial for maximizing its capabilities by clarifying intent, designing workflows, and incorporating validation and feedback. In summary, AI's breakneck pace continues on multiple fronts: foundational model scaling, the ambitious pursuit of World Models for physical understanding, and the ongoing refinement of practical Agents. The journey from capable to truly reliable and useful AI systems is well underway.

marsbit1h ago

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

marsbit1h ago

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

Elon Musk becomes the world's first trillionaire, driven by SpaceX's IPO valuing the company at $1.77 trillion. However, his vast wealth is largely illiquid: he holds over 85% voting control, likely through super-voting shares that are subject to lock-ups and selling restrictions. While his net worth surpasses $1 trillion across SpaceX, Tesla, and private holdings, only a tiny fraction (potentially under 2% annually) could be converted to cash without jeopardizing control and market confidence. SpaceX's IPO also creates paper millionaires for roughly 4,400 employees, but their holdings face lock-up periods, exercise costs, and taxes, delaying and reducing actual cash proceeds. Only 4.2% of total shares are initially available for public trading, making the stock price highly sensitive to limited net buying or selling pressure. A major test will come when lock-ups expire for the remaining 96% of shares. The article contrasts SpaceX's wealth distribution with potential AI IPOs. Anthropic and OpenAI could generate employee wealth pools 20 times larger than SpaceX's in paper value, due to their higher valuations relative to revenue and potentially more distributed ownership. However, sustaining those high price-to-sales multiples post-IPO is uncertain. A key financial puzzle for SpaceX investors is its xAI unit. While it has locked in an estimated $26 billion in annual compute revenue from clients like Anthropic and Google, the unit reported a $6.4 billion loss in 2025. More critically, estimated annual capital expenditures of ~$30.8 billion exceed that revenue. The long-term viability of SpaceX's AI narrative hinges on whether this compute income can eventually cover the unit's massive ongoing investments and losses.

链捕手2h ago

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

链捕手2h ago

Ethereum Researchers Propose SPHINCS- Signature Scheme For Post-Quantum Wallets

Ethereum researchers have proposed SPHINCS-, a stateless post-quantum signature verification scheme optimized for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Designed to function within the existing EVM without protocol changes or new precompiles, it replaces standard hash functions with EVM-native KECCAK256, enabling a Solidity implementation. The scheme is tailored for wallet use, targeting a more practical signature budget (2^14 to 2^20 signatures per key) rather than the standard astronomical limit, reflecting typical Ethereum address transaction patterns. A key variant, C13, is reported to verify signatures at about 127,000 gas with a 3,704-byte signature. The proposal, credited to researcher nicocsgy with acknowledgments to Vitalik Buterin, is currently a non-standard research concept, not a finished standard. It highlights trade-offs, such as long signing times on certain hardware wallets, but contributes to the broader, essential conversation on preparing Ethereum's account security for a future with quantum computers.

bitcoinist3h ago

Ethereum Researchers Propose SPHINCS- Signature Scheme For Post-Quantum Wallets

bitcoinist3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片