A16z Investor Partner: By 2026, Venture Capital Will Absorb Private Equity, Main Reason: AI Enables Cost Reduction and Efficiency Improvement

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

Troy Kirwin, an investor partner at A16z, argues that AI is rapidly erasing the traditional boundaries between venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE). Historically, these two sectors operated in separate worlds: VC in San Francisco focused on high-growth tech and large markets, while PE in New York prioritized stable cash flows and human-intensive services. AI is now the catalyst for convergence. Previously, B2B startups struggled to penetrate mid-market—industries like field services, IT outsourcing, and accounting—due to thin margins, high labor costs, and low IT budgets. AI is making these industries ripe for disruption and reinvention. Kirwin outlines three key collision paths: 1) PE funds are becoming channel partners, deploying AI across their portfolios; 2) PE portfolios are serving as "idea menus" for new startups; and 3) VC-backed AI platforms are moving beyond software to acquire traditional service businesses, enabling end-to-end integration, higher margins, and AI-native transformation. The conclusion is that the two distinct financial universes are merging.

A16z investor partner Troy Kirwin stated in a recent video that venture capital and private equity have long existed like two separate planets: VC in San Francisco, betting on technology, high growth, and massive TAM; PE in New York, preferring stable cash flows and labor-intensive service industries. However, the rapid penetration of AI is changing all of this.

In the past, B2B startups typically expanded from early adopters to Fortune 500 companies; but mid-market sectors like field services, IT outsourcing, accounting, construction, and recruitment have been difficult to conquer due to thin profit margins, high labor costs, and limited IT budgets. The emergence of AI has suddenly made these industries "ripe for reinvention."

Kirwin pointed out that VC and PE are colliding along three paths:

1) PE funds are beginning to serve as channel partners for AI startups, integrating AI across their entire investment portfolios;

2) PE investment portfolio pages are becoming "idea menus" for entrepreneurs;

3) VC-backed AI platform companies are no longer just selling software but are acquiring traditional business service companies to achieve end-to-end integration, improve profit margins, and make their operations AI-native.

"West Coast VCs in Patagonia and East Coast PEs in suits originally belonged to two different universes. But driven by AI, I believe they are rapidly converging."

Related Questions

QAccording to A16z's Troy Kirwin, what is AI fundamentally changing about the relationship between Venture Capital (VC) and Private Equity (PE)?

AAI is breaking down the traditional barriers between VC and PE, causing them to converge. Previously, they operated in separate spheres (VC in tech/growth, PE in stable/cash-flow businesses), but AI's ability to make previously unviable, labor-intensive service industries efficient is creating new investment opportunities that appeal to both.

QWhy have mid-market industries like field services and accounting been historically difficult for B2B startups to penetrate?

AThese mid-market industries have been difficult to penetrate due to their thin profit margins, high labor costs, and limited IT budgets, making them resistant to traditional software-based solutions.

QWhat are the three specific ways Kirwin identifies that VC and PE are beginning to collide?

A1) PE funds are becoming channel partners for AI startups. 2) PE investment portfolios are becoming 'idea menus' for entrepreneurs. 3) VC-backed AI platforms are acquiring traditional service businesses to create end-to-end, AI-native companies with higher margins.

QHow does the role of a Private Equity fund evolve when it acts as a 'channel partner' for an AI startup?

AThe PE fund leverages its entire portfolio of companies as a built-in customer base, introducing and implementing the AI startup's technology across its investments, thus providing the startup with immediate scale and distribution.

QWhat is the strategic reason for a VC-backed AI platform to acquire a traditional service business?

AThe acquisition allows the AI platform to achieve end-to-end integration. By owning the service delivery itself, the company can directly apply its AI to increase operational efficiency and profit margins, fundamentally transforming the acquired business into an AI-native operation.

Related Reads

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit8h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit8h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit9h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit9h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit10h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit10h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片