Top five crypto winners (and losers) of 2022

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-12-27Last updated on 2022-12-27

Abstract

Bitcoin and Ethereum are not part of the surprising list of five best and worst-performing cryptocurrencies for 2022.

Cointelegraph looks back on the best and worst-performing cryptocurrencies of 2022 among the top 100 assets by market capitalization. We used the highest and the lowest year-to-date (YTD) returns through the close of Dec. 25, 2022.

⠀

Overall, Cryptoindex.com 100 (CIX100), an index that tracks the 100 best-performing cryptocurrencies, fell nearly 68% YTD, suggesting most top coins underperformed in 2022.

⠀

CIX100 weekly price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

Stablecoins are naturally omitted from the list below. Similarly, coins tracking the value of gold and similar mainstream assets have also been ignored.

⠀

Instead, the coins mentioned below include decentralized currencies, smart contract tokens, exchange tokens and others.

⠀

Top five crypto of 2022

⠀

1. GMX (GMX)

⠀

YTD return: 111%

⠀

Sector: Decentralized exchange

⠀

Market Cap: $379.4 million

⠀

GMX acts as a utility and a governance token within the GMX decentralized exchange (DEX) ecosystem and is the best-performing digital asset among the top 100 coins (excluding stablecoins).

⠀

GMX’s price uptrend mostly picked its cues from the collapse of FTX, a centralized exchange, and its listing on popular trading platforms — including Binance and Huobi Global — across 2022. In addition, the token rallied impressively in late November after its platform briefly surpassed its top DEX rival, Uniwap, in daily trading fees.

⠀

GMX price performance YTD. Source: CoinMarketCap

⠀

2. Trust Wallet Token (TWT)

⠀

YTD return: 92%

⠀

Sector: Payment platform

⠀

Market Cap: $570 million

⠀

Trust Wallet Token (TWT) serves as a utility and a governance token within the Trust Wallet ecosystem. The token moved lower in tandem with the rest of the crypto market, mostly in 2022, but like GMX, its upside momentum increased amid the collapse of the FTX exchange in November.

⠀

TWT/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

As Cointelegraph reported, the FTX’s collapse boosted mistrust for centralized exchanges, which may have prompted investors to move their funds to self-custody wallets like Trust Wallet. The speculation could have played a major role in boosting TWT’s valuation.

⠀

3. Unus Sed Leo (LEO)

⠀

YTD return: -3.5%

⠀

Sector: Centralized exchange

⠀

Market Cap: $3.44 billion

⠀

Unus Sed Leo (LEO) is native to the iFinex ecosystem. The token suffered losses in 2022, but at -3.5%, they were little compared to most top coins, including Bitcoin and Ether, which lost over 65% in the same period.

⠀

LEO/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

One of the reasons why LEO outperformed most top-ranking assets could be iFinex’s pledge. Notably, the firm declared at the time of LEO’s private sale in 2018 that it would employ 27% of its revenue to buy back the tokens until the entire supply of 985.24 million units was removed from circulation.

⠀

IFinex also said it would use the funds it lost during the August 2016 Bitfinex hack to purchase LEO tokens. That explains why LEO rallied by more than 100% at the start of the year, given the uptrend came after the United States Department of Justice recovered 94,000 BTC from Bitfinex hackers.

⠀

The rally took LEO’s price to a YTD high of $8.15 in February. However, the token has dropped 55% since, though still remaining one of the best performers in 2022.

⠀

⠀

4. OKB (OKB)

⠀

YTD return: -19%

⠀

Sector: Centralized exchange

⠀

Market Cap: $1.38 billion

⠀

OKB is the native token of the OKX exchange. It provides users discounts on trading fees, access to OKX's initial exchange offering (IEO) platform, and voting rights for tokens to be listed on the exchange.

⠀

OKB trended synchronously with the broader crypto market in 2022, including its 150% recovery after bottoming out at around $9.50 in June. The token’s bullish retracement occurred despite the absence of a major market-moving event, suggesting it had been mostly speculative.

⠀

OKB/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

Overall, OKB’s volatile recovery helped it limit its YTD losses compared to most top-ranking assets.

⠀

5. The Open Network (TON)

⠀

YTD return: -33.5%

⠀

Sector: Smart contracts

⠀

Market Cap: $3.52 billion

⠀

The Open Network is a layer-1 blockchain ecosystem developed by the Telegram founders Nikolai Durov and Pavel Durov. Its native token, TON, trended downward in line with other top crypto assets during most of 2022 but recovered impressively ahead of the year’s close.

⠀

TON/USD price performance YTD. Source: CoinMarketCap

⠀

TON’s recovery period coincided with back-to-back optimistic news. For instance, in October, Telegram announced that it would employ the Open Network to auction usernames. Similarly, the Open Network built a bot the next month that allows Telegrams users to trade cryptocurrencies in-app.

⠀

Nonetheless, TON failed to recoup all of its losses, still down 33.5% YTD at $2.36.

⠀

Worst five cryptos of 2022

⠀

1. Terra (LUNA)

⠀

YTD performance: -99.99%

⠀

Sector: Smart contracts

⠀

Market Cap: $604 million

⠀

Terra became a debacle for the cryptocurrency sector after its market valuation crashed by 99.99% in May. The unraveling started with the implosion of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD (UST), marking one of the biggest busts in the crypto industry’s history.

⠀

LUNA/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

Terra’s implosion prompted its founder Do Kwon to suggest a fork to revive the project. Eventually, Terra underwent a chain split, with the old chain existing as Terra Classic and the new chain as Terra 2.0.

⠀

Luna Classic (LUNC) jumped nearly 100% after its launch in late May 2022 while LUNA (LUNA2) dropped around 40% in the same period.

⠀

2. FTX Token (FTT)

⠀

YTD performance: -98%

⠀

Sector: Centralized exchange

⠀

Market Cap: $307 million

⠀

FTX Token served as a native token to FTX, which collapsed after facing a liquidity crisis in November.

⠀

FTT/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

The token continues to trade across several exchanges but accompanies poor liquidity and volume. It is technically “dead” given the defunct status of FTX.

⠀

3. Solana (SOL)

⠀

YTD performance: -93.35%

⠀

Sector: Smart contracts

⠀

Market Cap: $4.11 billion

⠀

Solana, a layer-1 blockchain protocol, crashed 93.35% YTD due to a sequence of bad news all across 2022. That includes six network outages in the year, a $200 million hack on a Solana-based wallet and Solana’s association with FTX.

⠀

SOL/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

More bad coverage appeared in the form of accusations that Solana is not as decentralized as it claims to be, resulting in SOL being one of the worst-performers of 2022.

⠀

4. Axie Infinity (AXS)

⠀

YTD performance: -93%

⠀

Sector: Gaming/metaverse

⠀

Market Cap: $775 million

⠀

Axie Infinity Shard serves primarily as the governance token for Axie Infinity, a play-to-earn (P2E) gaming ecosystem. It also acts as a legal tender in the Axie Infinity marketplace, where in-game nonfungible tokens (NFT) can be purchased.

⠀

The AXS market has consistently trended lower in 2022 due to underwhelming players turnout (which lowers the demand for tokens), a $650 million hack concerning Axie Infinity’s blockchain Ronin in late March and fears surrounding the unlocking of 8% of supply in October.

⠀

AXS/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

AXS is down approximately 93% YTD, becoming one of the worst-performing assets in the current bear market.

⠀

5. The Sandbox (SAND)

⠀

YTD performance: -92.50%

⠀

Sector: Gaming/metaverse

⠀

Market Cap: $690 million

⠀

Like Axie Infinity, The Sandbox is a virtual platform where users can create, own and monetize their gaming skills using NFTs and The Sandbox, the platform’s utility token. But, despite initial success, the platform now has less than 500 unique users, according to data from DappRadar.

⠀

The lower turnout has affected SAND’s demand across spot exchanges, which, in turn, has pushed its price down 93.50% YTD, as shown below. Other factors behind the declining interest include a general lack of demand for riskier assets in a higher interest rate environment.

⠀

SAND/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

⠀

Other tokens that fell more than 90% YTD are Fantom, Avalanche, Algorand, Decentraland, BitTorrent (BTT) and others.

Related Reads

Raised $1.3 Billion in Seven Weeks, Yet SpaceX's Weighting Halved: The Dilution Trap of the NASA ETF

A new ETF named NASA, launched just seven weeks ago, has rapidly become the world's largest space-themed fund, amassing $1.3 billion in assets. Its primary draw is its unique position as a "pure" space ETF holding SpaceX stock through a special purpose vehicle (SPV). However, its exposure to SpaceX has been drastically diluted from 10.3% to 4.6% due to a massive, rapid inflow of investor cash. New money is forced into buying other public space stocks like Rocket Lab, meaning investors seeking SpaceX exposure end up with a portfolio of other companies. Further complications arise from the SPV's valuation mechanism, which only updates during specific manager trades, potentially lagging behind SpaceX's market price. This SPV will also face a six-month lock-up post-IPO, preventing investors from selling that portion if SpaceX shares drop after listing. The article highlights a valuation bubble in the broader space sector, with stocks like Planet Labs surging nearly 1000% in a year, driven more by the "SpaceX IPO narrative" than underlying fundamentals. Meanwhile, SpaceX's own financials show significant losses in 2024, and its record-breaking IPO valuation bundles its space business with other Musk assets like xAI, creating a complex investment proposition. The core warning is that the NASA ETF essentially uses SpaceX as bait but delivers a different product. The real beneficiaries may be the ETF issuers collecting high fees, while investors face dilution and hidden risks ahead of SpaceX's historic IPO on June 12th.

marsbit10m ago

Raised $1.3 Billion in Seven Weeks, Yet SpaceX's Weighting Halved: The Dilution Trap of the NASA ETF

marsbit10m ago

NEAR Doubles: 3 Major Trends Become the 'Engine' for Token Price Surge

NEAR token price surged from around $1.24 in early May to over $2.5, with its market cap returning above $3 billion. This significant growth, occurring amidst broader market volatility, is attributed to three key factors. First, the AI narrative has been a major driver. NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a co-author of the seminal Transformer paper, the foundation of modern AI models like ChatGPT. NEAR has integrated AI capabilities into its ecosystem, notably through the Near.com super-app, positioning itself as a key decentralized AI infrastructure project. Endorsements from figures like Arthur Hayes further boosted market sentiment. Second, NEAR is enhancing its utility as a privacy-focused blockchain. With the launch of NEAR Intents for cross-chain transactions, privacy features like Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents have become critical to protect users from MEV attacks. These functionalities allow private transfers of assets like ETH and BTC across more than 35 chains, balancing privacy with usability and appealing to institutional and enterprise users. Third, a new tokenomics mechanism is providing buy-side pressure. Following the full unlocking of its initial supply in late 2025, NEAR now employs a fee-burn model. All protocol fees generated by the NEAR Intents layer are used to buy back and effectively remove NEAR tokens from circulation. With NEAR Intents TVL exceeding $80 million, this creates consistent monthly buybacks estimated around $3 million, reducing sell pressure. Additional technical upgrades planned for mid-2026, including dynamic re-sharding and post-quantum security, aim to further strengthen the network's scalability and robustness.

marsbit12m ago

NEAR Doubles: 3 Major Trends Become the 'Engine' for Token Price Surge

marsbit12m ago

After $HYPE Hits a New High, Is It Worth Considering the Stock of "HYPE Version MicroStrategy" $PURR?

**HYPE Hits New Highs: Is $PURR, the "HYPE Version of MicroStrategy," Worth Considering?** The stock of Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ: $PURR), a publicly-traded company that exclusively buys and holds the cryptocurrency HYPE, has gained over 100% year-to-date, mirroring HYPE's own 150% surge to new all-time highs. This has sparked discussions about PURR being a more "capital-efficient" play than MicroStrategy's bitcoin strategy, given its reported ~$1 billion unrealized gain on a ~$220 million investment. The article clarifies that PURR is essentially a pure-play wrapper for HYPE, with no other business. It resulted from a 2025 SPAC merger led by firms like Paradigm and Atlas Merchant Capital, bringing traditional finance veterans to its board. Its value is entirely derived from the price of HYPE. While PURR offers a crucial compliance bridge for US-based institutional and retirement accounts unable to access HYPE directly, the analysis questions the "capital efficiency" narrative. The outsized gains are attributed to HYPE's exceptional performance, not superior corporate strategy. For investors who can buy HYPE directly, holding PURR introduces unnecessary risks: potential shareholder dilution from future stock offerings, incomplete passthrough of staking rewards, market hour mismatches, and counterparty risk via its single custodian. A key metric is its mNAV (modified net asset value). Current calculations show PURR trades at a discount to its HYPE holdings, but this could flip to a premium depending on the execution of registered share issuances. The article concludes that PURR is primarily a "conduit product." The investment thesis hinges entirely on one's bullishness on HYPE itself, not on the PURR wrapper, which adds friction and risk for those with direct crypto access.

marsbit42m ago

After $HYPE Hits a New High, Is It Worth Considering the Stock of "HYPE Version MicroStrategy" $PURR?

marsbit42m ago

The Real Progress and Investment Opportunities of Decentralized AI Computing Power Networks in 2026

In 2026, the AI compute market is marked by centralized GPU consolidation and a significant GPU shortage for smaller players. In this context, Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN), valued at $9.4B+, have emerged as a viable, revenue-generating alternative. Leading protocols like Aethir ($150M ARR), io.net (130k+ GPUs), Akash, Bittensor, and Render are carving out distinct niches, moving beyond hype to deliver verifiable income primarily from non-crypto-native clients. The key advantage of decentralized GPU networks lies in serving latency-tolerant, cost-sensitive workloads like AI inference, fine-tuning, data preprocessing, and agent operations, offering substantial cost savings (45-80%) compared to major cloud providers. However, reliability variance, lack of robust SLAs, and fragmented tech stacks remain significant adoption hurdles. The sector is maturing with critical 2026 shifts: 1) Evolution of tokenomics towards demand-driven, revenue-linked models (e.g., Render's BME, io.net's IDE), and 2) Clearer enterprise adoption pathways, with traditional firms integrating decentralized compute. For new entrants, opportunities are now concentrated in specialized tooling layers (orchestration, verification, SLA management), vertical applications (e.g., bio-med, content generation), and innovative token designs tied to real usage, rather than generic GPU aggregation. The convergence with the emerging AI Agent economy presents a significant future growth vector.

marsbit43m ago

The Real Progress and Investment Opportunities of Decentralized AI Computing Power Networks in 2026

marsbit43m ago

The Iran Deal Is Not a Finale, But a 60-Day Political Respite

The reported "Iran deal" is not a comprehensive peace agreement, but a proposed 60-day memorandum of understanding. During this period, Iran would clear mines from the Strait of Hormuz, the US would lift its naval blockade, and Iran would receive a sanctions waiver to sell oil, with formal nuclear negotiations to follow. However, the core structural conflicts remain unresolved: Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium, ultimate control of the Strait, the sequence of sanctions relief versus nuclear concessions, and the potential for Israeli unilateral action to derail the process. The article highlights deeper geopolitical currents: China is indirectly shaping talks via Pakistan to restore Iranian oil flows and curb US dominance, while trade routes through Oman and the UAE create leaks in the US blockade. Parallel US diplomatic efforts aim to draw India into its security framework, though India remains cautious. Ultimately, the deal offers short-term political breathing room for both Washington and Tehran. The true test will come after the 60-day window, when the irreconcilable demands—US insistence on nuclear rollback versus Iran's determination to retain the Strait as a deterrent—will resurface, determining if this is a path to peace or merely a managed pause in the conflict.

marsbit53m ago

The Iran Deal Is Not a Finale, But a 60-Day Political Respite

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions