2022年底展望：下一次牛市什么时候来临？

BiteyePublished on 2022-12-27Last updated on 2022-12-27

Abstract

正如圈外人所描绘的那样，2022 是糟糕、混乱的一年。尽管如此不堪，却仍有一些应用和工具，在这场 2022 的风暴中顽强存活。而这些项目可能就是开启下一个牛市的关键。

正如圈外人所描绘的那样，2022 是糟糕、混乱的一年。尽管如此不堪，却仍有一些应用和工具，在这场 2022 的风暴中顽强存活。而这些项目可能就是开启下一个牛市的关键。

⠀

今天，就让我们一起来探索一下，究竟哪些项目能在下个牛市大放异彩！

⠀

我们已经看到稳定币崩溃，对冲基金和贷方倒闭，以及一级交易所爆炸。

⠀

没有糖衣，只有炮弹：2022 年对加密货币来说很糟糕。

⠀

然而，在混乱中，该行业仍在继续建设。而且，不管你信不信，我们都有很多理由继续保持乐观。

⠀

这在今天听起来可能像是幻想，但随着创新有增无减，另一场牛市即将（最终）到来。同时，还有很多很酷的东西正在建造中。

⠀

此外，由于今年最大的爆炸事件都是在中心化实体发生的，这让去中心化技术的价值主张从未如此清晰。

⠀

我仍然认为加密货币需要很长时间才能恢复，但这是我早期的想法，我认为可以催化新的加密货币牛市。

⠀

01、法币对冲工具：BTC

⠀

为了让加密货币在 2017 年和 2021 年经历另一场牛市，比特币和以太坊将再次引领潮流。

⠀

它们占加密货币总市值的 55% 左右，投资者可能对它们重新产生兴趣的原因有很多。

⠀

就比特币而言，围绕该资产的兴奋仍然源于它被用作对冲地缘政治风险和中央银行信誉下降的对冲工具。

⠀

世界面临着令人悲痛的地缘政治风险，例如乌克兰的持续战争、大国之间的紧张关系以及世界许多国家的政治两极分化和不稳定。

⠀

像美联储这样的中央银行的信誉一如既往地低，因为这些机构加剧了他们肆意印钞的错误，并且未能及时应对由此造成的猖獗的通货膨胀。

⠀

这种不确定性为 BTC 等资产的复兴奠定了基础，因为投资者可能会在这些动荡时期寻求非主权资产来储存他们的财富。

⠀

02、网络债券：ETH

⠀

以太币是另一种资产，同样作为法币替代者，它也越来越受到追捧。

⠀

ETH 不仅具有价值存储特性，它的发行率预计会随着区块空间需求的轻微上升而通货紧缩。而且在过渡到股权证明（PoS）后，它现在还为投资者提供了收益。

⠀

⠀

这种质押收益将帮助 ETH 对喜欢投资生产性资产的投资者们越来越有吸引力。

⠀

当然，它作为去信任抵押品和链上经济指数的作用仍然保持不变。如果非说有什么变化，那 2022 年的一连串加密灾难，甚至更进一步加强了它的这些属性。

⠀

03、DeFi 的复兴

⠀

2022 年将 CeFi 的不透明和脆弱性彻底暴露，这为 2023 年及以后的 DeFi 重大回归奠定了基础。

⠀

尽管中心化交易所、贷方和对冲基金破产了，但 DeFi 协议并没有死亡，而是继续按计划执行，停机时间几乎为零。

⠀

这些非托管、透明以及去中心化的金融轨道证明了它们是我们重建的坚实基础。在 CeFi 火爆的同时，DeFi 的众多激动人心的领域继续交付和开发创新产品。

⠀

一种是流动性质押，在上海升级后质押需求将飙升，许多新兴协议如 Rocket Pool、StakeWise、Frax ETH、Swell 和 Diva 都已准备好与 Lido 和 Coinbase 等现有协议竞争。

⠀

去中心化永续合约是另一个令人兴奋的领域，GMX、dYdX、Perpetual Protocol、Gains Network、Rage Trade、Cap Finance 等协议正努力在 2023 年继续其增长轨迹，因为在 FTX 崩盘后，将会有更多的交易活动进入链上。

⠀

04、非金融类应用程序

⠀

交易和投机目前可能是加密货币最大的用例，但还有许多非金融应用类别有望继续增长，例如去中心化社交媒体、音乐 NFT 和加密游戏。

⠀

去中心化社交媒体平台一直是这些熊市期间的增长点之一。

⠀

Lens 和 Farcaster 等平台的用户群一直在扩大，而最近 Twitter 的混乱更是证明了抗审查社交网络的优点，这些网络为用户提供了受众的所有权和可移植性。

⠀

05、音乐 NFT

⠀

音乐 NFT 其实也算是金融应用程序，但我仍将它们写在这里，因为像社交媒体一样，它们代表了另一个增长点。

⠀

音乐 NFT 已经开始成为艺术家变现的一种新方式。

⠀

艺术家，尤其是规模较小的艺术家，能够通过向少数粉丝出售 NFT 获得的收入远远超过他们在 Spotfiy 等平台上进行流媒体播放所获得的收入。在 Spotfiy 等平台上，中间商占据了所创造的绝大部分价值。

⠀

虽然社区和市场仍然是利基市场，但最近几个月，像 Sound 这样的音乐 NFT 平台在数量、用户和铸币量等关键 KPI 方面出现了强劲增长。

⠀

06、加密游戏

⠀

像 Axie Infinity 这样的游戏令人难以置信的崛起和随后的衰落很可能在很多人看来已经玷污了空间，但 GameFi 仍然是加密货币中另一个有令人难以置信发展前景的领域。

⠀

区块链和 NFT 游戏的结合具有诱人的潜力，在过去的一年中，有数亿的风险投资资金涌入该领域。

⠀

我承认，在过去的一年里，除了 OP Craft（我个人的最爱）和其他几款链上游戏之外，并没有很多令人兴奋的 GameFi 发布。

⠀

但考虑到流入该领域的知识和金融资本，我想加密货币游戏成为一个主要的爆发点，更多的是一个时间问题，而不是是否。

⠀

07、充满希望

⠀

2022年很糟糕，但在价格下跌和公司倒闭的情况下，下一次牛市的种子已经种下。

⠀

它可能看起来不像，但有足够的理由对未来持乐观态度并抱有希望。

⠀

这可能需要一些时间，但在BTC和ETH卷土重来，DeFi复活，以及Web3社交、音乐NFT和加密游戏的兴起之间，有大量的理由说明为什么加密牛市再次兴起是不可避免的。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

Gate Research Institute: Chart Pattern Analysis and Breakout Trading Strategies Chart patterns are crucial tools in technical analysis for observing market supply and demand shifts, trend continuations, and reversals. This analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of trend, volume, support/resistance, time cycles, and breakout validity, not just rote pattern recognition. Patterns are broadly categorized into reversal patterns (e.g., Double Tops/Bottoms, Head and Shoulders) and continuation patterns (e.g., Flags, Triangles, Rectangles). An effective breakout, key for trading, requires clear support/resistance, prolonged consolidation, a prevailing trend backdrop, and volume confirmation. However, breakouts are not guaranteed, as false breakouts are common. Risk must be managed through position sizing, stop-loss orders, pullback confirmations, and profit-taking in stages. Key pattern types discussed include: * **Rectangle Patterns:** Indicate market indecision within parallel support and resistance, with breakouts projecting a move equal to the pattern's width. * **Flag & Pennant Patterns:** Short-term continuation patterns following sharp price moves ("flagpoles"). * **Triangle Patterns:** Symmetrical, Ascending (bullish bias), and Descending (bearish bias) triangles, representing consolidation before a directional move. * **Head and Shoulders Patterns:** Major reversal patterns signaling trend exhaustion. The article details breakout trading strategies, defining valid breakouts by price closing beyond a key level with increased volume and minimal immediate re-entry into the prior range. It contrasts range trading with breakout trading and outlines entry methods (immediate entry, pullback entry, scaling in), stop-loss placement (based on pattern failure), and profit-taking techniques (target-based, structure-based, trend-following). It further classifies breakout outcomes: 1. **Valid Breakouts:** Strong, sustained moves in the breakout direction. 2. **Pullback Breakouts:** Price breaks out, retests the breakout level as support/resistance, then resumes the trend—offering a lower-risk entry. 3. **False Breakouts:** Price briefly breaches a level but quickly reverses back into the prior range, a common risk managed by strict stop-losses. Key validation tools for breakouts include volume analysis, the principle of support/resistance role reversal, and momentum indicators like ATR, Moving Averages, Bollinger Bands, and RSI. In conclusion, while chart patterns and breakout analysis provide a structured framework, their effectiveness relies on multiple confirming factors—trend context, volume, and proper risk management. They should be integrated into a broader trading system rather than used as standalone signals.

marsbit6m ago

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

marsbit6m ago

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

In a speech titled "The Industrialization of Trust," Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom (former BlackRock digital assets head) discussed the future transformation of global finance. Drawing from 20 years at BlackRock, where he led the launch of Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and tokenized funds, Chalom highlighted the immense hidden costs of establishing trust in traditional finance—estimated at over $9.3 trillion annually in the US alone due to fragmented systems, multi-day settlements, and countless reconciliations. He argued that Ethereum is emerging as the global financial "settlement layer for trust," with its robust, decentralized infrastructure securing over $300 billion in on-chain assets and most stablecoins and tokenized assets. The future, he stated, will be driven by three accelerating pillars: stablecoins (evolving beyond crypto gateways to become efficient cross-border payment rails), tokenized assets (enabling 24/7 trading and reshaping capital markets), and DeFi (providing automated, accessible financial services). A potential game-changer, Chalom added, is the fourth pillar: "Agentic Finance," where AI agents autonomously execute programmable financial transactions via smart contracts and stablecoins. He envisions individuals soon having AI-powered "CFOs in their pockets" to optimize idle capital and manage tokenized portfolios. This shift, facilitated by Ethereum's trustless settlement, could multiply on-chain transaction volume 1000x within a year, moving finance toward a seamless, digitized future.

marsbit6m ago

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

marsbit6m ago

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbit18m ago

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbit18m ago

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight News37m ago

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight News37m ago

Anthony Scaramucci Signals Bitcoin Bottom, Citing Low RSI And Retail Apathy

Anthony Scaramucci, citing low retail interest, depressed sentiment, and weak momentum indicators like RSI, suggests Bitcoin may be nearing a cycle bottom. He remains a significant holder and bullish long-term, anticipating a stronger rally could begin in late 2026 or early 2027. His contrarian thesis posits that current market apathy and thin participation create conditions where even modest new demand could significantly move the price. However, the analysis notes that while weekly RSI is low, it may not be at historic bear-market lows, requiring a nuanced view. Ultimately, Scaramucci's argument frames the present weakness as a potential accumulation phase before the next bullish cycle, pending a future catalyst like ETF flows or improved macro conditions.

bitcoinist45m ago

Anthony Scaramucci Signals Bitcoin Bottom, Citing Low RSI And Retail Apathy

bitcoinist45m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

386 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions