An Ethereum whale raises its holdings to $1.7B: Will this move affect ETH?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-15Last updated on 2025-12-15

Abstract

An Ethereum whale significantly increased its holdings by purchasing 38,576 ETH (worth $119 million) after a 23-day break, raising its total holdings to 528,000 ETH valued at $1.723 billion. This accumulation, executed during a market downturn, has reduced Ethereum's exchange supply ratio to a monthly low, indicating decreased selling pressure and increased scarcity. However, despite the whale's activity, ETH's price momentum remains weak due to high retail trader dominance, which often leads to market instability. While the $3,000 support level has held so far, the risk of a drop below it persists if demand doesn't increase. A bullish reversal would require stronger demand to push ETH toward $3,300 or higher.

Ethereum retraced and hovered around $3.1k, indicating a market stuck at a decision point. At press time, Ethereum [ETH] traded at $3,117, up 0.22% on the daily chart but down 1.37% on the weekly chart.

The continued sideways movement established a perfect buying window, especially for whales.

Ethereum whale scoops up millions!

According to Lookonchain, an Ethereum whale returned after a 23-day break. The whale continued its aggressive accumulation, adding 38,576 ETH, valued at approximately $119 million.

To make the trade, the whale borrowed 85 million USDT from Aave and then moved it to Binance. After the latest addition, its total holdings jumped to 528,000 ETH, worth $1.723 billion, bought at an average price of $3,261.

All the above purchases were conducted within 40 days. With the market trending down over the period, these holdings recorded an unrealized loss of $105.7 million.

Often, whale-initiated purchases during downturns have been accompanied by elevated bullish sentiment. Such conditions have played a critical role in supply reduction.

As a result of whale accumulation, Ethereum’s Exchange Supply Ratio dipped to 0.13 and reached a monthly low.

A drop in ESR suggested fewer coins deposited into the Exchange, while withdrawals dominated exchange activity.

In fact, Exchange Depositing Addresses dropped to 4k, compared to 17k in withdrawal transactions. Such market conditions have resulted in decreased supply-side pressure, by hiking scarcity, often a prelude to higher prices.

What’s holding ETH back?

While Ethereum recorded a drop amid supply-side pressure, the spot market saw a spike in retail dominance.

Spot Average Order Size data from CryptoQuant showed a high volume of retail orders for seven consecutive days.

Usually, higher retail orders reflect increased market participation from small-scale traders, either on the demand or supply side.

Historically, retail dominance warned of trouble in the market. Retailers have been highly associated with poor risk management. Retail traders have emotionally pursued the market, leading to market instability.

A market dominated by the groups has seen sharp reversals, as they have tended to cash out at every opportunity, creating a fake breakout. That explained the current situation of Ethereum’s price movement.

What’s next for ETH?

While whale accumulation significantly reduced supply-side pressure, current demand remained inadequate to propel an upside movement.

However, the demand witnessed absorbed the rising pressure and has so far successfully held the $3k support level.

At press time, although the market signaled a potential trend shift, the momentum remained relatively weakened. RVGI Space Value dropped to 0.029, after it formed a bearish crossover days ago.

Such market conditions indicate that buyers have yet to retake the market, and the risk of further downside remains. A continuation of the trend could see a drop below $3k.

Conversely, if the demand from whales and the reduced supply are finally felt, ETH could reclaim $3.3k and the middle band of the Fibonacci Bollinger Bands at $3622.

Final Thoughts

  • An Ethereum whale returned after 23 days and purchased 38,576 ETH, worth $119 million.
  • Ethereum’s momentum remained relatively weakened by retail dominance.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
CapricornAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
dos
DAPPOSDOS
jst
JUSTJST

Related Reads

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit8m ago

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit8m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit23m ago

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit23m ago

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

Tsinghua and Wharton researchers have used GPT-5.6 Sol Pro to solve a 40-year-old open problem in optimization theory, proving a fundamental limit for gradient descent. They demonstrated that by adjusting only the step size sequence—without adding momentum or changing the algorithm's structure—the convergence rate of gradient descent cannot exceed Ω(T^{-1.9319}). This establishes a mathematical ceiling, showing that structural modifications are necessary to achieve the fastest possible convergence rates like O(1/T²). The core proof, involving a geometric construction based on "resisting oracles," was entirely generated through iterative interaction with the AI. The proof was then formally verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover, achieving zero "sorry" or "admit" statements, confirming its logical correctness without human intervention in the non-trivial mathematical steps. This result bridges the gap between the known O(T^{-1.2716}) rate achieved by the "silver stepsize" sequence and the newly proven impossibility bound. The work suggests a new paradigm where researchers can leverage general-purpose AI to explore and formally verify complex theoretical proofs.

marsbit33m ago

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

marsbit33m ago

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

Anthropic publicly apologized after users discovered a hidden A/B test in Claude Code (versions 2.1.237+) that seemingly "dumbed down" the model. Developer argofowl found that selecting the "high" reasoning effort was being mapped internally to a value of "10," which previously corresponded to the "low" setting. While Anthropic engineers clarified this was only a change to the numerical mapping scale and assured it did not affect performance based on internal evaluations, the lack of communication about the test sparked widespread user backlash and self-tests on social media. Separately, significant complaints emerged about the flagship Opus 5 model, with users reporting it became "unstable," prone to lazy outputs, factual errors, and repetitive corrections. An Anthropic engineer acknowledged Opus 5's performance instability, calling its resolution a top priority. The incident highlights a growing industry-wide rift between improving benchmark scores and declining user-perceived quality and reliability. It underscores the lack of transparency in continuous model updates, where server-side changes, A/B tests, and configuration adjustments occur without clear user notification, eroding trust as AI models become critical infrastructure.

marsbit33m ago

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

marsbit33m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit48m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit48m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions