AI is Triggering a Wave of Layoffs in Crypto Companies, Coinbase Says 'The Biggest Risk is Inaction'

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

The article reports on a wave of layoffs within the crypto and fintech industry, increasingly attributed by companies to the adoption of AI for efficiency and automation. Major firms like Coinbase, PayPal, Gemini, and Crypto.com have cut jobs, with Coinbase's CEO stating inaction is the "biggest risk" and framing a move towards a "lean, fast, AI-native" structure. This narrative gained momentum after Block (parent of Square and Cash App) announced significant cuts earlier, citing AI as part of a broader restructuring. However, critics question this "AI washing," suggesting companies may be using AI as a convenient rationale to mask layoffs driven by cooled market activity, lower trading volumes, slower growth, and over-hiring during previous boom periods. An analyst expresses skepticism, noting such cuts are not seen in currently thriving firms. An industry insider proposes a mixed reality, estimating 80% of cuts stem from genuine AI-driven efficiency gains, with 20% addressing past hiring excesses. Regardless of the primary driver, the trend indicates a fundamental restructuring of workforce needs, with operational and technical roles being consolidated and management layers flattened as automation tools replace repetitive tasks.

Author: Zhao Ying

Source: Wall Street News

Artificial intelligence is becoming the core narrative of a new wave of layoffs in the crypto and fintech industry. Coinbase, PayPal, Gemini, and Crypto.com have all cut jobs, citing automation and efficiency improvements as the main drivers. However, critics point out that some companies may be using AI as a guise to mask the real costs of business decline and over-expansion.

According to a Bloomberg report, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong set a tough tone for the layoffs this Tuesday, warning that "the biggest risk right now is not taking action" and stating the company is committed to becoming a "lean, fast, AI-native" organization. This statement marks a new high in crypto industry executives publicly pushing the narrative of AI-driven restructuring.

The immediate market impact of this layoff wave is: the hiring logic of crypto and fintech companies is being reconfigured, technology and operational roles face continued compression, and the flattening of management hierarchies is accelerating. Investors need to judge whether this is a precursor to a leap in industry efficiency or a cyclical contraction packaged with AI.

Block Takes the Lead, Industry Follows

According to Bloomberg, the momentum of this layoff wave accelerated significantly after Block Inc. announced major job cuts. Block, the parent company of Square and Cash App, announced significant layoffs earlier this year, listing AI as part of a broader restructuring plan. Subsequently, several peer companies adopted similar rhetoric, characterizing the layoffs as proactive preparation for an AI-driven future.

Coinbase has been particularly active in this process. In addition to cutting staff, the company is also compressing management layers, requiring managers to operate in a "player-coach" model, balancing execution and management duties. Blockchain infrastructure company 0G Labs stated that it has reduced its workforce by 25% after internal AI tools significantly boosted production efficiency.

'AI Whitewashing' Accusations Emerge

Critics are not fully convinced by the above narrative. Many companies simultaneously face more direct business pressures: crypto asset trading activity has noticeably cooled, digital asset prices remain below recent highs, and payment companies are struggling amid slowing growth and intensifying competition.

Some companies have their own internal difficulties. Block aggressively expanded during the pandemic boom, accumulating significant redundancy; PayPal is still in the midst of a comprehensive transformation led by new management. This context has fueled accusations of "AI whitewashing" — where companies use artificial intelligence as a more respectable justification for layoffs caused by weak demand or over-hiring.

Needham & Company analyst John Todaro bluntly questioned this: "Whenever I see these layoffs, and AI is listed as one of the reasons, I take a step back and ask: Have we seen this on companies where the market is on fire?" He added, "I'm not sure I believe the AI narrative."

Two Logics Coexist, the Ratio is Debated

Some observers believe both explanations can be true simultaneously. Raman Shalupau, founder of crypto recruitment platform CryptoJobsList, estimates that current layoffs are distributed "roughly 80/20 across the industry — with genuine AI efficiency gains accounting for 80% and cutting redundancy from the last bull market cycle accounting for 20%."

This assessment implies that substantive AI-driven restructuring of job roles is indeed happening, but its scale and pace vary by company. Even in companies not conducting large-scale layoffs, job functions are rapidly reorganizing around automation tools, with some repetitive work being replaced by systems rather than taken on by new hires.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason cited by multiple crypto and fintech companies for the recent wave of layoffs?

AThe main reason cited is the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) to drive automation and efficiency improvements, aiming to build 'leaner, faster, AI-native' organizations.

QWho specifically criticized the narrative that AI is driving these layoffs, and what was their skepticism based on?

ANeedham & Company analyst John Todaro expressed skepticism. He questioned the narrative by asking if such AI-driven layoffs were seen in companies during hot market periods and stated he was not sure he believed the AI explanation.

QWhat does the article suggest is the potential 'real cost' that some companies might be using AI to mask?

AThe article suggests that some companies might be using AI as a more respectable justification to mask the real costs of business downturns, cooling market demand, and over-expansion during previous boom cycles.

QWhat operational change did Coinbase implement alongside its job cuts, according to the article?

AAlongside job cuts, Coinbase is compressing management layers and requiring managers to operate in a 'player-coach' model, where they handle both execution and managerial duties.

QWhat ratio does Raman Shalupau from CryptoJobsList propose for the reasons behind the layoffs across the industry?

ARaman Shalupau estimates that the reasons are distributed in an '80/20' ratio, with about 80% being genuine efficiency gains from AI and 20% being the reduction of redundancies built up during the last bull market cycle.

Related Reads

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

From "Vintage Tech" to "New AI Darlings": How AI Revalues Old Infrastructure One year ago, tech giants like Dell, Nokia, Cisco, and Western Data were seen as slow-growth, low-valuation stories, far from the AI spotlight dominated by players like Nvidia. Now, these legacy tech stocks are gaining market attention, sparking debate on whether this is genuine industry revaluation or a temporary narrative. As AI moves from model parameters to real-world data centers, the market is recognizing companies with proven delivery and infrastructure capabilities. This shift marks a change in the AI investment thesis: from pure model and GPU focus to the complex systems engineering required for deployment. Companies like Dell, HPE, and Corning are being revalued not for being "sexy" AI innovators, but for their decades of accumulated expertise in supply chains, enterprise delivery, and infrastructure—assets that have become critical in the AI buildout phase. The revaluation is unfolding across three key infrastructure lines: 1. **Servers & System Integration:** Dell and HPE are emerging as crucial system integrators or "general contractors" for AI data centers, translating GPU orders into complete, deployable server racks integrated with power, cooling, and networking. 2. **Networking & Connectivity:** AI's scale demands robust high-speed connections. Corning (fiber optics), Nokia (AI-RAN, 6G), and Cisco (data center switches) are gaining importance for enabling efficient data transfer within and between AI clusters. 3. **Storage:** Beyond high-speed memory (HBM/DRAM), the AI data explosion is driving demand for high-capacity hard drives (HDDs) from companies like Western Digital and Seagate to handle training data, logs, and cold storage cost-effectively. For this revaluation to be substantive and not just a narrative, three criteria are key: 1) Concrete AI-related order and revenue growth (e.g., Dell's AI server sales), 2) Upward revisions to company financial guidance, and 3) Sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line revenue spikes. In essence, AI's transition to a real construction phase is re-pricing "old assets" against "new demand." The opportunity, however, is selective. Only those legacy firms that are demonstrably integrated into the capital expenditure chains of data center and enterprise AI deployment are likely to experience a true "logic re-rating" rather than just a temporary valuation bounce.

marsbit4m ago

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

marsbit4m ago

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

OpenAI is shifting its strategic focus from ChatGPT to Codex, merging them along with the browser tool Atlas into a unified desktop super-app. This move signals an internal belief that Codex, originally a programming tool, represents the next evolution of AI more than conversational models like ChatGPT. Over the past year, Codex's weekly active users have surged past 5 million. The key distinction is that while ChatGPT answers questions, Codex executes tasks. Enterprises increasingly value this ability to get work done over simply receiving advice. Consequently, Codex is attracting professionals beyond developers, including analysts, bankers, marketers, and product managers. OpenAI's reorganization and increased investment in Codex stem from recognizing that the future of AI competition lies in execution capabilities, not just conversation. The company is launching role-specific plugins (e.g., for data analysis, sales, design) to transform Codex into a broad knowledge work platform that automates and redefines white-collar workflows. Beyond being a tool, Codex reflects OpenAI's ambition to redefine software. New features like "Sites"—which generates interactive websites from documents—and collaborative "Annotations" aim to create a paradigm where the AI understands the goal and handles the tools and steps, functioning more like a digital colleague than traditional software. The ultimate goal is a unified experience where the user cares only about the completed task.

marsbit14m ago

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

marsbit14m ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit26m ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit26m ago

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit1h ago

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片