Aave Founder Strongly Opposes Proposed Ethereum Changes: 'This Could Cause Significant Harm'

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-04Last updated on 2026-08-04

Abstract

The founder and CEO of Aave, Stani Kulechov, has strongly opposed a proposed Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) aimed at capping staking rewards. The proposal suggests reducing staking yield to 0% if the staked ETH supply exceeds 50% of the total. Kulechov argues this would make yields unpredictable and unprofitable, damaging Ethereum's ecosystem and ETH's appeal as an investment asset. He warns that institutional investors, who value predictable cash flows, may turn to alternative blockchains offering more stable returns. Furthermore, zero staking rewards would render many ETH-based lending and yield strategies ineffective, potentially shrinking Ethereum's lending markets. Kulechov believes this proposal could weaken ETH's long-term viability and cause market participants to shift focus to other networks. He urges careful consideration of any changes to Ethereum's economic incentives, emphasizing that the network should not be penalized for its success.

Aave founder and CEO Stani Kulechov has spoken out against an EIP proposal that has emerged in the Ethereum community, aimed at limiting staking rewards. Kulechov argued that regulation would not achieve the desired results and could instead harm the Ethereum ecosystem and the attractiveness of $ETH as an investment asset.

The proposal involves reducing staking rewards to 0% if the share of staked $ETH exceeds 50% of the total supply. According to Kulechov, such a structure could make staking rewards unpredictable, making the activity unprofitable for many participants.

Aave CEO Kulechov stated that institutional investors, in particular, value predictable cash flows when building positions in $ETH. He noted that if returns become uncertain, these investors might turn to alternative blockchain networks offering more stable yields, which could create significant costs for Ethereum adoption.

Kulechov also argued that reducing staking yields to zero would render strategies for borrowing and earning yield through $ETH largely ineffective. In such a scenario, he said, the primary use for borrowing $ETH might be limited to short selling.

Kulechov stated that investors using yield products tied to $ETH might turn to stablecoins or other interest-bearing assets, suggesting that this proposal could significantly shrink Ethereum-based lending and yield markets.

In his personal assessment, Kulechov stated that this proposal would weaken the viability of $ETH as an asset and limit its long-term potential. Expressing hope that the proposal would not be adopted, the Aave CEO said that otherwise, many market participants might shift their focus to other blockchain networks.

Kulechov argued that Ethereum should not be punished for its growth, noting that any changes to the network's economic incentive structure should be carefully considered in terms of their impact on DeFi, staking, and institutional adoption.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core argument made by Aave founder Stani Kulechov against the proposed Ethereum EIP?

AStani Kulechov argues that the proposal to limit staking rewards would not achieve its goals and could instead significantly harm the Ethereum ecosystem and ETH's appeal as an investment asset.

QWhat specific condition in the EIP does Kulechov criticize, and what would be its direct effect?

AKulechov criticizes the proposal to reduce staking rewards to 0% if the staked ETH share exceeds 50% of the total supply. He states this would make staking returns unpredictable and unprofitable for many participants.

QAccording to Kulechov, how might the proposal affect institutional investors and their strategies?

AKulechov claims institutional investors value predictable cash flows. If yields become uncertain, they may turn to alternative blockchain networks offering more stable returns, creating significant adoption costs for Ethereum.

QWhat impact does Kulechov predict for Ethereum-based lending and yield markets if the proposal is implemented?

AHe predicts that lending and yield-generation strategies using ETH would become largely ineffective. The main use for borrowing ETH might be limited to short selling, and investors could move to stablecoins or other yield-bearing assets, shrinking Ethereum's lending markets.

QWhat is Kulechov's overall assessment of the proposal's long-term effect on ETH as an asset?

AKulechov's personal assessment is that the proposal would weaken the viability of ETH as an asset and limit its long-term potential. He hopes it won't be adopted, warning that otherwise, many market participants may shift their focus to other blockchain networks.

Related Reads

Supporters of Bitcoin BIP-110 Update Have Prepared a 'Last Resort' Plan If the Proposal Is Not Adopted: It Could Radically Change BTC's Value

Supporters of the BIP-110 update for Bitcoin have prepared a contingency plan in case the proposal is not adopted, a move that could radically alter BTC's value. Developer Chris Guida has adapted a proof-of-work code originally created by Luke Dashjr in 2017 for the current version of Bitcoin Knots. This adaptation is described as a last-resort measure to be activated if miners do not signal readiness for BIP-110. The proposal itself is a soft fork aimed at temporarily limiting the storage of arbitrary data in Bitcoin transactions. It introduces stricter limits on new transaction outputs, OP_RETURN fields, and witness data, with rules designed to expire after approximately one year. Guida stated this option needs to remain open if miners were to "conspire to betray Bitcoin." Should the contingency code be used, it could change Bitcoin's current mining algorithm. This change would likely prevent existing ASIC miners from generating blocks on the new chain, leading to a large-scale reorganization of the Bitcoin mining network. Luke Dashjr, another Bitcoin Knots developer, contributed to the code and expressed hope it would not be needed, but sees its existence as useful for a potential crisis. A supporter known as Mechanic argued that the mere possibility of a proof-of-work change could act as a deterrent, emphasizing that Bitcoin's rules should be set by participants and node operators, not miners. While miner signals are tracked for BIP-110 activation, data from the proposal's official tracking page indicates support remains limited.

cryptonews.ru28m ago

Supporters of Bitcoin BIP-110 Update Have Prepared a 'Last Resort' Plan If the Proposal Is Not Adopted: It Could Radically Change BTC's Value

cryptonews.ru28m ago

Why Did Bitcoin's Price Remain Stable and Not Fall Despite the Recent Major Hack? Here's the Secret

The article discusses why Bitcoin's price remained stable despite a recent $100 million hack targeting individual cold wallets, citing insights from experts on "The Wolf of All Streets" channel. Analysts attribute this resilience to significant institutional shifts in the crypto market. Key points include: 1. **Market Maturation:** The crypto market has transitioned from being dominated by individual retail holders to institutional investors. Most new capital now enters via regulated channels like spot ETFs and custodial services (e.g., Coinbase, Anchorage), making vulnerabilities in individual cold wallets less impactful. 2. **Institutional Dominance:** Control over price dynamics has shifted from miners and crypto exchanges to Wall Street and institutional capital. These large players operate with long-term strategies, viewing price corrections as buying opportunities rather than reasons for panic. 3. **Increased Resilience:** Institutional involvement has reduced market sensitivity to negative news. Sellers are largely exhausted, and remaining holders are steadfast. Major financial institutions (e.g., Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo) are incorporating crypto assets into portfolios, with research teams recommending allocations of 1–6% to Bitcoin. 4. **Risk Perception:** Bitcoin's integration into traditional financial indices has lowered perceived risk among professionals and institutions, further stabilizing its price against isolated security breaches.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Why Did Bitcoin's Price Remain Stable and Not Fall Despite the Recent Major Hack? Here's the Secret

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片