UK Bitcoin Company Discovers: Repurchasing Own Stock Earns 24% More Than Directly Buying Bitcoin

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-21Last updated on 2026-07-21

Abstract

British bitcoin holding company B HODL discovered that, when its share price trades below the value of its bitcoin holdings, repurchasing its own stock can be a more efficient way to increase bitcoin exposure per share than directly buying more bitcoin. In its first week of buybacks, the company spent approximately £37,985 to cancel 823,400 shares. Before fees, this resulted in a 24% greater increase in satoshis (the smallest unit of bitcoin) per share per pound spent, compared to using the same cash to purchase bitcoin directly. The analysis highlights a capital allocation strategy for treasury companies trading at a discount to their net asset value (NAV): issuing shares when it increases bitcoin per share, and buying them back when the stock itself offers cheaper bitcoin exposure. The decision, however, depends on factors like cash reserves and operational needs.

Author:CryptoSlate

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: When a Bitcoin treasury company's stock price falls below the value of the Bitcoin it holds, the cheapest way to increase Bitcoin exposure per share may not be buying Bitcoin, but rather repurchasing its own stock. UK-listed company B HODL tested this paradox with real money, and the results were surprising—what does this mean for the entire Bitcoin treasury industry?

When a Bitcoin treasury company trades below the value of the Bitcoin it holds, the cheapest way to increase Bitcoin exposure per share might be repurchasing its own stock.

UK-listed company B HODL tested this inversion phenomenon during the first week of its repurchase. The company spent approximately £37,985 (pre-fees) to cancel 823,400 shares, generating an increase in total satoshis per pound per share that was about 24% higher than using the same cash to buy Bitcoin.

This 24% advantage is pre-fee data, and these figures do not show the full picture of net asset value (NAV) growth per share.

B HODL's official dashboard on July 19th showed holdings of 166.487 BTC, a share price of 5.25 pence, and a market capitalization of £7.385 million. Based on the displayed Bitcoin price of £48,237, these holdings were worth approximately £8.031 million, leaving a gap of about £646,000.

Using the latest announced post-cancellation share count and the same share price, the equity value is approximately £7.378 million, about £652,000 or 8.1% lower than the Bitcoin value. Both sides of the comparison are in constant flux.

Why Buying Stock Beats Buying Bitcoin

B HODL's £100,000 share repurchase authorization became effective on July 9th. Disclosures covering purchases on July 9th, 10th, 13th, 15th, and 16th show a total of 823,400 shares, with a calculated weighted average price of 4.613 pence. Pre-fees, these purchases used about 38% of the authorized amount.

Following the announced cancellations, the share count decreased from 141,366,091 to 140,542,691 shares. Keeping the 166.487 BTC unchanged, the total Bitcoin per share increased from 117.77 satoshis to 118.46 satoshis, a gain of 0.69 satoshis or 0.59%.

At the same Bitcoin price of £48,237, £37,985 could purchase approximately 0.787 BTC. Spreading this purchase across the original share count would increase the total satoshis per share by about 0.557, while the buyback delivered an increase of 0.690. Under these matching assumptions, canceling equity increased value per pound spent by about 24%.

Why B HODL Can Buy and Sell Its Own Shares

B HODL is keeping its At-The-Market (ATM) program open while conducting the buyback. Its ATM only allows issuing shares when it is accretive based on the company's modified Net Asset Value (mNAV) framework for Bitcoin.

These instruments together create a capital allocation switch: issue equity when it can increase Bitcoin per share, then repurchase equity when the stock itself offers cheaper Bitcoin exposure.

The company's latest interim balance sheet is historical data, so the first week demonstrates growth in total satoshis per share under stated assumptions, not current NAV per share growth.

For other Bitcoin treasury companies trading below their Bitcoin value per share, this insight is conditional but clear.

Whether this is the correct move still depends on cash reserves, debt, trading liquidity, and operational needs—a discipline increasingly shaping the broader treasury industry.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the surprising finding of the British bitcoin company B HODL regarding its stock buyback?

AB HODL found that in its first week of buybacks, repurchasing its own stock generated about 24% more growth in satoshis per share per pound spent compared to using the same cash to directly buy Bitcoin.

QWhat is the significance of a Bitcoin vault company's stock trading below the value of its Bitcoin holdings?

AWhen a Bitcoin vault company's stock trades below the value of its Bitcoin holdings (a discount to NAV), the cheapest way to increase Bitcoin exposure per share for existing shareholders may not be to buy more Bitcoin, but to repurchase and cancel the company's own discounted shares.

QHow does B HODL's 'capital allocation switch' work with its ATM program and buyback authorization?

AB HODL operates a 'capital allocation switch' by combining its share buyback authorization with its At-The-Market (ATM) issuance program. The ATM only issues new shares when it increases satoshis per share under the company's mNAV framework. The company can then use the buyback to repurchase shares when they offer a cheaper source of Bitcoin exposure than buying Bitcoin directly.

QWhat key metric increased for B HODL shareholders as a result of the stock buyback, and by how much?

AAs a result of the share buyback and cancellation, the total satoshis (sats) per share for B HODL increased from 117.77 sats to 118.46 sats, a rise of 0.69 sats or 0.59%.

QAccording to the article, what important factors should a Bitcoin vault company consider before deciding on a stock buyback?

ABefore deciding on a stock buyback, a Bitcoin vault company must consider factors such as its cash reserves, existing debt, trading liquidity, and ongoing operational requirements, not just the discount of its share price to the value of its Bitcoin holdings.

Related Reads

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手37m ago

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手37m ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1h ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

963 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片