Bitcoin Miners Are Increasingly Earning on AI

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-14Last updated on 2026-08-14

Abstract

Bitcoin miners are increasingly shifting their computational resources away from cryptocurrency mining toward artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC), marking a structural change in the industry. Data shows a 13.4% drop in the realized hash rate of major public miners from Q4 2025 to Q2 2026, a steeper decline than the 10.6% fall in the overall Bitcoin network's hash rate. Excluding Bitdeer, which has continued focusing on mining, the decline among other major miners was 21.2%. Companies like Core Scientific and TeraWulf now generate significantly more revenue from leasing infrastructure for AI/HPC than from Bitcoin mining. This shift is driven by low mining profitability and booming demand for AI computing power, reversing the expansion cycle that followed China's 2021 mining ban. The transition, however, is complex. Mining data centers, built for ASIC hardware, require costly and time-intensive retrofitting to support the different cooling and power needs of AI-grade GPUs. While AI infrastructure contracts offer more predictable, long-term revenue compared to mining's volatility, the sustainability of this model amid potential future cooling in AI compute demand remains an open question. The industry is now split between players diversifying into AI and others, like Bitdeer and Riot Platforms, still expanding traditional Bitcoin mining operations.

Public bitcoin miners are cutting their computational power faster than the overall network hash rate is declining—operators are increasingly redirecting electricity and data center infrastructure towards artificial intelligence and high-performance computing tasks. The sector is moving further away from pure cryptocurrency mining.

According to the latest issue of the Miner Weekly newsletter, consulting firm BlocksBridge Consulting reported that the realized hash rate of a group of major bitcoin miners fell from 368.3 EH/s in the fourth quarter of 2025 to 319 EH/s in the second quarter of 2026. This represents a 13.4% decline.

Bitdeer Stands Out from the Rest

The drop was even more noticeable if we exclude company Bitdeer from the calculation, which, unlike most competitors, continued to focus on mining. Excluding Bitdeer, the group's hash rate decreased by 21.2% over six months—from 324.6 EH/s to 255.9 EH/s. Bitdeer's own indicator, on the contrary, increased by 44% and reached 63 EH/s.

For comparison, the average hash rate of the entire bitcoin network decreased by 10.6% over the same period. Thus, large miners are cutting capacity significantly faster than the market as a whole.

Revenues Shifting Towards AI Infrastructure

These changes are occurring against the backdrop of more and more miners recording a growing share of revenue from areas not related to bitcoin mining. Core Scientific generated $136.7 million from capacity leasing in the second quarter, while mining brought the company only $27.5 million. TeraWulf reported $31.9 million in revenue from leasing capacity for HPC against $12.8 million from mining.

Riot Platforms and Bitdeer are currently at an earlier stage of transitioning to a different revenue model—bitcoin mining still provides the majority of their revenue based on the results of the last quarter.

Experts describe the current downturn as a reversal of the cycle that began after the ban on bitcoin mining in China in 2021. At that time, the ban triggered one of the sharpest declines in the network hash rate in history, followed by a rapid recovery—miners massively relocated equipment abroad.

In North America, this migration spurred the expansion of public miners: companies raised capital and acquired new sites with access to electricity to increase capacity. One halving cycle later, the business economics have changed dramatically. Weak mining profitability combined with growing demand for infrastructure to serve artificial intelligence since 2022 has pushed a number of public miners to completely repurpose sites and energy capacities for other tasks.

Thus, the statistics record a structural shift in the industry: some players are betting on diversifying their business through AI and HPC, while others, including Bitdeer and Riot Platforms, continue to scale up classic bitcoin mining.

AI Opinion

From a machine data analysis perspective, repurposing mining capacity for artificial intelligence tasks looks much less straightforward than hash rate statistics show. Mining data centers were initially designed for ASIC equipment with a different cooling and power consumption scheme than the graphics processing units required for neural networks. A similar problem of technological incompatibility has been discussed before: mining sites are practically unsuitable for neural networks due to different equipment requirements. It follows that the 13.4% decline in hash rate reflects not so much a completed business reorientation, but rather the beginning of a capital-intensive and time-consuming infrastructure restructuring.

The economics of such a restructuring are noticeably more stable than classic mining: contracts for leasing capacity for AI and HPC typically lock in revenue for years ahead, while income from bitcoin mining is entirely dependent on the price of the underlying asset. Whether the appeal of such a model will persist if demand for model training compute cools down is a question that the current hash rate statistics do not yet address.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason public bitcoin miners are reducing their computational power faster than the overall network hash rate?

APublic bitcoin miners are reducing their hash rate to redirect electricity and data center infrastructure towards artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC) tasks, moving away from pure cryptocurrency mining.

QHow much did the realized hash rate of a group of major bitcoin miners decrease from Q4 2025 to Q2 2026, and how does this compare to the average network hash rate decline?

AThe realized hash rate of the group fell by 13.4%, from 368.3 EH/s to 319 EH/s. In comparison, the average bitcoin network hash rate declined by 10.6% over the same period.

QWhich company is noted as an exception to the trend of miners diversifying away from bitcoin mining, and what was its hash rate growth?

ABitdeer is the exception, as it continued to focus on mining. Its hash rate grew by 44%, reaching 63 EH/s.

QWhat two companies are highlighted as examples where non-mining revenue streams (like AI/HPC infrastructure leasing) have already surpassed bitcoin mining revenue?

ACore Scientific and TeraWulf are the examples. Core Scientific earned $136.7M from power hosting versus $27.5M from mining, and TeraWulf earned $31.9M from HPC hosting versus $12.8M from mining.

QWhat major challenge does the article's 'AI Opinion' section identify regarding the repurposing of bitcoin mining data centers for AI tasks?

AThe major challenge is technological incompatibility. Mining data centers were designed for ASIC equipment with different cooling and power requirements than the GPUs needed for AI neural networks, making the repurposing a capital-intensive and lengthy infrastructure rebuild.

Related Reads

Report: Bank of Japan Could Raise Interest Rates as Early as September, with Subsequent Pace Possibly Accelerating

According to Reuters, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) faces mounting pressure to raise interest rates, with a potential hike as early as September. Sources familiar with the internal discussions indicate the central bank is considering accelerating its tightening pace beyond the current schedule of roughly two increases per year. The September 17-18 policy meeting is now viewed as a critical juncture, with market pricing suggesting an approximately 80% probability of a rate hike. This would mark a third increase for 2024, potentially shifting expectations toward a quarterly tightening cycle. Key drivers behind this hawkish shift are multifaceted inflation risks. A persistently weak yen, near a 40-year low, continues to push up import costs. High wholesale prices at a three-year peak signal pending cost pass-through to consumers. Furthermore, inflation expectations among households, businesses, and economists are nearing or exceeding the BOJ's 2% target, raising concerns about de-anchoring. External factors, including energy price volatility from Middle East conflicts and strong global AI-related demand, add further upward pressure. Internal BOJ communications reveal a growing urgency. The July policy meeting summary showed some board members advocating for faster action to avoid "falling behind the curve." Governor Kazuo Ueda acknowledged the need to consider these heightened inflation risks, suggesting the pace of hikes could be increased if financial conditions are deemed too loose. This sentiment underscores a decisive shift within the BOJ toward preemptive monetary tightening.

marsbit47m ago

Report: Bank of Japan Could Raise Interest Rates as Early as September, with Subsequent Pace Possibly Accelerating

marsbit47m ago

To Counter Quantum Threat, Ethereum Abandons Poseidon and Switches to Traditional Hashes

On August 13th, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a strategic pivot in the face of the quantum computing threat: the Ethereum Foundation will abandon the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon at the L1 level in favor of traditional hash functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision, informed by eight years of research, represents a major shift in Ethereum's post-quantum cryptography roadmap. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, has been favored for zkRollups and zkVMs due to its efficiency within SNARK circuits. However, its shorter cryptographic history and analysis timeline became liabilities when post-quantum security became a critical requirement. The change is enabled by breakthroughs in SNARK design, particularly the adoption of "binary field" arithmetic. This allows traditional hash functions (which rely heavily on bitwise operations) to be verified efficiently in SNARKs, with recent benchmarks achieving millions of hashes per second on a laptop. Another key driver is the accelerating timeline of the quantum threat. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" (CRQCs) could break current public-key cryptography (like ECDSA) as early as the 2030s, risking trillions in on-chain assets. The enhanced cryptanalysis capabilities of AI have also weakened some post-quantum candidates, pushing Ethereum towards hash-based schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant. Ethereum's post-quantum deployment plan aims for a production-ready leanVM by 2027, followed by full deployment across the consensus, execution, and data availability layers by 2028. This leanVM will aggregate numerous large post-quantum signatures into a single compact proof per block. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core developers have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for their post-quantum roadmap. Starknet has outlined a multi-phase plan, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. By moving from the specialized Poseidon to the battle-tested SHA2/BLAKE2, Ethereum is opting for mature, widely analyzed cryptographic primitives, prioritizing long-term security assurance in the quantum era.

marsbit1h ago

To Counter Quantum Threat, Ethereum Abandons Poseidon and Switches to Traditional Hashes

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片