After Polymarket and Kalshi, Are There Any Dark Horses Left in the Prediction Market?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-21Last updated on 2026-05-21

Abstract

The prediction market, once a niche crypto experiment, has evolved into a mainstream financial and information market, moving beyond a sole reliance on political events. The 2024 US election showcased platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, but sustained post-election volume from sports, tech, and economics proved long-term demand. By 2026, a duopoly controls ~97.5% of volume: Polymarket leverages on-chain trading, USDC settlement, and media integrations, while Kalshi uses CFTC compliance to access mainstream finance via partners like Robinhood. New challengers are emerging in specific niches: short-cycle trading (@trylimitless), media-native markets (@MyriadMarkets), social platform integration (@kash_bot), and infrastructure layers (@azuroprotocol, @theclearingco). Key 2026 drivers include AI agents executing over 30% of on-chain trades, media platforms embedding odds as engaging content, and sports becoming the dominant sustained vertical. Core challenges remain: contested volume metrics, state-level regulatory friction classifying markets as gambling, and token airdrop speculation inflating activity. The future lies not with generic clones, but with platforms possessing deep vertical focus, clear distribution advantages, and viable regulatory or on-chain liquidity strategies.

Editor's Note: Prediction markets are evolving from a niche crypto application to a more mainstream financial and information market.

The 2024 US election brought Polymarket and Kalshi into the public eye, but what truly changed the industry narrative was that trading volume did not rapidly disappear after the election. Markets in sports, technology, and economics absorbed the traffic, proving that the long-term demand for prediction markets is not solely driven by political events.

This article outlines the core landscape of prediction markets in 2026: on one side, a duopoly formed by Polymarket and Kalshi, with the former expanding its influence through on-chain trading, USDC settlement, and media distribution, and the latter entering mainstream financial scenarios through CFTC compliance qualifications and channels like Robinhood. On the other side, a group of new platforms are seeking opportunities in short-cycle trading, sports prediction, media embedding, on-chain native metrics, and the infrastructure layer.

What's more noteworthy is that the competition in prediction markets is no longer just about trading volume; it's a comprehensive contest involving liquidity, distribution capabilities, and regulatory pathways. Meanwhile, issues like wash trading, disputes over trading volume statistics, expectations for token airdrops, and state-level regulatory pressure indicate that this sector is still in a highly uncertain stage.

Prediction markets are no longer just DeFi experiments. They are becoming a new asset class where financial trading, media content, and algorithmic strategies intersect. The platforms that truly have a chance to break through in the future may not be generalized replicas, but rather those with clear vertical scenarios and distribution advantages.

The following is the original text:

Two platforms that were barely known in 2022 settled a notional trading volume last year that exceeded New Zealand's GDP.

In 2025, the combined trading volume of Kalshi and Polymarket reached $44 billion. In May 2026, Kalshi raised $1 billion in funding at a valuation of $22 billion. The Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, pledged a $2 billion investment in Polymarket at a $9 billion valuation. AI Agents are already executing over 30% of on-chain trades. Meanwhile, a group of new teams are building vertical-specific platforms on Base, Solana, Hyperliquid, and Arweave—they are all betting on one judgment: these two giants cannot monopolize all categories.

This is likely the most comprehensive overview of the prediction market builder ecosystem available today.

Numbers That Rewrote the Narrative

2024 was the validation moment for prediction markets. The single market of the US Presidential election alone brought $3.3 billion in trading volume to Polymarket. During the campaign, almost all major financial news desks began reporting prediction market odds. Bloomberg, Politico, and FiveThirtyEight cited this data in their analyses.

But what happened after November 5th surprised many: trading volume did not drop back to its previous baseline. Sports markets absorbed that traffic.

By the end of 2025, sports markets accounted for 85% of Kalshi's trading volume and 39% of Polymarket's. Tech & Science markets grew 1,637% year-over-year, and Economic markets grew 905%. Political markets—the vertical once assumed to be the core driver of prediction markets—grew by only 43%.

Prediction markets found their long-term engine, and it wasn't elections.

The Duopoly Landscape

Polymarket runs on Polygon, settles in USDC, and intentionally charges no fees on most markets to prioritize building trading volume. In October 2025, ICE invested $2 billion in a strategic investment at a post-money valuation of approximately $9 billion. In June 2025, X announced Polymarket as its official prediction market partner. In February 2026, Substack natively integrated Polymarket's live odds data; within weeks, one-fifth of the top 250 revenue-generating publications on Substack began using this data. The platform's CMO also confirmed that the POLY token and an airdrop are forthcoming. Upon full functionality launch, its projected annualized fee revenue is expected to exceed $200 million.

Kalshi, on the other hand, obtained a Designated Contract Market designation from the CFTC, becoming the first event contract platform with such credentials, and turned this into a distribution moat. It was this compliant status that enabled Kalshi to enter Robinhood. In 2025 alone, Robinhood facilitated over 4 billion event contract trades. In January 2025, Kalshi launched markets related to the Super Bowl. In less than 12 months, sports markets skyrocketed from roughly 10% to over 85% of its trading volume. In May 2026, Kalshi raised $1 billion at a $22 billion valuation, led by Coatue with participation from Sequoia, a16z, Paradigm, Morgan Stanley, and ARK. At the time of funding, Kalshi had approximately 2 million monthly active users, annualized trading volume of about $178 billion, and annualized revenue of about $1.5 billion.

In 2025, these two companies collectively controlled about 97.5% of the total trading volume in the prediction market industry.

Ecosystem Map

The Challengers

Beyond the duopoly, over a dozen teams are building new prediction market platforms. Each targets a specific gap.

@trylimitless is deployed on Base, focusing on short-cycle markets including 15-minute, hourly, and daily markets, targeting cryptocurrency and stock traders seeking fast settlement. The project raised $10 million from 1confirmation, Coinbase Ventures, F-Prime, DCG, and Arrington, among others. In Q1 2026, its monthly trading volume reached $1.1 billion. The fully diluted valuation of the $LMTS token once reached $800 million after launch.

@MyriadMarkets runs on the Abstract chain and integrates with Linea, Celo, and BNB. It bets on "media-native" prediction markets. Its first distribution partnership occurred in December 2025, embedding prediction features into Trust Wallet. It currently has over 430,000 users who have completed more than 1.7 million predictions. The project was founded by the team behind Decrypt and Rug Radio.

KASH embeds into X via @kash_bot, allowing users to create and trade prediction markets within quote posts. In February 2026, KASH raised $2 million from Big Brain Holdings, Spartan, Coinbase Ventures, Animoca, and the Sui Foundation, among others. Its core belief: whoever can enter the scenarios where users already spend their time via the shortest path will win prediction markets.

@DriftProtocol is built atop Drift Protocol's $500 million Solana liquidity pool. It supports over 30 collateral assets, allows cross-collateral positions, and offers FUEL rewards.

@HedgehogMarket targets on-chain native metrics, such as Base fees, funding rates, validator performance, while also offering general binary options on Solana and Eclipse. The platform supports permissionless market creation, with peak TVL once reaching around $20 million.

@HyperliquidX's HIP-4 went live on May 2, 2026, co-designed by John Wang, Head of Crypto at Kalshi. This mechanism uses USDH exclusively as collateral, employs a CLOB order book model, and charges no opening fees. The first market, deployed officially by Hyperliquid, revolves around BTC outcomes, achieving $6 million in trading volume on its first day. Currently, @Outcomexyz is the primary frontend for HIP-4, contributing 10x the trading volume of any other interface.

@azuroprotocol is more like infrastructure than a frontend product for general users. It provides a sports prediction market layer for other teams, using a Liquidity Tree pool design. The project has raised $11 million from Delphi Digital, Gnosis, and Arrington Capital, among others.

@Overtime_io runs on Optimism, Arbitrum, and Base. All protocol revenue flows to $OVER token buybacks.

@RobinhoodApp is powered by Kalshi's backend, facilitating over 2 billion event contract trades in Q3 2025 alone.

The infrastructure layer is also heating up. In August 2025, @theclearingco raised a $15 million seed round from investors including Union Square Ventures, Haun Ventures, Coinbase Ventures, and Variant. The company was founded by former executives from Polymarket and Kalshi. Capital flowing to the clearinghouse layer usually signals that an asset class is maturing.

Core Drivers in 2026

Regulated platforms are exploring on-chain tracks. Kalshi tokenizing markets and deploying to Solana, Polymarket advancing US CFTC compliance through the acquisition of QCEX, and Hyperliquid's HIP-4 being co-designed by Kalshi—all these moves point in the same direction: a global liquidity layer at the base, overlaid with regulatory shells for different regions.

AI Agents have become a non-negligible part of prediction market activity. According to analytics platform LayerHub, over 30% of wallets on Polymarket are running AI Agents. Olas's Polystrat Agent executed over 4,200 trades in its first month, with single-position returns as high as 376%. Elastics also raised $2 million, aiming to build a natural language trading interface.

Whether platform teams initially designed for it or not, prediction markets are becoming algorithmic trading venues.

Media platforms are treating prediction odds as high-engagement content. X's official partnership deal, Substack's native integration, and Google Finance displaying live odds essentially serve the same purpose: turning financial questions into media events that can be discussed collectively, thereby driving organic user acquisition.

Sports is the most sustainable vertical. The 2024 US election brought the first wave of users; sports kept them. Any new platform raising funds in 2026 without a sports strategy is either building deep infrastructure or making a highly concentrated bet on a specific niche.

The Real Challenges

Three risks are worth pointing out directly.

First, trading volume metrics themselves are controversial. An analysis published by Paradigm in December 2025 noted that Polymarket's NegRisk architecture causes most third-party data tracking tools to double-count. CertiK estimated that wash trading accounted for peaks near 60% of some Polymarket trading volume in 2024. Therefore, the $44 billion figure is better used as a directional reference rather than strictly audited, accurate data.

Second, state-level legal friction is real. As of January 2026, there were over 19 related federal lawsuits. In March 2026, Ohio ruled that Kalshi's sports products constituted gambling. Attorneys General in Wisconsin and Arizona have also taken action against both major platforms. Federal tailwinds from the CFTC coexist with strong headwinds at the state level, and this tension won't disappear soon.

Third, token speculation is driving platform activity. A significant portion of trading volume in 2025 and early 2026 was related to market expectations for the POLY airdrop. Any platform touting impressive trading volume numbers without disclosing this context is misleading readers.

Conclusion

In 2024, prediction markets completed the leap from "interesting DeFi experiment" to a financial asset class. By 2025, they began building institutional-grade pipelines: strategic investments from exchange parent companies, CFTC-related settlements, Robinhood integration, and seed funding for clearinghouse layers.

In 2026, the real question for this sector has become: Who else has a chance to win besides Kalshi and Polymarket?

The current answer: Teams that go deep in verticals, possess clear distribution advantages, and can find paths for regulatory protection or on-chain liquidity density.

The opportunity for generalized replicas is over. Other paths, however, remain open.

If you are also building in this space and want to find the right growth architecture for your vertical, let's talk.

Related Questions

QWhat are the two dominant platforms in the prediction market as of 2026, and what are their key competitive advantages?

AAs of 2026, the two dominant platforms in the prediction market are Polymarket and Kalshi, forming a duopoly. Polymarket's key advantages include its on-chain infrastructure on Polygon, USDC settlement, zero-fee models for many markets, and strong media partnerships (e.g., with X and Substack) for distribution and visibility. Kalshi's core advantage is its CFTC designation as a Designated Contract Market, which provides regulatory compliance and enabled its integration into mainstream financial platforms like Robinhood, significantly expanding its user base.

QAccording to the article, what has become the most significant long-term driver for prediction markets, replacing political events?

AThe most significant long-term driver for prediction markets, as identified in the article, is sports. While the 2024 US Presidential election brought initial attention and users, sports markets successfully retained and grew that user base. By the end of 2025, sports markets accounted for 85% of Kalshi's trading volume and 39% of Polymarket's. This shift demonstrates that sustainable demand for prediction markets extends far beyond political cycles.

QWhat are some of the key vertical strategies or niches that new prediction market platforms are pursuing to challenge the duopoly?

ANew prediction market platforms are pursuing several vertical niches to challenge the dominant duopoly. These include: platforms focusing on short-cycle markets (like @trylimitless for minute/hour/day trades), media-native integrations (like @MyriadMarkets embedding predictions into content platforms), social-native trading via bots (like KASH on X), on-chain native metrics (like @HedgehogMarket for blockchain data), and dedicated infrastructure layers for sports betting (like @azuroprotocol).

QWhat major risks or challenges does the prediction market industry face according to the article?

AThe article highlights three major risks: 1) Controversy over trading volume metrics, with concerns about double-counting and wash trading potentially inflating reported figures. 2) Persistent legal friction at the state level, with multiple lawsuits and state-level rulings challenging the legality of certain prediction markets as gambling. 3) The influence of token speculation, where a significant portion of trading activity is driven by anticipation of token airdrops (like POLY), which may not represent genuine, sustainable user engagement.

QWhat is the article's conclusion about the future opportunity for new players in the prediction market space?

AThe article concludes that the opportunity for generic copycat platforms is over. Future success for new players lies in building platforms with deep specialization in a specific vertical (e.g., sports, finance), possessing clear distribution advantages (e.g., media integration, social embedding), and finding a viable path through regulatory hurdles or by leveraging on-chain liquidity density. The competition has evolved into a multi-dimensional battle involving liquidity, distribution, and regulatory strategy.

Related Reads

Musk Posted a Recruitment Ad for SpaceX, and After Reading the Comments Section, I Understood

On May 20th, SpaceX filed for a landmark IPO with a $1.75 trillion valuation. Shortly after, Elon Musk posted a recruitment call on X, seeking "world-class engineers and physicists" for SpaceX. The application process was starkly simple: email with three bullet points proving "exceptional ability," with real, complex projects as a plus. Musk promised to review qualifying emails himself. The post garnered millions of views and thousands of replies, revealing a spectrum of responses. Most comments, including a highly-upvoted humorous one listing absurd "skills," merely listed credentials or experiences in a conventional, non-differentiating way. This highlighted a key insight: a traditional resume listing degrees and skills often fails to demonstrate true exceptionalism. Effective self-presentation requires "performance efficiency." A standout reply came from an OpenAI engineering lead, who simply stated "codex." This demonstrated that for those who have built significant, recognized products, the product itself becomes the ultimate resume. The article argues that in the AI era, any tangible, shareable output—a tool, research, or online project—serves as a living, self-evident credential more powerful than a list of attributes. However, a twist emerged when applicants found the provided email address non-functional, leading to speculation that the post might also serve as an IPO publicity stunt, projecting an image of aggressive talent acquisition to investors. Ultimately, the episode served as a microcosm: some participate through performance, others through proof of work, while some question the reality of the stage itself. It underscores the enduring challenge of defining and demonstrating value in an age of abundant, yet often superficial, content.

marsbit49m ago

Musk Posted a Recruitment Ad for SpaceX, and After Reading the Comments Section, I Understood

marsbit49m ago

Cutting Off OpenAI, Anthropic Acquires the Tool Provider Used by a Quarter of Global Developers

Anthropic has acquired Stainless, a developer tool company that automatically generated official SDKs (Software Development Kits) for AI giants including OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Cloudflare. The deal, reportedly valued at around $300 million, marks a strategic shift for Anthropic as it builds its "AI agent" infrastructure. Stainless acted as a "translator," converting complex API specifications into ready-to-use code libraries for developers. Its tools indirectly reached about a quarter of professional software developers globally. Following the acquisition, Stainless will shut down its public products and its team will join Anthropic to focus on internal platform development, notably for the Claude Platform. Existing SDKs remain with their respective client companies but will no longer receive updates from Stainless. This move is part of Anthropic's broader 18-month strategy to assemble a complete "agent stack." The stack consists of the Claude model at its core, the newly acquired Stainless for standardized API interfaces, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open standard for connecting agents to external tools and data. This contrasts with OpenAI's focus on model generations and consumer-scale compute. Anthropic believes an agent's ultimate utility depends on its ability to connect to external systems. By internalizing the SDK layer and promoting MCP as a connection standard, Anthropic aims to lock in long-term ecosystem advantages and create path dependency, moving beyond the transient lead provided by any single model generation.

marsbit51m ago

Cutting Off OpenAI, Anthropic Acquires the Tool Provider Used by a Quarter of Global Developers

marsbit51m ago

Bankless Founder Sells Off ETH, Collective Collapse of Ethereum Faith

Ethereum faces a "crisis of faith" as David Hoffman, co-founder of the prominent pro-Ethereum media outlet Bankless, announces he has sold all his ETH. This move, coupled with reports of major layoffs at Bankless, signals a potential retreat of Ethereum's staunchest supporters. Hoffman and co-founder Ryan Sean Adams confirm Bankless is entering a "second era," with Adams stepping back and Hoffman exploring new frontiers. Hoffman sharply criticizes the Ethereum Foundation, stating that ETH's poor price performance cannot be separated from its leadership. He has a history of public dissatisfaction, citing the Foundation's failure to drive market growth and its "endless manifestos." His frustration coincides with ETH/BTC hitting multi-month lows and a significant exodus of senior researchers and executives from the Ethereum Foundation, partly attributed to controversial "loyalty oaths." The article contrasts Ethereum's current predicament—with its Layer-2 narrative discredited and ecosystem stagnant—against what should have been a highlight year in 2026 amid tokenization trends. While a previous surge to near $5,000 was driven by corporate buybacks (DAT热潮), ETH has since fallen over 50%. The core question remains: with fading faith and intense competition, what is Ethereum's next solution? Hoffman's divestment symbolizes a growing disconnect between the community and the ecosystem's direction.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Bankless Founder Sells Off ETH, Collective Collapse of Ethereum Faith

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy T

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Threshold Network Token (T) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Threshold Network Token (T) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Threshold Network Token (T)After purchasing your Threshold Network Token (T), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Threshold Network Token (T)Easily trade Threshold Network Token (T) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

11.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy T

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of T (T) are presented below.

活动图片