Cutting Off OpenAI, Anthropic Acquires the Tool Provider Used by a Quarter of Global Developers

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-21Last updated on 2026-05-21

Abstract

Anthropic has acquired Stainless, a developer tool company that automatically generated official SDKs (Software Development Kits) for AI giants including OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Cloudflare. The deal, reportedly valued at around $300 million, marks a strategic shift for Anthropic as it builds its "AI agent" infrastructure. Stainless acted as a "translator," converting complex API specifications into ready-to-use code libraries for developers. Its tools indirectly reached about a quarter of professional software developers globally. Following the acquisition, Stainless will shut down its public products and its team will join Anthropic to focus on internal platform development, notably for the Claude Platform. Existing SDKs remain with their respective client companies but will no longer receive updates from Stainless. This move is part of Anthropic's broader 18-month strategy to assemble a complete "agent stack." The stack consists of the Claude model at its core, the newly acquired Stainless for standardized API interfaces, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open standard for connecting agents to external tools and data. This contrasts with OpenAI's focus on model generations and consumer-scale compute. Anthropic believes an agent's ultimate utility depends on its ability to connect to external systems. By internalizing the SDK layer and promoting MCP as a connection standard, Anthropic aims to lock in long-term ecosystem advantages and create path dependency, m...

You may not have heard of Stainless, but if you've used the official SDKs of Claude, OpenAI, or Cloudflare, you've likely indirectly used code it generated.

Beyond OpenAI and Anthropic, Stainless's client list includes Meta, Groq, Runway, Cerebras, and others, covering nearly all the top players in AI infrastructure.

It acts as a "translator" between large models and developers: converting obscure API specifications into ready-to-use code libraries for developers.

Now, Anthropic has acquired Stainless, with both companies announcing the completion of the acquisition.

The Stainless founding team will join Anthropic, and Stainless will begin sunsetting its managed products, including the SDK generator.

This is not a simple tool company acquisition.

In its official blog post about acquiring Stainless, Anthropic mentioned that the upper limit of an agent's capabilities depends on how many external systems it can connect to: acquiring Stainless is about strengthening the agent's interfaces.

The AI frontier is shifting from models that can only answer questions to agents that can proactively execute tasks—and an agent's capabilities depend on the systems it can reach. Acquiring Stainless is precisely to expand this reach further.

If we place this acquisition within the context of Anthropic's actions over the past 18 months, the three-piece agent suite is now complete: Claude is the model, Stainless is the interface, and MCP is the connection.

The Company That Wrote SDKs for Multiple AI Giants Has Been Bought by Anthropic

Stainless was founded in New York in 2022 by Alex Rattray, who came from Stripe, where he led the redesign of the API documentation and personally built Stripe's SDK code generation system.

During user research, he discovered that developers never directly call API endpoints: for them, the SDK is the API itself.

This insight directly led him to later found Stainless, turning that capability into a product.

Stainless founder Alex Rattray

Developers feed it an OpenAPI specification, and it outputs official SDKs in Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, Ruby, and other languages.

The model company only needs to maintain one API description; Stainless handles all language versions, error handling, retry logic, documentation generation, and more.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Cloudflare, DocuSign, Square—these AI giants or software vendors are all Stainless clients.

Open the GitHub repository for OpenAI's official Python SDK, and the README states: "Generated by Stainless based on the OpenAPI specification."

Similarly, the header of any source file in the Anthropic SDK also states: "Automatically generated by Stainless from the OpenAPI specification."

This means that over the past few years, OpenAI and Anthropic, as rivals, have long used the same developer tool platform for their official SDK generation.

After the acquisition, Stainless founder Alex Rattray informed existing clients that all previously generated SDKs fully belong to the clients, who can modify and extend them independently, but Stainless will no longer provide subsequent support.

The Stainless team will continue working as an internal organization within Anthropic, focusing on building out Claude Platform capabilities and connecting agents to APIs.

https://www.stainless.com/blog/stainless-is-joining-anthropic/

This tool company's products indirectly reached about a quarter of professional software developers worldwide. On its first day joining Anthropic, it closed its doors to the entire industry: from a shared infrastructure to an internal department of Anthropic.

The Agent Three-Piece Suite Is Complete: Model, Interface, Connection

This acquisition is not an isolated event.

Placing the Stainless acquisition back on the strategic path Anthropic has taken over the past 18 months reveals a completed three-piece suite.

The foundational layer is the model.

From Claude 3.5 Sonnet all the way to Claude 4.7, programming and agent capabilities have been consistent differentiators for Anthropic. Claude Code has also become one of the most popular programming agents among developers this past year.

The middle layer is the interface.

Stainless's SDK auto-generation capability makes it possible for agents to call various APIs using a unified specification. This layer was previously outsourced; now it's brought in-house at Anthropic.

The top layer is the connection.

In November 2024, Anthropic open-sourced MCP (Model Context Protocol), standardizing how models connect to external data sources, tools, and file systems, so agents don't need to write separate adapters for every external service.

After MCP was open-sourced, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Cursor, and Replit announced support. MCP is evolving into an agent connectivity standard.

And Stainless can directly generate an MCP server from an API specification. The model is the brain, the interface is the nerve endings, and the connection standard is the protocol that links them. Combined, these three pieces form a functional agent machine.

Katelyn Lesse, Head of Platform Engineering at Anthropic, stated plainly: "How useful an agent is depends on what it can connect to."

Stainless founder and CEO Alex Rattray said that Anthropic was one of the earliest teams to bet on Stainless, and "bringing the two teams together was an easy decision."

This acquisition is the final move in a strategic game that began 18 months ago.

Why Is an "SDK Translation Company" Worth $300 Million?

According to a previous report by The Information, the negotiation amount for this acquisition was at least $300 million. Anthropic has not disclosed the specific figure officially, but even this magnitude is enough to make people reevaluate the value of the SDK layer.

In the past, SDKs were an insignificant engineering problem.

The API was the model company's business; the SDK was just a "wrapper layer" translating the API into various programming languages. Model companies could write it themselves or outsource it to Stainless; no one cared.

But the agent era is different. When Claude or GPT acts as an agent to call third-party services, the SDK is no longer a "tool for humans to read" but an "interface for agents to use."

Whether an agent task succeeds largely depends on whether every API's SDK it calls is robust: is error handling complete? Is retry logic reasonable? Are parameter definitions strict? Are types inferable?

Any non-standard SDK can cause an agent to get stuck mid-task.

If the reported $300 million negotiation amount is accurate, what Anthropic sees is clearly not just an SDK generator, but the developer interface infrastructure layer between APIs and agents.

There's a subtler point: The official SDKs of companies like OpenAI, Meta, and Cloudflare were all previously generated by Stainless.

On the first day after the acquisition, with Stainless closing its doors externally, these companies face a practical problem: will they take over SDK maintenance themselves, or find another supplier?

So far, none have responded to this question.

OpenAI Doubles Down on Models, Anthropic Secures the Foundation

Looking back at the final ASI showdown between the two giants, OpenAI and Anthropic have distinct strategic focuses.

OpenAI's focus is on model generations and compute investment.

From GPT-5, GPT-5.4 to GPT-5.5 incremental updates, the Stargate project's massive compute procurement, ChatGPT's weekly active users growing from 400 million a year ago to 900 million—it concentrates resources on the consumer-facing entry point and the model itself.

Anthropic is taking a different path: enterprise agent infrastructure. Strengthening developer tools with Claude Code, standardizing the connection protocol with MCP, and now bringing the SDK layer in-house with Stainless.

The underlying logic of these two paths is completely different.

The model layer follows a logic of generational disruption: when the next generation arrives, the previous generation's advantages can vanish instantly. The gaps between generations are shrinking, windows are getting shorter, and can only be achieved through compute and data.

The infrastructure layer's logic is the opposite. Once established as a de facto standard, the compounding returns are long-term. With MCP now adopted industry-wide, each new adopter adds switching costs. Once the SDK layer is internalized within Anthropic, the entire agent ecosystem could develop a path dependency on Anthropic's interface specifications.

According to Digital Applied statistics, the number of public MCP servers grew from 1,200 in Q1 2025 to over 9,400 by April 2026, with 78% of enterprise AI teams deploying at least one MCP agent in production.

The gap in model capabilities is becoming easier to close.

Once this connection layer gateway is locked, it becomes very hard to bypass.

References:

https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-stainless

https://www.stainless.com/blog/stainless-is-joining-anthropic/

https://www.digitalapplied.com/blog/mcp-adoption-statistics-2026-model-context-protocol

This article is from the WeChat public account "AI Era", author: ASI Revelation

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of Stainless as described in the article, and why was it significant for AI companies?

AStainless acts as a 'translator' between complex API specifications and developers, automatically generating official SDKs in multiple programming languages. It was significant for AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic because it allowed them to maintain just one API description while Stainless handled all language versions, error handling, retry logic, and documentation, greatly simplifying developer integration.

QWhy did Anthropic acquire Stainless, according to the article's analysis of their strategic roadmap?

AAnthropic acquired Stainless to strengthen its 'agent' infrastructure. The article states that an agent's usefulness depends on what it can connect to. By bringing Stainless in-house, Anthropic gains control over the 'interface' layer—the SDKs that agents use to call APIs—completing its 'agent trifecta' of model (Claude), interface (Stainless), and connection protocol (MCP).

QWhat immediate impact does the acquisition have on Stainless's existing clients, such as OpenAI and Meta?

AThe acquisition means Stainless will begin winding down its hosted products, including the SDK generator. While existing clients retain full ownership of previously generated SDKs and can modify them, Stainless will no longer provide future support or updates. These companies must now decide whether to maintain the SDKs themselves or find an alternative supplier.

QHow does the article contrast the strategic focuses of OpenAI and Anthropic in the AI race?

AThe article contrasts their strategies: OpenAI focuses on model generation leaps and massive compute investment (e.g., GPT-5 series, Stargate project) to dominate the consumer-facing market. Anthropic focuses on building enterprise-grade agent infrastructure, strengthening developer tools (Claude Code), standardizing the connection protocol (MCP), and now internalizing the SDK layer (Stainless) to create long-term ecosystem lock-in.

QWhat is MCP, and why is its growth cited as important for Anthropic's strategy?

AMCP (Model Context Protocol) is an open-source protocol standardized by Anthropic for connecting AI models to external data sources, tools, and file systems. Its growth is important because it's becoming a de facto standard for agent connectivity. With a reported increase from 1,200 to over 9,400 public servers and widespread enterprise adoption, it creates network effects and switching costs, solidifying Anthropic's position in the agent infrastructure layer.

Related Reads

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbit5m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbit5m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

The article traces the decade-long path of Zcash (ZEC), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, to its potential launch as the first privacy coin spot ETF, with Grayscale's ZCSH filing in August 2026. It argues ZEC's suitability stemmed not from regulatory acceptance of its privacy technology, but from its centralized, institutional structure from inception—a commercial company (ECC) with venture capital backing and a Founder's Reward—making it easier to package than decentralized alternatives. Three key institutions, intertwined in a network, drove the process: Grayscale (owned by DCG, an early ZEC investor), which had held ZEC in a trust since 2017; Coinbase, providing custody, prime brokerage, derivatives, and venture investment; and ZODL, a new for-profit entity formed in 2026 when ECC's core development team split from the non-profit foundation. The major regulatory hurdle was SEC scrutiny (2023-2026) over ZEC's historical structure, which resembled an unregistered investment contract due to automatic block rewards to ECC and the Foundation. This was resolved through governance changes (NU6 upgrade in 2024) that ended direct funding and shifted control to community voting, coinciding with a broader shift in SEC enforcement policy. Notably, the law firm Davis Polk represented both the Zcash Foundation in its SEC defense and Grayscale in the ETF filing. The push is also driven by DCG's dire financial needs amid Genesis bankruptcy lawsuits, seeking high-fee products (the ZEC ETF charges 2.5%). Concurrently, major mining operations by entities like Cypherpunk Technologies (backed by Winklevoss Capital) and DCG's Fortitude Mining expanded, motivated by profitability and aiming to influence the network. The article concludes with irony: to become a compliant ETF asset, ZEC must shed its core privacy feature for the fund's holdings, which will be held in transparent, auditable addresses. Wall Street is not adopting privacy technology but packaging the *concept* of privacy into a tradable, fee-generating financial product. The transformation was not a single master plan but the result of a network of aligned interests capitalizing on regulatory, governance, and market shifts over ten years.

marsbit15m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

marsbit15m ago

Bitcoin Core Developer Warns That Bitcoin Payments Are Disappearing at 'Bitcoin Beach'

A Bitcoin Core developer, John Atack, who has lived in El Salvador since 2022, shared a concerning anecdote about Bitcoin adoption in the country. While dining at El Zonte, a region known as "Bitcoin Beach," he paid with Bitcoin and was told it was the first such payment the establishment had received in a month. Staff explained Bitcoin payments, once common, have now virtually disappeared, with nearly all customers using cards. An employee even declined a Bitcoin tip, stating she had forgotten how to use her wallet and declaring "It's already dead." Atack emphasized this was a single observation but noted the employee had witnessed the payment evolution over three years. His comments sparked mixed reactions. Some disputed his experience, with one user confirming successful Bitcoin payments in the same area. However, Bitcoin reporter Juan Galt acknowledged an underlying "economic problem," arguing that expecting price appreciation makes using Bitcoin for everyday transactions counterintuitive to economic incentives needed for a circular crypto economy. Despite the concerning report, Atack also reflected that El Salvador remains a global leader in cryptocurrency adoption and progressive legislation, sometimes causing locals to take these advancements for granted. The story highlights the ongoing challenges of mainstream Bitcoin adoption for daily commerce, even in pioneering nations.

cryptonews.ru17m ago

Bitcoin Core Developer Warns That Bitcoin Payments Are Disappearing at 'Bitcoin Beach'

cryptonews.ru17m ago

A Huge 'Sleeping' Wave of New Bitcoin Buyers Has Not Even Bought Bitcoin Yet

A recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, titled "Do You Even Crypto, Bro? Cryptocurrencies in Household Finance," reveals that Bitcoin and other crypto assets are less understood than other financial assets in US households. The primary reasons for not owning crypto are a lack of knowledge and the perception that it is a poor investment. Even among owners, the main motivations are profit-seeking and portfolio diversification rather than an understanding of the underlying technology's benefits, such as independence from banks. The research found that showing respondents Bitcoin's past 12-month performance increased their desired portfolio allocation by about 47%, indicating investment decisions are driven more by recent returns than fundamental comprehension. Crypto gains are often treated like lottery winnings, leading to one-off luxury purchases rather than sustained increases in spending. While non-owners largely view crypto as high-risk, owners are somewhat less likely to do so, though they exhibit greater uncertainty about future returns compared to traditional assets like stocks or gold. This ambiguity about Bitcoin's nature and valuation contributes directly to its price volatility. The study concludes that this volatility will persist, but education efforts combined with price appreciation could convert today's uninformed non-owners into future Bitcoin holders.

cryptonews.ru20m ago

A Huge 'Sleeping' Wave of New Bitcoin Buyers Has Not Even Bought Bitcoin Yet

cryptonews.ru20m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片