MoonPay's Latest Integration Enables AI Agents to Handle Crypto Lending on Solana

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-28Last updated on 2026-08-28

Abstract

The latest integration of MoonPay enables AI agents to process cryptocurrency lending on Solana through the Kamino platform, which has a total value locked of about $1.3 billion and active loans of $1 billion. This integration allows users to delegate tasks to an AI tool, such as supplying Kamino tokens to earn yield or borrowing the USD-pegged stablecoin USDC against collateral deposited on the platform. However, it does not create a new lending product; instead, it replaces Kamino’s standard interface with natural-language instructions for AI interaction. Users can require password confirmation for each transaction or permit the AI to operate autonomously within set limits. To date, agentic crypto usage has primarily focused on small, high-frequency payments for data, computing power, and online tools, with Coinbase’s x402 processing around $50 million across 165 million payments. This development expands into managing user funds, where an instruction could create a leveraged position requiring ongoing monitoring. As an emerging technology, AI remains prone to execution errors that could prove costly when handling finances. While the integration lets users manage positions via conversation with the software, risks persist—if collateral value drops sufficiently, a position could hit Kamino’s liquidation threshold, allowing liquidators to repay the debt and seize part of the collateral. In July, MoonPay launched PayBox with features for payments, token swaps, bridges, and y...

According to DefiLlama, Kamino has a total locked value of approximately $1.3 billion, with active loans amounting to $1 billion. The integration allows users to instruct an artificial intelligence tool to supply Kamino tokens for yield generation or borrow the dollar-pegged stablecoin USDC against collateral provided to the platform.

However, this does not create a new credit product. Instead, it replaces Kamino's standard interface with natural language instructions for use with AI. Users can require password confirmation for each transaction or allow the AI to act autonomously within set limits.

The use of agent-based cryptocurrency has so far focused on small, high-frequency payments for data, computing power, and online tools, with Coinbase's x402 designed having processed about $50 million across $165 million in payments. This development enables the management of user funds, where an instruction can create a leveraged position requiring continuous monitoring.

AI is an emerging technology still prone to execution errors, which can be costly when handling cash. Although the integration allows users to manage their positions by communicating with the software, risks persist. If the collateral value drops significantly enough, a position may cross Kamino's liquidation threshold, allowing liquidators to repay the debt and seize a portion of the collateral.

In July, MoonPay introduced PayBox with payments, token swaps, bridges, and yield access via Aave. Kamino is an extension of Solana's major lending platform, not PayBox's first step into decentralized finance, as agent-based payment tools expand into capital allocation and lending.

The integration is not available in the U.S., the U.K., the European Union, and Australia, and access may depend on the asset and jurisdiction.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary function of the new AI agent integration with MoonPay mentioned in the article?

AThe integration allows AI agents to handle cryptocurrency lending on the Solana blockchain, specifically enabling them to deposit Kamino tokens for yield or borrow USDC against collateral provided to the Kamino platform.

QHow does this AI integration differ from creating a new lending product, according to the text?

AIt does not create a new lending product. Instead, it replaces Kamino's standard user interface with natural language instructions for interaction via AI.

QWhat are some of the potential risks associated with using this AI agent for managing crypto loans?

ARisks include potential costly execution errors from the AI, and the risk of liquidation if the collateral value drops below Kamino's threshold, allowing liquidators to repay the debt and seize part of the collateral.

QWhat precedent for AI agent crypto payments does the article mention, and what was the scale of that activity?

AThe article mentions the Coinbase x402 agent, which has facilitated approximately $50 million across 165 million payments, primarily focused on small, high-frequency payments for data, compute power, and online tools.

QWhich major regions or countries are explicitly excluded from accessing this new integration?

AThe integration is not available in the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Australia, with access potentially depending on the specific asset and jurisdiction.

Related Reads

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

In his first Jackson Hole speech, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled a significant shift in monetary policy communication. He declared that "forward guidance," a tool heavily used since the financial crisis, has outlived its usefulness in normal times and should be retired. He cautioned that over-reliance on it can distort market signals and constrain the Fed's flexibility. Instead, Warsh emphasized a return to data-dependence and decision-making discipline. Warsh outlined seven key principles to guide policy: anchoring the 2% inflation target, pursuing the employment mandate, using short-term rates as the primary tool, acknowledging the importance of money, and maintaining purposeful, restrained communication. He stressed that policy should focus on trends, not single data points. On the current economic outlook, Warsh noted that the labor market is consistent with full employment but inflation remains "far above" the Fed's target. He highlighted that over half of the PCE basket's components are still rising above 3% annually. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential for productivity and capital allocation, he admitted its full economic impact remains uncertain and is not a factor in current policy decisions. His core message was a commitment to policy discipline rather than pre-set decisions. Warsh stated the Fed's primary focus must be on restoring price stability, vowing, "We still have work to do," until there is clear evidence inflation is moving decisively toward 2%. He concluded by framing effective monetary policy as crucial for economic prosperity and U.S. global leadership.

Odaily星球日报13m ago

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

Odaily星球日报13m ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

Blockstream, a major Bitcoin solutions developer, has introduced a draft proposal for a new quantum-resistant digital signature scheme called SHRINCS. The scheme aims to protect Bitcoin transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers while aiming to maintain network throughput. This marks the second technical proposal for Bitcoin quantum defense in recent days, following a similar initiative from StarkWare. A quantum attack on blockchain typically involves deriving a private key from a public one. Currently considered computationally infeasible, quantum algorithms could potentially solve this problem far more efficiently. This threat presents two primary scenarios: an attacker could target addresses where the public key is already exposed, or intercept a transaction before it is confirmed, extract the public key, derive the private key, and replace the transaction. Blockstream's SHRINCS is designed to counter the latter, "in-flight" attack scenario. The SHRINCS signature is built upon the SHA-256 hash function, the same one already used in Bitcoin mining, allowing developers to leverage well-tested, familiar mechanisms. A key design goal was to preserve network capacity. Blockstream estimates Bitcoin could process about three transactions per second using SHRINCS, compared to the current rate of roughly seven, noting that some alternative quantum-resistant schemes could reduce throughput to as low as 0.36 transactions per second. Currently, the security proof for SHRINCS is pending, and the software has not been audited or deemed ready for production. However, Blockstream conducted tests with such transactions on its Liquid sidechain in March. Over the past year, Bitcoin developers have been actively exploring paths to migrate to post-quantum cryptography, a priority across the broader crypto market, underscored by significant investments into securing the leading cryptocurrency.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

When autonomous AI agents behave unpredictably and cause harm, determining legal liability is complex. Currently, there is no specific federal AI agent liability law, so existing legal frameworks are applied. The AI agent itself cannot be held liable, as it is not a legal entity. Liability typically falls on the "developer" (the maker of the AI) or the "deployer" (the user), depending on the facts and circumstances. A negligence analysis under standard tort law may apply. For instance, if a deployer gives a reckless instruction, such as demanding quick money without safety parameters, they could face significant liability, including potential criminal charges under statutes like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The situation is complicated by open-source models, where licenses often disclaim liability, and by the unclear division of responsibility between developers and deployers. An analogy is drawn to self-driving car accidents, where both the manufacturer and the human operator can share fault. In cases of severe harm, such as using AI to create bioweapons, liability for developers depends on jurisdiction; the EU's AI Act imposes responsibilities, while U.S. law offers less clear grounds, similar to platforms being shielded for user-generated content under Section 230. Even if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is achieved, the expert argues against making AGI itself a legally liable entity, as it lacks personhood, assets, or a meaningful way to provide remedy for harm. Instead, accountability should rest with the responsible human or corporate entities behind the technology.

cointelegraph1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

cointelegraph1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片