After Sending NVIDIA AI Servers into Space, This Space Startup Now Sets Its Sights on Bitcoin Mining

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-10Last updated on 2026-03-10

Abstract

A space computing startup, Starcloud, is expanding its ambitions after successfully sending NVIDIA AI servers into orbit. The company now plans to launch Bitcoin mining operations into space, aiming to leverage the advantages of the extraterrestrial environment. CEO Philip Johnston revealed that Starcloud intends to deploy Bitcoin ASIC hardware on its Starcloud-2 satellite, scheduled for launch in 2026. If successful, it would mark the first-ever Bitcoin mining operation in space. The company believes space offers significant benefits, including near-limitless solar energy, reduced cooling costs due to extreme environmental conditions, and freedom from terrestrial energy constraints and regulatory pressures. However, the economic viability remains uncertain due to high launch costs, hardware durability challenges in high-radiation environments, and rapidly evolving mining technology. While the initiative may currently hold more symbolic than practical value, it reflects a growing trend of extending blockchain and computing infrastructure beyond Earth. Starcloud, backed by investors like a16z and Sequoia, has already made strides by training an AI model in orbit using an NVIDIA H100 GPU. The company, along with others like Google and SpaceX, is part of a broader movement to develop space-based data centers, signaling that the next frontier for AI and computing may indeed be in orbit.

Author: Nancy, PANews

The next battlefield for AI computing power is extending into space, gradually becoming a new direction for commercial narratives.

After successfully launching the first space AI server, a space computing startup recently announced its plan to send Bitcoin mining into outer space.

Planning to Mine Bitcoin in Space This Year, Symbolic Significance May Outweigh Practical Value

Having moved past the first half of the competition focused on chips and models, the battle for AI computing power is quietly shifting toward the争夺 for energy. Electricity, as a core resource in this competition, is rapidly becoming a scarce resource in the global race for computing power. This shift is not only changing the industry landscape but also directly reshaping the cost structure of the Bitcoin mining industry.

In particular, once steady Bitcoin miners are now turning to the AI computing power track. Behind this transformation lies the survival pressure brought by Bitcoin halving, the profit compression caused by intensified competition and rising energy costs, and the huge opportunity presented by the AI narrative.

As Bitcoin mining efficiency is squeezed by the global energy争夺, Starcloud has proposed a bold plan to move Bitcoin mining into space.

In a recent interview with HyperChange, Starcloud CEO Philip Johnston revealed that the company is currently focused on its existing space computing power operations, but also has plans for Bitcoin mining. Starcloud will equip its Starcloud-2 satellite, scheduled for launch later in 2026, with some ASIC hardware specifically designed for Bitcoin mining. If successful, Starcloud would become the world's first spacecraft to mine Bitcoin in space.

Johnston believes that space offers multiple natural advantages over Earth. Firstly, space has an unlimited and continuous supply of solar energy, which is more stable and cheaper than renewable energy on Earth. At the same time, the environment in space is superior; although temperature differences and radiation are extreme, they can significantly reduce the heat dissipation energy consumption of hardware, lowering cooling costs and equipment maintenance burdens. Most importantly, Bitcoin mining in space can avoid the increasingly tense energy bottlenecks, grid limitations, and regulatory pressures on Earth. Currently, about 20GW of electricity is used for Bitcoin mining on Earth, and such large-scale power consumption is no longer feasible on the ground. In space, utilizing solar energy for cheap power offers a brand-new solution for Bitcoin mining.

Johnston further added that the cost of Bitcoin mining equipment typically ranges from $600 to several thousand dollars, far less than NVIDIA's enterprise-grade GPUs (often over $30,000). This makes the economics of space-based Bitcoin mining highly attractive.

Starcloud views Bitcoin mining as a "future business," leveraging solar energy in space for cheap power, and直言 this is also one of the reasons why it and other companies (including SpaceX) are building data centers in space. Space mining can not only significantly reduce costs but also provide a全新的 resource acquisition model for the global computing power market.

The concept of space mining is not new. Last year, Intercosmic Energy also stated it was researching Bitcoin mining in space.

However, mining Bitcoin in space still faces many challenges. Johnston also admitted that the economics of space-based Bitcoin mining remain unstable. Currently, Bitcoin ASIC devices can run on any cheap energy source, and with the continuous introduction of new equipment, the profitability of mining hardware can decline rapidly.

Furthermore, although launch costs are decreasing year by year, sending hardware into space remains an expensive endeavor. Compared to ground-based mining farms, the startup and maintenance costs of space mining are still high, including expenses for launch, spacecraft integration, satellite communications, equipment upgrades, etc.

More棘手的是, the space environment places extremely苛刻 demands on hardware. Bitcoin mining ASIC devices need to operate stably under极限 conditions such as high radiation and extreme temperature changes, posing severe tests for设备 performance and lifespan.设备 maintenance and upgrades will also become a major challenge, as the cost and difficulty of repairing and replacing hardware will increase significantly if a故障 occurs.

Previously, many crypto organizations have explored bringing blockchain business into space. For example, the veteran Bitcoin community company Blockstream has, since 2017, leased multiple geostationary orbit satellites to broadcast Bitcoin blockchain data globally for free. Even if there is a large-scale internet outage on Earth (such as natural disasters or人为封锁), as long as you have a small satellite dish (receiver), you can synchronize the Bitcoin ledger and complete transactions. SpaceChain installed the first commercial Ethereum node on the International Space Station (ISS) back in 2019. Earlier this year, a new project focused on space commerce, Spacecoin, also attracted market attention, aiming to use a satellite network for cryptocurrency payment settlements.

Therefore, the投入 for space mining in the short term may far exceed the收益. Currently, it holds more symbolic significance, or perhaps serves as a narrative手段 for this startup to attract market attention.

The First Time in Human History, Sending an NVIDIA AI Server into Space

Founded in 2024, Starcloud, formerly known as Lumen Orbit, has already emerged prominently in the global tech circle as one of the first companies to propose building data centers in space.

As a member of the NVIDIA Accelerator Program, and also part of the Y Combinator and Google Cloud incubator programs, Starcloud is not simply moving data centers into space. Its goal is to utilize the unique resources of the space environment to build infrastructure capable of supporting AI computing and large-scale computation.

So far, Starcloud has raised at least $21 million in funding, with backing from知名 investment firms like NFX, Y Combinator, FUSE, Soma Capital, a16z, and Sequoia Capital.

Starcloud has already secured a place in the space AI computing power race. Last November, Starcloud completed the first-ever large model training in space orbit. It launched its Starcloud-1 satellite via a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, sending an NVIDIA H100 GPU into Earth's orbit, and successfully ran Google's open-source AI large language model Gemma, sending the first message from space to Earth: "Hello, people of Earth!"

At the time, Philip Johnston stated that space AI is not a gimmick; the company's goal is to achieve orbital data center energy costs that are 10 times lower than those of ground-based data centers.

After achieving initial success, Starcloud's ambitions did not stop. Recently, the company applied to the FCC for permission to deploy a massive constellation of 88,000 satellites to build a distributed, space-based AI training and cloud computing platform. But turning this vision into reality is fraught with huge challenges. From funding scale, regulatory approval, launch capacity, orbital resource allocation, to operational sustainability, this is not just a commercial race but also a systematic engineering challenge, with every step full of uncertainty and complexity.

It's not just Starcloud. As the AI industry's demand for computing resources increases, more and more tech companies are seeking new sources of computing power, and space is gradually becoming the focus of this competition. For example, Google officially launched its Sun catcher project late last year, announcing plans to send its self-developed TPU AI chips into space, aiming to build a prototype solar-powered space data center; not long ago, Musk's SpaceX applied to deploy 1 million satellites in Earth orbit to build orbital data centers; recently, data storage and disaster recovery company Lonestar and semiconductor and storage company Phiso launched a set of data center infrastructure via a SpaceX rocket destined for the moon.

As the concept of space data centers moves from science fiction to reality, a new infrastructure arms race is unfolding. According to Musk's predictions, in five years, annual新增 AI computing power in space will reach hundreds of gigawatts; the annual amount of AI computing power sent into space for operation will exceed the historical cumulative total of all AI on Earth.

By then, the main battlefield of AI computing power competition will truly have moved to space. In the coming years, we will see more commercial exploration and technological innovation. Space mining might just be one of the stepping stones in this wave.

Related Questions

QWhat is the name of the space startup that plans to mine Bitcoin in space and recently sent an NVIDIA AI server into orbit?

AThe space startup is called Starcloud.

QAccording to the article, what are the main advantages of mining Bitcoin in space compared to on Earth?

AThe advantages include unlimited and continuous solar energy supply, lower cooling costs due to the extreme environment, and avoidance of Earth's energy bottlenecks, grid limitations, and regulatory pressures.

QWhen does Starcloud plan to launch its satellite (Starcloud-2) for Bitcoin mining, and what hardware will it use?

AStarcloud plans to launch the Starcloud-2 satellite in late 2026, and it will use ASIC hardware designed for Bitcoin mining.

QWhat significant achievement did Starcloud accomplish in November last year regarding AI in space?

AIn November, Starcloud successfully completed the first large model training in space orbit by sending an NVIDIA H100 GPU into Earth orbit via a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and running Google's open-source AI model Gemma.

QWhich major tech companies, besides Starcloud, are also exploring the concept of space data centers or orbital computing according to the article?

AOther companies include Google with its Sun Catcher project, SpaceX which applied to deploy satellites for orbital data centers, and Lonestar partnering with Phiso to send data center infrastructure to the Moon.

Related Reads

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片