Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-06Last updated on 2026-07-06

Abstract

Ethereum is back in focus with the announcement of the "Lean Ethereum" upgrade roadmap, described by Vitalik Buterin as Ethereum's third major update. This proposal aims to fundamentally redesign the consensus, data, and execution layers from first principles, striving to make Ethereum **simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.** The announcement comes amidst a broader restructuring within the ecosystem, including a 20% staff reduction at the Ethereum Foundation and the emergence of new organizations like EthLabs. This has sparked a debate among Ethereum supporters ("E-bizens"). **Optimists** view Lean Ethereum as a critical refocusing on core protocol fundamentals: * **sassal.eth** calls it the ultimate bullish catalyst, envisioning a future where running a node is so lightweight it could be done on a smartwatch, greatly enhancing decentralization. * **Ryan Sean Adams** sees it as Ethereum moving from "narrative expansion" to "protocol hardening," addressing long-term foundational issues like security and scalability. * Analysts like **BITWU** and **蓝狐 (Blue Fox)** frame it as a third-phase evolution towards a "minimal, durable, and credible base layer" designed for the next decade. * **gigi发财猪** interprets the organizational changes as Ethereum "shedding old baggage and forming new teams" for a lighter, more agile approach. * **Xiyu** notes that the roadmap itself provides a much-needed new narrative for market sentiment reco...

Author: Biteye

Ethereum is up!

June felt like the rainy season for Ethereum, with prices falling relentlessly, leaving Ethereum supporters questioning their sanity while averaging down.

But with recent cooling non-farm payroll data and the return of rate cut expectations, ETH has gradually rebounded from its lows.

And right at this juncture, Vitalik has brought the Lean Ethereum roadmap to the forefront, bluntly stating "this is Ethereum's third major upgrade."

In short, it's about redesigning the consensus layer (CL), data layer (DL), and execution layer (EL) from first principles, making Ethereum simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.

The Ethereum ecosystem has seen a lot of action lately: first, the Ethereum Foundation laid off 20% of its staff, then the protocol layer introduced the Lean Ethereum technical roadmap, paired with new organizations like EthLabs (founded by a former core Ethereum Foundation researcher, Bitmine, and Sharplink) stepping in. Is Ethereum getting its act together to 'shed its load and march forward'?

Without further ado, here are the future market views from the optimists and the cautious within the Ethereum supporter camp.

Optimists: Ethereum is Refocusing

sassal.eth/acc @sassal0x | Founder of The Daily Gwei | Xhunt Global Influence Rank: 99

Sassal's stance is direct, urging everyone to follow @leanEthereum and giving it extremely high praise.

He believes this will drastically lower node requirements (in the future, nodes could even run on smartwatches), greatly enhancing decentralization.

Core Takeaway:

There is nothing more bullish in the entire crypto ecosystem than this—nothing. Lean Ethereum is the endgame; it's the ultimate form a blockchain can and should be. Infinitely scalable and fully decentralized—only Ethereum can achieve this.

Ryan Sean Adams @RyanSAdams| Co-founder of Bankless | Xhunt Global Influence Rank: 115

Ryan tends to see Lean Ethereum as a signal of Ethereum entering its next phase.

Over the past few years, market criticisms of ETH have focused on a few points: overly complex roadmap, L2s siphoning value, declining mainnet fees, slow Foundation action. But Lean Ethereum refocuses attention back to Ethereum's most fundamental issues: security, scaling, privacy, quantum resistance, and the long-term trustworthiness of the protocol itself.

Core Takeaway:

Ethereum isn't without a next chapter; rather, the next chapter shifts from "narrative expansion" back to "protocol hardening." If the Merge was a major energy and consensus layer refactoring, then Lean Ethereum is more like a redesign of Ethereum's long-term foundation.

BITWU @Bitwux | Xhunt Global Influence Rank: 931

BITWU's view leans more towards "historical stage theory."

Ethereum has gone through several key turning points in the past: the early PoW era solved the problem of decentralized smart contracts from 0 to 1; the Merge solved the issues of consensus mechanism and energy consumption; and Lean Ethereum may represent Ethereum entering its third round of refactoring.

This round isn't about piling more features onto the protocol, but doing the opposite: reducing complexity, compressing verification costs, raising security boundaries, making the main protocol more like a "minimal trusted foundation" that can run long-term.

Core Takeaway:

The keyword for Lean Ethereum isn't "flashier," but "more durable." Ethereum needs to prove it's not a protocol growing increasingly bloated, but an infrastructure capable of continuous evolution.

Lanhu @lanhubiji | Xhunt Global Influence Rank: 1506

Lanhu focuses more on the long-term technical roadmap behind Lean Ethereum.

Judging from the strawmap, Lean Ethereum isn't a minor patch but a protocol refactoring spanning the next few years: including faster L1, stronger L2 data capabilities, zkEVM / real-time proofs, quantum-resistant security, and elevating privacy to a first-class goal.

This means Ethereum isn't just content with continuing to be the "settlement layer for L2s," but is trying to upgrade itself into a more secure, more verifiable, more suitable underlying protocol for long-term global finance and applications.

Core Takeaway:

Lean Ethereum won't immediately solve ETH's price issues, but it can answer a more fundamental question: Why should Ethereum continue to exist for the next decade?

gigi Rich Pig@gigiz_eth | Xhunt Global Influence Rank: 3086

gigi's expression is closer to the mental state of Ethereum supporters: Ethereum isn't lying flat now; it's shedding old baggage to set off anew.

EF layoffs, budget cuts, organizational restructuring—on the surface, it looks like contraction; but viewed together with Lean Ethereum, EthLabs, and new ecosystem organizations, it looks more like a reorganization of labor.

The EF becomes leaner, focusing on protocol and neutrality; external organizations like EthLabs take on more R&D, institutional adoption, and ecosystem growth. Ethereum shifts from "one Foundation pushing forward" to "multiple ETH-aligned organizations pushing forward together."

Core Takeaway:

Ethereum isn't simply laying people off; it's redistributing its fighting units. Before, the EF was carrying everything and running; now, it's slimming down first, then forming teams, marching forward with a lighter load.

Xiyu @ohxiyu | Xhunt Global Influence Rank: 5115

Xiyu says when it comes to getting things done in the crypto space, "it still has to be Ethereum."

Especially during this window of ETH price rebounding from lows, Lean Ethereum easily becomes a catalyst for sentiment repair.

The market might not immediately price in the technical roadmap, but it will first price in the "narrative recovery." For an asset long criticized for lacking new stories, Lean Ethereum at least gives ETH a new main storyline to discuss.

Core Takeaway:

Lean Ethereum isn't a single upgrade package; it's more like a protocol-level renovation round. Ethereum is still scaling, and also redefining itself.

The Cautious Faction: The Roadmap is Good, but the Market Waits for No One

Ignas @DefiIgnas| DeFi Researcher | Xhunt Global Influence Rank: 387

Ignas says if the Ethereum Foundation can deliver on time, then bullish on ETH; but if Ethereum Foundation delivery lags while the bear market persists, it could turn into a negative.

Core Takeaway:

The Lean Ethereum roadmap is very attractive as it addresses most of the key concerns previously raised by the community, but tokenomics issues remain untouched. Currently, competing projects like Tempo and Canton are challenging Ethereum in the fields of real-world assets (RWA) and institutional adoption.

Dankrad Feist @dankrad| Former Ethereum Foundation Researcher | Xhunt Global Influence Rank: 816

Dankrad's attitude is also quite cautious: approving of the direction, but finding the pace too slow.

He thinks the Lean Ethereum approach is good, but if execution is stretched over 3-4 years, it will be hard to satisfy the market. Especially in the context of AI-assisted R&D significantly improving engineering efficiency, Ethereum shouldn't use the slow pace of the past to push core upgrades.

Core Takeaway:

Ethereum's biggest problem has never been an inability to plan, but whether it can deliver faster. What Ethereum supporters need isn't just a vision, but also a progress bar.

Summary of Both Sides' Views

The Optimists Believe:

Lean Ethereum is an important signal of Ethereum refocusing on the protocol's foundation.

It compresses the previously complex roadmap into a few key points, addressing the community's most vocal demands: scaling, privacy, quantum resistance, security, and protocol simplification.

For ETH, this is a repair to the long-term narrative of the world's decentralized computer.

The Cautious Faction Believes:

The direction of Lean Ethereum is fine, but the 3-4 year timeline is too slow.

Ethereum's price is built on whether it can deliver faster, whether ETH can capture value, and whether the market can see tangible phased results—not just on a beautiful technical vision.

Final Thoughts?

The classic joke on Twitter is, why is Ethereum always at 1700 points every year?

Criticizing Ethereum for spending great effort on L2s and mocking Vitalik like an emperor who only listens to the "flattery" of those around the EF seems to have become politically correct.

But at least this time, Ethereum is trying to get its ranks in order and raise its banner.

Whether July can start off well depends on market liquidity and ETH's own performance; but from a narrative perspective, Ethereum has indeed regained a sense of being in the driver's seat, which has been missing for a while.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Lean Ethereum according to the article?

ALean Ethereum is a proposed major technical roadmap for Ethereum, described by Vitalik Buterin as 'Ethereum's third major update'. It aims to redesign the consensus, data, and execution layers from first principles to make Ethereum simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.

QHow does sassal.eth view the significance of Lean Ethereum for the cryptocurrency ecosystem?

ASassal.eth considers Lean Ethereum to be the most bullish development in the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem. He believes it is the endgame, representing the ultimate form a blockchain can and should be—infinitely scalable and fully decentralized, something he asserts only Ethereum can achieve.

QWhat are the main concerns of the 'cautious camp' regarding the Lean Ethereum roadmap?

AThe cautious camp, represented by figures like Ignas and Dankrad Feist, is primarily concerned with the long 3-4 year delivery timeline. They worry that while the direction is good, the slow pace of execution, coupled with a potential prolonged bear market and competition from other projects, could negate the benefits. They emphasize the need for faster delivery, tangible progress, and value capture for ETH rather than just visionary promises.

QAccording to the article, what are some of the recent organizational changes in the Ethereum ecosystem that accompany the Lean Ethereum proposal?

ARecent organizational changes include a 20% staff reduction at the Ethereum Foundation, the proposal of the Lean Ethereum technical roadmap at the protocol layer, and the establishment of new entities like EthLabs (founded by a former core researcher from the Ethereum Foundation, Bitmine, and Sharplink). The article suggests this represents a shift towards a more distributed, 'leaner' organizational structure where multiple 'ETH-aligned' entities push development forward together.

QWhat key problems does Ryan Sean Adams suggest Lean Ethereum refocuses Ethereum on solving?

ARyan Sean Adams suggests that Lean Ethereum refocuses Ethereum on addressing its most fundamental, underlying challenges. After years of criticisms around complex roadmaps and value accrual to L2s, it shifts the focus back to core protocol issues like security, scaling, privacy, quantum resistance, and the long-term credibility of the protocol itself, moving from 'narrative expansion' to 'protocol hardening'.

Related Reads

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手2m ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手2m ago

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

On July 6th, Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy announced the sale of 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million, incurring a realized loss of around $55.45 million compared to its average cost basis. This move, contradicting Saylor's long-standing "never sell" Bitcoin philosophy, was executed to pay dividends on its digital credit securities. The article traces this shift from a small "desensitization test" sale of 32 BTC in late May to the board's authorization on June 30th to sell up to $1.25 billion in Bitcoin for corporate purposes like dividends and buybacks. Analysis reveals that MicroStrategy's previous growth "flywheel"—using stock premiums to fund more Bitcoin purchases—has stalled. With its stock trading near a critical threshold (1.22x its Bitcoin NAV), issuing new shares would dilute value. Simultaneously, its financing channels (preferred stock, common stock ATM, convertible notes) are constrained while facing rigid annual dividend/interest obligations of roughly $1.76 billion. Consequently, selling Bitcoin became the calculated "optimal solution" under its own financial model. This transforms MicroStrategy from crypto's most prominent steady buyer into a predictable seller, creating a potential overhead of ~2,400 BTC in monthly selling pressure if obligations are fully covered by sales. This shift challenges the valuation models of the entire Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) sector that emulated MicroStrategy. The company's path forward now hinges on Bitcoin's price recovery, which would allow its preferred stock to trade at par and reopen its financing flywheel, creating a cyclical dependency between the firm's financial model and the asset it holds.

链捕手31m ago

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

链捕手31m ago

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher Last week, Open Standard launched the dollar stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) with a list of over 140 supposedly supporting companies, including major names like Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Samsung, Coinbase, Solana, and Ripple. The announcement initially impacted Circle's stock price, but doubts about the list quickly emerged. Several Korean firms named, including Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group, Dunamu (Upbit's parent), and K Bank, clarified they had not formally agreed to join the alliance. Some stated they were only approached for potential interest or learned of their inclusion from news reports, expressing surprise. Similar concerns were raised by U.S. entities, suggesting the list may be misleading. OUSD, led by Zach Abrams of Bridge (acquired by Stripe in 2024), promotes zero-fee minting/redemption, no transaction limits, and sharing reserve asset yields with partners instead of keeping profits. However, this model makes listed partnership imply economic benefits, turning it into a serious credibility issue. This incident reflects a common crypto marketing tactic of leveraging big names. A Chainstory analysis found over 62% of crypto press releases in late 2025 were high-risk or scams. The situation recalls Facebook's Libra (later Diem), which collapsed in 2022 after initial heavyweight backers like Visa and PayPal withdrew under regulatory pressure. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire welcomed the competition but highlighted the challenges. He argued stablecoin success relies on network effects and real usage, not just alliances. He criticized OUSD's "free" model and full revenue sharing as potentially starving infrastructure development. Noting the dominance of USDT (~$1.84T) and USDC (~$730B) in the ~$2.91T stablecoin market, he suggested many new entrants lack real utility despite inflated circulation from incentives. In conclusion, while OUSD has genuine backing and a distinct model, its future depends on actual adoption in B2B payments, settlements, and cross-border transactions, not just a prestigious partner list. The market will determine if it is a credible challenger or merely another marketing promise.

链捕手33m ago

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

链捕手33m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片