UK Bitcoin Company Discovers: Repurchasing Own Stock Earns 24% More Than Directly Buying Bitcoin

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-21Last updated on 2026-07-21

Abstract

British bitcoin holding company B HODL discovered that, when its share price trades below the value of its bitcoin holdings, repurchasing its own stock can be a more efficient way to increase bitcoin exposure per share than directly buying more bitcoin. In its first week of buybacks, the company spent approximately £37,985 to cancel 823,400 shares. Before fees, this resulted in a 24% greater increase in satoshis (the smallest unit of bitcoin) per share per pound spent, compared to using the same cash to purchase bitcoin directly. The analysis highlights a capital allocation strategy for treasury companies trading at a discount to their net asset value (NAV): issuing shares when it increases bitcoin per share, and buying them back when the stock itself offers cheaper bitcoin exposure. The decision, however, depends on factors like cash reserves and operational needs.

Author:CryptoSlate

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: When a Bitcoin treasury company's stock price falls below the value of the Bitcoin it holds, the cheapest way to increase Bitcoin exposure per share may not be buying Bitcoin, but rather repurchasing its own stock. UK-listed company B HODL tested this paradox with real money, and the results were surprising—what does this mean for the entire Bitcoin treasury industry?

When a Bitcoin treasury company trades below the value of the Bitcoin it holds, the cheapest way to increase Bitcoin exposure per share might be repurchasing its own stock.

UK-listed company B HODL tested this inversion phenomenon during the first week of its repurchase. The company spent approximately £37,985 (pre-fees) to cancel 823,400 shares, generating an increase in total satoshis per pound per share that was about 24% higher than using the same cash to buy Bitcoin.

This 24% advantage is pre-fee data, and these figures do not show the full picture of net asset value (NAV) growth per share.

B HODL's official dashboard on July 19th showed holdings of 166.487 BTC, a share price of 5.25 pence, and a market capitalization of £7.385 million. Based on the displayed Bitcoin price of £48,237, these holdings were worth approximately £8.031 million, leaving a gap of about £646,000.

Using the latest announced post-cancellation share count and the same share price, the equity value is approximately £7.378 million, about £652,000 or 8.1% lower than the Bitcoin value. Both sides of the comparison are in constant flux.

Why Buying Stock Beats Buying Bitcoin

B HODL's £100,000 share repurchase authorization became effective on July 9th. Disclosures covering purchases on July 9th, 10th, 13th, 15th, and 16th show a total of 823,400 shares, with a calculated weighted average price of 4.613 pence. Pre-fees, these purchases used about 38% of the authorized amount.

Following the announced cancellations, the share count decreased from 141,366,091 to 140,542,691 shares. Keeping the 166.487 BTC unchanged, the total Bitcoin per share increased from 117.77 satoshis to 118.46 satoshis, a gain of 0.69 satoshis or 0.59%.

At the same Bitcoin price of £48,237, £37,985 could purchase approximately 0.787 BTC. Spreading this purchase across the original share count would increase the total satoshis per share by about 0.557, while the buyback delivered an increase of 0.690. Under these matching assumptions, canceling equity increased value per pound spent by about 24%.

Why B HODL Can Buy and Sell Its Own Shares

B HODL is keeping its At-The-Market (ATM) program open while conducting the buyback. Its ATM only allows issuing shares when it is accretive based on the company's modified Net Asset Value (mNAV) framework for Bitcoin.

These instruments together create a capital allocation switch: issue equity when it can increase Bitcoin per share, then repurchase equity when the stock itself offers cheaper Bitcoin exposure.

The company's latest interim balance sheet is historical data, so the first week demonstrates growth in total satoshis per share under stated assumptions, not current NAV per share growth.

For other Bitcoin treasury companies trading below their Bitcoin value per share, this insight is conditional but clear.

Whether this is the correct move still depends on cash reserves, debt, trading liquidity, and operational needs—a discipline increasingly shaping the broader treasury industry.

Trending Cryptos

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

Manufacturing's Share Drops Below 25%: Is Hangzhou Unconcerned?

Hangzhou is entering a critical phase of industrial restructuring. While its manufacturing-to-GDP ratio has fallen below 25%, the city is not alarmed. Instead, it is strategically navigating a dual focus: advancing advanced manufacturing and expanding its service sector, particularly producer services. Recently, the city celebrated the IPO of a humanoid robotics company, seen as a milestone in moving beyond its e-commerce era. Simultaneously, it set an ambitious target for its service sector: to exceed 2 trillion yuan in value by 2030, with producer services making up over 60%. Data shows a clear trend: the service sector's share of GDP has risen to 75.3%, while manufacturing's share has declined to around 20.1%. This shift revives the debate on whether a strong service sector weakens a city's manufacturing "foundation." Hangzhou's approach challenges the notion of a fixed manufacturing "red line" near 25%. The city argues that the quality and integration of industries matter more than simple ratios. Its strategy is "using software to drive hardware," leveraging its core strengths in digital economy and producer services—like R&D, software, and supply chain management—to empower and add value to manufacturing. This is embodied by its emerging "AI era" companies, whose innovation in Hangzhou feeds into national industrial chains. The city believes that for a hub like Hangzhou, the key is not merely boosting visible manufacturing output, but strengthening the "invisible" competitive edge provided by high-end producer services, which ultimately determine manufacturing profitability. National policy is also shifting from insisting on a "stable" manufacturing share to acknowledging a "reasonable" range, allowing for quality-focused development. Hangzhou's future industrial blueprint aims for a manufacturing share above 22% of GDP by 2027, coupled with a dominant, high-value service sector. The goal is not to choose between manufacturing and services, but to deeply integrate them, using advanced services as the accelerator for next-generation manufacturing.

marsbit25m ago

Manufacturing's Share Drops Below 25%: Is Hangzhou Unconcerned?

marsbit25m ago

SEC Suddenly Proposes "Regulation Crypto": U.S. Token Fundraising May Become Legal Again

On August 18, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed a landmark set of permanent rules, "Regulation Crypto Assets," specifically designed for crypto asset investment contracts. The 402-page proposal introduces two registration exemption paths and a groundbreaking safe harbor mechanism, representing the SEC's first dedicated crypto-specific regulatory framework. Two exemption tiers are proposed: a "Startup Exemption" allowing a one-time raise of up to $5 million within four years with basic disclosure requirements, and a "Financing Exemption" permitting raises of up to $75 million every 12 months with stricter obligations, including financial statements and ongoing reporting. Both paths require "principles-based narrative disclosure," a flexible approach distinct from traditional IPO forms. The most transformative element is the investment contract safe harbor. It provides a legal path for tokens to "graduate" from being classified as securities. If an issuer completes or permanently ceases its "essential managerial efforts" as promised in the investment contract and meets specific conditions, it can file with the SEC to have the token exit the securities framework. This creates a novel legal lifecycle where a token can begin as a regulated security for fundraising and later become a non-security asset as the network decentralizes. This move is seen as the SEC pragmatically filling a legislative vacuum, as the stalled CLARITY Act in Congress faces significant delays. The proposal aims to offer a compliant pathway for token offerings within the U.S., countering the trend of projects moving overseas. While currently a proposal open for a 60-day public comment period, it signals a major potential shift from an enforcement-heavy approach toward establishing clearer rules for the crypto industry.

marsbit29m ago

SEC Suddenly Proposes "Regulation Crypto": U.S. Token Fundraising May Become Legal Again

marsbit29m ago

Late Qing County Magistrates' 'Official Debt' and the Crypto World's 'Exchange Listings': The Cross-Temporal Truth of Financializing Power

This article draws parallels between financialization of power in late Qing Dynasty China and the modern cryptocurrency industry. It opens with a staggering contemporary corruption case involving billions, illustrating how official positions control massive cash flows, akin to toll booths. The core analysis focuses on Du Fengzhi, a late Qing county magistrate. His 22-year journey from passing the provincial exam to finally obtaining a post highlights how bureaucratic "qualification" (like a VC investment) doesn't guarantee immediate benefit. Crucially, upon receiving his appointment, Du had to borrow heavily—"official debt"—to cover travel and networking costs to actually assume his position. Lenders, seeing his future post as a revenue-generating asset, offered loans with exorbitant effective interest rates (e.g., borrowing 4000 taels but receiving only 2000), effectively discounting and financializing his future power. Once in office, Du faced immense pressure from both public tax quotas and his crippling private debt. His diaries reveal aggressive, sometimes extreme, tax collection methods (sealing ancestral temples, pressuring local gentry) to meet these demands. The article argues this created a system where public duty and private financial survival became indistinguishable, with corruption evolving from operational necessity to normalized practice. The piece consistently analogizes this to crypto: VC funding as mere "qualification," the costly "listing" process on exchanges, the role of market makers and KOLs as intermediaries akin to local gentry, and the relentless pressure on funded projects to deliver returns—often leading to perpetual pivots, artificial metrics, and ultimately, the extraction of value from retail liquidity. Both systems, it concludes, are driven by the financialization of future potential, trapping individuals in cycles of debt and obligation with limited alternatives for upward mobility.

marsbit36m ago

Late Qing County Magistrates' 'Official Debt' and the Crypto World's 'Exchange Listings': The Cross-Temporal Truth of Financializing Power

marsbit36m ago

U.S. Stock Market Trends (August 19th): AI Hardware Rally Loosens, Long-Term Bond Yields Challenge Tech Valuations

U.S. stocks weakened further on Tuesday, with major indices hitting two-week lows for a third consecutive session. Pressure centered on the AI hardware sector, as the previously rebounding Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell sharply. Meanwhile, persistently high long-term Treasury yields and rising oil prices fueled by Middle East tensions prompted a cautious reassessment of high-valuation tech assets. Key closing data: The S&P 500 fell 0.69%, the Dow Jones dropped 0.22%, and the Nasdaq declined 1.33%. The 10-year Treasury yield hovered near 4.70%, while the 30-year yield briefly touched a new high since 2007 before settling around 5.28%. WTI crude rose to $84.94. The chip sector led the decline, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropping about 5%. Losses spread across memory, optical communication, and AI infrastructure stocks. This shift indicates investor focus is moving from chasing AI demand momentum to evaluating valuations and earnings timing. The "Magnificent Seven" stocks showed mixed performance, with pressure more concentrated on AI hardware than software giants. The market is observing whether capital will rotate back to large-cap tech, sustaining the internal AI sector rotation, or if the broader AI trade is entering a cooling phase. Chinese stocks were mostly weaker, with the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index down about 1%. Baidu's stock fell sharply post-earnings due to profit pressure from AI investments, while Alibaba gained. Persistently high long-term bond yields and rising oil prices are re-emerging as key anchors for U.S. stock pricing, constraining valuation multiples for AI-related companies. Corporate events, including earnings from Home Depot and AI financing news like Anthropic's reported credit line expansion, continue to highlight cost and capital expenditure pressures. Focus for the coming sessions: 1) Whether the 30-year Treasury yield stabilizes below 5.30%, and 2) The market's ability to absorb the chip sector sell-off, determining if it's a pre-earnings consolidation or the start of a broader AI hardware cool-down.

marsbit40m ago

U.S. Stock Market Trends (August 19th): AI Hardware Rally Loosens, Long-Term Bond Yields Challenge Tech Valuations

marsbit40m ago

Galaxy Research: Crypto Lending Contracts for Third Consecutive Quarter, Market Undergoing Orderly Deleveraging

**Galaxy Research Report: Crypto Lending Market Sees Orderly Deleveraging for Third Consecutive Quarter** The crypto asset-backed lending market contracted for a third consecutive quarter in Q2 2026, shrinking by $11.33B (-16.78%) to a total of $56.16B. This represents a 40.13% decline from the Q3 2025 peak. The process is marked by a controlled, "stair-step" decline rather than the sharp, cascading collapses seen in 2022, suggesting a healthier, more orderly deleveraging driven by market retrenchment rather than forced liquidations. Key findings include: * **CeFi vs. DeFi:** Centralized Finance (CeFi) lending ($22.98B) surpassed Decentralized Finance (DeFi) lending ($20.43B) for the first time since Q3 2023, as DeFi loan volumes fell 27.61% quarter-over-quarter. * **Market Leaders:** Tether remains the dominant CeFi lender, holding 58.54% market share. CeFi's top three players (Tether, Maple, Nexo) control nearly 75% of that segment. * **Corporate Debt:** Debt used by companies for digital asset treasury strategies declined by $1.5B to $16.1B, mainly due to a debt buyback by MicroStrategy. * **Rates & Leverage:** Stablecoin borrowing costs edged higher. Analysis of Aave V3 shows e-mode loans, primarily used for leveraged Ethereum staking strategies, carry significantly higher risk (debt-weighted avg. Health Factor ~1.06) compared to standard loans. * **Futures:** Aggregate futures open interest (OI) was relatively stable, down only 3.08% to $103.2B at quarter-end, though it has since rebounded. BTC and ETH futures OI together comprised 65% of the total. In conclusion, the crypto market continues to shed leverage in a measured manner. If this trend persists, the market may avoid the type of disorderly, cascading failures seen in the last cycle, even if lending activity continues to contract.

marsbit1h ago

Galaxy Research: Crypto Lending Contracts for Third Consecutive Quarter, Market Undergoing Orderly Deleveraging

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

Meet ZetaChain: The Universal L1 for Apps That Work Everywhere — Even on Bitcoin

ZetaChain is the first ever Universal Blockchain to enable native connection across all blockchain ecosystems.

49.2k Total ViewsPublished 2025.06.16Updated 2025.06.16

Meet ZetaChain: The Universal L1 for Apps That Work Everywhere — Even on Bitcoin

Fractal Bitcoin: Scaling Bitcoin as a Recursive System

Fractal Bitcoin is a Layer-1 scalability solution built on the Bitcoin core code, enabling infinite scalability through a recursive approach.

48.7k Total ViewsPublished 2025.06.30Updated 2025.06.30

Fractal Bitcoin: Scaling Bitcoin as a Recursive System

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.